JPB

@dacaleftmebehin

Created this account to help "legal dreamers" ALSO be included in any DACA legislation. Distributed solar enthusiast

e2visapeople.org/e2visapeople.o…
Joined October 2016
5 Photos and videos Photos and videos

You may also like

·

Worldwide trends

Tweets

You blocked @dacaleftmebehin

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @dacaleftmebehin

  1. Retweeted
    13 Sep 2017

    I came here at 12 years old, got a full-ride to a top 20 school,yet unlike can't work legally & not part of as I'm a F-1

    12 replies 70 retweets 57 likes
    Undo
  2. Retweeted
    23 Jul 2017

    Directly from .Only reason I don't qualify is due to not being inadmissible/deportable.Kids here lawfully are also fighting to stay

    5 replies 51 retweets 34 likes
    Undo
  3. Retweeted
    Feb 27

    Great to see this commentary in a conservative publication. Hope this gives certain Republicans a pro-immigrant demand for their vote: "The Forgotten Dreamers: What about the deserving, imperiled group of immigrants brought here legally as children?"

    12 replies 156 retweets 160 likes
    Undo
  4. Retweeted
    Feb 23
    Replying to

    Is it so controversial for you to ALSO fight for legal dreamers? We share identical stories, with the exception that we've had the privilege to stay here legally, yet we have no clear path towards residency/citizenship.At a MINIMUM, allow us to LOSE status to qualify for

    2 replies 12 retweets 14 likes
    Undo
  5. Retweeted
    15 Sep 2017

    Dream Act Inexplicably Excludes Legal Immigrant Dreamers, Requires Applicants Violate the Law via

    26 replies 204 retweets 155 likes
    Undo
  6. Retweeted
    Feb 15

    Great to finally see coverage of legal immigrant Dreamers in the news. They face the exact same fate as DACA recipients: temporary status with a path to deportation. They are Americans & deserve citizenship as much as those whose parents have no status.

    10 replies 160 retweets 146 likes
    Undo
  7. Retweeted
    Feb 21

    That's incorrect, Senator , they do exist. They are E2 Visa Holders. They are investors who hire American employees but never get a path to citizenship. Oh, and E2 kids are like DACA kids! Watch:

    7 replies 49 retweets 52 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  8. Retweeted
    Feb 6
    Replying to

    If you want an equivalent compromise when fixing DACA, it is essential that legal dreamers are included in ANY legislation. We meet all provisions that dreamers do, with the exception that we're here legally. We also deserve a chance to remain home!

    14 retweets 13 likes
    Undo
  9. Retweeted
    Jan 25

    If Dreamers are going to be given a Path to Citizenship please include Legal kids of E2 Treaty Investor Visa Holders too - most think legal immigrants always have a way to stay - not true - at 21 not covered anymore and could have to leave - unfair to investors & job creators

    2 replies 16 retweets 26 likes
    Undo
  10. Retweeted
    Jan 21

    It also specifically singles out for exclusions all aliens who are in any kind of lawful status, even if they meet all other requirements—no applications from TPS recipients or children of H-1Bs or E-2s who can apply under other bills. Why discriminate against *legal* immigrants?

    19 replies 561 retweets 804 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  11. Retweeted
    13 Nov 2017

    "Age-out DREAMers" are in the same position as DACA kids. We are DREAMers who came as kids with no choice. Why are we excluded in if 2 Republican DACA bills include children like me? RT and share with your congressmen.

    7 replies 112 retweets 121 likes
    Undo
  12. Retweeted
    Jan 17
    Replying to and

    Do you NOT care that there are thousands of legal dreamers also fighting to stay? That the only reason we aren't recipients is because we've had the privilege of being here legally?Do you understand that we also will be driven out if we're not included in any bill?

    1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes
    Undo
  13. Retweeted
    Jan 9

    Ignoring E2 DREAMers and saying that advocating for us will hurt the chances for DACA kids is wrong. Fact: E2 kids are already included in 3 Republican DACA bills, including the RAC act by , which has the most Republican cosponsors.

    1 reply 3 retweets 5 likes
    Undo
  14. 27 Oct 2017

    It is also morally correct and just to include legal immigrant dreamers in the , as we share identical stories

    There are huge fiscal benefits to including legal immigrant Dreamers in the DREAM Act.
    1 retweet 2 likes
    Undo
  15. Retweeted
    14 Oct 2017

    Does it make sense for a child who came to the USA at no choice, lived here legally for over a decade, to be excluded from DreamAct? RT

    2 retweets 5 likes
    Undo
  16. Retweeted
    7 Oct 2017

    Republican RACact by and S.1937 by Senator include E2 kid as DREAMers.Why does DREAMact exclude us.Add us

    2 replies 13 retweets 12 likes
    Undo
  17. Retweeted
    24 Oct 2017

    Huge Fiscal Benefits of Including Legal Immigrant Dreamers in the DREAM Act via

    4 replies 13 retweets 17 likes
    Undo
  18. Retweeted
    9 Oct 2017

    Yes, we need a for DREAMers — but we also need it for the young legal immigrants the U.S. kicks out after graduation.

    Republican RACact by and S.1937 by Senator include E2 kid as DREAMers.Why does DREAMact exclude us.Add us
    2 replies 6 retweets 14 likes
    Undo
  19. Retweeted
    15 Sep 2017

    Wrap your head around this. DACA

    Dream Act Inexplicably Excludes Legal Immigrant Dreamers, Requires Applicants Violate the Law via
    7 retweets 6 likes
    Undo
  20. Retweeted
    3 Sep 2017

    Here, I fixed the . Why would go out of the way to exclude legal kids in temporary status who meet the requirements?

    22 replies 116 retweets 79 likes
    Undo

@dacaleftmebehin hasn't Tweeted yet.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.