- So this all started off with...
- We can't wait for Sunday night!! pic.twitter.com/ah8IUPWr25
http://twitter.com/AIsForOrg/status/424387131004313600
— A is For (@AIsForOrg)Sat, Jan 18 2014 03:45:51 - Tonight's the night! A Night of a Thousand Vaginas! Text AISFOR to 75309 to donate $10 and help the women of Texas! http://bit.ly/1dJh19c
http://twitter.com/AIsForOrg/status/424897670897868800
— A is For (@AIsForOrg)Sun, Jan 19 2014 13:34:33 - Crucial cause, but can we not with the cissexism/bioessentialism, @AIsForOrg? https://twitter.com/AIsForOrg/status/424703712745906176 …
http://twitter.com/DrJaneChi/status/424947172233076737
— Jane Doe, MD (@DrJaneChi)Sun, Jan 19 2014 16:51:15 - Memo to pro-choice celebrity benefits: Perpetuating antichoicers' reducing people to genitals isn't subversive or funny.
http://twitter.com/DrJaneChi/status/424947867388637184
— Jane Doe, MD (@DrJaneChi)Sun, Jan 19 2014 16:54:01 - @DrJaneChi What is it you're objecting to, specifically?
http://twitter.com/AIsForOrg/status/424947904089182208
— A is For (@AIsForOrg)Sun, Jan 19 2014 16:54:10 - @AIsForOrg thanks for reply! It's the equation of vaginas=women=repro rights. Not all ppl w uteri are women, not all women have vaginas...
http://twitter.com/DrJaneChi/status/424948506806071297
— Jane Doe, MD (@DrJaneChi)Sun, Jan 19 2014 16:56:33 - @DrJaneChi Agreed. I love @AIsForOrg and that we're focused on solidarity, but I'd love to see us do it without alienating folks.
http://twitter.com/rbraceysherman/status/424948295543173120
— Renee Bracey Sherman (@rbraceysherman)Sun, Jan 19 2014 16:55:43 - @DrJaneChi @AIsForOrg Also, as someone who has had an abortion, I don't like being reduced to genitalia. My abortion was more than that.
http://twitter.com/rbraceysherman/status/424948971300077568
— Renee Bracey Sherman (@rbraceysherman)Sun, Jan 19 2014 16:58:24 - Abortion: not actually about vaginas.
http://twitter.com/DrJaneChi/status/424952161102233600
— Jane Doe, MD (@DrJaneChi)Sun, Jan 19 2014 17:11:05 - To support Texas abortion access, skip the Vagina Night & donate directly to @lilithfund & @TEAFund.
http://twitter.com/DrJaneChi/status/424954385211195393
— Jane Doe, MD (@DrJaneChi)Sun, Jan 19 2014 17:19:55 - Here's where Martha Plimpton comes in.
- @DrJaneChi I'm curious to know why use of the word "vagina" is a problem for you. Are we meant to be ashamed?
http://twitter.com/MarthaPlimpton/status/424955951028776960
— Martha Plimpton (@MarthaPlimpton)Sun, Jan 19 2014 17:26:08 - @MarthaPlimpton I can't speak for @DrJaneChi but I find it cissexist and bioreductionist. I am more than my body parts.
http://twitter.com/drtantatinycat/status/424956664547000321
— Dr Tanta Tinycat (@drtantatinycat)Sun, Jan 19 2014 17:28:58 - @MarthaPlimpton Thanks for reply! Ofc not. But alienates trans people, & it's reductionist. https://twitter.com/DrJaneChi/status/424948506806071297 … https://twitter.com/DrJaneChi/status/424948905072418816 …
http://twitter.com/DrJaneChi/status/424957113853804544
— Jane Doe, MD (@DrJaneChi)Sun, Jan 19 2014 17:30:45 - @DrJaneChi @lilithfund @TEAFund FYI we're not taking one dime from this fundraiser. It's all going directly to the funds. As they're aware.
http://twitter.com/MarthaPlimpton/status/424956349705756673
— Martha Plimpton (@MarthaPlimpton)Sun, Jan 19 2014 17:27:43 - @drtantatinycat @DrJaneChi Of course we all are. But our body parts are also under attack in a very specific way. Shame is part of that.
http://twitter.com/MarthaPlimpton/status/424957201585672193
— Martha Plimpton (@MarthaPlimpton)Sun, Jan 19 2014 17:31:06 - .@DrJaneChi ALL of the money from "Vagina Night" is going to @lilithfund, @TEAFund, @WholeWomans and @FundTexasWomen
http://twitter.com/AIsForOrg/status/424957402631245824
— A is For (@AIsForOrg)Sun, Jan 19 2014 17:31:54 - @AIsForOrg I understand that. The issue is the exclusionary cissexist language, which feminists have largely steadfastly refused to address.
https://twitter.com/DrJaneChi/status/424957878244360192
— Jane Doe, MD (@DrJaneChi)Sun, Jan 19 2014 17:33:48 - @MarthaPlimpton Trans men, wmn & gender nonconforming ppl feel under attack by a world that equates women & vaginas. I won't perpetuate that
https://twitter.com/DrJaneChi/status/424958229638942721
— Jane Doe, MD (@DrJaneChi)Sun, Jan 19 2014 17:35:11 - @DrJaneChi I must disagree, respectfully. Vaginas are not reductionist, or an insult to anyone. They're a human body part. #noshame
http://twitter.com/MarthaPlimpton/status/424958530458619905
— Martha Plimpton (@MarthaPlimpton)Sun, Jan 19 2014 17:36:23 - @MarthaPlimpton Using vaginas as a synecdoche for women is reductionist. Using vaginas to symbolize abortion is reductionist.
http://twitter.com/DrJaneChi/status/424959144160796672
— Jane Doe, MD (@DrJaneChi)Sun, Jan 19 2014 17:38:49 - @MarthaPlimpton @DrJaneChi so I come at this from the perspective of a linguist, but that's basically the definition of reductionist.
http://twitter.com/noveldevice/status/424975007161151488
— Magical Claws (@noveldevice)Sun, Jan 19 2014 18:41:52 - @MarthaPlimpton @DrJaneChi They're a human body part. They're *not* a human, nor should they be used metonymically to mean humans.
http://twitter.com/noveldevice/status/424975237810098176
— Magical Claws (@noveldevice)Sun, Jan 19 2014 18:42:47 - .@DrJaneChi @MarthaPlimpton Sometimes it feels like my abortion experience is reduced to a fetus on one side & my genitalia on the other...
http://twitter.com/rbraceysherman/status/424959039609794560
— Renee Bracey Sherman (@rbraceysherman)Sun, Jan 19 2014 17:38:25