Is this correct? The NYTimes says that Ossoff raised more.https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/09/us/politics/ossoff-handel-georgia-house-special-election.html …
UPDATED: Outside groups spent more than $27 million in #GA06, with pro-Handel forces spending about 2.5 times as much as pro-Ossoff orgspic.twitter.com/iE35KaY6Ob
-
-
-
I believe those figures don't include individual small donations (reporting limit might be $250, but don't quote me).
-
The chart above highlights only the spending by non-candidate groups, aka outside groups. Here's the full picture:https://twitter.com/mjbeckel/status/877324536307359744 …
-
Thanks for the clarification.
会話の終了
新しい会話 -
-
-
What's the source on this?
-
Data from official
@FEC filings. The chart highlights $ spent by non-candidate groups. Here's more w/ campaigns toohttps://twitter.com/mjbeckel/status/877324536307359744 … -
Thanks much
- 他2件の返信
新しい会話 -
-
-
Osoff raised more 23 million from out of state donations.
-
Source ?
-
Right, both Ossoff & Handel benefited from out-of-state money. Full campaign + outside spending figures are here -->https://twitter.com/mjbeckel/status/877324536307359744 …
- 他4件の返信
新しい会話 -
-
-
Perfect illustration of what is wrong with US elections; winners aren't really chosen by voters but are bought by influencers.
-
Yes, sad but true and the citizens of America need to put a cap on the amount of money allowed for any election.
-
Should all get equal amts of public funds, & no broadcast ads (like they do in UK.)
- 他1件の返信
新しい会話 -
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。やりなおすか、Twitterステータスで詳細をご確認ください。