Let's commission fursonas for all the candidates up for election!https://twitter.com/Pinboard/status/992821916510519296?s=19 …
-
-
Revenge porn by itself is really gross tbh
-
I hear that, but Larry Flynt comes to mind, even vulgar/explicit stuff qualifies as political satire of a public figure and this is directly referencing their policies. Would love to hear
@BoozyBadger's take. Mind you I wouldn't suggest someone do it for sake of rudeness. -
Oh, I’m not arguing the legality. I’m sure it’s 100% legal; I just don’t think it’s morally correct to draw an effigy of a female politician in revenge porn without her consent. That’s all I was saying. I don’t agree with this politicians stances but it still doesn’t feel right.
-
I think politician is the operative word, this can just as easily apply to a guy, case in point, Dan Savage googlebombing "Santorum" with sexual connotation to an anti-gay politician. Calling criticism "harassment" is dangerous. As for it just being not very nice, point taken.
-
Sexual critique is perfectly valid i think too, pushing back on sex negativity involves a certain "but why does it matter?" A drawing isn't the photo likeness. In this case its someone who made public comment that connected showing boobs with earning rape, so the irony is direct.
-
@fakedansavage@rachellarkmusic what do you guys think about making fursonas for politicians and satirizing their furry likenesses? See up thread.https://www.teenvogue.com/story/republican-politician-rep-kelly-townsend-asked-twitter-what-a-furry-is …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.