Good analysis: “World War 2 was literally about making entire ethnicities go away forever, so people did what they could, including a lot of heroism and also fucked up things”.
Bad analysis: “World War 2 has very clearly identifiable goodies and baddies, so the same things are great when the goodies do them and evil when baddies do them. Also propaganda is literally true.”
Ugly analysis: “Also, specifically the communists are goodies and no one else. The only thing that stops Nazism is millions of communists with guns, so let’s just do that again”
Really fucking horrible analysis go away forever: “Absolutely everything Communists did during the war as well as after the war was incredible, especially the whole de-Nazification thing, and Nazis are everywhere right now, so we are going to need a full repeat of that exact praxis 1:1. If you disagree you’re a liberal, a collaborationist, a nazi, and these three things are exactly the same”
Even your good analysis is pretty ridiculous. WWII is about who gets to rule Europe: Germans, Russians, or Anglos. The whole Jew thing was a retcon that essentially no one knew about until years after the war, when the Allies needed to drape themselves in heroism.
That’s a flat out lie. The Holocaust was a thing that happened and not a retcon, there’s enough evidence at this point that Roosevelt and co. were fully aware of it way before 1945, the whole Lebensraum thing involved making entire ethnicities go away forever, and of course let’s not forget Churchill’s white nationalist tendencies.