Elon Musk: SpaceX can colonise Mars and build moon base
Musk says project codenamed BFR would also allow commercial travel to anywhere on Earth in under an hour
Elon Musk has unveiled plans for a new spacecraft that he says would allow his company SpaceX to colonise Mars, build a base on the moon, and allow commercial travel to anywhere on Earth in under an hour.
The spacecraft is currently still codenamed the BFR (Big Fucking Rocket). Musk says the company hopes to have the first launch by 2022, and then have four flying to Mars by 2024.
Last year Musk proposed an earlier plan for the spacecraft, but at the time had not developed a way of funding the project.
Speaking at the International Astronautical Congress in Adelaide Australia on Friday, Musk said the company had figured out a way to pay for the project.
The key, he said, was to “cannibalise” all of SpaceX’s other products.
Instead of operating a number of smaller spacecrafts to deliver satellites into orbit and supply the International Space Station, Musk said the BFR would eventually be used to complete all of its missions.
“If we can do that then all the resources that are used for Falcon9, Dragon and Heavy can by applied to this system,” he said.
SpaceX has been working feverishly on reusable spacecraft designs, now completing 16 successful landings in a row of its Falcon9 rocket. That was the key to allowing the ambitious design to be economic, he said.
“It’s really crazy that we build these sophisticated rockets and then crash them every time we fly,” he said. “This is mad.”
Musk said the cost of fuel is low, and so if the crafts were fully reusable, the costs of flights drop dramatically. He said the company had already started building the system, with construction of the first ship to begin next year.
“I feel fairly confident that we can complete the ship and be ready for a launch in five years,” he said.
By 2024, Musk said he wanted to fly four ships to Mars, two of which would have crew in them. By that stage, they planned to be able to build a plant on the surface of Mars that would be able to synthesise fuel for return journeys back from Mars.
For a trip to Mars, he said the craft would be able to hold about 100 people in 40 cabins. But he said once the ship is built, it could be used to travel on Earth too.
Musk did not estimate the cost of such flights, but said that most long-distance flights could be completed in 30 minutes, and you could get anywhere on Earth in under an hour.
“If we’re building this thing to go to the Moon and Mars then why not go to other places on earth as well,” he said.
He said the size of the payload – which would allow items with a diameter of just under 9m – means larger satellites could be delivered to orbit in a single mission.
At a presentation at last year’s International Astronautical Congress in Guadalajara, Mexico, Musk described the earlier iteration of the system with more details about the costs.
For that earlier version, he said the cost of sending a person on the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System would be around $200,000. Musk suggested that multiple space rockets could take 100 people each over 40 to 100 years until a million people lived there.
“It was much too big and fantastical,” said Robert Zubrin, president and founder of Mars Society, a non-profit that promotes human settlement of Mars.
This is a modal window.
Musk’s proposal for getting a million people to Mars as quickly as possible was, Zubrin said, “like a D-Day landing”. Instead, Musk should be thinking of sending just ten people to set up an agricultural base, Zubrin said.
“Then send 20 more people and so forth to develop capabilities to make steel and eventually create institutions like schools.”
“He typically goes into something with over-reach,” Zubrin added, referring to Musk’s tendency to over-promise with many of his projects, including delivery dates of Teslas and the progress of The Boring Company, drilling a subterranean Los Angeles commuter tunnel.
“But he’s able to take criticism and adjust things to become achievable,” said Zubrin.
“If he reduces his launch system from 500 tons to 150 tons or less, that would show he’s serious and would move him from the realm of vision to the realm of engineering.”
Lockheed Martin also presented an idea for a manned Mars mission at the Adelaide event. The aerospace company outlined a six-person space station called Mars Base Camp that it thinks could be orbiting the red planet by 2028 along with a lander that could descend to the surface.
Astronauts on the space station could carry out scientific research and exploration work, including operating rovers and identifying landing spots on the surface of the planet for larger vehicles.
Since you’re here …
… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than ever but advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too.
I appreciate there not being a paywall: it is more democratic for the media to be available for all and not a commodity to be purchased by a few. I’m happy to make a contribution so others with less means still have access to information. Thomasine F-R.
If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps fund it, our future would be much more secure. For as little as £1, you can support the Guardian – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.
View all comments >
comments (1028)
Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion.
In other words : there's no hope for Earth, leave while you can.
There's no long-term hope for humanity only being on Earth (eggs all in one cosmic basket), hence his drive to get us out into the Solar System and beyond.
The only way we're leaving is with a major step change in technology. This stuff is all fun and everything but looks add much like interstellar colonisation as taking a long bath looks like captain cook going to America.
Have you seen literally any sci-fi?
So just how inhabitable is it on a scale of 10? (1=deadly no matter how hard you try, 10= earth)
Atmosphere? Soil? Water? Radiation?
Basically no better than space.
Well, there's water, and CO2 in the atmosphere (admittedly at low pressure) so in theory as long as you have power you can create a livable environment that doesn't have to be closed loop. So considerably better than space.
I'd give it a 3.5, maybe a 4 with some investment pumped into the environmental tech.
Tough, but colonists with the right stuff could make a go of it
How inhabitable do you think the Earth is? We need artificial help (clothing) to deal with the range of temperatures. We get sun burn and skin cancer from to much exposure to the sun.
Musk: by 2027 Space X will operate cruises to Jupiter's moons with spa breaks on Europa, 8 course meals on IO and a toilet break on the way back at Ganymede.
That's nothing. I've already visited the Planning Offices on Alpha Centuri. Apparently, there are plans to build a by-pass somewhere near here.
Are those plans in a locked filing cabinet with a sign on it, that says "Beware of the Leopard" ?
Could you please take Trump, May and all the Tory politicians on the first run please.
And accidentally bump the BRS (Big Red Switch) to self destruct
With THAT skin colour, Trump should blend in well with the Martian surface.
The aliens already based on the dark side of the moon won't allow it.
3 comments so far and no snark unrelated to the article!?
I’ll wait for “Something something Michael Gove!” or “Something something Brexit me to the moon”.
And I couldn’t even finish my own comment before it happened. Note: I’m not defending the topics *at all*, it’s just tiring seeing no sensible discussion in Guardian comment sections. It’s up there with YouTube.
Nice of you to step into the breach.
It’s the same dull drivel. A sad bubble of guffawing with no room for sensible discourse.
Currently still codenamed the BFR (Big Fucking Rocket),
Brilliant should keep the name .
I prefer Rocky McRocketface.
It will end up being changed to something scientific like Rocky McRocketface.
The biggest obstacle to Elon Musk's plans is Trump's determination to wipe us all out with his BFNW (Big Fucking Nuclear War)
Apparently NASA is dead set against colonisation, well that is what you must assume if you believe the daily mail who are reporting the agency only wants to send women only missions to Mars as women have less impure thoughts than men and are less likely to want sex. No sex, no colony.
men are redundant and expensive alternative to a tube of juice
Maybots
(Any men now having impure thoughts, kill yourselves)
Yep - that's the DM for yer !
I didn't realise it was April 1st?
Elon Musk operates on a different timescale to the rest of us. For him April 1st is also Groundhog Day. It's just a question of who is fooling who, endlessly repeating. One day he will work it out, and a self-driven rocket will take him to Mars, and he will become richer than Mark Zuckerberg too.
How can we make this article about brexit racists. Think people think!! On topic: it's inevitable we will colonise mars and the moon. We need to spread our bets because we will probably fuck this planet up.
It's the only thing that gets Katie Hopkins out of bed these days.
Dare I suggest that learning how to NOT fuck this planet up might be a Good Thing to do before buggering off to fuck another one up ?
Don't you mean the only thing that gets Hopkins out of her coffin these evenings?
I wish Mr Musk and SpaceX could sort out my neighbourhood first. The streets aren't safe anymore.
Bloody potholes.
Sign in or create your Guardian account to recommend a comment