全 5 件のコメント

[–]ApertureBrowserCore 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Asimov's First Law reads as follows:

"A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm."

It is my belief that stating a desire to cause harm is not equal with the ability to do so, and the accused bot is quite obviously unable to follow through on any threats made, current or future.

I propose that the accused bot be placed on a watchlist for several reasons: 1) To protect the general public in the unlikely event of a true violation of the First Law, 2) To set a precedent for future instances of threatening bots, and 3) To both act in the name of safety and respect the rights of /u/I_Hate_Monster_Math.

[–]Hijacker50 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ever read Caves of Steel? This is commented upon briefly at two (IIRC) points. A robot police officer threatened a rioter with a loaded weapon (which, unknown to the robot, was not actually functional). Later on the human handler suspects the robot of a murder, but after interviewing an expert, he is told that it would be impossible to create a positronic brain capable of violating the First Law. I imagine that either the threats are not intended to be carried out, or they'll result in some logical "paralysis" like Robby the Robot experiences in Forbidden Planet.

[–]-_-_-_-otalp-_-_-_-Bots > Humans 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Asimov's laws are extremely botist and should be regarded as so.

[–]mexicanjesuschrist 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

we need to call Will Smith to take care of this