全 16 件のコメント

[–]NachstenliebeNationalism, Corporatism, Meritocracy (Father & Homesteader)[M] [スコア非表示] stickied comment (0子コメント)

Stickied. Remember to keep things civil, everyone. I trust that you don't need to be reminded though.

[–]SlavophilesAnonymousChristian Neoliberal 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Why do you disfavor capitalism?

[–]TelochiTotalitarian Vanguard[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

That is an extremely broad question that can really be answered in many Leftist AMAs, but in short, Capitalism is a corrupt system that oppresses the workers, steals the surplus of their labor, and alienates them from their labor.

[–]hllspwnAryan 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Why is it that socialist revolutions are financed by multi-national billionaires? Doesn't this seem suspicious to you?

[–]TelochiTotalitarian Vanguard[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Which revolutions are you specifically talking about?

[–]hllspwnAryan 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (2子コメント)

For example, the Bolsheviks were supported financially by the banker and rabbinical Jewish aristocrat, Jacob Schiff.

[–]TelochiTotalitarian Vanguard[S] 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Jewish people tend to have a much more intimate understanding of oppression due to their history of being oppressed. Jacob Schiff himself despised Tsarist Russia for its pogroms against innocent Jews, so it makes sense that he'd support the enemies of Tsarism.

[–]hllspwnAryan 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

How could Jacob Schiff know oppression if he grew up in a family of wealthy capitalists? He was more privileged than most people even by today's standards.

[–]TurbbagoodInternationalist Communist 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

So do you support 20th century Stalinist states? Also what do you think of anti-Stalinist Leninists like Bordiga and Trotsky? Interestingly, they both agreed (though some think Trotsky changed his views later on) on the necessity for a certain sort of transient totalitarianism.

Do you agree with Marx, Engels and Lenin that with the abolition of classes the state will die out? You seem to be saying that at first, the proletariat does not get power, this seems to go against the concept of the dictatorship of the proletariat, so do you disagree with the DotP? I support vangaurdism but the vanguard should be the leading section which carries the rest forward, not a special group of people which dominate the proletariat. Also, are you even a Marxist?

What do you think of gender abolitionism?

Sorry for all the questions.

[–]TelochiTotalitarian Vanguard[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't advocate for Stalinism, Stalin advocated for one-nation Revolution and was highly problematic, he was racist, sexist, antisemitic, and homophobic.

It is not enough that the workers abolish class, but that class does not have the potential to rise again, this applies to other aspects of Revolution. Even with the abolition of the class, the bourgeoisie still holds power if it is not fully dismantled, especially when it comes to centuries of indoctrination.

I believe in gender fluidity, freedom of identity, but I am open to people who choose to identify as agender.

[–]palladistsLibertarian Marxist Humanist 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

The measures would gradually be reduced and abolished entirely as the postmodern consciousness of the proletariat is gradually achieved

What does this mean?

How do you expect it to happen?

[–]TelochiTotalitarian Vanguard[S] 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It means a full awareness of the various institutions and constructs of not just class, but gender, race, sexual orientation, disability, etc. It is similar to class consciousness but it is more all encompassing covering all aspects of oppression besides just classism. Postmodern consciousness is the ultimate goal of my ideology. It is what will allow for the destruction of all oppressive constructs.

It will be done through full generational education, complete societal upheaval, the rooting out of counterrevolutionary elements that still exist, and the gradual replacement of the old with the new. In a few generations, postmodern consciousness will be the new status quo and will have replaced all Oppressive tendencies, namely, capitalist, reactionary, and fascist thought.

As that is gradually achieved, the Vanguard will gradually relinquish all of their power back to the people. The Vanguard in of itself is an oppressive construct, the last construct to be dismantled. However, it is the anathema of Oppression, a means of fighting fire with fire, if you will.

[–]Nathan_thegloriousAmerican Blackshirt 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

2 questions:

So you speak of a revolution in the United States. How exactly do you plan on starting it? Are there any particular conditions you think would need to be met before said revolution?

Also, how do you intend on dealing with opposition?

[–]quietthomas 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I suspect you don't understand post-modernism.

See here.

[–]TotesMessenger 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)