Vulnerability Note VU#475445

Multiple SAML libraries may allow authentication bypass via incorrect XML canonicalization and DOM traversal

Original Release date: 27 Feb 2018 | Last revised: 27 Feb 2018

Overview

Multiple SAML libraries may incorrectly utilize the results of XML DOM traversal and canonicalization APIs in such a way that an attacker may be able to manipulate the SAML data without invalidating the cryptographic signature, allowing the attack to potentially bypass authentication to SAML service providers.

Description

CWE-287: Improper Authentication

Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) is an XML-based markup language for security assertions regarding authentication and permissions, most commonly used for single sign-on (SSO) services.

Some XML DOM traversal and canonicalization APIs may be inconsistent in handling of comments within XML nodes. Incorrect use of these APIs by some SAML libraries results in incorrect parsing of the inner text of XML nodes such that any inner text after the comment is lost prior to cryptographically signing the SAML message. Text after the comment therefore has no impact on the signature on the SAML message.

A remote attacker can modify SAML content for a SAML service provider without invalidating the cryptographic signature, which may allow attackers to bypass primary authentication for the affected SAML service provider

The following CVEs are assigned:

CVE-2017-11427 - OneLogin’s "python-saml"
CVE-2017-11428 - OneLogin’s "ruby-saml"
CVE-2017-11429 - Clever’s "saml2-js"
CVE-2017-11430 - "OmniAuth-SAML"
CVE-2018-0489 - Shibboleth openSAML C++

More information is available in the researcher's blog post.

Impact

By modifying SAML content without invalidating the cryptographic signature, a remote, unauthenticated attacker may be able to bypass primary authentication for an affected SAML service provider.

Solution

Apply updates

Affected SAML service providers should update software to utilize the latest releases of affected SAML libraries. Please see the vendor list below for more information.

Vendor Information (Learn More)

VendorStatusDate NotifiedDate Updated
Clever, Inc.Affected24 Jan 201826 Feb 2018
Duo SecurityAffected-22 Feb 2018
OmniAuthAffected24 Jan 201806 Feb 2018
OneLogin IncAffected24 Jan 201827 Feb 2018
Shibboleth ConsortiumAffected24 Jan 201806 Feb 2018
AssureBridgeNot Affected-27 Feb 2018
Okta Inc.Not Affected29 Jan 201827 Feb 2018
BoxUnknown23 Feb 201823 Feb 2018
CiscoUnknown23 Feb 201823 Feb 2018
Danish e-Infrastructure Cooperation (WAYF)Unknown24 Jan 201824 Jan 2018
Entr'ouvertUnknown24 Jan 201824 Jan 2018
GitHubUnknown24 Jan 201824 Jan 2018
GoogleUnknown23 Feb 201823 Feb 2018
MicrosoftUnknown23 Feb 201823 Feb 2018
Pivotal Software, Inc.Unknown24 Jan 201824 Jan 2018
If you are a vendor and your product is affected, let us know.

CVSS Metrics (Learn More)

Group Score Vector
Base 6.3 AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:C/I:N/A:N
Temporal 4.9 E:POC/RL:OF/RC:C
Environmental 4.9 CDP:ND/TD:ND/CR:ND/IR:ND/AR:ND

References

Credit

Thanks to Kelby Ludwig of Duo Security for reporting this vulnerability.

This document was written by Garret Wassermann.

Other Information

Feedback

If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us email.