why did the Obama admin allow that waiver in first place? What was background to it?
-
-
-
How exactly would the Obama admin leave something in the Republican HC bill?pic.twitter.com/DPMp6fZvP2
-
-
"That guidance was mostly meaningless because the ACA established a national set of essential benefits." Next Sentence. I read it too.
-
Which begs question of why was it granted in the first place -- which was the question I posed.
-
It was there because it was believed some states would require more than the essentials, and would allow multi-year employers to offer /1
-
/2 uniform benefits across state lines while still providing the minimum. Taking away the essential benefits guts that safety net, though.
-
Thank you -- that was the context I was interested in.
- 他1件の返信
新しい会話 -
-
-
One of the little talked about issues with
#Trumpcare: full-time benefited employees think Obamacare has nothing to do with them -
If u r well-off or simply racist/classist (which a good portion of america is) repealing Obamacare is btwn no biggie & appealing to you
-
Those ppl keep voting for Ayn Rand acolytes who wish Medicare and Medicaid didnt exist. What nursing home will Grandpa and MawMaw go to now?
-
The answer to that question: Curbstone Manor. Cardboard Box Village. Under the Overpass Gardens. Boxcar House. Arby's Restroom Oaks.
-
Shameful but true
会話の終了
新しい会話 -
-
-
Call your rep NOW - 202-224-3121 - VOTE NO!
-
I just called - thanks to your prompting.
-
Way to go, Kathy! Some of us still remember Democracy!!!
- 他1件の返信
新しい会話 -
-
-
The 2018 midterms are going to be trench warfare in a lot of red districts.
-
God help us all.
-
Why does this whole exercise feel like Ryan just wants to get this dumb bill out of the House to say he did it? Then it's Senate's fault.
-
Plan to kick it to senate where they can blame the Dems. AHCA is shit legislation, cobbled together with thoughts only to tax breaks.
- 他1件の返信
新しい会話 -
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。やりなおすか、Twitterステータスで詳細をご確認ください。