全 30 件のコメント

[–]aplaceatthedq 61 ポイント62 ポイント  (8子コメント)

the downvote button is there specifically for things you disagree with or dont like

as if a million downvote icon tooltip texts cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.

[–]Bofij 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (6子コメント)

Th downvote button is there for irrelevant information.

[–]AkortMy point, is no Jews invited me to worship Saturn [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Tbh has any sub ever used it differently?

[–]Felinomancy 99 ポイント100 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You know guys, part of facism is censoring dissenting views. You might want to consider that before reflexively hitting the downvote button.

As evidenced in Hitler's Night of the Long Downvotes, where dissenters of the Nazi regime were systematically downvoted.

But seriously, damn free speechers tend to whine the loudest at the expression of free speech. Guess what idiots, me slamming the down on your face because I don't want to hear you is also free speech.

[–]AnimatronicJesus 29 ポイント30 ポイント  (3子コメント)

SIR? ARE YOU ATTEMPTING TO CENSOR ME RIGHT NOW?

[–]JaneAngernice misuse of your semicolon, you blubbering simpleton 14 ポイント15 ポイント  (1子コメント)

AM I BEING RESTRAINED?

[–]DominkoI DO have a 180 IQ and I have tested it on MANY IQ websites 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (0子コメント)

AM I BEING DOWNVOTED?

[–]PenisdenapoleonIt's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know? 7 ポイント8 ポイント  (0子コメント)

"What is your name sir?" "Diss Traction." "Distraction from what? Are you censoring me?!"

[–]bkragsTakes flippant comments as an opportunity to lecture on wood. 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Freeze peaches at its finest.

[–]Pragmatic_Shill [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I'm a little curious as to why the concept of free speech is so funny that it has a negative phrase like 'freeze peach' attached to it?

[–]Bx_Mamba [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It's not meant to mock the concept of free speech. It's meant to mock tools like the guy in the thread who think any social backlash or not being listened to infringes on their right to free speech.

[–]PenisdenapoleonIt's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know? 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (4子コメント)

Remember when Reddit even tried to act like downvotes were only for things that didn't contribute to discussion? Neither do I.

[–]shufny 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (3子コメント)

It kind of works on some subs, but it's very rare.

[–]PenisdenapoleonIt's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know? [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

The best I can think of is stuff like SubredditSimulator, where you upvote "good" simulations and downvote "bad" ones.

[–]AkortMy point, is no Jews invited me to worship Saturn [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Yeah but the content is quite litteraly created by bots.

[–]PenisdenapoleonIt's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know? [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Nah, that's just a t_d conspiracy. /s

[–]CranberrySchnapps 23 ポイント24 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Downvotes /= censorship

Yes it is. That's the whole point. Once a comment gets enough downvotes, it becomes hidden. What would you call that besides censorship? Its frustrating because the purpose of downvotes is to censor spam, or off topic comments. Unfortunately its used to attack dissenting opinions.

Ah yes, the "muh freeze peaches means you have to listen to me!" argument. Let's see how that works out for him...

[–]xjayrooxNote to self:stop wasting time with atheists, they're all trolls [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

BLOCKING YOUR EARS WHILE I SHOUT INSANITY AT YOU IS CENSORSHIP

[–]BolshevikMuppet [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Yes it is. That's the whole point. Once a comment gets enough downvotes, it becomes hidden. What would you call that besides censorship?

A private group within a private organization being able to organize information and speech in the way they'd like.

The content is still there, all it takes is an extra click. But here we have the fundamental mistake of modern "censorship" discussion: it mistakes being denied a platform, a megaphone, owned by someone else for actually being censored.

And, no, it's not limited to asinine Trump supporters.

[–]shufny [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The ethical question could still be discussed regardless of legality, since there are a lot of self-proclaimed "free speech absolutists" parading that poor quote around. My bigger issue is that I've yet to meet one that bothered to form a coherent argument on how and why they get to exclude things like slander from "absolute" or what does "having the right" exactly mean to them.

[–]ZekeCool505Smuggest SRDine Alien Ghost Sorceror [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

TAKING AWAY MY MEGAPHONE IS BLATANT CENSORSHIP! THE ONLY TRUE FREE SPEECH IS EVERYONE LISTENING TO MY BULLSHIT ALL THE TIME!!

[–]SnapshillBotShilling for Big Archive™ 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

stopscopiesme>TAKEitTOrCIRCLEJERK.

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

  2. https://np.reddit.com/r/boardgames/... - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

[–]lasersnake [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

lol if downvotes are censorship then i just censored him a whole bunch of times

On a more serious note, whatever happened to being able to block people? I remember being able to do it in the past, but I cant see the 'block user' button any more.

[–]haxhaxhax1Does downvoting me give some form of perverse pleasure? [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Its definately a RES feature. If I try to tag someone there is an ignore slider which blocks their content. Not sure about standard reddit.