Hmmmm.....profit.
@anthronw
#AnthroNWpic.twitter.com/7ZnKnv2aiG
True and good use of that resource. However in the state of WA they have registered as both a nonprofit and a for-profit corporation. Raises questions about how the funds are being handled/funneled and which entity is receiving the funds at what time. https://www.sos.wa.gov/corps/search_results.aspx?search_type=simple&criteria=all&name_type=starts_with&name=Anthro&ubi= …
-
-
I am just amazed how how people are so quick to jump on the bandwagon to try and destroy any new event in Seattle. If this the first time, I'd maybe buy it. But the boy has cried wolf many times now. Why not let Seattle just have their own con?
-
It's not about that. I'd love to have a local con in Seattle again. But this con's actions raise questions.
-
As has every convention in existence. It's like everyone in Seattle says "a con must cater 100% to my tastes or I will destroy it". Problem is, everyone has different tastes, so there's no way a con can be 100% what you want, and also 100% what everyone else wants.
-
Dude. I pointed out a business paperwork oddity. I didn't mention my tastes. You're coming at me unnecessarily. If there's a simple answer to the question I posed then that's all that's needed.
-
If not this, I'm sure there's be some other aspect you'd find for people to attack. This isn't about the paperwork, but something much larger. It's not even about this con, what about the one in Tacoma? Or RF? Others? Not the first con attacked.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.