I agree, the idea that the auditors can be independent when the company they are auditing is their customer is pretty much a joke. I also think a company that is competent in auditing techniques (which isn't tough) can shape a GL so that it passes audit even if it's highly unreliable. Controls testing with SOX is still a joke, but it is headed in the right direction. I also think that 'off balance sheet' items are nearly impossible to audit and are an enormous risk in almost every company. I have a lot of opinions on this subject because i think it is a huge problem, especially when you get into capitalization and non gaap measurements. Most of this view has very little to do with Tesla though.
On the subject of auditors, here's an article from today. It's from the UK rather than the US, but it's still interesting - a large number of audits even by major companies are unacceptable: UK accounting watchdog says KPMG audits show 'unacceptable...
No, he doesn't. He lies outright; I've caught him doing this repeatedly. When he gets caught making an outright provable lie, he tried to get the person who caught him banned from commenting on his articles. It's happened to three or four of us here.
after listening to several podcasts i decided he must be a lobbyist or paid shrill of some sort. he certainly doesn't seem to know anything about money management. ms appears to me an educated sounding pied piper who rounds up a herd of unsuspecting mice to line the pockets of me and others with gold. that's probably the only reason I could be grateful to him.
Can you please share links to those podcasts? I was only able to find this one with a quick search Grant’s Podcast | Finance Expert Jim Grant on Investment, Stock Markets, Real Estate & Federal Reserve by CLNS Media Network on Apple Podcasts Are there others?
What's your feeling about current workload for delivery centers? For example there is this testimonial from a former delivery specialist. And there are plenty of complaints to be found on the forums about clear failings in customer service which can only be reasonably explained by an overloaded staff. On the other hand my experience from dealing with a sales/service center that's working a less busy area, it's just the other way around. 4 sales people sitting at the desk looking like a dear caught in the headlights when you approach them for a question. To me it looks like a serious imbalance in workforce allocation that's entirely due to the dealer-less business model. I am not sure Tesla has a good handle on things there. And responding by firing 9% of staff seems like the sledgehammer approach that's not necesarilly going to lead to a finetuned optimized-for-costs sales organisation. Much the same can be said about their service department. It's a hit and miss for sure. Some people get great service to the point of Rolls-Royce levels, others have their cars in for repairs for months on end with bodyshop and Tesla blaming each other. Despite repeated claims that Tesla is going to do better and some attempts (executive escalation, the special parts teams, more certified bodyshops together with more stringent rules, ...) none seem to really work. And the executives that were in headline roles to solve this are all on leave or left the company, only to either not be replaced or by unfamiliar names. Again to me this is due to the business model : rapid and continuous innovation creates service costs because there are many iterations of some parts, an explosion of combinations and basically no two cars are the same (nightmare of any service tech really) Here Tesla has now chosen to also inhouse more (body shops) but again this risks the issue that we're seeing with imbalance in work allocation between different locations that they have in other parts of their organisation. So opex obviously shouldn't scale with revenue, but on the other hand some of the reasons we've been hearing about why it has so far may also continue to be true in the medium term (short term they'll deal with it by across the board measures, long term by having an overwhelming amount of revenue) I also have continued concerns about the manufacturing side of things to the point that I am thinking of cashing in on a significant portion of the large gains that I am now sitting on. Basically, the risk was always there but the reward of skipping out of the risk is just very tempting. Human psychology is very strange, I never worried as much about the money side of my Tesla position as today, even not when I was significantly down.
What is everyone's take on the whole sabateur thing? I mean it can't be bullish right? Because it is either 1) True, which means it was a whistleblower or something that damaged operations. 2) False and is just a pre set reason why production #s are going to be bad Any other theories?
you could probably find them on twitter, i refuse to link to his garbage. i think the delivery workload / scheduling will probably look like a huge mess. at 5k/weekly in the united states alone, they will be increasing delivery volumes by nearly an order of magnitude per week. so it's going to be messy, no one could reasonably scale that much well on such a manual process. a lot of the reason opex has scaled with revenue is due to addition of business lines. if you try to back out solarcity (and maybe even tesla energy) you should find meaningful operating leverage when production ramps up. that was the 2 charts post a while back in this thread. i believe it is true. i believe it did damage or delay operations. and i believe it was a corporate or state actor (spy) vs. a short desperate to help their position as some have theorized. that's me hurling all over your screen. i'm sure my stomach will settle down whenever we cross 400.
To me it seems like an imbalance in workforce allocation which is due to lack of competent management at the top level in that area (and same in the service department). I don't think "franchised dealerships" would help with the problem. I think having a top exec for service (and/or for delivery) who was capable of reallocating resources geographically, and did so competently, would help. They've *never* had one. I don't think anything substitutes for competent management.
As for the saboteur thing... I think it's (a) true, and (b) bullish. They caught the saboteur. Ramping up the production lines sure will go faster without a saboteur.
I am hopeful that details will come out regarding the individual, their motives, and who the third parties were that received the stolen data. This information along with potential punishment coming to light would be a good deterrent for others.
To break it down, it's like this. Saboteur = bad, bearish. Sabotage = bad, bearish. Catching the saboteur = very good, bullish.
@luvb2b is your model in the first post the most recent one? Seems like your 23k might be a tad high but a really great forecast given the time you made it. Does the BI article make you questions your Q3 FCST at all?
the most recent update was posted on page 11. which bl article? didn't see it, please link. did you see the lawsuit against the saboteur? debunks a lot of the nonsense that had been floating around. Tesla sues alleged saboteur engineer who also apparently leaked false reports to media
i had to raise my estimates a bit this morning. there are several reasons/changes. 1. deliveries for q2 have adjusted modestly higher for s/x and model 3. this is because i now believe that the irs is counting vehicles towards the tax credit based on the date they are officially titled with the state. there are reports of tesla scheduling friday evening and saturday deliveries, which would mean july is the soonest a title could get registered with the state. however the friday and saturday deliveries will count towards the total for q2. not sure how many they could do this way but i assume it's 2k model 3 and 500 s/x. 2. higher deliveries in q2 means fewer holdovers to q3 and thus lower inventory. this improves cash burn in q2. 3. deliveries for model 3 in q3 and q4 have been updated higher. there are multiple reports indicating that model 3 production is now in excess of 4k per week. several vague sources have confirmed 5k weekly. an analyst note today where they counted trucks leaving the factory estimated 4300-4900 model 3's per week. here's the old version. q2-q4 2018 financial projections full update below …luv q4-18eluv q3-18eluv q2-18eMar-18s deliveries15,00015,00012,00011,738x deliveries13,00012,00010,50010,077s+x deliveries28,00027,00023,00021,8153 deliveries65,00054,00025,0008,182lease s/x % veh0.110.110.110.11avg price s+x106.00106.00106.00105.76avg price model 358.0060.0056.0056.00revenueauto sales ex 32,641,5202,547,1802,169,8202,053,375auto sales mod 33,770,0003,240,0001,400,000458,192auto leasing187,499181,557175,888173,4361 time autopilot0000zev credits100,000100,000050,314total auto6,699,0196,068,7373,745,7082,735,317energy storage180,000180,000164,500185,022solarcity220,000275,000275,000225,000grohmann0000services/other300,000300,000275,000263,412total revenue7,399,0196,823,7374,460,2083,408,751cost of revenueauto sales ex 31,973,4751,903,0691,623,2561,540,031auto sales mod 33,072,5502,689,2001,400,000551,366auto leasing120,000116,197112,568104,496total auto5,166,0244,708,4653,135,8242,195,893energy storage180,000189,000180,950217,863solarcity154,000192,500192,500157,500grohmann10,99910,99911,00011,000services & other375,000384,000365,750369,969total cost of rev5,886,0235,484,9643,886,0242,952,225gross profit1,512,9961,338,773574,184456,526auto gaap ex 3 gm28.5%28.6%26.0%27.8%auto-zev ex 3 gm26.0%26.0%26.0%26.1%model 3 gm18.5%17.0%0.0%-20.3%auto-zev incl 3 gm21.7%21.1%16.3%18.2%storage gm0.0%-5.0%-10.0%-17.7%scty gm30.0%30.0%30.0%30.0%grohmann gm-100.0%-100.0%-100.0%-100.0%services gm-25.0%-28.0%-33.0%-40.5%opextesla r&d315,000309,060340,000322,096tesla sg&a510,000499,950550,000551,4041 time costs0085,0000solarcity r&d42,00040,90545,00045,000solarcity sg&a132,000127,260140,000135,000total opex999,000977,1751,160,0001,053,500op income513,996361,598-585,816-596,974interest inc6,0006,0006,0005,214interest exp-107,000-107,000-107,000-102,546scty interest-53,000-53,000-53,000-47,000other income exp-12,000-12,000-12,000-37,7161time scty gain0000pretax income347,996195,598-751,816-779,022income tax19,99919,99920,0005,605net income327,997175,599-771,816-784,627non-cont int.-50,001-50,001-50,000-75,076net inc to common377,998225,600-721,816-709,551basic shares172,000170,900170,000169,146diluted shares183,000181,900170,000169,146diluted gaap eps2.071.24-4.25-4.19gaap net income377,998225,600-721,816-709,551 + stock based comp133,000133,000165,000141,639 + one time scty0000non-gaap net income510,998358,600-556,816-567,912non-gaap diluted eps2.791.97-3.28-3.36balance sheetcurrent assets cash & eq.2,045,8671,444,7281,915,7162,665,673 restricted cash150,000130,000100,000120,194 accts rcvbl1,216,2771,121,710821,167652,848 inventory4,644,3144,808,7363,534,6852,565,826 prepaids+other312,293305,001366,089379,379total current assets8,368,7527,810,1756,737,6576,383,920op lease vehicles2,527,4932,447,8662,368,8982,315,124solar energy sys6,345,8876,349,3816,352,9106,346,374pp&e12,420,08311,695,51611,061,43810,519,226intangible assets361,502361,502361,502346,428goodwill60,23760,23760,23761,284mypower rcvbls428,754435,754442,754449,754restricted cash440,000440,000440,000433,841other assets273,123273,123273,123415,478total assets31,225,83129,873,55428,098,51827,271,429current liabiliites accts payable4,966,8364,868,8453,598,5652,603,498 accrued liabs+other1,998,0001,905,4911,913,5001,898,431 deferred revenue606,598587,488544,846536,465 resale value guar600,000600,000600,000629,112 cust deposits965,000965,000965,000984,823 curr debt+leases1,500,0001,500,0001,800,0001,915,530 curr solar bonds100,000100,000100,00082,500total current liabs10,736,43410,526,8249,521,9118,650,359lt debt+leases9,000,0009,200,0009,000,0008,761,070solar bonds100100100100rel party conv debt2,5192,5192,5192,556deferred revenue884,622856,753829,114818,250resale value guar650,000670,000700,000756,800other lt liabilities2,747,2502,638,3732,633,7502,561,886comm stk warrants0000capital lease oblg0000total liabilities24,020,92623,894,56922,687,39421,551,021commits/contingsrdmbl ncis in subs402,943402,943402,943405,835conv senior notes0002nci in subsidiaries900,000900,000900,000863,876common equity5,901,9624,676,0424,108,1814,450,695cash flow statementcash flows from opsnet loss327,997175,599-771,816-784,627 dep/amortization484,383456,125442,458416,233 stock-based comp133,000133,000165,000141,639 am of debt discount35,00035,00035,00039,345 inv write-down48,08735,34725,65818,546 loss on disposals45,00045,00045,00052,237 forex loss (gain)25,00025,00025,00047,661 loss on acq scty0000 non-cash int/other000-3,984 chgs in op as/lb accts rcbl-94,567-300,543-168,319-169,142 inv / op leases84,795-1,353,019-1,022,632-419,277 prepaids/other ca000-50,001 mypower rcvbls + other-15,000-15,000-15,000-57,583 accts pybl/accr liabs140,5001,212,272960,136317,983 deferred revenue75,00065,00050,00045,795 customer deposits00-19,82367,359 other lt liabs000-60,560net cash from ops1,289,195513,780-249,339-398,376cash flows from invpp&e purchases-900,000-800,000-700,000-655,662purchase solar sys-60,000-60,000-70,000-72,975net cash from inv-960,000-860,000-770,000-728,637cash flows from finstock issued0000debt issued100,000100,000100,0001,775,481debt repayments0-400,0000-1,389,388rel pty solar repaids000-17,500coll lease borrowing100,000100,000100,000-87,092stock option excrs75,00075,00075,00094,018capital lease paids-30,000-30,000-30,000-18,787stock+debt issue cost-12,000-12,000-12,000-2,913investment by nci in subs75,00075,00075,00073,704dist to nci in subs-50,000-50,000-50,000-52,942buyouts of nci in subs000-2,921net cash from fin258,000-142,000258,000371,660forex effect13,94417,23211,38210,102net change in cash601,139-470,988-749,957-745,251cash & eq start1,444,7281,915,7162,665,6733,367,914cash & eq end2,045,8671,444,7281,915,7162,665,673