2 (2_gryphon) wrote,
2
2_gryphon

*Choke*

Ok, ok. Some people have made some good points in regards to my last post and far be it from me not to admit when I'm wrong. The diaper incident pissed me off, however, I don't want to give the wrong impression, (even though I didn't actually say the things some of you are assuming). So, for clarity, here we go...

I'm not planning on punching any babyfur I see in the future in the nose.

I *did* see the diaper myself. It's not a rumor.

My attitude is generally aimed at fecalphiles (as I mentioned), and not babyfurs. Fecalphiles most often associate themselves with babyfurs in the fandom. I'm pissed at them for being so purposely disgusting and I'm upset with babyfurs for not doing more to kick these weirdos in the nuts for it. But I honestly don't hate anyone just because of the group they claim themselves to be with... I hate people because of their actions. So to me, it doesn't matter what someone calls themselves, if they're throwing diapers around, I'm going to be pissed at them. I mentioned babyfurs because most people who throw diapers around ARE babyfurs and I'd like to see the babyfur community do more to discourage that... like a couple of soda cans in a pillow case. That would do it.

My last post wasn't worded the best it could have been, so I'm sorry for any miscommunication. As stated, my point was that if I see anyone smearing shit around (regardless of what group they're with), I'm going to be very pissed off.
Subscribe
Previous
← Ctrl ← Alt
Next
Ctrl → Alt →
Nicely said. Coraphelia squicks me to no end, and I'm glad to see you make the distinction.
It is kinda sick! Why anyone would WANT to wear nappies and poop in them is WAY past me. If i see any next year i will send you there way ;)
...but only once i have said "hello from england" to them! >:)

invaderluca

11 years ago

foxb

11 years ago

Deleted comment

Trust me 2, stuff like this is discouraged within the babyfur community. However, just as in furry in general, some babyfurs just don't give a darn.

I appreciate the clarification on the comments. I have quite a few people come up and tell me that I'm one of the few, if not the only, babyfur they would approach. The vast majority of us aren't as bad as the group is made out to be.
Actually, you're not the only approachable babyfur I know. There have been a couple of others I've talked with.

Deleted comment

I agree. And it shouldn't stop with babyfurs, but with all outwardly sexual fetishes. In public just isn't the place for that kind of thing, even if it is a furcon.
Well, this post should clear up a discussion we've been having in the FAOD forums.

We have lots of pretty discussions.

But shit in diapers being around people, and me, isn't very pretty.
No, 2, your last post was worded perfectly. I understood every word and clarification was not necessary. Nor was the retraction of your threat to beat someone senseless for such idiocy. I demand that you flog the next fecalphile in the balls with a shoehorn until he is chewing on them.
Not painful enough.

Stand his sorry ass right next to a ten-foot-tall subwoofer at 120 dB playing this (starting at 0:45).

andymack

11 years ago

raphaelfaunus

11 years ago

2_gryphon

11 years ago

I can't say much more then Rama already has, but yes, the community does what it can to curtail incidents like this.

Unfortunately, like any group, we can't be everywhere all at once.

You've met me, however briefly at cons, and I have always enjoyed your humor. You've gained a lot of respect in my book for being able to admit that your post was taken the wrong way.

If ever you have another disturbing experience with babyfurs at a con, bring it to the attention of myself, Rama, Swift_Fox, Fox_Cub, or any of the other babyfurs who are acting rationally. They will see that it's dealt with swiftly, and responsibly.
From what I've seen a lot of the bad press Furries get is from polyamorous whores, not the decent poly people like myself who use restraint and have partner consideration, and the skatfiles that lurk in the babyfurdom.

Of course, I'm less forgiving of these twerps than you might be. I've been into Daddy-dom for eight years of my life, and every so often I get one of these skatfile assholes sniffing around me wanting me to change their diapers because they're too damn lazy to go and take a shit like a normal person. We all have our fetishes, and yeah that's great if it works for you, but call yourself what you are. That's the problem here. They call themselves babyfurs when they are skatfiles, same as how a pediophile will lurk as a daddydom.

I can understand whole heartedly what the babyfurs problem is with being compared to them, I get accused of being a wife-beater, rapist, pediophile and other things just because I am into Daddy-dom. Sad thing is, anyone who looks at Daddy-dom realises real fucking fast it has nothing to do with age-play, incest, or beating. It's just another play of roles in a Master and slave relationship. I'm not going into it but for those who are curious you can read about it here.

I mean I know shit happens, but it better not while I have my hand down there fondling things!
there comes a time when asskicking is called for


Why dont you sane safe fetishists do more to clean out the garbage?

thrashbear

11 years ago

I still say it contradicts your rant "Bad Behavior."
Agreed.

2_gryphon

11 years ago

malcolmthebear

11 years ago

I know if it wasn't for the fact I'd still have to touch it in some way, if I saw one dumping a full ass-sack rather 'indiscreetly' I'd be way too tempted to treat 'em how teachers did us back in grade school with gum. Take the full shit-strainer and duct tape it to their face.
A fair cop. Man, I remember how PO'd I got at FC '04 for that shit. Literally. And if we catch someone like that, I'll hold him down while you get out the can of whoop-ass.
i don't know about other people, but it made perfect sense to me. *Shrugs* maybe it was a little unclear to some, but it seemed right to the point. and the thing is, i'd help you if i saw it.
My original post was clear to some, but there were a lot of people who were misunderstanding it, and with fairly good reason. I did make it sound like I wanted wholesale doom on babyfurs just for being babyfurs and that's not the message I intended to express. So I thought I'd make sure no one got the wrong idea.
Thanks for the clarification - and I agree with this statement fully, now. *gives koala stamp of approval*
There's some reason there.
There are some Baby Furs that are alive, but there is a large possibility that one or two of them have died at some point in furry history.
Ah shit now I have worm goo on my face.
I shall now place an inside joke that I have formed out of my own name in order to make this seem vaguely reasonable:
Damn you history and your obvious reasoning and common sense and margin of possibility!

2_gryphon

11 years ago

raphaelfaunus

11 years ago

salem_wikkat

11 years ago

This is true...

alfador_fox

11 years ago

Sadly no babyfurs seem to know who it is when this happens. Which means they either acted alone and were "smart" enough not to tell anyone or it wasn't a babyfur at all.

Trust me when babyfurs do this kind of thing...well they usually don't and when they do they almost never do it more than once. We do try to police our own the best that we can. Sadly with any kind of venue like this there can't be someone to police every action that every attendee does,
Previous
← Ctrl ← Alt
Next
Ctrl → Alt →
They liked it 0