More screenshots.pic.twitter.com/3Vlmv8dWz1
-
-
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn moreShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is cub artwork that TONS of artist draw who cares this page is great for news that totally isn't important what a joke.
-
Cub art in most cases is STILL depicting minors in sexual situations. Sorry you're ignorant to that fact.
-
You should label yourself sjw news I don't see you going after other cub artists again only tacklebox because he is a popular artist. You're not watchdogs you're cucks for drama and validation in slandering artist.
-
So quick to defend CP/Cub Porn, the entire lot of you.
-
So quick to police what people can and can't draw
-
drawing an art depicting what looking like a young child being sexualized in a form of furry art is still wrong,
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If you have a fetish that involves children, please, seek medical attention cuz that's not normal k? thx.
-
You could say the same about furries, though. "If you have a fetish that involves dogs, please, seek medical attention cuz that's not normal k? thx."
-
although furries are not a fetish.
-
I think there's an an argument to be made there about the sexual side of furry being a fetish. That being said, I don't think fetish is a dirty term, and I wear that badge of having fetishes with pride.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Honestly the only reason this is getting brought up is cause he exploded in popularity. There are plenty of other artists out there that draw that nobody even gives a second thought about
-
Unsure if this is directed at me or if I've just been tagged because I wasn't removed from a convo, but I could give two shits about the popularity of someone, if they draw or condone CP, I don't want anything to do with it either way.
-
No wasn't directed at you, forgot to untag sorry. I was just trying to point out that Tackle wouldn't be targeted like this had he not gotten so popular.
-
I dunno maybe he might not have been targeted if he didn't draw cp.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Because shaming will help
Don't trip up guys, you may end up like Israel.
-
This?? doesn't make sense?? Why SHOULDN'T we shame artists who draw cp? how else are we gonna show them what their doing is wrong? when someone (forgot his @ but hes still on here) was drawing nsfw of him and a 5year old girl he only stopped when he was shamed
-
It's not child porn, it's fiction. Secondly, it's only "wrong" because you and a mob of people on Twitter, mostly new furries, think it is, fueled by the trend to call out any perceived injustice. Which isn't a bad thing in and of itself, but can be "burn the witch" real quickly.
-
Most older people in the fandom will probably tell you something completely different about cub: indifference, a disgust with the fetish (while acknowledging that it is, indeed, merely a fetish and not what you think it is), acceptance or even approval.
-
Keep in mind that, for the longest time, the furry fandom was known by anyone outside of it to be a place full of fantasies of the most extreme fetishes. This was and in fact still is true, but what has changed is that new people aren't aware that the fandom bases itself
-
around acceptance of other people's fetishes. Otherwise, it would've imploded a decade ago because "furry community" doesn't work when the vore furries wage wars vs the feral furries vs the inflation furries because they think each other's fetish has got to stop existing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.