Note: it's weakly argued and poorly supported regardless of language
-
-
-
>Cites proper sources with unbiased scientists >Doesn't matter because it's 'poorly supported' according to
@Fired4Woo -
> Makes biological claims that are not supported by mainstream biological science > Cites psychologists instead Yeah seems legit
-
They don’t want to discuss the new essay by a biologist with more relevant work experience who refutes his essay.https://medium.com/@tweetingmouse/the-truth-has-got-its-boots-on-what-the-evidence-says-about-mr-damores-google-memo-bc93c8b2fdb9?source=linkShare-8699e1c7a0e4-1503256790 …
-
I think it’s only fair to ask them, “did you read the rebuttal?” If not, you don’t get to debate the topic until you have. I read his essay.
-
Now it’s his defenders’ turn to read the copious evidence against his vague, unsupported theories. Damore’s Wikipedia refs were misleading.
-
If you read Erin Giglio’s rebuttal, you can see that the original research doesn’t support the summary in Wikipedia that Damore copied. Sad.
-
Someone told me they didn’t read beyond the first screen because they didn’t like the Terry Pratchett quote for some reason. What an excuse.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Unfortunate, given that it's not only wrong but terribly written
-
Insults author, cites nothing inaccurate... Troll's gonna troll.
-
James Damore vs Prog Groupthink (James on the left)
#KickstartDebate#GoogleMemopic.twitter.com/yC1W8dhGLC -
So it’s groupthink to disagree with an nearly baseless opinion?
-
It's groupthink to think what the other group doesn't. They don't groupthink though. They're woke. Probably.
-
Considering that Damore offered his ideas for how Google could better accommodate women, the reaction seems slightly overwrought. Oh well...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I just posted it into several tech wechat groups in China
-
That was a dumb idea
-
Repeating nonsense generally is
-
thank you for your excellent contributions to twitter
-
Thanks for helping make tech a little shittier
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.