Sen. Rubio: Can you say whether you've ever been *asked* to end the investigation? DNI Coats: Not going to answer in open session.
-
Sen King: Why is it inappropriate to say whether or not Trump ever asked you about the Russia investigation? DNI Coats refuses to answer.
That Coats won't just deny that Trump asked him to influence the investigation makes it hard to draw any other conclusion than: Yes, he did.
-
-
As I predicted: Trump fans/pro-Trump media are falsely claiming that "not feeling pressured" = "Trump didn't ask me to influence probe."pic.twitter.com/8EuegELPXn
-
The story below is false. Neither DNI Coats nor NSA Dir Rogers would say whether Trump asked them to influence probehttps://twitter.com/RVAwonk/status/872479224027852808 …
-
Sen. King asks for legal basis for refusal to answer questions abt whether or not Trump asked them to interfere in FBI investigation.
-
Sen. King is heated; says it is inappropriate that Coats & Rogers are refusing to answer Q's abt **unclassified** info in open session.
-
Coats & Rogers refusals seem politically-motivated (to protect Trump).. but they won't deny news reports, which is hugely significant.
-
Responding to Sen. King's Q. abt legal basis for refusing to talk abt discussions w/Trump, Rogers says: "I don't feel it is appropriate."
-
Sen. King: That's not a legal justification for your refusal. Rogers: I stand by my answer.https://twitter.com/RVAwonk/status/872481698990182400 …
-
Coats & Rogers imply they feel constrained abt answering questions re. discussions with Trump/WH, even though exec privilege not invoked.
-
This is important: Coats & Rogers seem to imply they would need to consult w/WH counsel before answering these Q's even in closed session.
-
Coats & Rogers seemed to imply that exec privilege had been invoked, but then walked it back? This is very odd.https://twitter.com/RVAwonk/status/872483226593497090 …
-
Coats & Rogers seem to be saying they need to check w/ WH counsel on whether WH will invoke exec privilege on testimony in closed session.
会話の終了
新しい会話 -
-
-
Yeah, one dodge can be a mishearing of the question. Two dodges might be an attempt at side-stepping. 10 dodges and the jig is up.
-
"I refuse to answer on the grounds that the public will hear my answer."
会話の終了
新しい会話 -
-
His non answers are almost answers.
今後は興味のあるツイートがもっと表示されるようになります。 取り消す -
Especially when the senator said Coats could clear this up by simply saying no & he refused to even do that.
今後は興味のあるツイートがもっと表示されるようになります。 取り消す -
Can't wait to hear the leaks on the closed session meeting.
今後は興味のあるツイートがもっと表示されるようになります。 取り消す -
-
Makes sense. Trouble is, the right is going to take this at face value and grind it in the lefts faces.
-
Don't listen. They have no affect on the outcome anymore.
会話の終了
新しい会話 -
-
-
This whole thing is very demoralizing. Someone is lying to the American people. Either the media or our highest govt officials.
-
The investigation will take who knows how long and at this point it could be completely fruitless.
-
I suspect that Comeys testimony tmrrw will be similar to this joke today. In the meantime, Trumpers will feel vindicated and rightly so
会話の終了
新しい会話 -
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。やりなおすか、Twitterステータスで詳細をご確認ください。