The kind of stuff Lando/Rurijian reposts and retweets:pic.twitter.com/9oVLXkMVNv
Show this thread
Just posting a big beware on Lando, aka @/Rurijian on here while I’m at it, for those who don’t know. He’s a furry artist who is extremely into cub/child NSFW art . Report and block.pic.twitter.com/pbSErcfZeR
-
-
-
also really concerning: his favorite thing to sexualize is The Chipmunks - & his “taste” leans towards tiny anthros that r extremely realistic and barely human... or sometimes just animals. He literally taped a video of a squirrel just to admire its. Balls. Also children. Yeah.pic.twitter.com/Q5Qhn3jI0V
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So yall ok with the sonic cast? But not with other art............ok?pic.twitter.com/B7Sg49jrEQ
-
Point out on the doll anywhere someone mentioned sexualizing Sonic
-
I’m saying is that most the fandom accept the sonic porn And none of those characters are of age of consent. So why isn’t the fandom attacking that portion?
-
Hey! Huge Sonic fan here. The Sonic crew actually are depicted as adults in the comic series during a spin off storyline "Mobius 25 years later". So it's entirely fine to have those characters depicted as adults for said situations
-
Uhhh Yeah! I have that issue It’s a future scenario but before that they were depicted as much younger and now you talking about the Archie comics/IDW comics. But what about video game series? They’re all depicted as young. This is just a case a SJW/liberal double standards
-
It's not double standards if they are literally depicted as adults and you make it clear that those are the forms in which you're discussing. And the fact you likened people having morals and the fact that there are specific as "SJW double standards" is telling.
-
You can't claim everyone is drawing them from the video games when the comics exist just so you can keep ass patting pedos
-
That’s it keep on flamin! I love watching you SJW worms dig your own holes!
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Me going through this post blocking anyone saying this is acceptable.pic.twitter.com/kABirJeGLD
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn't it better to NOT bring it to everyone's attention, rather than kick off a new lynching? I'm very much against the content, but I wouldn't have even known this existed had someone not posted screenshots of the account... :/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh no, he draws things I don't like! SEND THE LYNCH MOB ON HIM! You realize that people who follow him follow him because of his art and his retweets, right? And you realize that, by reporting, you are wasting the Twitter team's time because the content is allowed here?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who cares tho
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t personally think it’s the persons fault they have a fetish on younger people, some people try to seek help, others don’t. I don’t see why people have this fetish, but. It exists, what I personally don’t get. Why is animal cub (child) porn allowed, but human isn’t?
-
Like it literally falls under that category. It’s still child porn, why not ban it?
-
In most places except the UK, Australia and Canada, lolicon is legal or at least condoned.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Even tho I find this incredibly disgusting,I prefer someone watching/commissioning/making cub porn rather that real child porn and/or abusing kids/animals. If they do indeed harm real children/animals, I'd totally be against them. I will block them tho,I don't wanna see that shit
-
So, thank you for making this post
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.