slatestarscratchpad.tumblr.com
What sneer culture members have in common is that they’re strongly reinforced by sneering, seek out provided info that they can sneer at, and hang out with other people who sneer at things in a group where they know they have an approved target. There are more skillful professional sneerers who specialize in feeding those audiences, but the masses below are just as much a part of the culture. “Lol homeopathy” skepticism is sneer culture, just as “Burn down the churches” atheism is hate culture, but neither of these are apex predators of Blue-coded spaces (if I understand correctly what that term means)…
“sneer culture” seems reminiscent of the “serious people” concept that floats around political journalism, where proposing certain ideas makes you unserious and hence dismissable, eg. Ron Paul, or any non-mainstream candidate.
But I think it’s better to describe tactics than cultures, otherwise it is too tempting to identify the bad tactics with the bad groups we don’t like in isolation, and forget that these tactics are incredibly tempting and crop up in every group that doesn’t carefully police itself against their use.
I agree that it would be good to have some magic way of reminding people that ‘sneer culture’ or ‘the culture formerly known as sneer’ or whatever we end up calling it is a degenerate state that any group can end up in if they don’t pump against entropy. I also think it’s important to have a compact category that fires when you see a Slate journalist talking about a ‘referendum on autism’ or someone talking about how Yudkowsky gets in all these great punches on Rowling (something that disturbs me every time I see it said, because the only part of HPMOR that I see as even arguing with Rowling is Ch. 39) or someone boasting about how they wrote their criticism while drunk, etc. How will we know what not to do if we don’t have a category for it?
The phrase ‘sneer tactics’ occurs to me, but it’s probably a little too close to ‘smear tactics’ and doesn’t convey the cultural depth of the problem.
(via argumate)
futuristicallyclassydonut liked this
necroticfunk liked this
alexanderrm liked this
balioc reblogged this from yudkowsky and added:
Going back to a discussion this old is tomb-robbing by Tumblr standards…but nonetheless I think it’s worth unpacking a...
di--es---can-ic-ul-ar--es liked this
seltaris liked this
smart-elec liked this
notraptor liked this
academicianzex liked this
rapid-advance reblogged this from slatestarscratchpad
mischiefmanaged777twoofus liked this
eternalsailordianamon liked this
jpri26 reblogged this from yudkowsky
jpri26 liked this
anaisnein liked this
glenraphael liked this
fivekeys liked this
psshaw liked this
viridian-sun liked this
warriorprinceofthewoodlandrealm liked this
guillecosta500 liked this
hoot215 liked this
anti-pococurantism liked this
trappedinavelociraptor liked this
amazinglagann liked this
bgbgbg liked this
antisquark liked this
mathpuzzleoftheday liked this
energyfluffball-blog reblogged this from light-rook-offtopic and added:
That’s what I interpreted Yudowsky’s intentions as when I read the earlier parts of HPMOR. Hence my reaction to his post...
erebuskioku reblogged this from cyborgbutterflies
markpanel9 liked this
sarcasmisdeadisgone liked this
bioinfobrett liked this
rabulah liked this
everything-is-spiders liked this
nomette liked this
xferal liked this
arundelo liked this
cultureulterior liked this
almostcoralchaos reblogged this from nuclearspaceheater
raginrayguns liked this
lambdaphagy liked this
call-with-current-continuation liked this
krayfish117 liked this
brutereason liked this
mugasofer reblogged this from jaiwithani
slatestarscratchpad posted this
- Show more notes