181
182

report brigaders plsFeminist Frequency: On VidCon, Harassment, and Garbage Humans (feministfrequency.com)

NoxiousDogCloudfeminist gazpacho が 投稿

全 121 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]chewinchawingumMark this hill, shills. You died on it.[M] [スコア非表示] stickied comment (1子コメント)

If you look at the Other Discussions tab, you'll see that a bunch of garbage humans are also discussing this post. Please report brigaders immediately so that we can take out the trash.

[–]ReginaldRimCrim 53 ポイント54 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Carl looks to be pulling something now with Franchesca Ramsey. Complimenting her and offering to apologize and wanting to open a dialogue with her.

She's, rightfully, suspicious and doesn't seem to be taking the bate. A huge part of me actually really wants them to talk as she'd definitely tear him apart but I'm sure Carl knows that his fans will take it as an opportunity to harass her (which she also pointed out).

There's also the tiniest sliver of me that wants to believe that he can change his ways but with him relying on his current douchebag behavior to make money, I won't hold my breath.

See here for the conversation. https://mobile.twitter.com/chescaleigh/status/879315932241383424

[–]ilikekittensdoyoumeow meow ethics meow 27 ポイント28 ポイント  (2子コメント)

This rando reply. http://imgur.com/ZXlJHqm
Umm... I know he means long-term, but it really sounds a lot like "talk to this man, so we don't have to keep @ replying you and making your life miserable."

[–]NoxiousDogCloudfeminist gazpacho[S] 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I really hate the new reply system in twitter.

[–]cholantesh 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm pretty glad I never jumped onto the Twitter bandwagon. It was always too busy and FOMO inducing for my liking, and now it seems like a total shithole.

[–]AonghusMacKilkenny 85 ポイント86 ポイント  (31子コメント)

Human Garbage is currently making a fool of himself on the Joe Rogan podcast

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrBCsLsSD2E

Dude has spent a good 25 minutes moaning about Anita Sarkeeian, looking into the camera and calling her a "bitch" and an "idiot" - didnt have the bollocks to say that to her at Vidcom though did he? Joe is even calling him out saying "You live in a bubble, dude..." but Carl is just going on and on and on and on... What a tragic existence you must lead to get this riled up about someone?

[–]LiveHardandProsperI'm a "Women are Cool" people! 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Didn't think I'd be agreeing with the dude whose latest comedy special is entitled "Triggered", but here the fuck we are.

[–]Maria-Stryker 45 ポイント46 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I had so many Sargon brigaders demanding physical proof of him hurling worse insults at her when I tried to point out that she was pretty restrained all things considered in the /r/DeFranco thread on this fiasco. Well there you go, Sargon escalating the insults rather than being the bigger person

[–]NoxiousDogCloudfeminist gazpacho[S] 62 ポイント63 ポイント  (4子コメント)

haha, omg what a fucking pillock.

So he gets all "huffy" (let's be real here, he's playing a victim) about her call him names, and then he goes on a podcast and starts calling her names. OK.

[–]Foresight2 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Actually I believe this is something that should be of concern. The fact that he got onto Joe Rogan means that Sargon is now famous to a certain extent. If he keeps up with this one day he'll be on the same level as Milo at his peak, and it's more worrying since the guy is more stable so he might not burn out like Milo.

[–]AonghusMacKilkenny 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Milo had more charisma in his little finger than Sargon has. No way he'd catch on in the same way

[–]autoportret 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

He's only charismatic to incredibly dumb people who seem to think that a Home Counties RP accent means you're somehow academically competent. Carl can't even do that properly, his oratory skills are awful.

[–]RacecarlockSocial Justice Sharknado 35 ポイント36 ポイント  (8子コメント)

I saw Harry Potter And The Prisoner Of Azkaban again recently, and this reminds me very much of how often malfoy backed down and cried like a baby in that movie.

[–]Skulls_Skulls_SkullsJust wanna play video games every night and every day 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (2子コメント)

So much for the tolerant left.

[–]Tweevle 25 ポイント26 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I regret nothing.

[–]HawkAtreidese dolore magna gloria 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well, she didn't hit him with the left!

[–]Bananasonfire 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (4子コメント)

The Malfoy analogy works in more ways than just that. Isn't there a vague undertone throughout the whole Harry Potter series about Muggle-borns, Centaurs and other disadvantaged people in the Wizarding World going "This is not fucking fair! We are being constantly put down and even killed and you're doing -nothing- about it!"?

You've got the Death Eaters who are pretty much Wizarding Nazis, and then you've got Malfoy, the Wizarding Alt-right. Right in the middle of it, you've got the Ministry of Magic, which are pretty much the 'white moderates' that Martin Luther King spoke about in his letter from Birmingham Jail, where they'll pay some lip service to the problems muggleborns face, but won't actually do anything about it because it's uncomfortable for them.

It doesn't go into detail about the real world parallels, but it does make it pretty obvious to the target audience.

[–]HeIsTheSisko 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (2子コメント)

http://i.imgur.com/z1PEEXL.jpg

[–]Bananasonfire 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're god damn right! Magical space wizards make everything more exciting.

[–]sjwIlluminatiAntifa Sarkeesian 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It ironic that it fits so well since Rowling came out and supported the Lib Dems in the British election.

[–]ReginaldRimCrim 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (2子コメント)

For the record, Rogan's reddit is giving Carl a lot of shit right now too. Glad to see more of the Internet is able to see through his bullshit.

[–]space_chief 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

What's the name of that reddit? I searched joe rogan but didn't find any that were active

[–]ReginaldRimCrim 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Just typed in Joe Rogan Reddit on Google. First thing that came up.

[–]upthatknowledge 30 ポイント31 ポイント  (9子コメント)

He literally views everything through the lens of sjws. I feel like joe is getting bored with him

[–]mechachap 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (8子コメント)

Question: Is Joe Rogan still worth listening to, or has he gone full "anti-SJW red-pill blah blah blah"?

[–]NoxiousDogCloudfeminist gazpacho[S] 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Was he ever worth listening to

[–]rome_apple 13 ポイント14 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Is Joe Rogan still worth listening to

Was he ever?

[–]mechachap 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Back, maybe 2 or three years ago before he started interviewing the likes of Milo, CHS, now Sargy (wow) and others in that... shitsphere. I can't say "alt-right" because they take offense to that. You know... back when it was all about simple MMA talk, smoking weed, reaching higher levels of conciousness and talking to Shane Smith, Eddie Huang, David Choe, local comedians... the fun years, I would say.

[–]cholantesh 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'd be OK with that timeline if it didn't include all his promotion of woo and transphobia.

[–]xXKILLA_D21XxScary Punk Skeleton 💀 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I can't say "alt-right" because they take offense to that.

Then call what they are and what they always have been and always will be, Nazis.

[–]mechachap 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

What about shitlords? Seems more apt.

[–]charlespdk 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I liked him for a while, but he's just too ill-informed about anything besides MMA, conspiracies, and the do-nothing supplements he peddles. I get the feeling he does little to no research on the people he interviews so while he's willing to push back like a good interviewer should he's too ill-informed to know when to push back. Carl was blatantly dishonest several times throughout that interview and just a little research would have made for an interesting conversation but instead he just accepts that the worse thing Carl has ever said about Anita before Vidcon is that she was wrong.

Rogan is just too easy to bamboozle (see Cowspiracy) to be taken seriously. He loves contrarian opinions first and facts second.

[–]sjwIlluminatiAntifa Sarkeesian 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (1子コメント)

The best part is that Anita don't care at all about Carl and his sad life, but for him the thought of Anita having opinions about video games consumes his every waking moment.

[–]xXKILLA_D21XxScary Punk Skeleton 💀 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The best part is that Anita don't care at all about Carl and his sad life, but for him the thought of Anita having opinions about video games consumes his every waking moment.

This will forever be fucking relevant to her.

[–]Nukerjsr 104 ポイント105 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The companion of his who made that apology video I referenced earlier also tweeted that women are “powerful” enough to “deal with things like workplace harassment to rape.” As if power is in accepting a culture in which women are second-class citizens, in which misogyny and workplace harassment and rape are the norm. Fuck that. I’ll never settle for that. You’re damn right I’m powerful. After everything I’ve been put through by Carl and other men just like him, I’m still powerful enough to go out there and try to change it.

Fuckin' A, Anita. Fuckin' A.

[–]Tweevle 69 ポイント70 ポイント  (28子コメント)

In case anyone was in doubt that they were not there in good faith.

EDIT: Additional.

EDIT2: the1janitor tells it like it is.

[–]ilikekittensdoyoumeow meow ethics meow 49 ポイント50 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Holy shit, that second video. Isn't THAT a direct violation of the VidCon rules?

[–]NoxiousDogCloudfeminist gazpacho[S] 38 ポイント39 ポイント  (0子コメント)

oh wow, Carl and his crowd being disingenuous with their intentions. What a god damn surprise.

[–]Aerik 45 ポイント46 ポイント  (0子コメント)

so the harassment brigade plans and organizes to show up as a block in order to intimidate anita sarkeesian and the other women.

these people should be banned from all cons. all. cons.

[–]NoxiousDogCloudfeminist gazpacho[S] 74 ポイント75 ポイント  (9子コメント)

The greatest thing we've ever done

Showed up at a panel to try to intimidate a woman? That's the best thing they've ever done. OK.

edit: that second video makes me want to vomit so hard the spray will be visible for miles.

[–]saccharindsmug anime girl twitter icon 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (0子コメント)

hur hur hur we're so funny and edgy and obviously not here in good faith

[–]Pure_GonzoColluding Right Now 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (1子コメント)

This is honestly one of the saddest, most pathetic things I've ever seen. This is the it. This is the greatest thing for these sad fucks. They came to a paid panel and giggled together in a group and then talked shit later on video as if they slayed a dragon. I can't even imagine what it is like to be that empty and boring inside.

[–]NoxiousDogCloudfeminist gazpacho[S] 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

"haha we got her to call Carl garbage what a success"

[–]xXKILLA_D21XxScary Punk Skeleton 💀 27 ポイント28 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Showed up at a panel to try to intimidate a woman?

Okay so let's play into this moronic logic of his, and say he and his little "crew" did come there in good faith to hear her arguments and intimidating her was not their intention (I'll take full of shit for $500 Alex). If that really is what your intentions were, WHY WOULD YOU SIT IN THE FRONT GODDAMNED ROW OF ALL PLACES CONSIDERING YOUR HISTORY??? Did he not consider the fact that at the bare fucking minimum that would be some really weird shit to do? Why not sit your sorry ass in the back? I'm sure you could have heard her just fine from there. Did he not consider, even the slightest possibility that considering your history with her and the harassment you caused directly or indirectly, that the person you caused so much harm, and that you dislike so strongly would think that it is very strange that you showed up in person to a panel she is on, let alone sit in the front fucking row of all places? So either A which is the most likely answer Carl is totally full of shit, or B which could be just as likely that he's such an oblivious dumbass that he didn't even give a remote consideration to how someone he's caused so much harm may react to him showing to a panel she is on up in person.

[–]TheCatloaf 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (0子コメント)

or C: he's full of shit and an oblivious dumbass

[–]chewinchawingumMark this hill, shills. You died on it. 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (2子コメント)

They got there early just so that they could take up the bulk of the two first rows.

Garbage humans, all of 'em.

[–]Aerik 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (1子コメント)

three rows

[–]chewinchawingumMark this hill, shills. You died on it. 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

3 rows of garbage humans.

[–]chewinchawingumMark this hill, shills. You died on it. 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wow, that will make for an awful flashback on their (eventual) deathbeds. I mean, I feel like I've done greater things than that today, just by you know not harassing anyone.

[–]BreakTheLoop 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Lacy Green's boyfriend named as being part of this in the second video, waiting for her to call out this coordinated harassment. /s

[–]NoxiousDogCloudfeminist gazpacho[S] 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (7子コメント)

Gee. Fuck Green.

[–]woodsoffeels 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (6子コメント)

We don't like Laci Green?

[–]squirrelrampageSquirrel Justice Warrior 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Feel free to form your own opinion about her, but with her recent antics you won't find many people on Ghazi who like her anymore.

[–]NoxiousDogCloudfeminist gazpacho[S] 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Laci Green is dating, and defending, Chris Ray Gun, an avowed anti-feminist.

[–]aliencupcake 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

This video by Contrapoints does a good job at demonstrating the problem people have with her recent actions. The moderator is based on her.

[–]OutlastOnWii-U 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I thought the moderator was based on RoamingMillennial

[–]charlespdk 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think Dave Rubin is the typical go-to for this type -classical liberal who nods along with nazis without challenging them and cries about free speech- but it does represent the general flaws of 'centrists' and allows fascists ideas to corrupt the free market place of ideas. By trying to play centrist, Laci is giving more credence to anti-feminists than necessary. Feminists have enough to deal with trying to sort through real gender issues within their own field of study without having to deal with a group that wants everything they stand for to go away.

It's sort of like the old question of should we debate creationists? Creationists LOVE the opportunity to debate not because they have solid evidence and want to present it but because standing on a stage discussing 'science' makes them look legitimate.

Laci is basically dating a creationist and saying 'shouldn't we just debate and try to find common ground?'

[–]aliencupcake 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Perhaps. I'm not familiar with them, and it seemed to match Laci's recent comments.

[–]Aerik 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

people almost never betray whoever's in their pants on these sorts of grounds, I'm afraid. Especially if the relationship has recently been making them money.

[–]PrettyMuchAMess☠Skeleton Justice Warrior☠ 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Because of course they so totes had to do that.

Newsflash arseholes, to normal people you come off as obsessive creeps.

[–]Wrecksomethingscope shill 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (1子コメント)

It can't be mentioned enough how much this is all performance for third parties. We know, Sarkeesian knows, and "shitlords" all know what they're really doing.

But the reason they're grinning their asses off, saying they got high on the adrenaline, and bragging that the footage is all out there... it's because it creates this context-free moment that is powerful to recruit more people to hate and create another opportunity to harass. In a vacuum they don't appear to have done anything wrong, even though they're not convincing anyone with the slightest knowledge of the context. Now there's another dogpile "debate" from those who pretend everyone is overreacting.

Sarkeesian mentioned how it is gaslighting their targets, making them doubt reality themselves. Horrible and can't be forgiven. Yet that doubt is all the more powerful for outsiders who don't have the intimate knowledge of context that their targets have.

[–]Aiicc 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

But the reason they're grinning their asses off, saying they got high on the adrenaline, and bragging that the footage is all out there... it's because it creates this context-free moment that is powerful to recruit more people to hate and create another opportunity to harass. In a vacuum they don't appear to have done anything wrong, even though they're not convincing anyone with the slightest knowledge of the context.

Actually, it doesn't take much knowledge of context to expose Carl for being the garbage he is. You don't need to watch more than one of his videos (it doesn't even have to be about Anita) to know that his style is to insult and demean everyone and everything he dislikes in the name of le politically incorrect freeze peach. In light of that, the way he reacts so intensely to being called a garbage human one time should make it obvious to all but the most ignorant that Carl is a whiny hypocrite.

[–]charlespdk 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is the way people talked about getting gay marriage passed. I wish these people would take all this motivation and put it some good use like, you know, helping others. Aren't there at least men's needs type charities for them to give to like suicide hotlines and such? Do something effing worthwhile.

[–]MasterlessMan333☭ⒶCultural BakuninistⒶ☭ 66 ポイント67 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Katherine Cross wrote a pretty good article about this.

Reactionary trolls simply feign moral outrage in order to trouble the lives of their targets, cause chaos, and create busywork for their opponents. Nothing more or less.

[–]JefWithOnefJef Rouner, Houston Press 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (2子コメント)

How much longer are these dingalings going to pretend 1. we don't know what they're really doing and 2. KEEP TALKING ABOUT THEIR STUPID HARASSMENT PLANS IN PUBLICLY AVAILABLE FORUMS?

[–]rkingett 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

LOL! I wondered the very same thing!

The other threads on this topic... SMH...

Glad she stood her ground.

BUT, it's not like it would be hard to expose to the whole crowd how narrow minded these people are. I would have waited until the Q&A, and, while refuting their LOL question, then just let loose.

[–]RacecarlockSocial Justice Sharknado 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Until whenever the universe dies.

[–]spore1234 54 ポイント55 ポイント  (0子コメント)

"Debate": a.k.a let YouTube chat support their favorite fascist.

[–]FyreWulff 27 ポイント28 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I like how almost nobody buys that old "we're just sitting here, being paying customers" bullshit. Homey, you had a camera pointed right at her with your entourage all staring at her. It was an attempt to intimidate and she didn't hold back on calling him out for it.

[–]rkingett 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

serious question due to the, well, blindness.

Acording to others, she used a picture of him with his hands in his lap...

But wasn't the whole point to go there and prove how crazy she is?

My head hurts. sigh.

I may not like her content as much as Caroline's from gamespot, but the fact she felt this intimidated should tell someone they were not there to just listen.

[–]ignavusaur 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I wish that was true, but the amount of "Oh poor Carl, what was he doing other than taking an empty chair? :(" tweets is so astronomically high, if this is not cognitive dissonance I don't know what is?

[–]koronicusSocial Justice Platypus 19 ポイント20 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You tell them. Good on you.

[–]PaladinofFarore 78 ポイント79 ポイント  (22子コメント)

Lol Half the replies are people shouting "debate him!"

My for year old nephew could out debate Carl. He already has a better moral compass

[–]NoxiousDogCloudfeminist gazpacho[S] 79 ポイント80 ポイント  (4子コメント)

The "Rationals" and "Skeptics" always demand that people like Anita meet them for debate, and chide them for not being the better person. But why is it up to Anita, or any of us, to debate people who have been gigantic dickholes to everyone else. Oh, she called him garbage, that's such poor behaviour. Why can't she be polite. WHY. WHY BE POLITE TO HIM. He's been nothing but a horrible person to her, why is it up to her to be the bigger person here? Fuck debate. Fuck Carl.

[–]rome_apple 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Calls for civility are white male privilege + sea lioning

[–]Blackrock121Social Conservative and still an SJW to Gamergate 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't think it is calls for civility that are the problem, it is the cultural perception that someone who isn't being civil is in the wrong

[–]CouncilofAutumn 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

EXCUUUUSE ME DID YOU JUST MENTION SEA LIONS

[–]PM_ME_UR__RECIPES 86 ポイント87 ポイント  (14子コメント)

"""Debating""" for these people is just a big preformative showdown for people like Carl (I refuse to call him Sargon) to insult people while his fans sit there saying "kek he totally triggered them".

[–]Neurotic-Kitten 65 ポイント66 ポイント  (9子コメント)

Didn't he like, debated a female college professor on a similar subject, and she pretty much moped the floor with him?

[–]ilikekittensdoyoumeow meow ethics meow 65 ポイント66 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Kristi Winters, yes. You would think the result of that debate was clear, but I've read posts from "neutral observers" (ie: Carl fans who pretend they're not taking his side just because they love him) saying she was disingenuous and poorly debating through the entire thing. Apparently, according to them, she should still answer his questions about a report, even if he didn't bother to produce a link to the report before or during the debate.

[–]Tymareta 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (0子コメント)

she was disingenuous

Remind us again dear "neutrals", which of the two debaters had a giggle when an act of rape was described.

[–]Ayasugi-san 22 ポイント23 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Apparently, according to them, she should still answer his questions about a report, even if he didn't bother to produce a link to the report before or during the debate.

Being a professional means that you've read every piece of literature vaguely related to your area of expertise and can recall each of them perfectly at any time!

[–]HawkAtreidese dolore magna gloria 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

And you should be able to immediately respond to anything they bring up even if they've made up a term that's not used outside of their anti-intellectual echo chamber. I've seen a number of creationists, gators, and climate deniers use that exact strategy - invoke a term that doesn't exist outside their sphere then excoriate their opponent for not knowing it as if it were some common piece of terminology. Some of them may think they're attacking "inscrutable" (i.e., they don't understand it, so it's meaningless) academic jargon, but all they're doing is making themselves look like idiots to everyone not already on their side, since no one else has heard of their term either.

[–]Aerik 27 ポイント28 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes, and he was defeated, thoroughly. He just read from a script. So after his first time talking, Kristi Winters directly addressed that segment. Then he went on and on about things he planned to say no matter what, showing that he has no idea what's going on or what he's doing. He did not know how to, or have any material with him to counter anything Kristi said.

[–]GucciJesus 66 ポイント67 ポイント  (2子コメント)

The fallout of that was incredible. They accused her of just talking "about facts". lol

What the fuck.

[–]Neurotic-Kitten 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, how dare she to use her professional experience and properly present the facts? People should totally listen to the jackass with the internet show who can't even bother to google a link to an article.

[–]PrettyMuchAMess☠Skeleton Justice Warrior☠ 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hah - I guess that makes them even dumber than Young Earth Creationists/Intelligent Design idiots then.

[–]JefWithOnefJef Rouner, Houston Press 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It was Kristi Winters I believe

[–]bonefreshCommulist Sympathizer 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It would be an exercise in futility and would do nothing but give his garbage views legitimacy.

Anita had the right idea by just mocking him from a distance.

[–]Aerik 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (2子コメント)

call him Carlgon. He helps whites be whiter.

[–]bonefreshCommulist Sympathizer 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I hear washing machines live longer with him

[–]koronicusSocial Justice Platypus 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

that's too great

[–]bajtartax-xewk 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (1子コメント)

the sweet, sweet irony of the whole "debate" position of RationalsTM in lieu of their common belief that creationists should not be debated or given a platform.

[–]Ire224 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (0子コメント)

yes, Yes, YES, and YES!!! Thank you for bringing this up. I still remember the pre-anti-sjw days of the "skeptic" community, and one of their major talking points was how creationists only sought debate not to prove their ideas but to convince as many people that their beliefs could stand toe-to-toe with scientific facts. Funny how nowadays they have completely forgotten that and actually say that we need to have debates with trolls/racists/actual facsists.

[–]PrettyMuchAMess☠Skeleton Justice Warrior☠ 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Dear Carl of Swindon, aka Carlgon.

When you have been the target of a large, semi-organised mob of fuckwits engaged in harassing you online and calling for your rape, death etc, that was directed at you by someone, then it is appropriate to call them out. But comparing being called a "garbage person" to what Anita etc have gone through, is so hyperbolic it boggles the mind, at least until one remembers just how utter fucking stupid you are. Then again, you've always had a thin skin and lack the brains to hack a spade being called a spade, because you are an actual garbage person. Because if I were to talk about your actions with someone unaware of this whole shit heap you helped create, they would pretty much be disgusted with you and consider you a fuckwit.

[–]rkingett 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It also creams my corn how so many of these people dismiss her words as whining. Not in here, elsewhere.

[–]HiredGoon_40 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm hoping Sarkeesian continues to speak out and doesn't let SoA turn this into his Deplorables moment.

[–]says_cabbage 21 ポイント22 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I am so sick of fighting all the time.

[–]CouncilofAutumn 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (4子コメント)

We need a summation word like "Schadenfreude" or "Tartle" for when a normally garbage person acts decently for a fraction of a second, gets called on their insincerity in public, so that """""neutral""""" people like Philip DeFranco can make a video defending them with a straight face.

Was that too specific? I don't know.

EDIT: I'm not done. These idiots in the middle like to pretend they're smart but if you can't figure out what Sargon and his deplorables are doing, you're an idiot.

[–]Igotlikesixaccounts 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (3子コメント)

A lot of YT "Muh Centrism" types are legitimate novices in regards to their own beliefs, let alone anything that actually requires cracking open up a book.

And DeFranco is a thin skinned dork. He had ONE article in which he was merely mentioned and he flipped his shit.

They're all transparent manchildren who watched fight club one too many times.

[–]CouncilofAutumn 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (2子コメント)

He mentioned today "Kat Blaque mentioned me in a few tweets but deleted them" as if he HEROICALLY fended off a MONSTER and she crumpled in the face of his brave centrism.

[–]Igotlikesixaccounts 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (1子コメント)

How people respect this dude is beyond me. He's essentially a Lionel Hutz with an ok presentation.

[–]CouncilofAutumn 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

He's the face of comfortable liberalism.

[–]wholetyouinhere 20 ポイント21 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fuck yes. I am so glad she's not backing down an inch. They only thing that could have made me happier would be if she had reiterated that indeed, Carl is a garbage human. That's exactly what he is.

And sure, calling him that won't make him reform, and it will embolden him, but fuck that. That's exactly what he is. It's not anyone else's job to make him stop being garbage. So why not call him what he is, even if it's impolite?

[–]zzxcvb#ShartGate 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

As if power is in accepting a culture in which women are second-class citizens, in which misogyny and workplace harassment and rape are the norm. Fuck that. I’ll never settle for that. You’re damn right I’m powerful. After everything I’ve been put through by Carl and other men just like him, I’m still powerful enough to go out there and try to change it.

Man, is there a place where I can hand in my testicles? After reading that, I'm clearly not fit for them.

G O D D A M N

[–]-SGIASJCommulist Party Member 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I wonder if the tables were turned, and someone dedicated a significant portion of their time and lives to making 100s of videos about Sargon, how he would react.

[–]_realitycheck_ 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Is it true that she called him a garbage human?

[–]NoxiousDogCloudfeminist gazpacho[S] 30 ポイント31 ポイント  (2子コメント)

yes.

[–]_realitycheck_ 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

ok

[–]Eternium_Orean actual cultural marxist 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I hope that was a good reality check for Carl