Taqqiya Purveyor

Imagine lying to pretend you care about bullying because your only goal politically is to OWN THE SJWS! Especially gross when you're using a woman's death for your political ends while working for one of the nastiest people on the internet

And from a moral perspective, a famous person killing themselves over getting dog piled on the internet is an unforeseeable consequence. People get dog piled constantly and few commit suicide. It's tragic, it was wrong to dog pile her, but they aren't guilty of killing her

You can't base a moral argument on unforeseeable consequences of a given activity. If you think dog piling and bullying is wrong, it's *equally wrong* whether someone chooses to kill themselves or not because you can't control or foresee the likelihood of suicide

That's been my point the last few days. All this petulant, hypocritical grandstanding about how she was bullied to suicide ignores that no one possibly could have seen that coming and hence they are no more guilty than anyone else who engages on dog piling on here

Her suicide is a substantively different issue than, for example, someone being fired because people go after their job. If you go after someone's job and they're fired that's a *readily foreseeable consequence* so you are morally culpable in a way you aren't over this suicide

And regardless, Ian Miles Cheong can go fuck himself. The entire idea he cares about bullying as anything other than a PWN the SJWs political gambit is laughable. When your entire internet presence is being a dishonest partisan don't expect me to think you suddenly grew morals

Everyone thinks that they're "just a single person" calling someone a name until it is too late. This is what Wokie is talking about. Ian Miles Cheong hasn't been responsible for bullying someone into suicide, but not out of principle, but entirely out of blind luck so far.

You can't tell if there's a pile on going on? Please.

And you don't think Ian and Milo have participated in and/or instigated pile-ons? Just check the replies to Ian's tweet to see how hypocritical he's being. People have receipts.

Of course. And does online bullying have consequences or not? Is online bullying harmless or not?

It's not harmless, there is enough evidence on that

I agree. Sounds like @notwokieleaks is claiming a mob cant be blamed for a suicide.

Yeah, there are definitely two different debates here: 1. Can a mob be blamed for a suicide? 2. Is Ian Miles Cheong being hypocritical? Ian's hypocritical because his answer for 1 used to be "no," but now it's "yes" because it's politically convenient for him.

Who has Milo bullied and why?