×

Details which the movies have which you would like to have in the books? by Vality9 in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That one never made sense to me, since it was Draco who said it wrong, not Ron.

Details which the movies have which you would like to have in the books? by Vality9 in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel that a lot of the things you mentioned that were in the movies, didn't need to be in the books. The movies had to put those scenes in them to make up for a lack of character development or plot development. It's like Dobby's death scene. In the book Dobby only said 'Harry Potter' and it was all he needed to say, we knew how much Harry meant to him and the other way around. But in the movie they had to have him say more to come even close to having an emotional scene, because they hadn't developed his character.

As for Harry confronting Snape in the great hall; apart from Radcliffe's uptight acting, it was a nice scene. But Harry in the movie focuses on confronting Snape, while Harry in the book knows that revenge is not the priority and focuses on fulfilling his task. It's many scenes like this where the different decisions Harry makes in the movies vs the books that make book Harry so much smarter.

One little thing I really did like though was Harry's little 'yes!' moment in DH1 when Hermione finally suggested they go to Godric's Hollow. And that hug between Harry and Sirius is a moment I always watch back after I've finished rereading OotP.

Spotted this on the road. by jkatlanta in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope for them they don't work for free.

Thrice defied by hokiewankenobi in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what Rowling said in an interview, even refusing to join Voldemort already counted as defying him. So I don't know whether it will really be as exciting as you think. But we can hope. I would love to see a short story of James and Sirius messing with Voldemort or some Death Eaters.

How big world Hp be without the movies. by Brainsun in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Of course the fandom got bigger with the movies, but I think you're greatly underestimating how popular the books were already. They even released an adult's book cover because there were so many adults reading the books, either in secret or openly. Just look at some of the interviews and press reports of before the movies were released. This series took off very quickly.

As for me, I did end up reading the series because of the movie. Even though I've always been a bookworm, I didn't like Harry Potter. Some of my classmates in primary school were huge fans and my aunt tried to get me to read the books several times, but for some strange reason I didn't want to. Then my parents bought me the first movie when it got out when I was 11 and I was hooked. By then the first four books were out, and I bought them all as quickly as possible after I had seen the movie. But I can honestly say the books wouldn't just be another book series without the movies. Thankfully the books are far more prominent in my imagination than the movies are. The movies were made because of how wonderful the books are, but they never magaged to truly capture that in the movies. Thankfully at 11 I wasn't a critical movie viewer.

Hogwarts Tattoo (my first tattoo) by LoveyBiscuits in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's beautiful. I want to get a hogwarts tattoo as well eventually, but I'm not exactly sure what I want it to be yet. It's always great to see tattoos here to get some inspiration.

Why was Harry not more popular? by coconutcancer in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think he was pretty popular. There are many mentions of students whispering as he walks by, even standing up from dinner to have a good look at him. Whenever an article or something came out he was the talk of the school. But the problem was that his popularity came and went depending on the way certain people, like Fudge looked at him.

Aside from that, throughout the books, we see Harry with a pretty tight knit group of friends. We do see a lot of other students he's friendly with, but he's not the kind of guy to have a laugh with just anyone. So I imagine that limits his popularity. From what I remember from school, the popular kids were either assholes, were loud and attention seeking, or were just really easy going and very easily made friends with people. Harry is none of those. While he is generally friendly, unless he or his friends get attacked, he seemed pretty closed off to anyone outside his group of friends.

People being too hard on the series as of late by VeelaThwip in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think a lot of the criticism on the series is justified. I grew up loving the books completely and it took a bit of growing up before I could look at the series more objectively. I consider Rowling to be a wonderful writer and the Harry Potter series to be one of the best in the world, but the books do have their flaws and it's okay to recognize that. I don't mind anyone pointing out things the books are lacking and I'm always happy to have discussions about it. To me however, even knowing the books' flaws doesn't really matter to me, but they don't really make me love the books any less. The good things are so great and worth it that I can ignore the bad things.

One of the things I like about reddit (despite all the bad things) is that a lot of the people here know every detail of the series, which makes discussions a lot of fun since we're not just judging characters and plots on superficial, general stuff, but take all details into account. I love that kind of stuff.

As for the things you mention, that to me leans more towards blind hate. I think a lot of those people hate the books without even having read them and a lot of others hate them because they don't seem to think that you love several series at once. Especially the kind of people who pitch Harry Potter and LotR against each other and can't stand that Harry Potter is so popular when they feel that LotR should be the only fantasy series in excistence that gets any praise. I don't like people who reject something at face value.

And yes, there are some people who have read the books and can't stand them. I feel a lot of these people don't look at the books objectively, or only look at a small part of it. Or maybe it's just me. Whatever it is, it sucks. To a certain extent, I can understand. I grew up with these books, and the characters still feel almost like real people to me. Certain decisions made in the books made me feel bitter about it and that's difficult to let go. But it makes no sense and it definitely shouldn't lead to people hating the series entirely.

The biggest thing that annoys me about people who have blind hate for anything is that there is no talking with them. I'm happy to have discussions and defend my point of view over Harry Potter or anything really, but these people don't have reasons for hating, so there is no chance of a discussion with them. They have nothing to back up their argument and they aren't willing to listen to another's point of view, they just want to hate and want others to hate as well.

Just recognize that you saying Fantastic Beasts is great, that Pottermore is fine, that there are no great plotholes, or what you do or don't consider canon is just an opinion as well. Just because you have those opinions doesn't mean everyone has. Understand that everybody looks at the series in their own way, and second, that many of us have long term attachments to these books and they mean a lot to us. That a book series can do that to us speaks of it's exellence, but also means that they have come to life in our minds and we don't look at them objectively. From your description it's clear that you don't either and that's fine. Just recognize that they are your subjective opinions and not facts.

Everyone hates on the 4th film, yet I believe it gave us one of the greatest scenes in the series. by Zalzagor in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's a matter of opinion. I get why people like it. I couldn't help but notice and be annoyed by Radcliffe's continued groaning.

In the books I found the scene scary. In the movie, Harry was constantly whimpering and Voldemort was prancing around like a ballerina. Thankfully the book scene is far more prominent in my mind.

Fandom misconceptions: Hermione isn't "close-minded" - she simply disliked that Xenophilius Lovegood used bad reasoning in his argument for the Hallows' existence by Obversa in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hermione is the very definition of close minded.

They all have their flaws and strengths, this is one of Hermione's flaws. This is not solely based on the scene you described. She's so close minded that Dumbledore actually counted on her to slow Harry down. But she's not just close minded, she's dismissive and condescending about it, even when it turns out she was wrong, which in the latter books is more often than not. This is when Harry has gone through a lot of character growth while she stayed mostly the same.

Things about the books/movies that bother you more than they should? by [deleted] in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Why would you assume children growing up in the wizarding world don't learn things like maths and literature?

For one thing, Rowling confirmed that they get taught at home.

For another, you may have noticed that all students at school are capable of writing essays and using money. I have no idea how you come to conclusion that they don't learn these things.

Of course they get an education! Even in the real word, school isn't the only option. In certain countries there are plenty of children who get homeschooled. Why on earth would you think that with the wizarding world existing, muggle school would be the only option available?

Can’t we please reserve judgement on Johnny Depp until we actually see the movie? by newboy97 in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With actors this popular and well known, more often than not they get invited to audition, instead of the actor having to go to the director. So my point stands, the director chooses the actor based on past performances.

Can’t we please reserve judgement on Johnny Depp until we actually see the movie? by newboy97 in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. I don't know exactly what happened with Heard, but it doesn't matter to me. In my mind, the actor's personal life has nothing to do with the actor's performance. I come to watch Grindelwald, not Depp.

Can’t we please reserve judgement on Johnny Depp until we actually see the movie? by newboy97 in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The guy who started this topic is actually part of that circle jerk. I like discussing opinions and seeing people's personal experiences. It's completely fine if someone has a different opinion than me. But what the OP does and some other people do is basically tell people that they're not allowed to have their own opinion. That's no great way to have a conversation.

Can’t we please reserve judgement on Johnny Depp until we actually see the movie? by newboy97 in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First of all, we have seen him in the first movie. So we have something to judge him on.

And you know how directors decide which actors to choose? By looking at their past performances. That's the best indicator we have of how they'll do in the future.

So get over yourself, everybody has their own opinion. That's just how it is. I like having discussions, or conversations on reddit. So it's completely fine with me if people have different opinions than I do and we can discuss them. But you don't tell people that they're not allowed to have opinions.

If you want people to change their mind over Depp (personally, I'm half dreading half carefully optimistic), use reasoned arguments to debate with people. That way you're setting up an open conversation, instead of telling people what to do and think, which inevitably antagonizes people.

I know we all hate Umbridge. But as I'm reading through the OoTP again, I can't help but think how stupid Harry is. by BEllinWoo in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I consider Harry to be quite intelligent, not stupid. Definitely more intelligent than the average person. That's the weird thing about fictional characters. I doubt there are many, if any, people in real life who would have handled things better if they had Harry's life and were in his situation. We all make mistakes sometimes, yet with fictional characters we pick apart every decision and judge them for it far more harshley.

Which elective courses would you pick for third year? by Reine_zofia in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ancient runes because I love history and language, especially when these runes would be used for magic purposes, and care of magical creatures because it's my goal to work with animals.

What do you feel about the romantic pairings in the books? by CaliforniaMntnSnake in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm happy with them, especially Harry and Ginny. I can't think of any other girl in the series who is worthy of him and who fits with him.

Why didn't Voldemort use Legilimency to read the prophecy from Harry's mind in OOTP? by desh00 in harrypotter

[–]Amy713 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They did screw it up. There is no doubt that Voldemort could have used legilimency. Voldemort in the books is well established as someone who is skilled at it. And legilimency is pretty much like mind reading, Snape just doesn't like it being called that, because it's more intricate and more difficult. But it's clear in the books that legilimency can be used to view someone's memory, so Voldemort could have watched Harry's memory of hearing the prophecy.

Aside from that, in the movie, the prophecy just started saying it's contents out loud, probably loud enough for the death eaters around them to hear it. It was completely quiet around them. In the book at least when the prophecy broke and the contents spoken, there was noise from the fighting around Harry so nobody heard it.