A Japanese doctor who has stood up to a campaign of misinformation around a common anti-cancer vaccine has won a prestigious prize for championing evidence in the face of hostility and personal threats.
Riko Muranaka at Kyoto University was awarded the 2017 John Maddox prize on Thursday for her efforts to explain the safety of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine amid strong opposition from anti-vaccine activists and a small group of academics.
Muranaka was praised by colleagues for her courage and leadership as she endured insults, litigation and attempts to undermine her professional status as the HPV vaccine came under attack in Japan. While the jab is used without fuss in many countries, in Japan and some other nations, fears raised by campaigners have hit vaccine uptake rates.
Britain has offered the HPV vaccine on its national immunisation program since 2008. The jab protects against several strains of HPV that cause nearly all cases of cervical cancer, a disease that claims more than quarter of a million lives globally each year.
Muranaka began writing about the vaccine after Japanese TV stations and other national media carried unconfirmed reports of immunised children experiencing pain, walking problems, seizures and other neurological issues. Some parents posted videos of their children online, claiming their symptoms were caused by the HPV jab. Despite its own health ministry finding no evidence that the vaccine was to blame, the Japanese government suspended proactive recommendations for the jab in 2013.
Uncritical media coverage and the government’s stance spread concern over the jab’s safety and vaccination rates in Japan have crashed from more than 70% to less than 1% in recent years. The situation was compounded by a small number of doctors proposing a new condition, namely HPV vaccination-associated neuro-immunopathic syndrome, or HANS, based on patients’ complaints. The Japanese government committee to review vaccine reactions has concluded that the symptoms are probably psychosomatic.
Muranaka said sensational media coverage helped spread unfounded fears over the HPV vaccine across Japan. “I was really surprised that people believed it so easily. With screening and this vaccine we could prevent many deaths from this disease in Japan, but we are not taking the opportunity,” she said. A handful of other countries are witnessing similar trends, with Ireland and Denmark both experiencing falls in HPV vaccination rates.
In June, the World Health Organisation (WHO) restated that there was no evidence the vaccine caused the reported illnesses. The WHO’s Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety said that “despite the extensive safety data available for this vaccine, attention has continued to focus on spurious case reports and unsubstantiated allegations.”
Muranaka is now embroiled in a court case with another doctor who was commissioned by the Japanese government to investigate adverse reactions to the vaccine. Shuichi Ikeda at Shinshu University claimed that mouse studies revealed a link between the vaccine and brain damage. Muranaka claims that Ikeda fabricated the results, and while a university investigation cleared him of that specific charge, it criticised Ikeda for presenting early data from a single mouse as conclusive medical evidence.
In speaking out, Muranaka has been threatened and accused of being in the pay of the vaccine’s manufacturers, or the government, to promote the jab, and even of being a “WHO spy”.
The John Maddox prize is awarded by the journal Nature, the Kohn Foundation, and the charity Sense about Science, to people who promote science and evidence on matters of public interest. Previous winners include the psychiatrist Simon Wessely, who faced death threats for his work on chronic fatigue syndrome and mental health, and Elizabeth Loftus, whose work on false memories propelled her into controversies over the unreliability of eyewitness testimonies and recovered memories of child abuse.
“I really hope that the prize helps scientists and journalists in Japan to speak more about the truth,” Muranaka said. “I hope it will help people take the side of science.”
Heidi Larson, director of the vaccine confidence project at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine said there was no scientific evidence linking HPV to the reported neurological symptoms. “The dramatic drop in vaccine acceptance has been influenced by aggressive negative social media, mainstream media that has been biased towards the negative personal stories, as well as, and very importantly, the government not standing up for the vaccine and the vaccine science in the face of public anxiety and uncertainty,” she said.
“The parents of the young women who have had these reactions are convinced that these symptoms are caused by the vaccination and are unlikely to change their minds,” Larson said. “But it is important for young women who have not yet been vaccinated, and for their parents, to have more information on the number of girls around the world who have been successfully vaccinated without any negative reactions, and to understand better what it means to have cervical cancer.
Katsuyuki Kinoshita, head of the Japanese Association of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, who nominated Muranaka for the prize, said: “Her courageous challenge in demonstrating the safety of the HPV vaccine, despite insult, litigation and attempts to undermine her professional status, epitomises the core spirit of the Maddox prize.”
View all comments >
comments (283)
Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion.
Congratulations Dr. Muranaka.
The trouble with the anti vax lobby is that they buy into a ‘new idea’ without critical reasoning. It happened here with the MMR with predictable and well publicised results. It’s now happening (especially in Japan) with the HPV vaccine.
Well done Dr Muranaka for your courage in standing against this, despite huge vilification, your award was richly deserved.
We must get some kind of control or increased understanding of the bad science that opposes these vaccination programmes (to what end - it’s baffling) before it causes the untold damage which inevitably results.
The trouble with the HPV vaccination programme is that it is15-20 years before it starts to have an effect. You can do a huge amount of damage in 15-20 years,
Anti vaccine nuts out in force I see. It's one thing pushing woo like homeopathy or healing crystals since mainly it's only credulous fools wasting their money. But those who spread falsehoods & withhold vaccines from their children not only put their own children at risk from easily preventable disease & death also put at risk others. Digusting fools.
Ok all you people who do no research what so ever and are happy to inject any toxic substance into your body and that of your children in the name of Health have a chance to win 1 million. Jamie Mcintyre is offering 1 million to prove vaccines are completely safe and effective.
Maybe just read the product insert with the list of side effects and potential complications and save yourself getting over excited about winning a million. Also vaccine injury compensation schemes are testimony to the fact that they are not.
I take it you have done your ‘research ‘. Would you care to tell us about the labs you’ve worked in and the papers you’ve published?
Vaccines aren't 100% safe or effective. No treatment or medicine is. Neither are bridges but we still cross them and neither are planes but we don't stop using them. Will you refuse antibiotics when your doctor prescribes them because statistically you're far more likely to have serious side effects from those?
You claim you've done research but you've clearly rushed over basic immunology and toxicology. Can you explain how it's possible for a single dose of few hundred micrograms of something to be toxic? Not even drugs have a single effect at that dose. But of course I guess polio and whooping cough are fine to have instead and don't have a much higher chance of resulting in far more serious complications.....
We need a vaccine that will prevent confirmation bias.
If this wasn't the Guardian they'd also mention that the same HPVs affected by Gardasil also cause throat cancer (but we like to blame smoking) and penis cancer (but fuck men, right?).
I love it when people make up nonsense
Research confirms Suppressed comments, whilst also adding mouth cancer & anal cancer - in fact cancer anywhere the virus is transmitted. Only when this info is well known will all people support the virus.
Currently, the media focus is on women, thus making it a women's issue and something that men may ignore, much like breast cancer - which also affects men. This leaves men ignorant of the risk and unsupported when they get these cancers.
"Suppressed" is correct re throat cancer and penis cancer. Additionally there is mouth cancer and anal cancer all caused by the HPVs. HPV affects both genders which is why boys now get the vaccination.
Sadly, many men are ignorant of the risk and see the issue as a women's issue, so not their concern. This may mean they are less supportive of the value of the vaccine. This ignorance increases their risk and reduces the level of support available if they get these cancers. The same occurs with breast cancer, which also afflicts men.
Of course heart disease is an even greater killer of both genders.
will she take personal responsibility for injury/death?
Will you take responsibility for any extra deaths caused by cervical cancer and the rest?
Do you prefer the corporations to earn lots more extra money through chemo and other such expensive therapies?
Peggy is a conspiracy nutcase. You will never convince her.
Why don't we look at that question after you show that vaccines cause more harm than they prevent?
We'll be waiting.
Anti-vaxxers, Trumpists, Brexiters, climate change deniers - all examples of the age of unreason we live in.
You may feel a lovely warm satisfaction that you're really speshul and know something other people don't, but anti-vaxxers cause people to die
I'd be really impressed if you could cite some specific examples of people that don't vaccinate in full or in part causing death in others. Anyway, here's something I know, it doesn't make me feel in the least bit special to share it, but people should be aware, and if they do some independent research and decide vaccination is for them then that's their decision.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10067-017-3768-5
One of the main reasons that gardasil is considered safe is that they used aluminium adjuvant as placebo, or they used another HPV vaccine containing aluminium. Therefore, despite aluminium being neurotoxic, there was little discernable difference between vaccine and placebo. In another control arm they used saline. In this group there were very few side effects. What this indicates then is how harmful aluminium is. If you have all 3 injections, there is a 2 percent chance of developing a new autoimmune disease within 6 months. With this information in mind, is it worth the risk? The studies behind gardasil are junk. One of their lead scientists came out and said so.
You can find details of some of the 9028 preventable deaths here.
The Jenny McCarthy body count? OMFG!!
The alleged link between some HPV types and uterine cancer has never been proven. The vaccine is completely unnecessary inasmuch as the cancer takes decades to appear, and is detectable in routine exams. It is easily eradicated in early stages. The number of deaths in the U. S. is miniscule--less than the number of deaths from anemia. Vaccinating millions of young women to avoid something that is completely preventable with yearly PAP smears is marketing, not science. On top of these facts is the growing awareness that repeatedly injecting people with aluminum, one of the ingredients in HPV vaccine, has side effects. One of them is that it can travel to the brain. One of the listed side effects of this drug is immediate collapse. Facts left out of this article.
BTW, I won't insult your intelligence by pointing out that scientists never say they have proved that a particular agent causes a particular disease, as you, no doubt, know that already. I'm sure that it was a mere slip of your fingers on the keyboard.
Cervical cancer kills around 900 women every year. This vaccine is likely to prevent a proportion of those deaths. So far the vaccine itself has killed nobody.
'Repeatedly' injecting people with fractions of a mg of aluminium has no real effect on people, sorry.
Cervical cancer kills around 900 women every year. This vaccine is likely to prevent a proportion of those deaths. So far the vaccine itself has killed nobody.
'Repeatedly' injecting people with fractions of a mg of aluminium has no real effect on people, sorry.
Clearly the Russians are spreading vaccine disinformation again.
Ha ha...
Sign in or create your Guardian account to recommend a comment