I have been very desirous of reading a bonafide furry legal professional's assessment of fictional child porn, and I'm a bit surprised you didn't compose it earlier. I've rather intensively studied the concept of obscenity (which is really just an ostensibly free nation's (1)
Oh, I see a psychologist (like lawyers, they have doctorates) for unrelated matters, but I have been utterly candid with him regarding my sexuality, and he has no problems whatsoever with my decision to use, and preference for, artwork, stories, and character development.(11)
-
-
Howdy. Thank you for the response. I’d like to point out I did state I’m torn on whether or not I could vote to convict in this situation. I did not state I would it would not vote to convict, which is what you seem to be taking away from it.pic.twitter.com/3KOywlyoTg
-
I’m personally not going to say “Oh, I think it’s fine,” because I personally don’t think works depicting minors engaged in sexual conduct is fine. But I’m not saying I believe it should carry a criminal penalty or be equated to actual child pornography in a legal sense.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.