Dog

the fake is DEFINITELY a fake https://twitter.com/kngrk9/status/996411667163631616?s=21 … but I don’t know that this puts the original any further away from suspicion. the fake wasn’t the one saying horrible things about children. Maybe this is a second fake, but I find it very hard to believe

we cannot just send people down the river without giving them some chance to try and defend themselves, even with a situation this reprehensible, that’s still a basic tenet of justice. but this defense just doesn’t pass the smell test and raises more questions than it answers

if you had two people impersonating you on telegram, wouldn’t you publicly say you had two fakes? if you’re going to publicly call one out, why not the other one as well, unless it’s not a fake? That’s just my speculation though, it shouldn’t be seen as a factual condemnation.

telegram makes it really difficult to tell who’s who following username changes. It would be dishonest of me not to point out that there is SOME possibility of there being two fakes at play here. but given his fishy way of addressing this, I’m not sure how probable that is

but the usernames are still different, for all we know he could be trying to defend the original from the allegations, for the faker its a burner identity and they have nothing to lose, whereas Seth has a lot to lose for being seen as a child predator

could you ask what other telegram usernames they’ve faked as in the past? Could you show them the messages from the pedo chat and ask if it was them? I don’t even know how much this random faker online can be trusted but it would still be some more information to go off of

I can. He's been honest so far with me being polite. I'm waiting on a reply to that very question now about if those chats were him.