Why not both?
A lot of Trump's actions are easier to understand if you assume he's guilty rather than stupid.
-
-
- 他2件の返信
新しい会話 -
-
-
But the problem is that there's so much evidence he's stupid.
- 他2件の返信
新しい会話 -
-
-
Or both. I assume both and have yet to be surprised. Upset? Sure. Never surprised.
-
if you knew you were guilty this is arguably the smartest way to handle it and it explains why he was furious that sessions recused himself
-
Those unencumbered by conscience can make short term moves that are difficult for non-sociopaths to parse (I sued a con artist for 4yrs)
-
that sounds like a very interesting story!
-
It is now that it's over!
-
ya i mean also sounds like a goddamn nightmare obviously
会話の終了
新しい会話 -
-
-
I'm sure you'll get 1,000 of this same question: why shouldn't we assume both?
-
-
I do love a wise quote! Thanks! :)
-
You're welcome
!
会話の終了
新しい会話 -
-
-
Not that their mutually exclusive, replied everyone.
- 他1件の返信
新しい会話 -
-
There's no need to choose here.
今後は興味のあるツイートがもっと表示されるようになります。 取り消す -
He's an impressive mix of guilty and stupid.
今後は興味のあるツイートがもっと表示されるようになります。 取り消す
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。やりなおすか、Twitterステータスで詳細をご確認ください。