<div style="display:none;"> <img src="//pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-6EzWtvBV9sFU3.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt="Quantcast"/> </div>
EVESPLAINING
Stop Saying 'Alt-Left'

ByEve Peyserillustrated byLia Kantrowitz

Donald Trump has appropriated an anti-leftist slur invented by liberals. It's time to abandon the phrase as meaningless.

In a press conference at Trump Tower on Tuesday, the president blamed "both sides" for the violence at a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville that left one counter protester dead. "What about the alt-left that came charging at the, as you say, the alt-right?" Trump opined. "Do they have any semblance of guilt?"

The alt-left has no semblance of guilt because the "alt-left" does not exist.

The alt-right is an amorphous movement with a fair amount of internal disagreement, but you can point to certain nodes and leaders: Breitbart, Steve Bannon, Milo Yiannopoulos, Mike Cernovich, 4chan, r/The_Donald, Richard Spencer, and so on. Some are explicit white supremacists and some aren't, but they have shared beliefs that include an anti-immigrant nationalism, a love for Donald Trump, protectionist views on trade, a hatred of establishment Republicans, and so on.

There's no corresponding movement on the left. Does "alt-left" mean violent anti-fascists? Black Lives Matter activists? Bernie Sanders supporters who are vocal online? People who think the Democrats should reject identity politics? The Democratic Socialists of America? Actual communists?

As Mark Pitcavage, an analyst at the Anti-Defamation League, explained to the New York Times recently, "[The term alt-left] did not arise organically, and it refers to no actual group or movement or network. It's just a made-up epithet, similar to certain people calling any news they don't like 'fake news.'"

And the people who pioneered that epithet aren't right-wingers but liberals.

It remains unclear where Trump first heard about the "alt-left"—Sean Hannity talked about the dangers of the alt-left on his show in November, and the term has been used in conservative circles to denigrate leftist activists. But "alt-left" wasn't cooked up in some right-wing think tank as a brilliant rhetorical weapon to use against the resistance warriors. Rather, it was popularized by Hillary Clinton supporters as a slur to dismiss those to the left of them.

I know what I'm talking about, having been accused of being part of the alt-left myself. According to a cursory Twitter search, the first time someone threw that term at me was in October 2016, undoubtedly due to both my penchant for vulgarity and my outspoken support of Sanders.

Back then, the phrase was largely synonymous with "Bernie bro"—which, if you recall, was an invention of the Clinton campaign used to frame Sanders supporters as misogynists. The "alt-left" became somewhat of a mainstream liberal talking point in the summer of 2016, thanks to prominent pundits like Nation writer and MSNBC contributor Joan Walsh, Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden, and Media Matters founder Eric Boehlert.

In March, Vanity Fair published an essay by James Walcott headlined "Why the Alt-Left Is a Problem, Too." In perhaps the clearest example of how the term equates the hateful rhetoric of the alt-right with the left's frustration with the centrism of the Democrats, Walcott writes, "Disillusionment with Obama's presidency, loathing of Hillary Clinton, disgust with 'identity politics,' and a craving for a climactic reckoning that will clear the stage for a bold tomorrow have created a kinship between the 'alt-right' and an alt-left."

It's telling that Walcott lumps in such disparate figures as the socialist magazine Jacobin, Glenn Greenwald, and Mickey Kaus, a formerly liberal writer who is now a Trump supporter because of his views on immigration. It's also downright disingenuous to assert that disliking Barack Obama and Clinton—both centrist figures—makes someone an unhinged extremist. There are plenty of reasonable left-wing reasons to condemn Obama's use of drone warfare, Hillary Clinton praising Walmart and big banks in paid speeches, or the fact that the Affordable Care Act didn't do enough to ensure healthcare for all.

Leftism—actual leftism, as opposed to the kind of moderate liberalism that has defined the Democratic Party for a generation—is unmistakably on the rise. Sanders's primary campaign, along with the terrifying consequences of a Trump presidency, has inspired some formerly disaffected people to become politically active, and convinced others that the Democratic establishment isn't equipped to handle this moment. In the past year, membership of the Democratic Socialists of America ballooned from 8,000 to 25,000. Left-wing media outlets and podcasts have blossomed, and Democratic politicians have embraced leftists policies like single-payer healthcare.

For what feels like at least 600 years, Bernie and Hillary supporters of varying degrees of importance have been bickering about how far left the Democrats should lean. During the election, the centrist-left did an effective job of mischaracterizing Bernie supporters as woman-hating bigots who are a degree away from embracing the pseudo-populism Trump espouses.

Needless to say, there is a lot of bad blood between Democratic factions. But there is an iota of hope.

Neera Tanden, who is no stranger to feuding with leftists on Twitter, told me, "I've used [alt-left] to describe particular people who've used racially charged terms," like those who endorsed a Medium post imploring anti-establishment leftist activists to work with the alt-right. "Trump's use of the term to paint the entire left is obviously abhorrent— he uses it to attack those who are standing up for racial justice while I have used it for the opposite [reason]. But given his use, I won't use it again."

I hope other liberals follow Tanden's lead. After all, the alleged "alt-left" was on the front lines of the counterprotests in Charlottesville, and will continue to fight racism, corporate greed, and the toxicity of Trump—causes all progressives can endorse. To liken them to the alt-right diminishes their work, and hurts the resistance.

Follow Eve Peyser on Twitter.

food
I Went to a Brunch Convention to Discover the Secrets of Brunch
Megan Koester

Megan Koester

All photos by the author

Is brunch a stupid meal for the privileged? I set out to find out.

I have always considered brunch to be class warfare; an excuse for well-off white women with top buns to max out their father's credit cards and men with questionable facial hair to stand in line for bread by choice. It is why, whenever a well-meaning friend asks me to eat before 3 PM on a weekend, I emphatically decline.

Which means, of course, I am wholly unfamiliar with the actuality of brunch. I have wantonly judged, seething, from a distance for years, yet rarely experienced the stimulus itself. But blind hatred isn't a particularly attractive quality, especially given our current political climate.

Which is why, in the interest of seeing how the other half eats, I have found myself wearing a flimsy paper badge around my neck at 1 PM on a Sunday. "Get ready to brunch so hard," it reads. The fact that this statement isn't preceded by a hashtag perplexes me. If an event catered to millennials occurs without one, has it actually occurred?

The badge grants me entrance to Downtown LA's BrunchCon, a weekend-long celebration of all things half breakfast, half lunch, with tastings from over fifty vendors, photo ops in front of signs that read "#CulturedAF" and "#FoodPorn" (finally, the hashtags I, a millennial, crave), beer pong and, according to the event's website, "a BOTTOMLESS MIMOSA BAR and a BOTTOMLESS BLOODY MARY BAR SPONSORED BY KETEL ONE!" My fellow attendees have paid $65 for the privilege of listening to nondescript top 40 music whilst consuming mass quantities of off-brand champagne and congealed eggs.

In the VIP holding area, people mingle under fluorescent lights. Chugging mimosas out of plastic cups, they anxiously wait for the event to open; they have paid $30 more than the general public in order to gorge themselves 30 minutes earlier than the plebes.

At the holding area's bar, because I don't drink, I order an orange juice sans champagne—the bartender looks at me aghast. "Just orange juice?" she incredulously asks. I nod, ashamed. Were security to emerge behind me and escort me out, I would understand entirely.

The doors open and people rush them like the Who concert disaster of 1979—the energy they possess while already intoxicated is inspiring. A trio of women wearing shirts that read "Shut the Brunch Up" squeal with delight.

Once we enter the venue, we are presented with booths peddling wares like "the perfect brunch shirt!" and coozies that say "Make America Drunk Again." The word bitch is bandied about so much, it quickly loses all meaning. Balloons read "Cheers, Bitches." Water bottles with the slogan "Thirsty Bitch" embossed in gold await dehydrated buyers. I stand in line and await a sample of "Skinny Bitch Pizza."

There is the option to wash down the food with a rosé mimosa, which sounds like diabetes in a glass. "It's rosé, I'm keeping it classy" says a man as he gesticulates toward his sunset-colored beverage. He is clearly not on his first glass.

I emotionlessly consume flavorless "breakfast pasta" out of a paper cup and survey the scene. Out of the corner of my eye I think I see a man doing a sieg heil by the Bumble branded beer pong table; upon closer examination, I realize he's just exuberantly dancing to the Chainsmokers.

I am on edge because Charlottesville has just happened the night prior. Down the street, people are marching in the streets in protest of white supremacy, but at BrunchCon, the only reminder of the South's existence is waffles on a stick.

On the car ride there, I remembered driving past a line of people waiting to brunch on my way to the post-election Women's March. I viewed them with intense disdain, thinking they were on the wrong side of history. How the fuck can you idly eat avocado toast while the world burns? I wondered. Given that and my preconceived notions of brunch, I assumed I would feel similarly at BrunchCon.

Curiously, I do not. I am, rather, struck by the intense diversity of the crowd. I always found brunch to be a white person's game, having seen it used as a punchline in countless shows and films about insufferable millennial Williamsburg residents, and everyone in the line I passed on the way to the Women's March was as white as the eggs they were lining up to eat.


Watch: Planning a Mother's Day weed brunch


But here at BrunchCon, I am surrounded by hundreds of people of all races, all here for one common purpose: to drunkenly shovel chilaquiles into their gaping maws. Everyone, including me, nods in rhythm to E-40's "Function" as it blasts from the DJ booth. I smoke a cigarette on a staircase outside next to a middle aged black man in a guayabera sharing a vape with two Filipinas he'd just met.

Inside, people old and young excitedly talk at communal tables. Some fit my preexisting mental image of a bruncher—slouchy top bun, boho dress, suede booties—but most do not. No one is upset, everyone is equal, and piles of uneaten food cover every surface. Given the unrest unfolding outside its doors, it feels downright utopian.

In this moment, I realize brunch is not the class warfare I always assumed it was. It is a place where everyone can act as though they're a member of the 1%, regardless of their actual socioeconomic bracket. The ability to spend $13 one may or may not have on eggs is society's great equalizer—after all, some of the poorest people I know are the most fervent brunchers I know. An opportunity to get drunk and wild in the middle of the day, to forget reality for three hours, is why brunch has become an American institution.

Maybe, I think, we should brunch instead of protest—if everyone got along as well as people do when under the influence of bottomless mimosas, we'd solve this whole racism thing in an afternoon. White supremacists would hate BrunchCon's Rainbow Coalition of people laughing and dancing and drinking non-American macrobrew beer on this, a Sunday, the Lord's day. True equality exists when everyone has the same opportunity to stand in line for room temperature tacos. A mimosa in every hand, and every man, woman and child a bitch—this is the future liberals want.

Follow Megan Koester on Twitter.