マリア様の婢女

He makes Luther look like an orthodox Catholic. We have TV and internet; nobody can say, "I didn't know he said God isnt real, hell isnt real, Jews have the true religion, Jews are chosen, communism is good, gays are holy," etc. People know this, and adore him. They hate God.

My argument condensed: (1) Pope remains pope until death or some canonical action (2) No one can initiate a coercive canonical action (e.g. deposition) on a superior (3) No one can initiate a canonical action against a Pope (unless they're a pope)

My argument: (1) Who cares? (2) You are actively participating in scandal by your refusal to condemn him every day publically for his numerous public acts of apostasy. (3) I did not convert until last year bc of lukewarm Catholics like you. For the love of God, condemn him.

(4) Francis is not even Catholic. He cant be the head of a group he doesnt even belong to. (5) By calling him your "superior", you say it doesnt matter that he's not even Catholic. If you are too stupid to know whether he's Catholic or not, stop lecturing other people.

(6) His election is invalid anyway, because he's obviously a freemason.

(1) The Church cares about her own law--this is Catholicism (2) I've by no means contributed to scandal--to argue this you have to assume the conclusion that you already know he's not the pope (3) I've no right to condemn a superior (4) Canonically he's Catholic

(5) invalidity would have to be proven canonically because it's covered under canon law.

(6) I could always burn hotter and I pray I do. Categorically calling me lukewarm is inaccurate though because the condemnation you claim is my duty is not in fact my duty.