Dogpatch Press

Hey, casual reminder that drawing revenge porn of a person without their consent is a form of sexual harassment and this shouldn’t be condoned.

Revenge porn by itself is really gross tbh

I hear that, but Larry Flynt comes to mind, even vulgar/explicit stuff qualifies as political satire of a public figure and this is directly referencing their policies. Would love to hear @BoozyBadger's take. Mind you I wouldn't suggest someone do it for sake of rudeness.

Oh, I’m not arguing the legality. I’m sure it’s 100% legal; I just don’t think it’s morally correct to draw an effigy of a female politician in revenge porn without her consent. That’s all I was saying. I don’t agree with this politicians stances but it still doesn’t feel right.

I think politician is the operative word, this can just as easily apply to a guy, case in point, Dan Savage googlebombing "Santorum" with sexual connotation to an anti-gay politician. Calling criticism "harassment" is dangerous. As for it just being not very nice, point taken.

Sexual critique is perfectly valid i think too, pushing back on sex negativity involves a certain "but why does it matter?" A drawing isn't the photo likeness. In this case its someone who made public comment that connected showing boobs with earning rape, so the irony is direct.

XD i just had to give her the full ride xD and she is so anti LGTBQ that making her in this situations was funny as hell

well this is the worst thing i've seen today

Yeah IDK, I could see fursonas being a special thing for deserving candidates only, like not ones trying to bring theocracy, but just think of the potential... Birdy Sanders!