Freakin THANKYOU.
What @DogpatchPress was pushing and promoting was just awful. I don't care how awful you think a person is, you don't send or draw porn of them without consent.
Freakin learn common sense.https://twitter.com/BoozyBadger/status/992967490585137155 …
Nah i wasnt pushing and promoting anything by discussing. Relevant https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_for_the_neologism_%22santorum%22 …
-
-
Not promoting? What's this? https://twitter.com/DogpatchPress/status/992903979871825920 … And this thread? https://twitter.com/Anuvia/status/992907891349716993 … You are supporting porn of someone against their will. That's pretty gross dude.
-
JESUS CHRIST AHHH does not mean support, to be clear.
-
And yet the following tweets in your conversation with Anuvia show you defending the actions, arguing the legality of it. Legality shouldn't even be something worth defending or discussing; whether it is legal or not doesn't mean it's okay.
-
I discussed legality, called it rude, asked the rep if she felt it was fair criticism and if she didn't want to talk about the issue (she had no problem with it), and asked Rama not to continue.
-
There is something to also be said about the later in the chain/in other chains something is mentioned the less visibility it conveniently has, much like
@TartiiCat can miss that, many more can too. It's an annoying side-effect of the platform but you got to think about it. -
It's why I'm not a fan of trying to use Twitter to have any sort of reasonable discussion, especially one with branching discussions around legalities, morality, and other events going on all in chains all over.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.