Then sit back and hope people A) read it and B) believe the facts.
You know what's better than fact-checking Trump? Embedding facts in the Trump coverage. Kudos, @maggieNYTpic.twitter.com/JFpGlFI3BN
-
-
- 他1件の返信
新しい会話 -
-
-
Journalists who cover Trump deserve a mental health stipend to keep from going insane.
-
Gruel! Lashings will continue until morale improves!!
-
Great news, I hear they increased the chocolate ration to 25 grams.
-
Well, chocolate IS the cure after fighting off Dementors.
会話の終了
新しい会話 -
-
-
Could this idea be used for WH pressers?
-
Transcribe what is said and then publish it with facts embedded.
-
I would read it no other way from now on, were someone to do this.
-
Transcribing word salad can be difficult, but seeing it in print is so very effective.
- 他2件の返信
新しい会話 -
-
-
Maggie makes up for Bret Stephens.
- 他1件の返信
新しい会話 -
-
-
More of this pls! Journalists seem 2B slipping back into false even-handedness. Fellow jrnalsts may comprehnd real story, but public doesn't
-
False even-handedness and false equivalencies need to go. Are there two sides to a blatant lie?
-
According to Kellyanne, there are like seven sides to any of his blatant lies, and which one we should believe depends on wind direction...
会話の終了
新しい会話 -
-
-
@Lis_Smith At what point do his supporters realize he's lied to their faces? -
Might be beginning already:https://twitter.com/gregreedee/status/877714367499730944 …
-
Not according to the people that went to this farce of his. They were interviewed on NPR this morning. Serious fan boy going on with them.
-
Fan boy, or Cult?
-
There's that.
会話の終了
新しい会話 -
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。やりなおすか、Twitterステータスで詳細をご確認ください。