1036
1037

'F*ck Steve Scalise': HuffPost writer wishes political violence were more 'organized' (twitchy.com)

J0kerrKnight Grand Cross of the Order of Triggering が 投稿

全 95 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]Wyomingfarmer 230 ポイント231 ポイント  (13子コメント)

And now he has been doxxed and his personal info is all over Twitter.

Let's see how he likes political violence now

[–]CynixCS 153 ポイント154 ポイント  (11子コメント)

"I want to kill all the cops and everybody standing between me and lynching Trump"

gets doxed

"WAAAAH cops and Trump people help!!!"

[–]yehakhrot 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (10子コメント)

To be fair, i know this is a primarily right sub(my understanding from the articles,maybe wrong) that exposes the liberal scum, i would suggest you not go ONLY by this subs trash sjw stories before you judge liberals , just a request. Remember the internet only shows the extreme dumbfuckery, not the sensible talk.

Edit: but ofcourse this man is a fucking disgrace.

[–]CynixCS 32 ポイント33 ポイント  (2子コメント)

maybe wrong

Nah it's accurate - the problem with the default (news) subs is that they censor conservative/right-leaning posts, so on alternative subs, you'll mostly find that kind of stuff (e.g. if you're a rabid Hillary supporter, pro immigration, pro gun regulation, pro government person, you'll have no problems using news, worldnews et al).

Naturally, that'll create echo chambers. I'm perfectly aware of the fact that uncensorednews is an echo chamber as well - the more important question is whether you think critically about information or take it at face value.

i would suggest you not go ONLY by this subs trash sjw stories before you judge liberals

Here I think we need to draw a line between leftism and liberalism. Classical John Locke-style liberalism is fine. It has its problems that would have to be addressed, but what ever. Lefties are trying to push marxism and where that goes, we've been able to see on more than one occasion. Those people need to be stopped. You must not tolerate intolerance because it's inherently stronger than tolerance - what happens when you don't can be observed in half of Europe right now.

Remember the internet only shows the extreme dumbfuckery, not the sensible talk.

The internet shows everything, the extreme dumbfuckery is what's going to make headlines one way or the other. As for the argument, I don't really care about moderate people - they might have different opinions but they're not out to actively harm anybody so I'm not going to bother them. I care about people who want me dead for supporting something they don't like because that nonsense is legitimately dangerous in more than just the obvious way.

They're doing EXACTLY the same thing Hitler did to the jews in the 1930s. Accuse of being violent and parasitic, condone violence against them, [YOU ARE HERE], dehumanise, remove from public life, outlaw, KZ, genocide. We went down this road once, I'm not keen on going there again.

[–]Rumhand -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

They're doing EXACTLY the same thing Hitler did to the jews in the 1930s. Accuse of being violent and parasitic, condone violence against them, [YOU ARE HERE], dehumanise, remove from public life, outlaw, KZ, genocide. We went down this road once, I'm not keen on going there again.

It's pretty funny that this same pattern can be seen in the other direction on the fringier ends of the right-wing subreddits, or even the comments in this one.

Accuse of violence: (check)

Accuse of "(((parasitism)))": (all the checks)

Dehumanize: (libtard, commie, shitskin, sweeping generalizations)

Condone violence against them: /r/Physical_Removal

[YOU ARE HERE]

So what's the deal? Are we into some deep-level human nature victim mentality stuff, here? "Everyone's the hero of their own story," in other words?

It is an effective way to rally folks to a cause. Yankees fans aside, humans have an affinity for underdog stories.

When a post under this one comments on how we're living in weimar now, and how we need a 'right-wing uprising'... I guess when everyone is Nazis, no one is.

Maybe it's just a glitch in our pattern recognition. Law of Fives kinda stuff. The harder you look for something, the more likely you are to find it (even if it isn't, strictly speaking, true).

[–]CynixCS 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's pretty funny that this same pattern can be seen in the other direction on the fringier ends of the right-wing subreddits, or even the comments in this one.

(((citation needed)))

Accuse of violence: (check)

Oh you mean like the thousands of NRA people going around smacking people with bike locks AR15 stocks?

OF COURSE you have people resorting to violence on every side - given the enormous sample size it would be a legit miracle if there weren't any. However, the scale is very much tilted towards the left. You don't see Breitbart glorifying a Shakespear play where Barack Obama gets nailed to a cross and burned alive. However you DO see things - like - this from leftist sources.

Yeah that's not even close to comparable.

Accuse of "(((parasitism)))": (all the checks)

We're getting there

Dehumanize: (libtard, commie, shitskin, sweeping generalizations)

Never heard shitskin outside of legitimately racist circles. Citation needed.

Apart from that, those are insults. Not even close to being the same. This is a newspaper suggesting men should not be allowed to vote. Apples and oranges much?

Oh and look at that, Trump is a virus? Now we're 1:1, the NS people used that exact comparison (vermin, bacillus, virus et al) for the jews.

Condone violence against them: /r/Physical_Removal

A 7000 sub subreddit about people hitting back? Well then I guess I'll concede, that's the overwhelming majority. Oh wait, Trump got some 63 million votes so those 7000 aren't even .012%. Even if I would accept your premise (which I don't), that's one out of 8350 people. Let's go to some leftist college campus like Berkeley and ask there how many of them would be okay with trump supporters getting beaten up - wanna bet it's slightly more than 1/8350?

So what's the deal?

I guess that?

Are we into some deep-level human nature victim mentality stuff, here?

No, we're in some "one side is salty they lost the election, now they're stirring up the exact kind of shit they're constantly accusing the other side of" stuff and here's the problem: this is not going to be the 1789 revolution where the glorious people win and drag the evil king to the guillotine, this is going to end up like 1832.

humans have an affinity for underdog stories.

Bullets don't, and that's the issue.

Maybe it's just a glitch in our pattern recognition. Law of Fives kinda stuff. The harder you look for something, the more likely you are to find it (even if it isn't, strictly speaking, true).

Or maybe we're slowly coming to the conclusion that intolerance must not be tolerated. The hilarious part being that those accusing of intolerance and those expressing intolerance are not as far apart as they'd like.

[–]phukka 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Go to literally ANY of the fervently anti-Trump subs on this website and it's basically 100% people who are foaming at the mouth for the possibility to be violent or hateful to anyone to the right of them.

Liberal scum is the default now, and the handful of decent human beings are the outlier.

[–]yehakhrot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

True, not really. Its just the dumbfolk trying to fit in, be liked and act smart. It happens across all spectrums, these days more on the liberal side, but thats mainly 12 year old kids trying to act like idiotic 17 year olds(Atleast this is my understanding, sure there are actually that delusional folk but what gets most folk to believe that the world has gone to shit is the number of upvotes and similar minded comments on those posts).

[–]Steven_Seboom-boom 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

good. can't wait for him to be on a body bag. organized of course

[–]Yesofcoursenaturally 135 ポイント136 ポイント  (3子コメント)

A jackass reporter is pushed and his glasses broke: THIS IS THE END OF THE WORLD.

Left-wing idiot tries to kill as many Republicans as possible: we must listen to the anger of some of the public.

[–]DongleNocker 57 ポイント58 ポイント  (17子コメント)

I'm sorta worried these self absorbed antifa douche nozzles will plan a kristallnacht like event.

[–]RiverRunnerVDB 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (1子コメント)

MRW

[–]J0kerrKnight Grand Cross of the Order of Triggering[S] 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

These people are awesome...gonna share another video of theirs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIiFeZ7r6aU

[–]ceejthemoonman 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (5子コメント)

We're already living in their weimar republic. Rampant degeneracy, communists, leftism, jews, all we're missing is an organized right wing uprising

[–]oddisay 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Got my Weimaraner pup ready to go. 👌🏻

[–]Sean1488 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Is it really going to be an uprising if we have limp wrist faggots fighting on the left?

[–]PerkyObamaUnited States of America 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Would purge be more correct then?

[–]Sean1488 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It would be politically correct

[–]DongleNocker 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why would the right wings organize an up rising when they have been able to vote in a conservative congress and president?

[–]pitchforkmilitia 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think you mean the Reichstag Fire.

[–]xKaelic 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

No in pretty sure he's taking about what he means to talk about.. having a group of organized violence break into your house while you're sleeping and torturing/killing you

[–]CynixCS 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Without proper military training (the SS units were basically private regiments), any support of the military, police or national government and against a demographic that is by no means an unarmed and helpless minority?

I'll take "suicidal" for 500, Alex.

[–]SkyrmirEVERYTHING I DON'T LIKE IS FAKE NEWS! 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (5子コメント)

They'd have a lot of catching up to do before they were as prepared as all the right wing militia groups.

[–]DongleNocker 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (4子コメント)

How many right wing militia groups have staged riots in the last decade?

[–]SkyrmirEVERYTHING I DON'T LIKE IS FAKE NEWS! -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Did you miss the Bundy stand off?

[–]DongleNocker 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (2子コメント)

So the answer is 0 riots?

[–]SkyrmirEVERYTHING I DON'T LIKE IS FAKE NEWS! -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Well if you want to rule out armed insurrection, I guess that's your prerogative.

[–]DongleNocker 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It wasn't a riot, that was a stand off (and eventually a armed occupation). Both of which are base on the fact that the Bundy's refused to recognize that they didn't own the land, pay for using, and remove his cattle from it upon request. They are throw backs to when cattlemen terrorized and attacked homesteaders with a crazy notion that they owned large areas of federal land.

[–]Dis_mah_mobile_one 47 ポイント48 ポイント  (46子コメント)

Civil war when?

[–]VintageOG 35 ポイント36 ポイント  (32子コメント)

That's what they want to happen. They have tricked everyone into thinking 'the other side' is the enemy, when they are the actual enemy. Don't play their game, don't give them what they want

[–]oddisay 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (21子コメント)

No, they want a guerrilla war. Everyone knows Democrats stand no chance in a real civil war.

[–]J0kerrKnight Grand Cross of the Order of Triggering[S] 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (18子コメント)

If they target government targets they are starting a civil war as rebels...if they start targeting civilians they are starting a terrorist campaign as terrorists.

[–]schnazzmizzles 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (17子コメント)

Using violence to advance a political cause is still considered terrorism.

[–]J0kerrKnight Grand Cross of the Order of Triggering[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (16子コメント)

If that was the case, a country using violence to defend their standing government would be a terrorist group.

[–]schnazzmizzles 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (15子コメント)

Your confusing war with subversion. Using violence to advance political or religious beliefs is the textbook definition of terrorism.

[–]J0kerrKnight Grand Cross of the Order of Triggering[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (14子コメント)

Actually its not. The actual textbook definition is (which neither of us are using):

the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

[–]schnazzmizzles 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (13子コメント)

"The United States Department of Defense defines terrorism as the calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological."

[–]J0kerrKnight Grand Cross of the Order of Triggering[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (12子コメント)

Thank you for saying exactly what I just said...just with more words.

[–]Delheru 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's such a crude split. As someone solidly in the middle voting for whoever is least moronic at the moment, it's hardly a sensible or fair fight.

Yeah, the extremists from both sides would result in a bloodbath given the right wings enthusiasm for guns.

Yet from a GDP perspective the center (more leaning democrat) has by far the most power, dominating all the centers creating the US wealth (read: the major cities like SFO, NYC, Boston, LA, Chicago). Why would anyone that controls the money want to fight a war?

[–]oddisay 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

They don't. There want a guerrilla war just like I said.

[–]tetrasyzygy 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (6子コメント)

The wealthy are the enemy, not citizens on the other side of the political isle.

[–]TOPICALJOKELOL 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (3子コメント)

My enemies are people who type isle when they mean aisle.

[–]tetrasyzygy 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Shit I'm so embarrassed... Not gonna change it though lol

[–]TOPICALJOKELOL 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's all good homie, the more you know.

[–]lng5 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It’s no mistake, everyone knows America Island is divided politically down the middle

[–]PerkyObamaUnited States of America 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

(((The wealthy)))

[–]ZweiHollowFangs 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That would be lovely if everyone could understand that. Unfortunately, that zombie apocalypse that everybody prepares for is just a silly euphemism for what will become reality.

[–]thr3sk -5 ポイント-4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

This could be said of factions on both sides, I know this is a relatively conservative sub but let's not pretend there aren't right-wingers who spout the same shit.

[–]mjcov 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (9子コメント)

I think a state will secede before it happens. So distant future.

[–]IceDota 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

South Carolina is always first

[–]cow_moo_moo 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Its the American people vs the Media. Cut the head off the snake. If they insight civil war, they must be somewhat aware that they are going to be the first targets.

[–]ManyVariedInterests 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

soon

[–]dagonn3 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Right after the nuclear war hits.

[–]cptginyu 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hahahaha, bet you in 48 hours this tweet will be deleted. Should see the people threatening to call child services and who have already called the FBI on this nutcase.

[–]exploderatorCanada 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

People should be careful what they wish for.

[–]Steven_Seboom-boom 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (2子コメント)

has he been fired yet?

[–]Nergaal 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

why would he? /s

[–]MustLoveAllCats 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

For what? His comments don't exactly break stance with huffington paint

[–]johnnight 11 ポイント12 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oh look, it's Jesse Benn. You should look up his past articles. equally outrageous.

[–]TheyShootBeesAtYou 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

More names for lists.

[–]Jian_Baijiu 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thank god all news agencies are totally unbiased otherwise I'd be concerned about this.

[–]uneducated1 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I hear martial law is coming before a civil war

[–]Saigunx 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

He was investigating pedogate