use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
292 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
Conservatism (Latin: conservare, "to retain") is a political and social philosophy that promotes retaining traditional social institutions.
Sidebar Tribute History
Subreddit Rules
Our Twitter Page
Official Discussions
Use the report button for violations of the rules or message the modqueue.
Click here to request flair.
Mission Statement:
We provide a place on Reddit for conservatives, both fiscal and social, to read and discuss political and cultural issues from a distinctly conservative point of view.
Rules
1 - Keep it civil.
2 - No racism.
3 - Don't spam article submissions (this doesn't apply to comments). Limit 4 per hour, 1 image post daily.
4 - No vote brigading. All links to other subs / comments must use the np prefix.
5 - Shit posts will be removed at moderator discretion and the user may be banned. [Click here for examples]
6 - Submission headlines must match the article headline or quote the article.
Republican
Libertarian
Paleoconservative
Monarchism
Conservative Lounge (Restricted)
ConservativesOnly
Conservative Meta
Conservative Ladies
ProLife
Firearms
SocialConservative Click here to message the moderators for an invite.
Prager University
ClimateSkeptics
Convention of States
The Liberty Amendments
Conservative Cartoons
Gamer Gate / Ethics
Liberal
The Red Pill
The Red Pill Women
Catholicism
Protestantism
Judaism
Capitalism
Immigration Reform
PornFree
Entrepreneurship
Traditional Marriage Click here to message the moderators for an invite.
Donald Trump
Ted Cruz
Rand Paul
John Kasich
Gary Johnson
Mark Levin
Tories
Sverigedemokraterna
Showerthought: liberals should consider the phrase "A woman's right to choose" transphobic. (self.Conservative)
elsuperj が 16時間前 投稿
Because it ignores all the pregnant people who are actually men.
[–]Diggy-Dog 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 15時間前 (21子コメント)
What the hell is transphobic?
[–]elsuperj[S] 15 ポイント16 ポイント17 ポイント 15時間前 (19子コメント)
Liberal buzzword for anti-transgender.
[–]TheWonderTaker 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 14時間前 (18子コメント)
Is it a buzzword or the linguistically appropriate labeling of a fear of transgender individuals? Can linguistically appropriate terms be considered buzzwords? Is "buzzword" a buzzword?
Let me know.
[–]elsuperj[S] 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 14時間前 (17子コメント)
It is not a labeling of fear, but of non-validation, with a strawman implication of fear.
buzz·word ˈbəzˌwərd nouninformal a word or phrase, often an item of jargon, that is fashionable at a particular time or in a particular context.
Transphobia is a buzzword, because: 1) its use has come into fashion recently, and 2) it is jargon, as evidenced by at least one reply in this thread who was unfamiliar with the word at all.
Buzzword is not a buzzword because it has been around for a long time, is accessibly understandable, and can be used in any context.
[+]TheWonderTaker スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8 ポイント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント 14時間前 (16子コメント)
I think it's basically a labeling of a fear because of the "-phobia" thing on the end of it.
Since America, for better or worse, has largely become a secular nation, I tend to disregard any reasoning for oppression of the Trans community rooted in the bible or religion as a low-hanging fruit.
If it's not phobia encouraging the oppression and resistance against their rights, then what is it?
[–]elsuperj[S] 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 14時間前 (9子コメント)
What do you think they have a right to that is being denied?
[–]NetflixBaePizzaLevinite 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 13時間前 (0子コメント)
Important question.
[–]TheWonderTaker -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 12時間前 (7子コメント)
Respect as fellow human beings. In this case, and I'm not trans so I really don't know despite this being my best guess, but I think it means going along with whatever gender identity they're choosing and treating them as a living being, hiding your contempt and disgust and bewilderment at their lifestyle or even forgetting about it because their choice really has nothing to do with the way you choose to live your life - that's definitely present, not suggesting that it's present in you, but that sentiment is definitely there among those who don't support the T in the LGBT community. I'm sure they deal with some pretty horrendous stigma and hatred, so the fact that they want to be recognized and seen as 'victims' is because they are victims of more discrimination than the usual person. This isn't a situation where a person can say "well, I haven't seen it and I don't discriminate, so they must be making it up!" It's there, it happens, and I think getting bent out of shape because another sincerely marginalized group wants more recognition and acceptance in modern society is a reaction borne out of fear.
[–]elsuperj[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 12時間前 (6子コメント)
going along with whatever gender identity they're choosing and treating them as a living being, hiding your contempt and disgust and bewilderment at their lifestyle or even forgetting about it
going along with whatever gender identity they're choosing
and treating them as a living being,
hiding your contempt and disgust and bewilderment at their lifestyle
or even forgetting about it
One can't get away with just doing the last 3?
[–]TheWonderTaker 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 12時間前 (5子コメント)
This is a serious question, not a knee jerk question: What part of your life and/or lifestyle is threatened by going along with whatever identity they're choosing? If you don't feel threatened, then why refuse to go along with something? There isn't one person I can think of that is threatened by identification.
[–]elsuperj[S] 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 12時間前 (3子コメント)
Intellectual integrity; not assenting outwardly to statements that I suspect to in fact be false.
[–]Robo1p [スコア非表示] 8時間前 (0子コメント)
What part of your life and/or lifestyle is threatened by going along with whatever identity they're choosing?
This seems very reminiscent of the whole "why do you care what someone does in there bedroom" thing. What that turned into is that being gay has now become a protected class (in many cities), and it is illegal to not serve them. The same thing is destined to happen with transsexuals.
So to answer your question: Freedom of Association.
[–]PubliusVA 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 11時間前 (5子コメント)
It's not a phobia, it's disagreement. If someone claims to be a dragon, and you perceive that they are not one and respectfully disagree, is that dracophobia?
[–]TheWonderTaker -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 11時間前 (3子コメント)
Ok I'll answer for real. Why is it for you to decide what is real for another person? Why do YOU have to involve your SELF with the other person's choices by voluntarily disagreeing. Nobody walks around asking people if they agree with their gender choice. People just voluntarily disagree, unprompted. Why would they do that?
[–]PubliusVA 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 10時間前 (2子コメント)
Well, I guess I believe in objective reality, and I think it's important to think and act in accordance with truth, reality, and reason. I wouldn't walk up to someone and say "hey, you're not really a man/woman!" We're mostly talking about matters of public policy and broader social issues here.
[–]TheWonderTaker 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 10時間前 (0子コメント)
Right, but public policy operates on statistical averages. Statistical averages curb numbers to fit the very concept of an average, shaving off a range of outliers and deviations from the norm. Public policies that operate on "averages" are marginalizing groups of society left and right by doing this. If you wouldn't walk up to a man/woman and tell them that they're not really so, then why would you create policies that do?
And I'm not so sure there's such a thing as objective reality. What can we define as objective reality? Really if we continue the discussion in any direction, I would love for it to be on this topic. No sarcasm.
EDIT: Rather, where does the boundary between objective reality and subjective reality show itself?
[–]TheWonderTaker -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 11時間前 (0子コメント)
So you're saying you believe in dragons?
[–]raccoonbandit13 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 13時間前 (0子コメント)
Liberals really have taken to misusing the 'phobia' suffix. Calling people out for wanting to normalize a mental disorder is not an irrational fear of 'trans' people, and acknowledging that muslims are behind 99.99% of suicide bombings does not constitute and irrational fear of muslims.
[–]FAMUgolfer 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 14時間前 (5子コメント)
But her biology is still female. I don't get it.
[–]elsuperj[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 14時間前 (4子コメント)
I'm just pointing out an inconsistency in liberal gender ideology.
[–]FAMUgolfer 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 14時間前 (3子コメント)
How is calling a woman "a woman" inconsistent?
[–]elsuperj[S] 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 14時間前 (2子コメント)
Because if she calls herself a man, progressives would say that makes her a man. But then they would lump her in with women for purposes of pro-choice soapboxing.
[–]FAMUgolfer 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 14時間前 (1子コメント)
Progressives will no doubt call her a man in just about any setting because of aesthetics (attire, speech, etc) but no one is confusing her sex in terms of biology. I think your trying to find a problem that simply doesn't exist.
[–]PubliusVA 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 11時間前 (0子コメント)
La Leche League (prominent breastfeeding advocacy group) recently issued a statement acknowledging that some men can breastfeed. I think OP isn't far off.
[–]Ironyde [スコア非表示] 9時間前 (0子コメント)
Can we, like, build a wall around this subreddit already and make /r/politics pay for it? The leftists are getting annoying.
[+]TheWonderTaker スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント 14時間前* (27子コメント)
Do you often find yourself deep in contemplation about this issue? If so, I'm gonna bet that you want to side with Transgender individuals. Otherwise you wouldn't spend time trying to get your hatred validated by people on the internet. You would just hate, enough said.
Please keep thinking and talking about this issue though, I think you'll find that at the bottom of it there is no reason for the hatred. Talking in circles and trying to validate it is evidence that you're clinging to a belief with no logical basis.
[–]elsuperj[S] 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 14時間前 (9子コメント)
Do you often find yourself deep in contemplation about this issue?
I find myself in contemplation about this issue whenever I run across it, which is often because it is frequently shoved in my face.
If so, I'm gonna bet that you want to side with Transgender individuals.
What is it to "side with" transgender individuals? To bend the knee to whatever arbitrary ontology anyone wants to come up with for themselves?
Otherwise you wouldn't spend time trying to get your hatred validated by people on the internet. You would just hate, enough said. Please keep thinking and talking about this issue though, I think you'll find that at the bottom of it there is no reason for the hatred. Talking in circles and trying to validate it is evidence that you're clinging to a belief with no logical basis.
Why do you think I hate anyone involved? That's such a leap.
[–]TheWonderTaker -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 14時間前 (8子コメント)
I am generalizing based on the forum you frequent, and the posting made here. That's how people act online, right?
And yeah basically why not bend the knee to whatever arbitrary ontology anyone wants to come up with if it doesn't hurt you?
[–]elsuperj[S] 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 14時間前 (6子コメント)
For all I care, people can be Otherkin. But I have a right to say that they're delusional.
[–]TheWonderTaker -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 13時間前 (5子コメント)
Absolutely you do! I hope you do.
But don't they have the right to be delusional?
[–]TheXarath 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 11時間前 (3子コメント)
Nobody is arguing that transgender people don't have a right to exist or call themselves whatever they want, we're arguing that other people shouldn't be forced by law or society to entertain that notion if they don't want to. It has nothing to do with hate, but it has everything to do with not wanting people's ideas policed.
[–]TheWonderTaker -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 11時間前 (2子コメント)
Guess what? Ideas are intangible! There's no way they can be policed. Have the ideas all you want. If you struggle to even entertain the notion, that's fine too no one judges you for that. I don't care if you don't agree with it, but why come out and put your foot down about it? People are just going to be assholes to you about it creating a reinforcement of your disgust for the left.
[–]TheXarath 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 11時間前 (1子コメント)
Ideas frequently take the form of speech which certainly can be policed.
[–]TheWonderTaker -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 10時間前 (0子コメント)
Ideas = Thoughts. Thoughts aren't often scrubbed before they turn into speech. So, what we get is thoughts that are coming from places that don't have a whole lot of room for acceptance, and are putting them out there in really raw forms.
For instance, here's a thought, not scrubbed: "Conservatives are awful people"
Same thought, with a bit of extra intellect behind it to clarify: "Some of the things that a handful of conservatives believe in really are perplexing to me because they don't seem to take compassion and empathy into account when considering the effect of their actions on the physical, psychological, and emotional welfare of the citizens of this country."
Which one are you more inclined to engage with?
Same thing is true here. There's another poster in this thread who articulated his concern with the LGBT movement in a way that is totally logical. I had no problem with that, and I'm even glad he has those views. Moreover, glad he shared them. I think it's rare on both sides of the aisle to find a person willing to put aside their ego and actually try to understand what their counterpart is saying.
Too many people think some vile shit and say it without finding out where the thought came from and repackaging it imbued with standards of human communication and decency.
[–]ACynicalPatriot 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 12時間前 (0子コメント)
Of course they have the right to be delusional; no one here is saying they don't. The issue is when they attempt to force everyone else to take part in their insanity. I have the right to be rational and sane just as they have the right to be irrational and insane. As long as they leave me alone, I couldn't care less what they think.
if it doesn't hurt you?
In Canada, the government will now take children away from parents who "misgender their children". The insanity of the left absolutely does hurt people.
[–]LibertyTerp 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 12時間前 (2子コメント)
Where did anyone say anything about hating anyone?
[–]TheWonderTaker -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント 12時間前 (1子コメント)
I said it! Hatred is the only reason I can find that people have any pushback to supporting solidarity with the T of the LGBT (beyond bible verses, which as I said, are low hanging fruit because of the increasingly secular nature of the United States). If there's a logical and rational reason to refuse to support the cause of someone who is Transgender, then I haven't seen it yet. If it's because it goes against your own intellect, sorry, but that has to do with your intellect and not with the Trans individual. Not saying "dumb" or "dimwitted" or "unintelligent," but I think that considering the time we live in and our access to all of the information we've ever cultivated as a species, saying that something goes against your intellect should be a starting point to expand and open your mind, not an ending point.
[–]expendable_Henchman 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 14時間前 (2子コメント)
Look, another leftie internet psychiatrist!
[–]TheWonderTaker 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 14時間前 (1子コメント)
Hey guys.
Want an autograph?
[–]expendable_Henchman 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 14時間前 (0子コメント)
No, but here is your genuine, OSHA approved, gluten-free downvote! Enjoy it in good health.
[–]elsuperj[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 14時間前 (8子コメント)
I'm curious about your opinion on my OP. Isn't "a woman's right to choose" trans-exclusionary? Wouldn't "a person's right to choose" better suit the cause of trans equality?
[–]TheWonderTaker 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 12時間前 (6子コメント)
No, it's not trans-exclusionary. If you're trans, you're not choosing to be in gender limbo. It means you were born one gender while psychologically identifying as another, and this is not an elective identification. So say you were born a man but identify as a woman, you don't consider yourself "both" or "flexible", you consider yourself a woman. Trans women would have to have a serious misunderstanding of how the transition surgeries work to believe that after their operation they would have a fully functioning set of reproductive organs. So, to that point, I don't think any trans woman is out there thinking that they may have to have an abortion in the future. Thus, I suspect very few trans women are going to feel excluded or offended by the language surrounding the concept that in abortions, women have the right to choose.
That's a weird concept, man. I don't think liberals think the way you think suspect they do.
[–]elsuperj[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 12時間前 (5子コメント)
I'm not talking about trans women, I'm talking about trans men with female reproductive organs.
[–]TheWonderTaker 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 12時間前 (4子コメント)
Is this a serious question or are you just being a logic troll?
Trans men don't have female reproductive organs post-op. Pre-op, they are identifying as male. If they're "male" psychologically, they're probably not looking to be impregnated by another male.
Do YOU think a "woman's right to choose" is an exclusionary phrase? How many men do you know with children in their wombs that would be able to make that choice?
[–]TheXarath 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 11時間前* (0子コメント)
implying that there aren't some trans men attracted to cis men and vice versa.
You bigot! /s
[–]elsuperj[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 12時間前 (2子コメント)
Pre-op, they are identifying as male.
I really don't think that's a progressively orthodox statement. This might be the crux of our misunderstanding. At least from my experience digesting progressive writings, transgenderism is, first and foremost, identifying as a gender that does not match one's current biology. Believing oneself, pre-op, to be "a man in a woman's body," so to speak, would be called a trans man. Progressives, in my experience, have been unified behind this.
I've only perceived division in the progressive movement as to whether someone who is post-op should still be called "a trans man/woman" or simply a "man/woman." To say nothing of transgender identifiers who do not wish to undergo surgery at all.
I'm seriously not trying to troll you, and I actually really appreciate this discussion we're having. I hope I don't come across as too vitriolic.
[–]PubliusVA 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 11時間前 (0子コメント)
As a specific example, Caitlyn Jenner identified as a woman and was recognized as a woman by the media and progressives generally long before having reassignment surgery. Also, the whole debate about bathrooms primarily relates to trans people who identify as the other gender but who have not had surgery.
[–]TheWonderTaker 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 12時間前 (0子コメント)
Gotcha. Yeah you're good dude this is not vitriolic in any way and I'm just trying to figure out what you're trying to express, so bare with me.
I think your shower thought has more to do with how trans men/women choose to identify. To that point, I don't really even care how they identify. I lived with someone in college who was f to m. Asked him how he identified, what he preferred to be called. Discussion over. Went on like regular housemates for the rest of that year. I don't see where there could ever be a problem between myself and someone in that community. He was even a bit of a prick and I didn't like him that much, but it had nothing to do with his sexuality.
EDIT: didn't finish the thought... I think the shower thought you had conflates two social issues in a way that just creates a paradox of sorts. Maybe it's because I have progressive values that I don't see the humor in it, so that's on me.
[–]LumpyWumpusChristian Capitalist Conservative 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 10時間前 (1子コメント)
Thank you for your concern fellow conservative
[–]TheWonderTaker -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 10時間前 (0子コメント)
Anything 4u Lumpy.
π Rendered by PID 8833 on app-71 at 2017-06-30 09:10:03.353153+00:00 running d7ea8c6 country code: JP.
[–]Diggy-Dog 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (21子コメント)
[–]elsuperj[S] 15 ポイント16 ポイント17 ポイント (19子コメント)
[–]TheWonderTaker 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (18子コメント)
[–]elsuperj[S] 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント (17子コメント)
[+]TheWonderTaker スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8 ポイント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント (16子コメント)
[–]elsuperj[S] 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]NetflixBaePizzaLevinite 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TheWonderTaker -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]elsuperj[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]TheWonderTaker 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]elsuperj[S] 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Robo1p [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]PubliusVA 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]TheWonderTaker -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]PubliusVA 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]TheWonderTaker 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TheWonderTaker 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TheWonderTaker -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]raccoonbandit13 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]FAMUgolfer 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]elsuperj[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]FAMUgolfer 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]elsuperj[S] 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]FAMUgolfer 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]PubliusVA 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Ironyde [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[+]TheWonderTaker スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント-4 ポイント (27子コメント)
[–]elsuperj[S] 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]TheWonderTaker -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]elsuperj[S] 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]TheWonderTaker -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]TheXarath 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]TheWonderTaker -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]TheXarath 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]TheWonderTaker -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ACynicalPatriot 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Ironyde [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]LibertyTerp 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]TheWonderTaker -4 ポイント-3 ポイント-2 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]expendable_Henchman 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]TheWonderTaker 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]expendable_Henchman 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]elsuperj[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]TheWonderTaker 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]elsuperj[S] 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]TheWonderTaker 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]TheXarath 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]elsuperj[S] 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]PubliusVA 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TheWonderTaker 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]LumpyWumpusChristian Capitalist Conservative 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]TheWonderTaker -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)