You should be aware the AAP is not a reliable source on "Medical Benefit": https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316527603_Cultural_bias_in_American_medicine_the_case_of_infant_male_circumcision … Nearly all other major medical institutions agree that hypothetical benefits do not outweigh the harm, and that even if they did it's STILL not justified: http://cuaj.ca/index.php/journal/article/view/5034/3470 …
-
-
-
As for religious freedom, why are you not concerned with the freedom of the child? They have their own right to decide whether to participate in your religion. What if they wish to practise Sikhism instead, a religion that does not permit circumcision?
-
Let the record show that
@LA_ADL chose to block me rather than answer my simple question
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Forcibly mutilating the genitals of non-consenting babies with the mark of your religion is an egregious violation of the babies' religious freedom. It's an unconscionable human rights violation to permanently amputate functional genital tissue from innocent people. Shame on you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No toleration for genital mutilation!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't you find your obscene practice of depriving your males from a full sexual experience as adults deplorable? What's wrong with the brit shalom?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Any religion that needs to mutilate the genitals of a helpless healthy baby, also needs to modernise. Stonings & slavery used to be acceptable. This is the 21st century. Many Jews choose Brit Shalom. No blood no mutilation. Iceland are dead right to protect the babies' rights.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The AAP is a trade body in whose financial interests it is to maintain totally unethical practice of non-medical male infant circ. The rest of the developed world's doctors do not peddle the myths nor do they need to repair botched circumcisions - which make more $$ for US docs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wonder what your opinion would be if you could see yourselves in an alternate universe where you weren't ritually mutilated as an innocent babe of 8 days. Is there a greater betrayal of love than intentionally causing or allowing needless pain on your defenseless child?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There is no medical benefit to cutting off part of a penis.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Make up your mind. Either religious freedom or medical benefits, but you can't use both together. Either the medical benefits are significant enough on their own or their are irrelevant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why are you against the circumcision ban in Iceland?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This isn't an attack on religion - religions can and should adapt to conform to basic human rights: You could replace the act with a symbolic ritual for newborns, then allow the child to make a consenting decision for themselves when they reach adulthood.
#i2#HisBosyHisChoiceThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
NOthing in the Icelandic bill prevents a grown man from enduring a blood sacrifice if he chooses at an age capable of consent. By forcing it on an infant, you take away his religious and intimate freedom for life. With the Bris Shalom, there's no excuse to hurt children.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.