LibertyHQ forums

Gary North article: "Seeing Is Not Believing: Steel and Concrete Became Mid-Air Dust on 9/11"
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/09/gar ... st-on-911/

"......Here is a wild theory. It is supported by impossible videos. The videos are real, however...."

Here, Mr North makes the classic, [inexcusable?] investigative procedural error of practically every 9/11 "truther" out there - that is, the assumption that the imagery examined is genuine imagery.

This is always done without the viewer [Mr North in this case] having _any_ real justification for making such an important, far-reaching assumption, having no experience with close imagery analysis, nor of the equally important provenance issue.

The images "must" be genuine merely because almost everyone else out there has also made the exact same assumptive error.

And so it goes....

For more on imagery analysis, see: "The 9/11 "Truth Movement" Versus Simple, Common Sense Logic ":
http://onebornfrees911researchreview.bl ... ommon.html

Regards, onebornfree.

For all of you "100% all CGI by the MSM on the morning of 9/11" non-believers, [everyone here, I assume :-) ], here is a good video demonstration of what could be achieved with CGI technology back in 2014. 

Of course,  computer power and software was more primitive back in 2001, which is why it is much easier to spot the CGI "tells" that are all over the MSM's official, archived on-line footage: https://archive.org/details/sept_11_tv_archive/

For more on this subject, and some specific examples taken from the MSM archives,please see:

" The 9/11 "Truth Movement" Versus Simple,Common Sense Logic ": http://onebornfrees911researchreview.bl ... ommon.html

Regards, onebornfree

[above Video removed by youtube approx. 02/25/18 :-) ]

Now can be seen at Vimeo:


A Simon Shack classic- exposing some of the sham [and bad] actors still surrounding the alleged events of 9/11.

Here are two, slo-mo, frame by frame analyses of alleged "amateur- Fl. 175 crashes into WTC2" videos, the originals of which were both broadcast by the MSM, one on the eve of Sept. 11th. '01, and the other on the morning of Sept. 12th ' 01:




Regards,onebornfree

"Video and Photo Evidence Now Even More Easily Faked and Fabricated"

"Photo evidence and video evidence has been relied on in academia, science, courts of law and elsewhere to prove or refute facts and theories – but those days are coming to an end. We live in an historic era. Technological advances in the realm of computers and AI are taking place so rapidly that our world is being changed overnight. Now, software has been written that allows computers to create new faces that look like normal unique people but which are actually composite amalgams; to literally create and fabricate objects (from a basic sketch) and render them so lifelike that you won’t be able to tell the difference between the fabricated ones and the real ones; and to remove entire objects from video footage in real-time, and render in the empty space so well that it is undetectable to the eye. The days of being able to trust photo evidence and video evidence are disappearing – and the implications for human knowledge are far reaching...."

https://www.activistpost.com/2017/11/vi ... cated.html

"So this article [above] is about recent developments", you might say; and, maybe: " this technology was not around in 2001" you might claim.

Oh, but it was, dear reader. Not as sophisticated, granted, but the basic idea and the various software programs were available and obviously heavily utilized by the 9/11 perps, to the extent that most, possibly all of the alleged 9/11 victims were in fact 100% artificial creations, complete with faked photos in the on-line memorials, fake bios, fake relatives etc. etc. See: http://www.septemberclues.info/vicsims_ ... yses.shtml

....and :"Why are 3,000 victims of 9/11 missing from Social Security death list?"
http://www.dailyrepublic.com/california ... eath-list/

Regards, onebornfree

"Larry Silverstein Set to Receive Another $95 Million in New 9/11 Settlement "
https://www.activistpost.com/2017/11/la ... ement.html

Apart from the fact that Silverstein is indeed set to receive another $95 million, much in this article is dead wrong:

1] For starters, the picture heading the article is false. The portrait of Silverstein, although pasted into the picture, is the only part of the whole that is in any way truthful [although itself probably photo-shopped ]. Every other part of the picture, that is: the whole "9/11 live" picture used [i.e. foreground, background, Twin towers, all buildings, plane, smoke, sky etc. etc. ], is false, a digital composite. In other words, if the Silverstein portrait was removed, the entire picture would still be wholly fake. See : http://www.septemberclues.info/power_of_imagery.shtml , and, of course: "September Clues":



2] The video of WTC7's collapse that is used, just like every other "live" video of that same alleged event, [and of the Twin towers collapses, and of the two prior alleged plane strikes into those towers], is also a 100% video composite pre-constructed on computer prior to 9/11 and then broadcast as being live imagery on 9/11. See: "WTC7 Study":



Also:"World Trade Center Building 7 - Real Vs Fake ":


There are more inaccuracies in the article, but I won't get into those right now- the biggest ones have been revealed, the rest [ie serious thinking] is up to you.

Regards, onebornfree

"Doug Casey on What Happens After the Next 9/11":

"......My view is that 80% of human beings are basically decent, get along, go along types. 20% are what you might call potential trouble sources, that can go either way. But then you take 20% of that 20% and you’re dealing with the sociopaths.

When social conditions reach a certain stage these really bad guys come out from under their rocks and take advantage of the situation. We’re seeing that right now in the US, across the political spectrum. Just as we’ve seen in the past in hundreds of places throughout history.

A major tipping point occurred sixteen years ago, on September 11, 2001, with the attacks in New York and Washington. They were disastrous. But not nearly as disastrous as the government’s reaction to them.

Among them the creation of the Department of Homeland Security. Anybody that speaks German knows that a reasonable translation of Homeland Security is Geheime Staatspolizei, which is usually abbreviated to Gestapo. Anybody that goes through airline security these days should ask themselves, “Where the hell did they find these people? Didn’t they have jobs before they went to work for this moronic agency?”..............":
http://www.internationalman.com/article ... -next-9-11

Regards, onebornfree.

“Where the hell did they find these people?“ I’ve asked myself this question quite a few times, actually.

DanielMuff wrote: ↑

December 17th, 2017, 12:00 pm

“Where the hell did they find these people?“ I’ve asked myself this question quite a few times, actually.

Er, Walmart?

Regards, onebornfree

"Studies Show Wtc Building 1,2 & 7 Could Not Have Fallen – Why Does The Us Still Lie About 9/11?"
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/12/no_ ... bout-9-11/

Question: when [if ever] will these so-called "scientific investigators" like R. Gage, J. Wood, and S. Jones etc. twig to the plain, simple fact that the tower collapse video footage they have all so assiduously studied is in fact all very poorly made [and therefor obvious] , 100% CGI, and _not_ genuine live footage? :





Also, no one ever brings up the fact that the WTC complex consisted of 7 buildings, and that all 7 got destroyed on 9/11, not just WTC's 1,2, and 7.

And so it goes......

See: "The 9/11 "Truth Movement" Versus Simple, Common Sense Logic ":
http://onebornfrees911researchreview.bl ... ommon.html

Regards, onebornfree

The latest Corbett Report video: "Don’t Believe Your Lying Eyes":



[The year 2000 M.I.T. report that Mr Corbett has recently been made aware of and that is the centerpiece for discussion in his above video{2018} was featured at my own 9/11 blog back in 2012: http://onebornfrees911researchreview.bl ... ixels.html ].

Regards, onebornfree

Another brilliant Simon Shack 9/11 analysis I'd forgotten about that I was recently reminded of:



" THE RATIONALE OF THE 9/11 HOAX
If you have come to terms with the fact that 9/11 was a massive money-making scheme and - of course - a pretext to wage hugely profitable wars, the basic rationale behind this Grand Hoax should, hopefully, become clearer. It is essential to consider all the variables which such an audacious false-flag operation would entail and what precautions its plotters must have observed: The 9/11 Deception Plan was undoubtedly meant to be foolproof and, ideally, free of unnecessary elements of risk and opposition. There was simply no rationale for the 9/11 plotters to commit a mass murder of some 3,000, mostly white-collar professionals (brokers, bankers, financial analysts, etc.) whose families would likely have access to first-rate, uptown legal assistance. Surely, killing that many people would have been an utterly senseless, self-inflicted aggravation on the part of the perpetrators. Since they could reliably rely on the fully compliant top-brass of the mainstream media, they would have used this unique, exclusive asset to its full potential.

Ever since day one, the major hurdle for many people to even start considering 9/11 being an inside job has been: "I cant believe my own government would murder 3000 of their own people". Once that psychological obstacle is removed, it should become apparent that the whole operation consisted essentially of a covert demolition of a redundant, asbestos-filled building complex. To kill thousands of people in the process never was an envisaged proposition as it would have encountered severe resistance among the insiders involved. The second objective was to blame this destruction on a foreign enemy; an inanely fanciful, outlandish tale involving hijacked airliners used as missiles was concocted, supported by digital imagery and special movie effects. How this was done is thoroughly illustrated in my September Clues video analyses.

Read my two articles dedicated to the "9/11 victims" research :
THE MEMORIAL SCAMS:
http://septemberclues.info/vicsims_photo-analyses.htm
DECONSTRUCTING 9/11
http://www.septemberclues.info/deconstructing.htm "

Regards, onebornfree

The You Tube Purge:

As you can see, as of today [030318] the video linked to in the previous post is now unavailable - Simon Shack's youtube account has now been terminated in the latest purge going on there, meaning that none of his vids that I have previously linked to here are available at YT any more :-( .

In the meantime, here is a link to an archive of at least some of his "September Clues" 9/11 related videos to date [assuming anyone out here is even interested in seeing them :-) ]:

http://fakeologist.com/september-clues-tour-guide/

Regards, onebornfree

Ahh yes, the same Youtube that would have been nothing without endless cat videos and illegally-copied copyrighted music videos and music.

DanielMuff wrote: ↑

March 7th, 2018, 3:44 pm

Ahh yes, the same Youtube that would have been nothing without endless cat videos and illegally-copied copyrighted music videos and music.

If you check the "Google/Youtube Scam" thread, there's a J. Corbett video I posted there about the extremely shady Southern Poverty Law Center, which apparently has engineered itself a handy little censoring gig at Google/YouTube. Explains a lot, methinks.

Regards, onebornfree

Assuming I haven't gone through the entire thread, what's your final verdict on 9/11?

FvS wrote: ↑

March 8th, 2018, 9:52 pm

Assuming I haven't gone through the entire thread, what's your final verdict on 9/11?

Please review the first post in this thread.

Regards, onebornfree

"John Lear: Memorandum for the President: 9/11 Twin Towers Were Not Hit By Nor Destroyed By Two Airliners":

Now this article is very interesting. It seems that ex pilot John Lear, well known in 9/11 "truth" circles [via Pilots For 9/11 Truth], has finally come out and said what people like myself have been saying since 2007-8, and have been saying here for a few years in this very thread :

"..............No Boeing 767 airlines hit either of the Twin Towers, as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors. All of the “evidence” to that effect, including video depictions, has been fabricated and can be forensically challenged........"

I repeat. He says :"All of the “evidence” to that effect, including video depictions, has been fabricated and can be forensically challenged."

See article here:https://phibetaiota.net/2018/07/john-le ... airliners/

Regards, onebornfree

Onebornfree appears to either be a severe schizophrenic; or an intentional disinformation-peddler: one who puts out what is known in intelligence-agency circles as Black Propaganda, such as with the FBI's COINTELPRO (Counter-Intelligence Program) disseminating the anti-white racist Black Panther Coloring Book in order to discredit the Black Panthers. For more on this ancient technique of mendacious disinformation used by many governments throughout history, see the following article:

* "Black propaganda", Wikipedia, July 4, 2018, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =848834354 , https://archive.is/eriNB , https://www.webcitation.org/713dvolld .

Case in point by Onebornfree:

* Onebornfree, "The 9/11 'Truth Movement' Versus Simple,Common Sense Logic", Onebornfree's 9/11 Research Review, June 12, 2017, https://onebornfrees911researchreview.b ... ommon.html , https://archive.is/nfyf7 , https://www.webcitation.org/713dmzGaB .

Take this brilliant gem from Onebornfree's above blog-post:

""
Fig. 6 ABC's "Spinning Twin Towers"
["More Spinning Towers", kidwave1, Sept. 25, 2009]

More Simple, Applied Logic:

There is, I submit, in light of the obviously fraudulent class [1] ABC sequence above, taken as it is from the original on-line archives, pre- collapse of either tower, absolutely no good logical reason to gaily assume the realness of any subsequent sequence, on any TV channel, that  allegedly depicts the later "collapse" of either of those same  two impossibly "spinning towers", surely?
""

Such is the general nature of Onebornfree's methodology. He takes innocuous videos which sane people would detect nothing sinister about, and builds with them a demented case that the jetliners crashing into the World Trade Center Twin Towers were all video fakery. Either Onebornfree is of a genuinely fevered mind, or he is intentionally attempting to discredit the 9/11 Truth movement with such nonsensical fantasms of the mind.

For more on Black Propaganda disinformation used by the US government against the 9/11 Truth movement--such as with the absurdist 9/11 attacks disinformation-peddlers Drs. James Fetzer, Morgan Reynolds and Judy Woods--see the following article by chemist Kevin Ryan:

* Kevin Ryan, "Techniques Used to Disrupt 9/11 Questioning", Dig Within, June 24, 2018, https://digwithin.net/2018/06/24/disruption/ , https://archive.is/ZtLFe , https://www.webcitation.org/713fBXvs8 .

For irrefragable physicochemical proof that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job by the US government--i.e., via the use of large quantities of thermite in the case of the collapse of the three destroyed World Trade Center towers--see pp. 75-84 of my following article:

* James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708, https://archive.org/download/ThePhysics ... of-God.pdf , https://purl.org/redford/physics-of-god .

The foregoing article concerns physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE). However, it also analyzes the societal implications of said, particularly the implications of the exponential advancement of technology and hence also the coming radical life-extension technologies (i.e., transhumanism) in light of a world dominated by a callous oligarchy.