0
0

DemocraticSocialist01 debunks Pinochet apologists (self.Anarcho_Capitalism)

TheCarlyleanHeroAncaps are morons. が 投稿

https://youtu.be/emi9CaAEuv0

全 22 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]kurokamifrSurvivalist 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Why would the opinion of a socialist matter?

thats like a child rapist debunking the justice system

[–]TheCarlyleanHeroAncaps are morons.[S] -3 ポイント-2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Not an argument.

[–]NoZiggidyNoDoubtDeep-Fried 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Actually quite an argument. People that see no problem with initiating force against others for the sake of utility have no place arguing against a temporary dictator doing the same.

Socialists have already shown that they're okay with murdering to safeguard their political ambitions, so why is it suddenly bad when someone else does it? They should be totally okay with it as far as I'm concerned.

[–]TheCarlyleanHeroAncaps are morons.[S] -2 ポイント-1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Not an argument.

[–]Winged__HussarNo Step! 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Calm down there molymeme

[–]Pinochet-Heli-ToursFree market security solutions 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (1子コメント)

http://i.magaimg.net/img/s30.png

[–]TheCarlyleanHeroAncaps are morons.[S] -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not an argument.

[–]stat_enthusiast 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (12子コメント)

the video claims he left chile with a higher poverty rate but I can't find any data to support it. Most data shows a distinct downward trend in the poverty rate starting during his rule and continuing after he left office until 2006. Unless you can provide sources to back up this claim im not continuing the video and I am going to call bullshit

[–]TheCarlyleanHeroAncaps are morons.[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (11子コメント)

Most data shows a distinct downward trend in the poverty rate starting during his rule and continuing after he left office until 2006

LOL, which data says that?

https://theredphoenixapl.org/2011/05/27/augusto-pinochet-the-realities-of-the-free-market-in-chile/

http://anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/secc11.html

[–]stat_enthusiast 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (10子コメント)

Lol excellent sources you have there. I skimmed the first and saw that they reject the wall street journal's claim with Huffington post article at one point. So theyre arguing over which biased tertiary source is right? I can tell now how you've managed to have such an ignorant worldview

[–]TheCarlyleanHeroAncaps are morons.[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (9子コメント)

You are an idiot who clearly does not know how to read. You will not accept that under your beloved Pinochet poverty shot up. Roflmao.

And at least I have actually provided sources. You have provided nothing to back up your laughable claim that poverty under Pinochet decreased. You are a dunderhead.

[–]stat_enthusiast 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (8子コメント)

Lol I think we're done here. Scurry off back to your fascist retard subs

[–]TheCarlyleanHeroAncaps are morons.[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Lol, come up with a rebuttal or go to hell.

[–]stat_enthusiast 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (6子コメント)

You haven't provided anything to rebut faggot

[–]TheCarlyleanHeroAncaps are morons.[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (5子コメント)

You are an illiterate moron. You made the laughably idiotic claim that poverty under Pinochet decreased. I called you out on your nonsense and provided you with sources debunking that, which you didn't bother to read. Instead you got triggered like a typical braindead anarcho-capitalist.

Please deport yourself to Somalia you incomprehensibly dense excuse for a human being.

[–]stat_enthusiast 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Provide a source that isn't leftistanarchy.co.biz I know you studied abstract feminist tattoo interpretations at the local community college but in the real world you are expected to provide quality, peer reviewed sources to back up your claims. Anarchy.co.biz is NOT a valid source and the fact that you think it is shows you are not even worthy of my time. You are trying to prove US wrong so post quality, unbiased proof or fuck off

[–]TheCarlyleanHeroAncaps are morons.[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Again, you are a dunderhead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_fallacy

The fact that you don't like the source doesn't make the information in it invalid. Your own confirmation bias is blinding you.

There are even more sources proving my point:

http://www.e-ir.info/2013/04/03/the-pinochet-regime-and-chilean-politics/

In 1982 and 1983 Chile’s GDP fell by 16%, the worst fall of any Latin American nation, the financial sector collapsed costing Chileans between 30 and 40 percent of GDP and unemployment increased to almost 30 percent of the population (Shanghai Poverty Conference, p.1). Although Chile’s economic situation did improve as the decade went on, the economic crisis in 1982-1983 is reported to have resulted in around 50% of the Chilean population falling below the poverty line, with extreme poverty affecting 30% of the population (Shanghai Poverty Conference, p.1).

Rip-roaring success, right?

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=dXSNCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA114&lpg=PA114&dq=pinochet+poverty+rate&source=bl&ots=LATgOZ1KSZ&sig=Rx2pCmJErQ2DcC82RB-obPOAHLU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjc2rn-n_rUAhVIBcAKHWb8D_Q4ChDoAQg6MAQ#v=onepage&q=pinochet%20poverty%20rate&f=false

That source also makes it clear that poverty increased under Pinochet, only decreasing asfter he left office and the left-wing took power.

https://libcom.org/library/chile-anatomy-of-an-economic-miracle

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=pPwdCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA26&lpg=PA26&dq=pinochet+poverty+rate&source=bl&ots=bwNkwHz2La&sig=eL7o6W3cK5kui31r1VLDt-Z6Txc&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjC9P3XoPrUAhXMKMAKHQi_DUE4FBDoAQg7MAY#v=onepage&q=pinochet%20poverty%20rate&f=false

http://pconway.web.unc.edu/files/2016/01/Chilemac.pdf

All that good enough for you, moron?

[–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]TheCarlyleanHeroAncaps are morons.[S] -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Not an argument.

    [–]TheCarlyleanHeroAncaps are morons.[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Hey, dunderheads, downvoting my post is not an argument.