Not access to health care, access to insurance - the outcome of the latter is very hard to study:https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/03/myth-diagnosis/307905/ …
"You can't talk about people DYING from losing access to health care" might literally be the dumbest argument in the history of the Internetpic.twitter.com/clxckojyF9
-
-
-
But the data for improving health outcomes via tax cuts for the rich is even weaker, I believe.
-
If GOP goal was to cut taxes They should eliminate taxes for everyone making less than $250,000 and double taxes for everyone making more
-
And this would stimulate the economy. Working clas will spend it. The rich do not create economic growth for. Anyone but themselves
-
Kansas proved that with their little economic experiment, and the tax cuts finally had to be repealed...by the Republicans, no less.
- 他2件の返信
新しい会話 -
-
-
Losing subsidies for insurance is not the same as losing access to healthcare.
-
It is if without the subsidies you can't afford to pay for healthcare.
-
Reforming insurance markets will make insurance more affordable, but people should be able to not buy insurance if that is their preference.
-
reforming insurance markets = shitty "insurance" to maximize profits
-
Actually Obamacare's fancy policies are much more profitable... if people could afford them.
-
Yes those fancy plans that everyone in congress has, that include mental health, prexisting conditions and emergency services...
-
Health insurance literally determines whether you can even get an appointment without having to go to an urgent care center or the ER.
-
What the actual hell are you talking about? Markets? This is people living or dying at the whims of the market and whose regulating them.
- 他1件の返信
新しい会話 -
-
-
If you're going to argue "losing access" it's relevant that CBO said most of those uninsured would be b/c they were no longer FORCED.
-
The CBO says that people will make an economic decision not to have ins; the system bears them anyway because of the ER care imperative.
-
With 58% actuarial value ins doesn't make economic sense for any but sickest, driving up cost for plans. A recipe for a REAL death spiral.
-
Precisely. If you dispute that, I would love to hear from you. A thoughtful defense of this plan is not currently in evidence.
会話の終了
新しい会話 -
-
-
You're too smart to believe the CBO on the mandate.
-
You're too smart (are you?) not to listen to the governors. Even barely-Dem businessman CO Gov John Hickenlooper says too much too quickly.
-
@bdomenech isn't too smart for literally anything, I wouldn't be surprised if he drowned in the shower -
Federalist Society, Heritage Foundation, ALEC, Cooler Heads, Grover Norquist - authoritarian anti-gay anti-union Joe Coors' sad legacies.
会話の終了
新しい会話 -
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。やりなおすか、Twitterステータスで詳細をご確認ください。