全 28 件のコメント

[–]itisike 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Any good papers on economics of advertising? In particular, does advertising in general increase welfare?

[–]pvoteseveryoneR1 submitter 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Dangal was fantastic. Yes it had the classic cheesiness of Indian film and in the first half of the film I already realized how it was going to end (which is fine in my view, Indian films do not try to hide the ending of films as much as it is done in Western media) but it was utterly fantastic.

The whole idea of Indian sport drama's is to tell an underdog story, rising against a culture traditionally hostile to doing sports and against a government so utterly corrupt that people cannot truly pursue it. Therefore, people succeed because of their own determination and will. This film took that basic theme and inserted several interesting ideas. Not only are the protagonists fighting the government lack of infrastructure, they are fighting the sexist culture in much of rural India. It incorporated Indian ideals of child rearing and family, specifically the idea that a.) hard work should be prioritized above all else and b.) advice given through family and familial relations trump new-fangled technology and pure money.

And it combined those ideals to bring up an interesting point, if Indian society wants to encourage hard work and strict parenting, then they must apply those ideals to females as well as males, force them to work hard to succeed instead of encourage them to do chores and simply be married off. The way this was delivered most powerfully was predictable but still very good.

Spoilers beyond this point:

The nationalistic aspect of an Indian sports drama was done extremely well. I cried at the end and the father, who was locked in a cabinet and who could not see his daughter, learned his daughter won by hearing the Indian national anthem play. It was such a beautiful scene. At times the nationalism was a bit much (was making the Australian racist really necessary?) but it was overall very well done.

So many hilarious jokes for people who get the culture, an Aamir Khan film made fun of Shah Rukh Khan (spoilers: Essentially Shah Rukh Khan's films have all become stupid sappy love stories. Every single one tries to criticize the Indian view of marriage in the process, but fails to. This move made fun of that by having the girl's wrestling team swoon over every little thing the girl does in one of SRK's films), having to wait ten years for your father to say I am proud of you, etc ... Also, the vegetarian joke was a nice touch.

Aamir Khan acted brilliantly. You really got the sense of a man who was steadfast and stoic in his pursuits to reach his goal of having his daughters win a medal and pushing them though very difficult tasks, willing to give punishment if necessary, but also someone who deeply cares for his daughters. There was an excellent scene where he reveals to organizers for the Indian team that he kept with all the money laminated that the girls won in competitions. He had the quit his job to continue the girls training and yet he never spent the money they earned, for they had much greater value in symbolizing accomplishment than as 50 to 100 rupee notes.

It was, like many of Aamir Khan's films, a useful social criticism and very well told. It was an excellent film and I encourage everyone to watch it. My favorite of all films this year.

Edit: one other thing I love about Indian film, it is not realistic and more importantly no one cares. Even with very serious topics you can have fun. For example, the movie pk was about an alien who came to earth and was curious about religon. That is a ridiculous plotline, it worked because no one really cares. It moved the story forward and allowed the director to be whimsical and tell a hilarious story. People have fun. They don't mind being cliche and cheesy or predictable. But at the same time, there are serious dramas with complex ideals that invoke heavy emotion. I love the way those ideals and emotion is expressed those a very casual tone.

[–]CutlasssLife During Wartime 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The thing about TANSTAAFL is that sometimes there is a free lunch, and you have it for years and years, and then all of the sudden it gets taken away from you. And you're all like WHAT THE FUCK!!

[–]say_wot_againNot quite Noahpinion 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (2子コメント)

https://www.reddit.com/r/badeconomics/comments/6exqj3/_/didyxie

OH SHIT /u/he3-1 CALLED IT!!!!!!!!

Well, maybe. But still, goddamn.

[–]FizzleMateriel 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I suggested, 3 months ago, that the Conservatives weren't as safe as they thought they were.

But this was before May called a snap election and I wasn't expecting to be right 3 years early.

[–]zpattack12 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (11子コメント)

Has anyone seen this video yet? Some of the stuff they say seems okish, but there's a lot of stuff that seems just flat out wrong or the same old automation BS that we've seen around the internet for a while now.

[–]PonderayFollows an AR(1) process 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's really so clear that they've never done any work with data, like ever.

The automated task allocation software is hilariously ridiculous.

[–]VodkaHazePython pRoletariat 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (9子コメント)

I'll probably RI it next week

[–]besttrousers 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (8子コメント)

I've got a half written RI of it.

There aren;t even any especially interesting points. Booooored.

[–]say_wot_againNot quite Noahpinion 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I was going to RI it tomorrow. ML is kinda my thing...

[–]besttrousers 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Plenty of room for two RIs! I'll skip those parts, and focus on the labor pieces.

C

O

M

P

A D V A N T A G E

R

A

T

I

V

E

[–]say_wot_againNot quite Noahpinion 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

But yeah, "TFP IS SLOWING YOU JACKASSES" is one of my biggest pet peeves.

[–]say_wot_againNot quite Noahpinion 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah...they get the present wrong bigly.

[–]VodkaHazePython pRoletariat 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (3子コメント)

These guys are really good at producing videos but also really good at taking their sources from secondhand.

It goes research -> pop books -> youtubers. If youtubers get their sources from research instead of pop books the quality would increase. Instead they're just chewing prechewed information some more for people with even lower attention spans.

And I actually like CGP Grey and kursgezszsagszagtzszazagt

[–]besttrousers 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (2子コメント)

If youtubers get their sources from research instead of pop books the quality would increase. Instead they're just chewing prechewed information some more for people with even lower attention spans.

Yeah, that sounds right.

It's obnoxious, because it doesn't even answer the questions it supposedly asks! It professes to show "what's different about automation this time" and then never answers it, just asserts that it is over and over.

[–]say_wot_againNot quite Noahpinion 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Worse, it confuses techno-optimist projections for the 2030s and beyond with what's happening today, which is disproven by the facts on the ground.

[–]VodkaHazePython pRoletariat 9 ポイント10 ポイント  (0子コメント)

One thing is clear: a UBI will probably fix it

[–]TomWeights_Come at the king, you best not miss 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (2子コメント)

I'm a sucker for some nice writing. Perry Mehrling's 'New Lombard Street' is one of my favourites in that regard. The passage where he talks about extending credit as 'spinning bridges out to land still unseen' is good stuff. What economist writes the best prose?

[–]LuckstYle 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

McCloskey is pretty good

[–]TomWeights_Come at the king, you best not miss 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah I'd definitely agree there.

[–]ocamlmycaml 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

r/economics is launching its third grad school panel in a few weeks, and we are looking for panelists!

If you're a grad student or degree holder, please come and volunteer! Think of the service to the community!

[–]AMatterofTrustLe courage de la vérité 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

The thing I am concerned about here is not the whole finding or the opposition or what have you. It is the fact that the NIH of all places thought it was more fitting to describe their research using "the rate of increase decreases" in stead of, as the Science article handily supplies, "decreasing marginal productivity." That would simply things considerably and save a lot of time.

[–][削除されました]  (5子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]seeellayewhyeconometrics is relatively soft science 26 ポイント27 ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Dude give it a rest already. You've posted similar comments in 5 of the last 7 threads, including this exact same one. (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) We all know the story and many of us enjoy the sub when it's not flooding our front pages with "upvote if" bullshit. It seems like you're just coming in here to brag and it comes off a bit douchey.

    Besides, it's badecon to talk about /r/neoliberal's rise driving the fall in posts in /r/badeconomics without proper analysis. What's your causal mechanism?? No analysis of this natural experiment?? /s

    [–]brberg 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Too late. It's gone past getting old, into the realm of tradition. Like "Suck it, Catfortune!"

    [–]MuttonmanMy utility function is a natural monopoly 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    A board devoted to producing Webbys. I hope you're proud of yourself

    [–]besttrousers 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Bad subreddits drive out good subreddits. Just as BE destroyed ASS, so NL is destroying BE. The discourse gets worse and worse.

    [–]say_wot_againNot quite Noahpinion[M] 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Bad subreddits drive out good subreddits

    BE destroyed ASS

    That's an example of a good subreddit driving out a bad one. BENNED.