use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
648 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
related subreddits
View the troll network of subreddits
Unofficial Discord Chat: https://discord.gg/En9Jmw5
IRC: #TrollChromosomes on snoonet.org
honestly run fast & run far (i.redd.it)
riallyWe should just totally stab Caesar!🔪 が 1日前 投稿
[–][削除されました] 18時間前 (1子コメント)
[removed]
[–]DisputedDetails 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 17時間前 (0子コメント)
Why do you hang out in this sub? You hate it.
[–]blahwomanblah 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 22時間前 (1子コメント)
Advice like this makes me want to keep a scrapbook of shit that I want to teach my nieces and daughters. Yes. So much yes.
And the female corollary is: beware of females that act helpless and need a man to save her.
[–]MyogiNightKidsnow taking applications to join my girl gang 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 4時間前 (0子コメント)
That scrapbook thing is actually a pretty cool idea.
[–]BluthiIndustries 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Except maybe if they're working for the Innocence Project.
[–]zodberg 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
"I don't see why you men are so obsessed with my innocence, it's just an abstract quality you're drawn to because it makes me less intimidating and you have fetishistic draw to vulnerability."
But the assembled lawyers and judge at my misdemeanor trial continued to gaslight my concerns and tried to find out how innocent I wasn't.
Just because I was a woman who broke several laws, while men who don't break laws never receive this kind of negative attention.
[–]katniqpONE LIP TAR TO BRING THEM ALL AND IN THE DARKNESS BIND THEM 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
If you google the actual definition of innocent, half of the expanded definitions are something like, simple, naive, free from moral corruption, harmless, without knowledge of.
Which sounds pretty fucking boring to me.
[–]ChocoHorrorChocolate required for summoning ritual 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 19時間前 (0子コメント)
Your flair is the best. That is all I had to say.
[–]kiwi_butt 65 ポイント66 ポイント67 ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
I haven't met a single guy who didn't tell me in a sexual way that I come across as "innocent". I'm asian, petite, shy and young-looking but also into kinky stuff. Men are crazy about the fantasy of the girl who comes across as "innocent" and "pure" (barf) to others but will do "dirty" things just with them. The obsession with child-like attributes grosses me out too but as I said, I haven't met a single guy who was not into it. :/
[–]EnglishQueenis as subtle as a shotgun 16 ポイント17 ポイント18 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
Yeah same with me too. I work in Early childhood education and am kinky too. Guys go wild when they see demure me and learn how "dirty" I can be. It really ia sad, gross, and disheartening to know you are fetishized. I just want someone to like me for me :/
[–]AmeradianToday I choose me. 19 ポイント20 ポイント21 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
I just realized that this is activity encouraged in religious communities. Women are supposed to dress very conservatively to prove that they are humble (read: submissive), then once they are married, they are supposed to be a sexy tigress in the bedroom to prevent their husbands from being unfaithful.
[–]qwertypolkSelf-hating feminazi 86 ポイント87 ポイント88 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
There's this girl I've known since college. She tends to dress fairly demurely, so when she wore a sexy black dress to a concert a few months ago I was surprised. She got so many compliments, but a few days later when we were hanging out she told me that her boyfriend didn't like it. Apparently he doesn't like her looking sexy and prefers her to look demure and innocent. I was like "you're a 27 year old woman, you can look however the hell you like." but she's decided she won't wear the dress again. Sad times.
[–]SoloSeal 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 10時間前 (0子コメント)
If I could have any super power it would be to be able to split up any couple at will.
[+][削除されました] 1日前 (2子コメント)
[deleted]
[–]tunabuttonsiron sides 32 ポイント33 ポイント34 ポイント 1日前* (0子コメント)
Not really. Any time it's roleplay for consenting adults where the submissive/little is fully in control of themselves and informed on what'll happen to them on a realistic level, it's entirely different. Wouldn't you be creeped out by a daddy who only trolled for the youngest littles on purpose because of perceived ACTUAL innocence, not just admiration for the cutesy trappings of it? I don't think it's comparable at all to what this is addressing, no worries.
I mean it's not like people into bondage are the same as people who tie folks up to kidnap them, right?
[–]an_eloquent_enemy 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
As a kink that is different. Being obsessed with innocence in the general dating pool is disturbing. Nothing wrong if 2 consenting adults are loving a ddlg scenario!
[–]littlejawn 14 ポイント15 ポイント16 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
All I can think of:
IN NO CENCE
[+]Shadowglove スコアが基準値未満のコメント-115 ポイント-114 ポイント-113 ポイント 1日前 (12子コメント)
*Insecurites.
Innocence is fucking hot. That doesn't necessarily mean insecure.
[–]I_say_batoBaby Troll 70 ポイント71 ポイント72 ポイント 1日前 (11子コメント)
Innocence isn't hot.
Experience is hot. Informed consent is hot. Confidence is hot. Adults are hot. Enthusiasm is hot.
Why do you want someone who isn't your equal? Isn't that annoying?
[+]Shadowglove スコアが基準値未満のコメント-65 ポイント-64 ポイント-63 ポイント 1日前 (10子コメント)
Because I'm into that sort of thing. My kink isn't your kink.
[–]Keyspell#NastyWomen2020 25 ポイント26 ポイント27 ポイント 1日前 (4子コメント)
Ya you're into taking advantage of people, not a kink. Big 'ol difference m8.
[+]Shadowglove スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
Nah, I actually prefer when a guy does it to me.
[–]Keyspell#NastyWomen2020 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 23時間前 (2子コメント)
You're not winning this one, just do us a favor and shut your face while you're ahead :)
[–]Shadowglove -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 21時間前 (1子コメント)
Yeah, god forbid if a guy likes a woman that looks innocent. Must we all look at and like tanks?
[–]Keyspell#NastyWomen2020 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 21時間前 (0子コメント)
Nah, god forbid a creepy fuckwad like you even manage to get close to whatever you consider "innocent". THAT would be a tragedy.
[–]I_say_batoBaby Troll 55 ポイント56 ポイント57 ポイント 1日前 (4子コメント)
It's been said a bunch of times in this thread that we're not talking about consensual kinks between equally empowered adults who happen to enjoy the trappings of innocence.
Wanting someone in the whole relationship that is innocent because it will give you more power over them (instead of having a consensual power exchange between two adults who are both informed about what they are entering into) is not a kink. At best, it's creepy. At worst, it's abuse.
[+]Shadowglove スコアが基準値未満のコメント-27 ポイント-26 ポイント-25 ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
That's straight up abuse of course. I'm just saying that some like that sort of thing in people, the look of innocense and that those shouldn't be bashed for liking it. Maybe the person should have said insecurity. I think that suits better.
[–]I_say_batoBaby Troll 19 ポイント20 ポイント21 ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
No, because obsession with innocence and liking insecure partners are different problems. Even if a girl is confident, if you like her because she's 'innocent' you're fetishizing young girls and normalizing imbalanced (aka unhealthy) relationships.
[+]Shadowglove スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8 ポイント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
Looking innocent and being insecure is not the same thing.
[–]I_say_batoBaby Troll 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
That's exactly what I just said.
[–]kruemelmonstah 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
My bf sometimes jokes that he's glad I'm insecure and don't know how pretty I am or else I'd leave him for something "better"... shame that a lot of men actually do prey on a girl's insecurities. The only time I'm "innocent" is when I'm roleplaying in the bedroom, it's just one of my kinks. shrugs
[+][削除されました] 1日前 (12子コメント)
[–]dobbysteacozy 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Actually we really are.
[–]iamsortoffakenews 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
There are absolutely predatory women out there
[–]DisputedDetails 108 ポイント109 ポイント110 ポイント 1日前 (8子コメント)
I'm not even sure what you're trying to say. Do you think women fetishise innocence? That doesn't even fit into a stereotype.
[–]Barf_Tart 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
I'm not sure but I think they're trying to say feminists make women out to be innocent and at times childlike, without personal agency. I might be totally wrong too though.
[–]DisputedDetails 28 ポイント29 ポイント30 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Naw, I checked his user history. Dude's 16. Just "trolling".
[–]MompyI'm never going outside again unless I need a place to throw up 114 ポイント115 ポイント116 ポイント 1日前 (5子コメント)
Nah we're all totally pining for them high school boys, something about the mix of excessive body spray and sexual inexperience really gets me riled /s
[–]LonelyNixon 15 ポイント16 ポイント17 ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
I'm reminded of The cougar episode of 30 rock where Liz lemon And Jenna date younger guy's and it's slowly turns into them acting like weird sex mom's
[–]CorvidaeSFJam out with your clam out. 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
Sex Mom, band name, calling it
[–]jennybean42 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
"Jam out with your clam out" being the first album, of course.
[–]SoFetchBetch 30 ポイント31 ポイント32 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Mmm Dorito breath. Hot!
[–]TehRenPockets: They should all be bigger. 70 ポイント71 ポイント72 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Aw he can't even do his own laundry that's so hot - Nobody ever :D
[–]woollyhammockAll tea, all shade 134 ポイント135 ポイント136 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Which subreddit do you think you're on? This one is rife with feminists, and we like it that way.
Get with the program, yo ;)
[–]great-god-om 71 ポイント72 ポイント73 ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
Stay away from women like this too. My ex was like this, so it's not always a sexism thing (though its roots for many are in sexism). It's a real red fuckin flag when someone says they are less attracted to you since you became more confident.
[–]AskMrScience 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 15時間前 (0子コメント)
"You don't know you're beautiful. That's what makes you beautiful!"
One Direction can fuck right off with their "women with low self esteem are hotter" song.
[–]MaladjustedSinner 71 ポイント72 ポイント73 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Isn't it? Women aren't immune to sexism and internalized misogyny is a very well known phenomenon.
Lesbians apparently sometimes try and emulate the thought process and actions of what they see straight man do, that's how they were taught to sexually and romantically interact with women by society, by culture. They probably either see themselves as "different from the other giiiiiirls" or hate themselves enough to take it out on other women.
[–]DieKatzenKoenigin 25 ポイント26 ポイント27 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
If I could turn back time and warn my younger self...:/
[–]StCory 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Also stay away from the ones obsessed with the convicted ones aswell.
[–]somecallmenonny 160 ポイント161 ポイント162 ポイント 1日前 (8子コメント)
So here's my philosophy on my partner's sexual history:
If I have more experience than them: Cool! I get to teach them stuff! This'll be fun.
If they have more experience than me: Cool! I might learn some stuff! This'll be fun.
If we have about the same amount of experience: Cool! No pressure! This'll be fun.
[–]The_Mighty_Jericha 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 23時間前 (1子コメント)
My current partner has only been with one other woman one time, so if you don't count awkward losing your virginity sex, I'm basically his first real sexual partner. Teaching him everything I like is super fun. He is very dedicated to getting me off too, which is a HUGE bonus and one of the reasons I really enjoy being with him. It doesn't matter that he has had far fewer partners than me. I don't idolize him for his naivety or innocence. We just like having fun together. And he is not judgmental at all towards me even though I have been with more people. He likes me and doesn't care, more fun for him because I have picked up some skills.
My ideology is exactly the same. As long as we are into pleasing each other and willing to learn what the other likes (and assuming you've used protection and are regularly tested if you've had many partners), who cares how many partners you have.
[–]somecallmenonny 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 23時間前 (0子コメント)
Exactly! The only reason to worry about your partner's sexual history is for STDs. And of course you get to look out for your health first and foremost. Protection and regular testing do the trick. No reason to involve shame, too.
[–]greenhearted 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 1日前* (0子コメント)
Fun is what is key!
I have only benefitted from my bf's sexual experience. It took a while for him to accumulate the skills he uses to give me the most pleasure I've ever experienced in my own life. Why would I look upon that negatively?
We've never had the "number of previous partners" conversation bc who cares? We're together now, that's all that matters at the moment.
edit: a letter
[–]Endless_Search 26 ポイント27 ポイント28 ポイント 1日前 (4子コメント)
Emphasis on fun!
[–]NheeaI put the "fun" in dysfunctional. 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
Funtastic!
[–]FunLovingMurderhobo 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
Surely you mean fucktastic :p
[–]NheeaI put the "fun" in dysfunctional. 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
Omg fuck yeaaaaaah!
[–]Endless_Search 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 10時間前 (0子コメント)
I love y'all!
[+]Eaglestrike スコアが基準値未満のコメント-96 ポイント-95 ポイント-94 ポイント 1日前 (15子コメント)
Seems a pretty generic formula, though.
Stay away from x obsessed with y.
I mean this can even be correct in this context:
stay the fuck away from girls obsessed with supernatural
I love Supernatural, but there are legit Sam/Dean shippers there, man...
[–]BJPenwhistle 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント 1日前* (6子コメント)
FYI, I'm not a Wincest shipper but I don't see what's wrong with it. It's a kink people enjoy. Yeah, it's a little weird but it's not like they're hurting anyone and by the gods, there are A LOT weirder things than that for sure. So what's the big deal?
[+]Eaglestrike スコアが基準値未満のコメント-51 ポイント-50 ポイント-49 ポイント 1日前 (5子コメント)
it's not like they're hurting anyone. So what's the big deal?
Can you not say the same thing about a guy who prefers innocence?
[–]ElegantShitwadtampon, tampoff 42 ポイント43 ポイント44 ポイント 1日前 (4子コメント)
this post is talking about a guy who's obsessed with innocence, it's not just a preference. if a guy tends to like shy/socially awkward girls more because they seem more innocent, that's perfectly okay. a guy is obsessed with innocence is a whole other story entirely.
[+]Eaglestrike スコアが基準値未満のコメント-31 ポイント-30 ポイント-29 ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
And again, can you not say the same thing about being "obsessed" with seeing two brothers have at each other? The word obsess comes with the understanding that someone is going too far, and extremism is the whole issue in most scenarios.
The reason tending to like innocence is okay, but obsession is not okay is because the implication of obsession comes with things like assault, badgering, harassment, etc. either someone who comes across as innocent to them and is desired, or someone who is deplorable to them for not being innocent.
Likewise if you're obsessed with Sam/Dean Wincest you may tend to go to every single con and badger/harass/assault Jensen and Jared, which is not okay.
[–]Keyspell#NastyWomen2020 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 1日前* (0子コメント)
You're a remarkably dense idiot, and that's saying something. Kindly piss off please.
[–]BJPenwhistle 19 ポイント20 ポイント21 ポイント 1日前* (1子コメント)
I do think there's a difference, yes, to some extent; hear me out.
Wincest shipping is a sexual fantasy that doesn't have any realworld repercussions. Brothers don't feel pressured to have sex/make out/become romantically involved with each other because a small subset of a fandom ships Wincest.
Conversely, the very strong societal infatuation with chaste, virginal, infantilized women does have measurable negative repercussions. This attitude has disempowered women throughout history and unnecessarily burdened men- that's right, this negatively affects men as well. If you doubt this kind of attitude has negative repercussions, just drop in at the redpill and incel subs. For sure, those subs do not represent all men but they serve as a magnifying glass to show how these attitudes can be damaging to both men and women.
When it is just a sexual fantasy, I have absolutely zero problems with it all. But unfortunately, it so often goes way beyond that, frequently to the point where the implications become borderline or even overtly pedophilic.
TL;DR: I don't have a problem with the sexual fantasy of preferring a chaste, virginal, innocent woman. I do have a problem when women as a whole are expected to conform to this expectation. Have your sexual fantasy. That's fine. I NEVER shame people for their sexual preferences. But, as a society, we need to stop denigrating, disempowering, and chastising women who don't want to be seen as chaste, virginal, infantilized sex objects.
[–]Eaglestrike -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント 21時間前 (0子コメント)
I don't disagree with the negative effects of the obsession with innocence, but I would argue the major difference here is how common the obsessions are. It's pretty common to see men (and women, to some extent) with an obsession for innocence and thus notice how it effects society. On the other hand, a Wincest fan actually exists in the TV show, here's an excerpt of her actions:
Becky fixates again on Sam. Wanting him, she gets a love potion from what she believes is a wiccan but is really a crossroads demon named Guy. Becky drugs Sam with the love potion during his annual trip to Vegas, aware of it from the Supernatural books and marries him in a chapel there. Repeatedly drugging Sam with the love potion, which she believes brings out deep feelings he has for her, she brings him to her high school reunion to show him off where she gets more potion from Guy. She also investigates the deaths of people who seem to have made deals with Sam. After the potion wears off and she runs out, Becky knocks out Sam and takes him to her parent's fishing cabin where she ties him up and calls Guy for more potion, not listening to Sam when he tries to assert that Guy is not a good guy and to let him go. Becky is horrified when Guy reveals himself to be a crossroads demon and he offers her a 25 year deal for a permanent potion if she doesn't let the Winchesters know and promises not to have her killed in an "accident." Becky considers the deal and talks to Sam about how she wants someone to love her for her.
And there have been stories of "superfans" that kill their heroes (like Selena) because of how insane they've gotten with their obsession. I'll admit I didn't come up with an example anywhere close to the scope of the original point, but I do believe the issue is with how far people go with obsessions more than what they obsess about. To use another terrible example, there is such a thing as a pedophile who never molests children, they have a tendency/fetish for young children, but it's never so bad they act on it. It's the ones that cannot control themselves that are an issue to society.
[–]ElegantShitwadtampon, tampoff 76 ポイント77 ポイント78 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
i think being obsessed with a tv show and being obsessed with innocence are two entirely different things. one is something we can all admit to doing, and the other is creepy as fuck.
[–]MooncinderI tried to catch fog the other day. Mist. 32 ポイント33 ポイント34 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
You actually make a good point. Obsession in general can often be a red flag.
[+]dougielou スコアが基準値未満のコメント-57 ポイント-56 ポイント-55 ポイント 1日前 (5子コメント)
Lol idk why you got downvoted. Maybe people just don't know what shipping is??? Otherwise I don't think think they'd be down voting you...
[–]ElegantShitwadtampon, tampoff 40 ポイント41 ポイント42 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
i think they're being downvoted because they're comparing harmless shippers to guys who are obsessed with innocence. one is basically teenagers being cringey(like teenagers tend to be) and one is fucking concerning and creepy.
[+]Eaglestrike スコアが基準値未満のコメント-22 ポイント-21 ポイント-20 ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
Could be the legit Sam/Dean shippers were first to reach this thread, who knows, reddit votes are a fickle thing, lol.
[–]NotKateBush 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 23時間前 (0子コメント)
I've never seen a single episode of that show. Keep telling yourself that's the reason why people downvoted your shitty comment.
[+]dougielou スコアが基準値未満のコメント-40 ポイント-39 ポイント-38 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Hahah and they are ANGERY!
[–]penguin_waddleSerial killer documentaries and chill? 229 ポイント230 ポイント231 ポイント 1日前 (16子コメント)
A huge red flag for me are the ones with the Madonna Whore complex.
[–]pamplemoussmy favorite little jewy this side of st. louis 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
I feel like that's less a red flag and more something hidden that red flags (like an obsession with innocence) might be signaling.
[–]SugarTits1strong independent troll who don't need no bridge 42 ポイント43 ポイント44 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Oh, I see you've met my ex.
[–]crazymcfattypants 93 ポイント94 ポイント95 ポイント 1日前 (13子コメント)
Ohhh, what's the Madonna Whore complex?
I am ready to be educated and probably sickened.
[–]cyanpineapple 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
The Wikipedia article is fascinating
[–]MooncinderI tried to catch fog the other day. Mist. 95 ポイント96 ポイント97 ポイント 1日前 (6子コメント)
Wikipedia has an article if you want to go in-depth but it's basically where men are only capable of seeing women as one extreme or the other.
[–]WikiTextBot 99 ポイント100 ポイント101 ポイント 1日前 (5子コメント)
Madonna–whore complex
In psychoanalytic literature, a Madonna–whore complex is the inability to maintain sexual arousal within a committed, loving relationship. First identified by Sigmund Freud, under the rubric of psychic impotence, this psychological complex is said to develop in men who see women as either saintly Madonnas or debased prostitutes. Men with this complex desire a sexual partner who has been degraded (the whore) while they cannot desire the respected partner (the Madonna). Freud wrote: "Where such men love they have no desire and where they desire they cannot love." Clinical psychologist Uwe Hartmann, writing in 2009, stated that the complex "is still highly prevalent in today's patients".
[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source ] Downvote to remove | v0.22
[–]Queen_of_RepostsThe babe with the power 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
Ah, I guess I've misunderstood it then. I thought it was a Nice Guy TM thing. When they think all women are sluts except for the one they want as a girlfriend, she is the most pure thing while all others deserve no respect at all. And when it turns out that she don't want them, then she was a whore all along, in disguise.
[–]nightrideis probably worrying about climate change (◡‿◡✿) 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 20時間前 (0子コメント)
No that's just a misogynist.
[–]D_Andreams 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント 23時間前 (0子コメント)
I think those related outlooks - two points on the same spectrum maybe. I would probably still call that the M/W Complex in a more general sense if not in a medical/psychological sense.
[–]suckzbuttz69420bro 16 ポイント17 ポイント18 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Like Charlotte's first husband in Sex and the City.
[–]CorvidaeSFJam out with your clam out. 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Thank you, WikiTextBot!
[–]MaladjustedSinner 128 ポイント129 ポイント130 ポイント 1日前 (4子コメント)
You'll recognize it immediatly as what many people/men tend to support or think, even at a subconscious level.
They see women either as Madonna (pure mother figure) or a whore, basically. There is no inbetween and all women have to fit into those categories, as you might imagine most of us would go on the whore side.
[+]aFunnyWorldWeLiveIn スコアが基準値未満のコメント-92 ポイント-91 ポイント-90 ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
Aaaaaand now I'm trying to analyse if this complex is at play in my relationship lol.
My bf of 5 years and myself were each other's first sexual partners so I guess we were both Madonnas when we started dating and now we're both whores and proud of it haha
[–]porcellus_ultor 97 ポイント98 ポイント99 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
It's more like a person dividing women into two distinct categories:
1) she can be either a pure unblemished virgin or an upright, sexless matron beyond reproach... or
2) a disgusting whore worthy only of derision and/or a quick, meaningless liason
[–]aFunnyWorldWeLiveIn 61 ポイント62 ポイント63 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Oh, I completely misunderstood. Sorry!! And thanks for clarifying that. I can totally see how the cognitive dissonance would be at play in long term relationships!
[–]frozenchocolate 151 ポイント152 ポイント153 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
That's not at all what the complex is.
[–]Fartsandfarts 348 ポイント349 ポイント350 ポイント 1日前 (73子コメント)
I read an article recently about how pedophilia is like, "en vogue"... men/the media are constantly fantasizing about youth from "barely legal" to "any hair is gross!" to "I like innocent girls". The more I thought about it the more totally grossed out I got.
[+][削除されました] 11時間前 (1子コメント)
[–]DisputedDetails 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 6時間前 (0子コメント)
Or you could stop stop perving on little girls, jeez.
[–]IndieLady 59 ポイント60 ポイント61 ポイント 1日前 (6子コメント)
I was a teen in the early 90s and not exposed to porn aside from Playboy or that kind of very soft erotica.
My first boyfriend had slept with one girl before me. Not to be critical of other women but told me how his previous sex partner had no pubic hair. And I was like "whaaa...?" because it seemed so childlike. Like who would want to fuck a child?
To me and my boyfriend at the time, pubic hair was womanly and sexy. It's weird how normal female pubic hair has not only become unfashionable, but actually repugnant.
[–]ChkYrHeadConnoisseur of Labia Confetti 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 22時間前 (3子コメント)
It's not repugnant to me, but in my experience, women with a full bush tend to smell a bit more musky (not in a good way) and when I'm going down on them, it's not fun having to navigate the hair and getting it in your mouth. Obviously, women can groom how they wish, but I do have a preference for at least trimmed genitals (and yes, I trim/shave mine) and it has zero to do with them looking like children.
[–]DisputedDetails 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 17時間前 (2子コメント)
Do you shave your armpits as well then? Hairy armpits are definitely musky lol
[–]ChkYrHeadConnoisseur of Labia Confetti 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 15時間前 (1子コメント)
I trim them, actually. Yes. But my dates also aren't licking my pits. Sooo...there's that.
[–]DisputedDetails 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
I wasn't having a go, just wondering - if you're averse to the smell then pits on yourself might be worse than a bush on others!
I bet someone has that fetish though. Best be prepared.
[–]suckzbuttz69420bro 28 ポイント29 ポイント30 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
It's weird how normal female pubic hair has not only become unfashionable, but actually repugnant.
I feel like this attitude is changing. More and more people are being less dickish about how people groom their pubes.
[–]Fartsandfarts 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 13時間前 (0子コメント)
Really? God i hope so, no one I've met/ been intimate with in the last 10 years has seemed to feel that way :(
[–]Jill4ChrisRedInternally Wednesday Addams 213 ポイント214 ポイント215 ポイント 1日前 (40子コメント)
I live in the UK and see this on the front page of Daily Mail all the time (or in my grandmas house). "PEDO ARRESTED SCUM OF THE EARTH!!!" 2 pages later, pictures of 14 year old Celebrities/Celebrities daughters "Looking all grown up in their swim suit! Not leaving much to the imagination! Acting beyond their years" is usually code word for "Look at these sexy 14 year olds."
[–]shut-up-dana 81 ポイント82 ポイント83 ポイント 1日前 (32子コメント)
It's barely even code for "look at these sexy 14 year olds". Wasn't the Mail the one that had a jailbait countdown running ahead of Emma Watson's 16th birthday? Mingers.
[–]Maggiemayday 27 ポイント28 ポイント29 ポイント 1日前 (30子コメント)
Now I must go google "mingers". Whoot, new vocabulary.
edit: Is it pronounced ming or minj?
[–]srhlzbth731Fishermen are reel men. 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Watch the Inbetweeners and the world of crude British slang will open up to you
[–]simonjp 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 1日前 (5子コメント)
ming-ers. Sometimes ming-gers.
[–]Maggiemayday 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 1日前 (4子コメント)
So like fingers or lingers, or possibly singers? Got it.
[–]shut-up-dana 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Mingers like singers, not quite like fingers/lingers (which has a more pronounced 'G' I think?).
[–]simonjp 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
Yes - although as you've probably seen, this isn't exactly where I would use it myself. It usually means an ugly person, usually a woman. So not a great word in honesty. Although so fun to say
[–]Maggiemayday 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
I understand. I love the word "twat", and it is simply unacceptable these days. It was always unacceptable, but the reasons have changed.
Fuck, I'm old.
[–]simonjp 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Saying them out loud, it's the softer g of singer, rather than the harder g of linger.
[–]littlespy 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Ming
[–]steerpike88 26 ポイント27 ポイント28 ポイント 1日前 (21子コメント)
Ming... Minge (Minj) is your fanny
[–]baardvarkLipstick-stained burrito 19 ポイント20 ポイント21 ポイント 1日前 (19子コメント)
Wait, fanny has a British meaning too
[–]draw_it_nowCome join us at /r/TrollBi 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント 1日前 (17子コメント)
Intro to Britspeak:
Minge = fanny
fanny = cunt
cunt = dickhead
[–]alyraptorderby af 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 21時間前 (15子コメント)
Fanny pack takes on a whole new meaning.
[–]draw_it_nowCome join us at /r/TrollBi 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 21時間前 (14子コメント)
We call them bumbags
Also:
Jello = jelly
Jelly = jam
Jam = conserve
[–]alyraptorderby af 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 21時間前 (13子コメント)
Hah! Whatever you say chap. Next you'll be telling me you've got different words for cookies and potato chips!
[–]raziphelshameless plug: visit /r/troll4troll! 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 22時間前 (0子コメント)
bellend = dickhead also
[–]sobok 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
It's your cunt.
[–]Maggiemayday 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Thank you for this vital information.
[–]Jill4ChrisRedInternally Wednesday Addams 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
YEP.
[–]MooncinderI tried to catch fog the other day. Mist. 51 ポイント52 ポイント53 ポイント 1日前 (6子コメント)
That's the Daily Fail for you. My grandparents read it too. :(
[–]Jill4ChrisRedInternally Wednesday Addams 22 ポイント23 ポイント24 ポイント 1日前 (5子コメント)
I'm lucky my gran only reads it for the cute pictures of peoples kids and dogs they have sometimes, and the cross words. She's (thankfully) smart enough to know tabloid-speak and doesn't believe a lot of what the papers say. But it still annoys me that she buys them :/
[–]simonjp 16 ポイント17 ポイント18 ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
Print out /r/aww for her, it might be enough.
[–]Jill4ChrisRedInternally Wednesday Addams 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
Unfortunately she's computer illiterate :( I do send her cute pictures by post occasionally though, cards and stuff:) I'm getting her crossword puzzles for her birthday and some brain training exercises too, to keep her active.
[–]simonjp 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
Yeah, that's why you'll need to print it. Perhaps make a flip-book for the gifs.
[–]Jill4ChrisRedInternally Wednesday Addams 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
That's a genuinely awesome idea haha
[–]Panic_Mechanic 180 ポイント181 ポイント182 ポイント 1日前 (22子コメント)
This seriously grinds my gears. Nasty shit it is. My favourite (negatively speaking) is watching people try to explain away the 'age specific'- phelia. Like no buddy, call it whether you want you just want to fuck and or control very young girls.
Also Leo DiCaprio being the "envy" of men everywhere for only dating 20 to 24 or so year old models that never last more than a couple of months. It's like dudes, your bro-idol has a ton of baggage he's gotta sort out.
[–]thedude346 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント 1日前 (21子コメント)
I don't get why you feel the need to judge Leo, it seemed uncalled for. As long as everyone's cool and consenting, I don't see a problem. Have you considered that maybe he's not looking for anything serious right now? If he was a 35+ year old actress regularly pulling hot young male model beaus, she'd probably be cheered and celebrated on this sub. Just because he's a dude it's considered wrong to casually date young, attractive women?
[–]Mynamebaby 36 ポイント37 ポイント38 ポイント 1日前 (8子コメント)
The issue is the age difference and the fact that he's famous and influential. Seems blind of you to leave that out.
A guy only dating women half his age is likely a) insecure b) immature c) a manipulator or some combination of all of the above. So I don't see anyone on this forum celebrating a woman if she did the same.
[–]thedude346 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 10時間前 (1子コメント)
I don't think you're doing the adult women he dates any favors by infantilizing them.
I'm highly skeptical of the whole age/money/fame differential becoming "dangerous" once both parties are above 18-20+. Seinfeld dating a 17 year old at 40? Skeevy as fuck, sure. A 35 year old and a 24 year old? Who cares?
Does this mean any celebrity that dates or married a non-celebrity who is younger than them is exploiting them? Or a royal family member doing the same with a "commoner?"
You think none of these young models see his string of relationships and history and get what's going on, and then go for him anyway, for a number of reasons? It's highly possible they're getting something out of it too and "using" him the same way he "uses" them if we're going to label it that. Hell, I see it as infinitely more likely that these adult women spring for the chance of dating a wealthy, famous, high-profile, and supposedly charismatic actor (and all the perks that come with that) rather than that they are all helpless victims falling under the spell of some master manipulator.
[–]Mynamebaby -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 18分前 (0子コメント)
This isn't about infantilizing women. It's about a middle aged man serially dating women in their early twenties, which makes him an immature douchebro.
[+]DumbledoresFerrari スコアが基準値未満のコメント-19 ポイント-18 ポイント-17 ポイント 1日前 (5子コメント)
Or he finds that age range most attractive, and given he's not looking for anything serious, looks are the most important thing to him.
Why does it have to be so negative. He's an adult who has casual sex with other adults. There's no need to make up that he must be a creep and the girls can't think for themselves.
[–]Mynamebaby 38 ポイント39 ポイント40 ポイント 1日前 (4子コメント)
Oh brother. You sound like a creep defending a creep.
[–]thedude346 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 10時間前 (1子コメント)
Genuine question: what exactly is creepy about the above comment?
[–]Mynamebaby -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント 14分前 (0子コメント)
The fact that you're asking that makes you look like a creep.
[+]DumbledoresFerrari スコアが基準値未満のコメント-18 ポイント-17 ポイント-16 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
You sound like an internet psychologist lol
[–]Panic_Mechanic 47 ポイント48 ポイント49 ポイント 1日前* (3子コメント)
I'm not one to believe that a satisfactory life on this earth requires you to have a relationship. So please don't think this comes from a place of needing to see people settle down. It's also never been about people wanting to be with someone they find attractive. Why should it?
I'm just asking you to understand this within the context of the post. For most of the world and especially our North American culture, innocence = youth, naiveté, submission.
I chose Leo specifically because I know industry people (you're going to take this with a grain of salt and I understand) who've been around him and his attitudes towards women is exactly the thing were discussing this is post. He's constantly lauded in our society as someone to emulate and envy for his "string of young, beautiful models". Even if you haven't heard the stories, simply by looking at decades of dating habits can say a ton about a person. Especially when they're in their mid-forties and unable or unwilling to have a relationship with anyone over basically half their age.
But I will concede that maybe I should not have called him out on it and I understand how it can come across. It's also just a personal annoyance having to hear and see about Leo's new conquest for the 20th time in a row and being told how lucky he is to be dating such young women as if it's something to be proud of.
[+]sobok スコアが基準値未満のコメント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
There's a world of difference between a 24 year old and a 14 year old, though.
Unless he's testing these women poorly, what is there to call him out on? The relationships are short, so he's not trapping them.
And umm... He's a hot commodity. Have you thought that maybe he's the conquest for these women?
Sure, the people praising him might need a reality check, but I don't believe that's his fault
[–]nightrideis probably worrying about climate change (◡‿◡✿) 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 20時間前 (0子コメント)
Nobody's saying he's a pedophile though. Only that he most definitely fetishizes youth/innocence or else he wouldn't date early twenty somethings only. And by the way, 20-4 is still very young and inexperienced and it's DiCaprio is being a creepy fuck.
[–]D_Andreams 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント 23時間前 (0子コメント)
Eh, a pattern of dating drastically younger women is one of those if-there's-smoke-there's-probably-fire things.
He's not technically doing anything wrong and he might not have a ton of baggage and a questionable attitude towards women. But like, every other guy I've known with that patten has, so. It's not something we should aspire to.
[–]Ishouldbepolite 58 ポイント59 ポイント60 ポイント 1日前* (5子コメント)
Name one such actress that does that.
And at age 43 after decades of only short flings and not a couple of partners after a long term relationship.
It's the difference between not wanting anything serious right now and not being able to have anything serious.
He's not judged on having consenting relationships, the people who admire him for it are called out for gloryfying the guy's undressed issues.
Leo can be Leo, but let's at least allow him to be a 3d person instead of being reduced to a cartoon male sexual avatar by the men that want to escape their own lives vicariously through him.
[–]thedude346 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント 11時間前 (0子コメント)
I recognize it's less common due to societal sexist double standards. But if there were to be a gender-flipped Leo, I'd be just as staunch a defender of her right to conduct a consensual, non-abusive love life without judgment.
I think you're reading into someone's life you don't know anything about. Have you talked to him personally about this? Not everyone wants the same things in life. Some people never want to have children, and some people may never be seeking a traditional-style lifelong, monogamous partner.
Sure, maybe he had issues that prevent him from having anything more substantial than shallow flings. Or maybe all he's interested in are short flings. Without any insight into his life, all we can do is speculate and judge needlessly.
[–]sobok 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
I feel uncomfortable trying to diagnose someone with mental health problems ("underlying issues") because of their dating/sex life, when they've not been causing harm to anyone.
It could just be that he likes being single, and having these short flings are fun.
You don't need to have underlying issues to be a 3d person. Just like strong female characters don't need a rape to be strong.
[–]absentbird 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント 22時間前 (1子コメント)
I don't know that I would call it a diagnosis as much as an observation. People don't usually flit from relationship to relationship without forming lasting bonds, it strongly correlates with intimacy issues.
What the fuck?
[–]thedude346 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 11時間前 (0子コメント)
People don't usually flit from relationship to relationship without forming lasting bonds, it strongly correlates with intimacy issues.
Serious question: do you have evidence to support this assertion? Or is this just anecdotal stuff?
When I'm not looking for a serious relationship but still interested in dating around and having sex, I have exactly that type of relationship: a not too involved, usually brief fling. Perhaps this comes across as defensiveness, but I bristle at the suggestion that people conducting their love lives in a manner other than you personally see fit somehow have something wrong with them.
[–]D_Andreams 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント 23時間前 (0子コメント)
Don't you though?
If you interpret "underlying issues" to mean "mental illness", then no. But most people have issues. Anyone who grew up a hollywood star is pretty much bound to have some.
[–]ProbablyNotANewIdea 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
I gave you an upvote just because it's a thoughtful response. I'm not sure how I feel one way or another on the topic.
Thanks. Appreciate the opposite of the "downvoted because disagreement" phenomenon :)
[+]guidedhand スコアが基準値未満のコメント-228 ポイント-227 ポイント-226 ポイント 1日前 (9子コメント)
'innocent' girls are always the ones to shame me for my sexual history. Im running away from them too.
[–]syncopacetic 203 ポイント204 ポイント205 ポイント 1日前* (7子コメント)
wtf is this that you are bringing into this thread, bro
[+]guidedhand スコアが基準値未満のコメント-33 ポイント-32 ポイント-31 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
NaCl
[–]syncopacetic 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント 22時間前 (0子コメント)
Ay, you think you're clever with your old reddit salty joke, but the actual funny thing is that you're the one being saliferous. See. See what I did there.
[–]woollyhammockAll tea, all shade 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
In the immortal words of Ms Alyssa Edwards...
[–]HIS_FATTY_PUBIS 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Not on tonight.
[–]CurtainClothes 133 ポイント134 ポイント135 ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
I'm sorry, I love how you said this. All I'm imagining is you standing in a doorway asking "what the heck you trying to bring in here?" As someone tries to drag a giant bag of luggage through the door.
[–]syncopacetic 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント 22時間前 (0子コメント)
It was like coming home totally exhausted and discovering your roommate is setting up for a party on a Tuesday.
[–]DisputedDetails 25 ポイント26 ポイント27 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Haha you're both amazing
[–]ahchavavaginas and internet friends 72 ポイント73 ポイント74 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
I wish I would have learned this at the age of 10. Would have saved me a lot of heartache.
[–]Bakleind 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Truth
[–]WitchJuice 307 ポイント308 ポイント309 ポイント 1日前 (12子コメント)
Absolutely no one who is even slightly interested in this as a quality would ever even look in my direction, much less start a conversation with me. I ooze 'been there, done that, got the t-shirt, burned the t-shirt, ran around naked in front of shocked onlookers after burning the t-shirt whilst high on acid'. But yeah, good advice!
[+]indianincels スコアが基準値未満のコメント-17 ポイント-16 ポイント-15 ポイント 22時間前 (0子コメント)
Okay I think I get why people wouldn't want to date girls like this.
[–]Maggiemayday 24 ポイント25 ポイント26 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
So, the average Wednesday after Burning Man? Nice.
[+][削除されました] 1日前 (8子コメント)
[–]SugarTits1strong independent troll who don't need no bridge 23 ポイント24 ポイント25 ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
I love how literally you're taking a reddit comment. On a sub called TrollX
[–]hodnesheda 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
Your flair is amazing :)
[–]SugarTits1strong independent troll who don't need no bridge 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Thank you :D
[–]Sabuleon 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
You should have phrased that as "I need this to learn how to not give any fucks".
[–]candle_and_brabehold my querulous quim 146 ポイント147 ポイント148 ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
Search 'tits' on google u thirsty gull
[–]BJPenwhistle 56 ポイント57 ポイント58 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
This reminds me of a time a guy was repeatedly begging me over Skype for pictures of my boobs. I told him to google titties but he said no. He desperately HAD to see mine for some reason. So finally, I got sick of his begging, found a tit-pic on google images, and sent it to him. He randomly gave me 30$ and I never heard from him again.
[–]candle_and_brabehold my querulous quim 27 ポイント28 ポイント29 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Lmao what an actual fool
[–]SpicyRicin 22 ポイント23 ポイント24 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
You, I like you.
[–]little_blue_penguin 77 ポイント78 ポイント79 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
You sound like fun! :D
[–]ElegantShitwadtampon, tampoff 23 ポイント24 ポイント25 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
solid advice
[–]woollyhammockAll tea, all shade 187 ポイント188 ポイント189 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Woo-hoo! All my years of jaded cynicism to the rescue!
It's great to know I'll never have some megadouche drooling over me - I've seen too much shit, and am out of fucks to give.
[–]pumpkinpink 30 ポイント31 ポイント32 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Legit
[–]tunabuttonsiron sides 748 ポイント749 ポイント750 ポイント 1日前 (23子コメント)
Completely accurate. Anyone who goes on about how they admire "innocence" is really just admitting to you that they're looking for vulnerable/impressionable people.
[–]raziphelshameless plug: visit /r/troll4troll! 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント 22時間前 (0子コメント)
Experienced women don't tolerate their bullshit, manipulation, or abuse. They can see the red flags for miles.
[–]noratat 27 ポイント28 ポイント29 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Yeah innocence is adorable in children, but definitely not what I'm looking for in a partner. Being an adult's already hard enough without having to babysit someone else.
[–]SayingWhatUrThinkinBeauty is in the eye of the beer holder. 49 ポイント50 ポイント51 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
the fact that this is the default for 'attractive' to men in this society should really tell you all you need to know about rape culture.
[–]RagingFuckalot 117 ポイント118 ポイント119 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Or they're looking for the legal version of a child.
[–]SugarTits1strong independent troll who don't need no bridge 172 ポイント173 ポイント174 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Yup. Even if they aren't consciously aware that they like innocence because it implies a certain level of manipulative control over the individual. They're still sub-consciously doing that. Sure, it might seem cute on the surface and the guy might enjoy being able to "swoop in and protect m'lady" but it's still creepy as fuck to date people on that premise.
[+][削除されました] 1日前 (17子コメント)
[–]_ArcticMonkeys_1D Stan and proud 344 ポイント345 ポイント346 ポイント 1日前 (11子コメント)
Innocence isn't entirely based around who you've slept with. There are plenty of virgins out there who aren't innocent in the slightest, and vice versa. I'd say the reason you're being down voted is because you decided to place sex as the main reason for loss of innocence, and then went on to slut shame in a sub full of women who hate slut shaming.
[–]n0m_de_plum 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント 18時間前 (0子コメント)
A few years back a nutjob went on a shooting spree because he was frustrated about being a virgin. Would you call him innocent?
Likewise, there are plenty of people who have had sex but are still very sheltered and naive in their world view.
Innocence =|= virginity
[+]Lipat97Whats long and hard and has cum in it? A cucumber. スコアが基準値未満のコメント-70 ポイント-69 ポイント-68 ポイント 1日前 (9子コメント)
But could a virgin flip through a little book of sex tips? And the experienced can discard naughty nights for niceness?
Truly one for the philosophers!
[–]Malari_ZahnNormal is relative, just not my relatives... 44 ポイント45 ポイント46 ポイント 1日前 (5子コメント)
Naughty nights and niceness are not mutually exclusive...
[+]Lipat97Whats long and hard and has cum in it? A cucumber. スコアが基準値未満のコメント-25 ポイント-24 ポイント-23 ポイント 1日前 (4子コメント)
What about fishnets and night dresses?
[–]Malari_ZahnNormal is relative, just not my relatives... 32 ポイント33 ポイント34 ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
Rock those fishnets and night dresses! I'm not here to judge. I think you'll look faaabbbbulous dahhhling.
PS, but if I don't feed the trolls, who will?! :p
[–]koalatycontrol 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
I think they were just making an Arctic Monkeys reference...
Edit: derp, just saw their comment below mine explaining. Leaving mine for support because /u/Lipat97's comment is still in the negative.
[–]Lipat97Whats long and hard and has cum in it? A cucumber. 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Ding ding
Worth every downvote 😎
π Rendered by PID 71115 on app-295 at 2017-06-22 15:24:46.841097+00:00 running 841481a country code: JP.
[–][削除されました] (1子コメント)
[removed]
[–]DisputedDetails 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]blahwomanblah 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]MyogiNightKidsnow taking applications to join my girl gang 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]BluthiIndustries 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]zodberg 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]katniqpONE LIP TAR TO BRING THEM ALL AND IN THE DARKNESS BIND THEM 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]ChocoHorrorChocolate required for summoning ritual 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]kiwi_butt 65 ポイント66 ポイント67 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]EnglishQueenis as subtle as a shotgun 16 ポイント17 ポイント18 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]AmeradianToday I choose me. 19 ポイント20 ポイント21 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]qwertypolkSelf-hating feminazi 86 ポイント87 ポイント88 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]SoloSeal 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+][削除されました] (2子コメント)
[deleted]
[–]tunabuttonsiron sides 32 ポイント33 ポイント34 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]an_eloquent_enemy 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]littlejawn 14 ポイント15 ポイント16 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]Shadowglove スコアが基準値未満のコメント-115 ポイント-114 ポイント-113 ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]I_say_batoBaby Troll 70 ポイント71 ポイント72 ポイント (11子コメント)
[+]Shadowglove スコアが基準値未満のコメント-65 ポイント-64 ポイント-63 ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]Keyspell#NastyWomen2020 25 ポイント26 ポイント27 ポイント (4子コメント)
[+]Shadowglove スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント-5 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Keyspell#NastyWomen2020 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Shadowglove -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Keyspell#NastyWomen2020 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]I_say_batoBaby Troll 55 ポイント56 ポイント57 ポイント (4子コメント)
[+]Shadowglove スコアが基準値未満のコメント-27 ポイント-26 ポイント-25 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]I_say_batoBaby Troll 19 ポイント20 ポイント21 ポイント (2子コメント)
[+]Shadowglove スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8 ポイント-7 ポイント-6 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]I_say_batoBaby Troll 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]kruemelmonstah 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+][削除されました] (12子コメント)
[removed]
[–]dobbysteacozy 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]iamsortoffakenews 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]DisputedDetails 108 ポイント109 ポイント110 ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]Barf_Tart 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]DisputedDetails 28 ポイント29 ポイント30 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MompyI'm never going outside again unless I need a place to throw up 114 ポイント115 ポイント116 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]LonelyNixon 15 ポイント16 ポイント17 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]CorvidaeSFJam out with your clam out. 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]jennybean42 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SoFetchBetch 30 ポイント31 ポイント32 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TehRenPockets: They should all be bigger. 70 ポイント71 ポイント72 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]woollyhammockAll tea, all shade 134 ポイント135 ポイント136 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]great-god-om 71 ポイント72 ポイント73 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]AskMrScience 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MaladjustedSinner 71 ポイント72 ポイント73 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]DieKatzenKoenigin 25 ポイント26 ポイント27 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]StCory 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]somecallmenonny 160 ポイント161 ポイント162 ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]The_Mighty_Jericha 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]somecallmenonny 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]greenhearted 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Endless_Search 26 ポイント27 ポイント28 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]NheeaI put the "fun" in dysfunctional. 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]FunLovingMurderhobo 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]NheeaI put the "fun" in dysfunctional. 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Endless_Search 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]Eaglestrike スコアが基準値未満のコメント-96 ポイント-95 ポイント-94 ポイント (15子コメント)
[–]BJPenwhistle 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント (6子コメント)
[+]Eaglestrike スコアが基準値未満のコメント-51 ポイント-50 ポイント-49 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]ElegantShitwadtampon, tampoff 42 ポイント43 ポイント44 ポイント (4子コメント)
[+]Eaglestrike スコアが基準値未満のコメント-31 ポイント-30 ポイント-29 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Keyspell#NastyWomen2020 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]BJPenwhistle 19 ポイント20 ポイント21 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Eaglestrike -2 ポイント-1 ポイント0 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ElegantShitwadtampon, tampoff 76 ポイント77 ポイント78 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MooncinderI tried to catch fog the other day. Mist. 32 ポイント33 ポイント34 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]dougielou スコアが基準値未満のコメント-57 ポイント-56 ポイント-55 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]ElegantShitwadtampon, tampoff 40 ポイント41 ポイント42 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]Eaglestrike スコアが基準値未満のコメント-22 ポイント-21 ポイント-20 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]NotKateBush 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]dougielou スコアが基準値未満のコメント-40 ポイント-39 ポイント-38 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]penguin_waddleSerial killer documentaries and chill? 229 ポイント230 ポイント231 ポイント (16子コメント)
[–]pamplemoussmy favorite little jewy this side of st. louis 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SugarTits1strong independent troll who don't need no bridge 42 ポイント43 ポイント44 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]crazymcfattypants 93 ポイント94 ポイント95 ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]cyanpineapple 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MooncinderI tried to catch fog the other day. Mist. 95 ポイント96 ポイント97 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]WikiTextBot 99 ポイント100 ポイント101 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]Queen_of_RepostsThe babe with the power 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]nightrideis probably worrying about climate change (◡‿◡✿) 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]D_Andreams 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]suckzbuttz69420bro 16 ポイント17 ポイント18 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]CorvidaeSFJam out with your clam out. 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MaladjustedSinner 128 ポイント129 ポイント130 ポイント (4子コメント)
[+]aFunnyWorldWeLiveIn スコアが基準値未満のコメント-92 ポイント-91 ポイント-90 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]porcellus_ultor 97 ポイント98 ポイント99 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]aFunnyWorldWeLiveIn 61 ポイント62 ポイント63 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]frozenchocolate 151 ポイント152 ポイント153 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Fartsandfarts 348 ポイント349 ポイント350 ポイント (73子コメント)
[+][削除されました] (1子コメント)
[removed]
[–]DisputedDetails 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]IndieLady 59 ポイント60 ポイント61 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]ChkYrHeadConnoisseur of Labia Confetti 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]DisputedDetails 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]ChkYrHeadConnoisseur of Labia Confetti 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]DisputedDetails 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]suckzbuttz69420bro 28 ポイント29 ポイント30 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Fartsandfarts 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Jill4ChrisRedInternally Wednesday Addams 213 ポイント214 ポイント215 ポイント (40子コメント)
[–]shut-up-dana 81 ポイント82 ポイント83 ポイント (32子コメント)
[–]Maggiemayday 27 ポイント28 ポイント29 ポイント (30子コメント)
[–]srhlzbth731Fishermen are reel men. 9 ポイント10 ポイント11 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]simonjp 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]Maggiemayday 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]shut-up-dana 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]simonjp 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Maggiemayday 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]simonjp 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]littlespy 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]steerpike88 26 ポイント27 ポイント28 ポイント (21子コメント)
[–]baardvarkLipstick-stained burrito 19 ポイント20 ポイント21 ポイント (19子コメント)
[–]draw_it_nowCome join us at /r/TrollBi 20 ポイント21 ポイント22 ポイント (17子コメント)
[–]alyraptorderby af 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (15子コメント)
[–]draw_it_nowCome join us at /r/TrollBi 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (14子コメント)
[–]alyraptorderby af 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]raziphelshameless plug: visit /r/troll4troll! 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]sobok 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Maggiemayday 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Jill4ChrisRedInternally Wednesday Addams 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MooncinderI tried to catch fog the other day. Mist. 51 ポイント52 ポイント53 ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]Jill4ChrisRedInternally Wednesday Addams 22 ポイント23 ポイント24 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]simonjp 16 ポイント17 ポイント18 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Jill4ChrisRedInternally Wednesday Addams 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]simonjp 8 ポイント9 ポイント10 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Jill4ChrisRedInternally Wednesday Addams 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Panic_Mechanic 180 ポイント181 ポイント182 ポイント (22子コメント)
[–]thedude346 10 ポイント11 ポイント12 ポイント (21子コメント)
[–]Mynamebaby 36 ポイント37 ポイント38 ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]thedude346 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Mynamebaby -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]DumbledoresFerrari スコアが基準値未満のコメント-19 ポイント-18 ポイント-17 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]Mynamebaby 38 ポイント39 ポイント40 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]thedude346 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Mynamebaby -1 ポイント0 ポイント1 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]DumbledoresFerrari スコアが基準値未満のコメント-18 ポイント-17 ポイント-16 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Panic_Mechanic 47 ポイント48 ポイント49 ポイント (3子コメント)
[+]sobok スコアが基準値未満のコメント-13 ポイント-12 ポイント-11 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]nightrideis probably worrying about climate change (◡‿◡✿) 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]D_Andreams 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Ishouldbepolite 58 ポイント59 ポイント60 ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]thedude346 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]sobok 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]absentbird 12 ポイント13 ポイント14 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]thedude346 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]D_Andreams 2 ポイント3 ポイント4 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ProbablyNotANewIdea 17 ポイント18 ポイント19 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]thedude346 0 ポイント1 ポイント2 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]guidedhand スコアが基準値未満のコメント-228 ポイント-227 ポイント-226 ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]syncopacetic 203 ポイント204 ポイント205 ポイント (7子コメント)
[+]guidedhand スコアが基準値未満のコメント-33 ポイント-32 ポイント-31 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]syncopacetic 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]woollyhammockAll tea, all shade 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]HIS_FATTY_PUBIS 7 ポイント8 ポイント9 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]CurtainClothes 133 ポイント134 ポイント135 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]syncopacetic 1 ポイント2 ポイント3 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]DisputedDetails 25 ポイント26 ポイント27 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ahchavavaginas and internet friends 72 ポイント73 ポイント74 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Bakleind 18 ポイント19 ポイント20 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]WitchJuice 307 ポイント308 ポイント309 ポイント (12子コメント)
[+]indianincels スコアが基準値未満のコメント-17 ポイント-16 ポイント-15 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Maggiemayday 24 ポイント25 ポイント26 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+][削除されました] (8子コメント)
[removed]
[–]SugarTits1strong independent troll who don't need no bridge 23 ポイント24 ポイント25 ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]hodnesheda 4 ポイント5 ポイント6 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]SugarTits1strong independent troll who don't need no bridge 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Sabuleon 11 ポイント12 ポイント13 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]candle_and_brabehold my querulous quim 146 ポイント147 ポイント148 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]BJPenwhistle 56 ポイント57 ポイント58 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]candle_and_brabehold my querulous quim 27 ポイント28 ポイント29 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SpicyRicin 22 ポイント23 ポイント24 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]little_blue_penguin 77 ポイント78 ポイント79 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ElegantShitwadtampon, tampoff 23 ポイント24 ポイント25 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]woollyhammockAll tea, all shade 187 ポイント188 ポイント189 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]pumpkinpink 30 ポイント31 ポイント32 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]tunabuttonsiron sides 748 ポイント749 ポイント750 ポイント (23子コメント)
[–]raziphelshameless plug: visit /r/troll4troll! 13 ポイント14 ポイント15 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]noratat 27 ポイント28 ポイント29 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SayingWhatUrThinkinBeauty is in the eye of the beer holder. 49 ポイント50 ポイント51 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]RagingFuckalot 117 ポイント118 ポイント119 ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SugarTits1strong independent troll who don't need no bridge 172 ポイント173 ポイント174 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+][削除されました] (17子コメント)
[deleted]
[–]_ArcticMonkeys_1D Stan and proud 344 ポイント345 ポイント346 ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]n0m_de_plum 6 ポイント7 ポイント8 ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]Lipat97Whats long and hard and has cum in it? A cucumber. スコアが基準値未満のコメント-70 ポイント-69 ポイント-68 ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]Malari_ZahnNormal is relative, just not my relatives... 44 ポイント45 ポイント46 ポイント (5子コメント)
[+]Lipat97Whats long and hard and has cum in it? A cucumber. スコアが基準値未満のコメント-25 ポイント-24 ポイント-23 ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Malari_ZahnNormal is relative, just not my relatives... 32 ポイント33 ポイント34 ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]koalatycontrol 5 ポイント6 ポイント7 ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Lipat97Whats long and hard and has cum in it? A cucumber. 3 ポイント4 ポイント5 ポイント (0子コメント)