...Trump and Comey. At no point does Trump make any concerted effort to discern whether or not Russia did in fact attempt to interfere...
-
-
-
...in the election. Indeed, he notes that the claim has created a cloud over his governance -- so he can scarcely say that it isn't...
-
...of real concern to him; his concern is premised in this meeting. Yet, he doesn't inquire as to what Comey and the FBI is yet discerning..
-
...about Russia's role. He doesn't even do so as a means of disparaging the claim. (i.e. "I'm sure you're finding out that there's nothing..
-
...to the claims of Russian interference, right?" It. Doesn't. Come. Up. In this regard, I am reminded of every innocent and guilty man...
-
...I ever witnessed in an interrogation room. The innocent ask a multitude of questions about what the detectives know, or why the cops...
-
...might think X or Y or whether Z happened to the victim. The guilty forget to inquire. They know. An old law school saw tells young...
-
...trial lawyers to remind their clients to stay curious in front of a jury. There's a famous tale of a murder case in which the body of...
-
...the defendant's wife had not been recovered yet he was charged with the killing. Defense attorney tells the jury in final argument...
-
..there's been no crime and the supposed victim will walk through the courtroom doors in 10 seconds. 30 seconds later the door remains...
-
...shut. "Ok, she isn't coming today. But the point is all of you on jury looked, and that my friends is reasonable doubt. You must acquit."
-
Jury comes back in twenty minutes: Guilty. Attorney goes to the foreman: "I thought I had you." Foreman: "You had me and ten others. But...
-
"...juror number 8 didn't look at the door, he looke at your client. And he didn't eye the door, he was examining his nails."
-
Even when he was completely alone with Comey, Trump didn't look at the door. He eyed his nails. It's an absolute tell.
-
Why? Because Trump already knows that there is some fixed amount of Russian interference on his behalf, and possibly, collusion as well.
- 他8件の返信
新しい会話 -
-
-
Stick with fiction
-
Dumb is one thing. Too lazy to actually note that the work in question was entirely a non-fiction account of police investigation another.
-
So that qualifies you to do a psychological profile of the President? Gotcha.
-
That isn't a psychological profile at all. Not remotely. It's a cop's-eye reflection how a guilty men behave as a cohort.
-
That's twice in a row you've willfully mischaracterized what I wrote. Third will be the blockZ
-
Awww that would break his heart too. Like most Trumpys they don't have a real purpose except searching for someone, something to fight with.
-
2 defend the indefensible.
@POTUS is ruthless, vengeful, narcissistic, sociopathic grifter. What kind of person wants to align with that? -
Oh but you know they don't see his flaws bc they CHOOSE to be blind. They celebrate his hate, his LIES, his greed AND his stupidity. Unreal
- 他5件の返信
新しい会話 -
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。やりなおすか、Twitterステータスで詳細をご確認ください。