/pol/ - Politically Incorrect★

where's that clip of a european female politician/scientist explaining co2 to some kiddie protestors

My problem with climate change is that most of it is peddled by so-called "Climate Scientists" who drive gas-gussling cars to work every morning, fly in wasteful jet airplanes, and then have the fucking gaul to stand in a News Studio on TV, point and the audience and say; "This is your fault for not doing enough please give me money!"

Even if climate change wasn't a fucking scam, how is anyone supposed to take that shit seriously?

>>12015871 (OP)

Climate science is very young and the models they create do not agree with reality. They cannot even predict the past, let alone the present or the future.. However, as a scientific point, it is possible the global warming is real and human are exacerbating it, but there is simply not enough good evidence at the moment. That being said, it's true that most global warming enthusiasts cannot talk about “muh climate change” without shilling for (((neo-liberal))) schemes that involve stripping nations of their sovereignty, dictating the minutiae of everyone's lives down to light bulbs and straws, and advocating the mass genocide of Western peoples. Have some caps, maybe it'll help.

Also, for your point on CO2, the Earth is not a closed system so CO2 does escape, but more importantly CO2 is plant food which is constantly being converted into oxygen. Even without plant life, if you follow your argument to its logical conclusion, all planets would be like Venus, and Earth would have never been able to support life.

>>12015871 (OP)

The first graphic shows why your hypothesis failed to predict: the 13 micrometer band is already blocked. Adding more CO2 has no effect.

The second graphic shows the basis for the lies of the warming; by "adjusting past data in the US, they've adjusted the satellite data so the whole world appears to be warmer.

Third graphic shows your idiot hypothesis didn't even predict.

Forth graphic explains to retards why the 3rd graphic is important.

The fifth graphic reveals that your "scientists" are a goddamned bunch of fucking frauds and not scientists.

>>12015935

Op is a faggot, slide poster and left wing shill.

>>12015871 (OP)

The world is not warming. It is cooling.

The oceans are not rising. In the last 13,000 years they have never risen more slowly.

The deserts are not growing. They are shrinking.

Monsoons are not getting worse. They are becoming milder.

Droughts are not getting worse. They are becoming milder.

Summers are not getting hotter. They are becoming milder.

Winters are getting slightly colder (and snow cover in fall, winter, and spring is growing), and solar scientists are saying we’re going to hit a new maunder minimum soon. This will create a crisis for agriculture because it won’t be warm enough to get as many harvests.

EVERY. SINGLE. FUCKING. CLAIM. THAT AGW PAID JEWISH SHILLS HAVE MADE ARE ALREADY PROVEN FALSE.

Jews IN THE UNITED FUCKING NATIONS ITSELF have OPENLY ADMITTED that AGW doesn’t exist, and that ITS SOLE PURPOSE IS TO STEAL WEALTH AND INDUSTRY FROM WHITE NATIONS AND ALLOW THE THIRD WORLD TO DESTROY US.

http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html

http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/97_Consensus_Myth.pdf

https://archive.is/xJqb4

http://www.oil-price.net/

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/01/26/all-of-paraguays-temperature-record-has-been-tampered-with/

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/

http://www.edsanders.com/global/c02up2.htm

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/11395516/The-fiddling-with-temperature-data-is-the-biggest-science-scandal-ever.html

http://www.americantraditions.org/Articles/New%20Evidence%20that%20Man-Made%20Carbon%20Dioxide%20(CO2)%20Does%20Not%20Cause%20Global%20Warming.htm

http://www.nytimes.com/2000/04/25/science/persistent-and-severe-drought-strikes-again.html

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/hotpolitics/interviews/wirth.html

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/06/26/gates_renewable_energy_cant_do_the_job_gov_should_switch_green_subsidies_into_rd/

https://archive.is/i29K7

http://rt.com/news/256861-climate-change-un-hoax/

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/11/18/ipcc-official-%E2%80%9Cclimate-policy-is-redistributing-the-worlds-wealth%E2%80%9D/

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/03/29/j-scott-armstrong-fraction-1-papers-scientific-journals-follow-scientific-method/

https://archive.is/C7ydZ

https://archive.is/UCNZf

https://archive.is/1dxem

http://hotair.com/archives/2017/07/25/author-fools-peer-reviewed-journals-paper-midi-chlorians/

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/03/rampant-government-corruption.html

http://narrative.ly/stories/nick-brown-smelled-bull/

http://www.rense.com/general67/oils.htm

https://web.archive.org/web/20150910050658/http://www.tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/globalregional.htm

http://ruby.fgcu.edu/courses/twimberley/EnviroPhilo/Estimating.pdf

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.6148.pdf

http://www.jcronline.org.pinnacle.allenpress.com/doi/pdf/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10-00157.1

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v439/n7074/abs/nature04448.html

https://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm

http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_07/

http://notrickszone.com/2015/11/20/german-professor-examines-nasa-giss-temperature-datasets-finds-they-have-been-massively-altered/#sthash.8ZXuSkxc.dpbs

http://realclimatescience.com/2016/07/climate-talking-points-for-trump/

https://archive.is/ij67d

https://www.windy.com/

https://realclimatescience.com/2017/09/the-global-temperature-record-is-a-complete-fake/

https://archive.is/RlcQS

https://archive.is/OmmTx

http://scottishsceptic.co.uk/2017/04/02/the-biggest-global-experiment-disproving-co2-as-the-main-cause-of-late-20th-century-warming/

http://www.wsj.com/video/opinion-journal-how-government-twists-climate-statistics/80027CBC-2C36-4930-AB0B-9C3344B6E199.html?mod=trending_now_video_3

https://scienceofdoom.com/

http://notrickszone.com/2017/06/17/what-a-mess-spiegel-reveals-scientists-dont-know-real-temperature-of-the-planet/#sthash.DKBTp893.dpbs

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4648214/NASA-says-solar-minimum-way.html

>>12017092

I even forgot hurricanes and tornadoes (also floods and forest fires), which are at absolute record lows. As the solar output decreases and we hit this new maunder minimum, expect volcanic activity to increase, which will spew shit into the atmosphere, blocking even more sunlight and cooling things further.

Plants loooooooooooooooooove C02. It makes them grow bigly.

You think you green. You ain't green.

the Earth warms and cools according to solar cycles, carbon dioxide has nothing to do with it

>the temperature record does not indicate abnormal warming; in fact, we are now cooling

>carbon dioxide is a weak greenhouse gas and would not cause global warming; water vapor has a stronger greenhouse effect and there is much more of it

>carbon dioxide is not a pollutant and is good for plants

>the vast majority of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is natural, literally like 97%

>warming wouldn't even be a bad thing, we've been warmer before and it was fine, it's good for biodiversity as it expands the tropics and allows species to live further north, it's good for agricultural productivity as well

I could go on but global warming is such complete bullshit in every way

>>12015871 (OP)

Who cares?

At this rate, humanity will be extinct before it matters.

I'd like you all to consider the entire planet as a chemical reaction

The "reactants" are Carbon Dioxide, Oxygen, Water, and Nitrogen.

The "products" are all the life you see around you on Earth.

Just like a real chemical reaction, the Reactants will combine to form the Products. However, there is also a reverse reaction that takes place, whereby the Products convert back into Reactants. Depending on the relative speed of the "forward reaction" and the "reverse reaction", you will have more or less product at equilibrium.

Did you follow me? Re-read it again if you're confused.

Moving on. This means that the net biomass of life on Earth is set largely by the amount of reactants present in the environment, as well as the relative speed of the forward and reverse reactions.

In most complicated chemical reactions, you have 1 ingredient which is in lower supply than the others that "chokes" the reaction. So for example, let's say you're creating Calcium Phosphate, but you're short on the Phosphate. At equilibrium, you're going to have a bunch of extra Calcium hanging around in solution, but not so much Phosphate (because this is the limiting reactant). There will be a tiny trace amount of Phosphate, because of the reverse reaction, but it will be barely measurable, and certainly in far more limited supply than all that unused Calcium.

Therefore, if we want to see which of the ingredients is choking off the reaction, just look for the one that is in scarce supply.

So which is it? Well 70% of the Earth is water, I doubt that's it. And 70% of the atmosphere is Nitrogen, very doubtful this is correct. Now let's decide between the remaining two, Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide. 20% of th atmosphere is Oxygen, and 0.04% is Carbon Dioxide. Which do you think is the better candidate here?

Once you understand that Carbon is the limiting reactant, ask yourself what would happen if someone came along and dumped a bunch of extra Carbon into the system? Well going back to the example of the calcium phosphate reaction, what would happen if you dumped a bunch more Phosphate in? To answer: more Calcium Phosphate would form, but the amount of Phosphate hanging around in solution would only increase slightly. Because the speed of the reverse reaction has not increased all that much.

Follow all this? I hope so, if not crack open a chemistry textbook.

So if you add more Carbon Dioxide to the system, you will just create a lot more biomass, without increasing the amount of Carbon in the atmosphere all that much. We can see this happening, the earth is greening significantly. Plants grow faster, this leads to more rich and diverse ecosystems.

You might object and say, why is the level of CO2 in the atmosphere increasing? It's probably because this imbalance takes a long time to balance itself out. Sucking the extra CO2 out of the atmosphere and assimilating it into plant and animal life is a slow moving process. But the higher the CO2 levels get, the more quickly and efficiently it is done. This means the CO2 in the atmosphere does not increase eternally, but finds a new equilibrium to match our output.

>>12017809

This

Although I would specify that its the bastards in the board rooms who perpetuate the "global trade" which is doing the damage, not us per se.

Who is Behind the Climate Change Hoax?

https://thezog.wordpress.com/who-is-behind-the-climate-change-hoax/

Davis Guggenheim (Ashkenazi jew) – Director, An Inconvenient Truth

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_Guggenheim

Jeffrey Skoll (Ashkenazi jew) – Executive Producer, An Inconvenient Truth

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Skoll

Joseph J. Romm (Ashkenazi jew) – Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress

http://www.americanprogress.org/experts/RommJoseph.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_J._Romm

Stephen H. Schneider (Ashkenazi jew) – Professor of Environmental Biology and Global Change, Stanford University

http://stephenschneider.stanford.edu

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Schneider

Michael E. Mann (Ashkenazi jew) – Professor of Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~mann/Mann

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_E._Mann

Gavin A. Schmidt (Ashkenazi jew) – Climatologist, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies

http://www.giss.nasa.gov/staff/gschmidt

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_Schmidt

Benjamin D. Santer (Ashkenazi jew) – Climate Researcher, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

http://www.eoearth.org/article/Santer,_Benjamin_D.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_D._Santer

Carbon Taxes/Carbon Trading:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_tax

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_emission_trading

Todd D. Stern (Ashkenazi jew) – Special Envoy for Climate Change, U.S. State Department

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/biog/122554.htm

http://www.whorunsgov.com/Profiles/Todd_D._Stern

Richard L. Sandor (Ashkenazi jew) – Chairman and Founder, Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX)

http://www.chicagoclimatex.com/content.jsf?id=122

http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1663317_1663322_1669930,00.html

Nicholas H. Stern (Ashkenazi jew) – Professor of Economics and Government, London School of Economics (LSE)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Stern,_Baron_Stern_of_Brentford

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review

Ignacy Sachs (Ashkenazi jew) – Socioeconomist, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales

http://www.unhistory.org/CD/Sachs.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignacy_Sachs