全 2 件のコメント

[–]JustARandomCatholicRidiculous Even by Nazi Propaganda Standards [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Oooh! Oooh!

One of our best and brightest, /u/the_howling_cow, wrote up an excellent AskHistorians post debunking a lot of the misconceptions about the Sherman, and showing that its protection and overall performance were quite good. As a tidbit - for each Sherman knocked out in combat, they suffered on average less than 2 crewmembers killed in action.

[–]VitigerGoddard. Pelterie. Oberth. Tsiolkovsky. [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I don't have the resources right now to speak on the Sherman's armor, however, I can respond about it's gun:

The US military had in its possession an extremely effective anti-tank round for the 75mm cannon called the M61 APCBC. The APCBC could actually penetrate the Tiger tank from ALL aspects as well as the Panther in most regards. It could penetrate nearly 100mm of enemy armor from 500 yards, and over 90mm from a thousand yards. This was enough to penetrate the rear or side armor of the Tiger from the longer distance, or at a distance of 500yds, penetrate the tiger from the front. Many critics of the M4 do note that the up-gunned tanks carrying the 76mm gun could take on a tiger, yet the armor penetration of the 76mm is only 5% better than the 75mm armed with the M61 APCBC ammunition.