FA just went thru my entire gallery to change the ratings on art that is literally dated back to 2010, yet they won't delete a cub comment from one of the most popular artists in the fandom. I don't mind the rating changes at all, but why does one supersede the other
-
-
Hm, I see. Although I've only seen backlash from other users, not DA admins. But then again, my point of view is too limited in that regard. And yeah, the lack of a clearly adult oriented part of the site is a -. But I don't know of someone who has to pay on SF except for ads. :o
-
However, considering the nature of some of the content there I can understand people, who don't want to support/help expand SF because of it. Still thanks a lot for helping me understand some of the angles to consider here. Hopefully we'll get a site that will suit all eventually
-
DA doesn't allow drawn porn. That's actually how FA started, since all the Furry artists needed a site of their own. Tbh i lost hope for a new Furry oriented website that has agreeable rules that are also enforced by admins that actually care.
-
Weasyl is pretty good and I heard very good things and tried using it. It's really nice but I am not a big artist so I got like no interaction and everyone went back to FA. I suggest weasyl though
-
Depending on how FA is going to handle this I might go there and maybe people will follow. This is way worse then the project Phoenix situation
-
the what
-
Project Phoenix? That’s when people tried to leave FA
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Just a quick heads up: We are a free website. We accept donations but we are neither a pay site nor do we have any kind of premium features :)
-
Ah thanks for clarification. Do you allow cub porn though?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.