heres some more updated laws, the previous was a bit old. it doesnt even have to depict a real minor now, for anyone sayin "but what if i slap an animal head on em!" nope still extremely illegal!!pic.twitter.com/MnnK58twRS
-
-
Show this thread
-
also to everyone saying its fiction, its not "really illegal," and ignoring all the voices saying they are hurt by it- it spirals, it leads to consequences, legal and social. it lures in venerable people, promotes the acceptance and normalization of it in minor spaces. rethink
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You know, if you’re going to highlight something, it’s probably a good to actually read it. It says any computer generated or edited images have to be completely indistinguishable from actual, real life images of minors
-
a lot of cp artists refrence from children/create work identical to a human child, and its enough to file a reasonable legal report. "computer generated" can mean digital art, 3D models, etc
-
If by identical you mean that any human being with eyes can tell that it’s not an *actual* child, then yes, they do create work identical to a human child. As far as using children as references, it’s creepy, but not illegal, as long as they’re not using cp as a reference
-
The ways in which you people bend over backwards to defend this shit shows everyone exactly who to stay away from. You’re just showing that someone wanking to pretend children is more important than the safety and comfort of real ones.
-
Wanna bring up an instance where furry porn has been the issue?
-
Yeah, y'all should just keep poking your heads up so we know who the pedos are, thanks
-
Its not like ive already been added to so many lists.... when will the thought police just chill and let those of us who arent harming anyone be?
-
Stop jerking off to children, dude
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The emphasis is on "actual minor", meaning the picture created depicts a child in real life. If someone's drawing lewds of your kid, it's illegal if you can prove without a doubt that the drawing is, in fact, of your child. Also, source?
-
u defend tacklebawks lmao be quiet
-
Your a whiteknighting SJW who can't tell the difference between fantasy and reality. Sit back down.
-
using SJW unironically in the year 2018? someone get this man some vitamin D cause your lack of ever going outside is gunna make you deficient
-
Damn, best roast of 2018. I'm going to need some ice for that burn. /s Nice Ad Hominem. Good to see you're defending your strawman argument. Welcome to my ever-growing blocklist.
-
"Nice ad hominem" you say as you call someone a whiteknighting sjw
-
Statement of facts. That's all it is, dear.
-
i dont think you're realizing that you're kinda defending those who draw CP?? thats honestly disgusting. also your bias is very amusing
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The more vocal we get on this topic, the more people will out themselves trying to defend it. Keep up the good work. This does effect victims, and is more important than some person getting their rocks off to kids.
-
Being a survivor of this, it affects people. Watching the open sharing of these acts, no matter how fictional, harms us in the worst of ways due to the normalization of these acts. It is not okay to profit off of real world suffering. This harms victims. End of story.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.