The a-bombs' lies were created by two powerful, sick men in the 1940's - US president/warlord F.D. Roosevelt and USSR dictator/mass murderer J. Stalin - to end WW2. Media assisted to back up the propaganda without evidence! The people were made to believe, e.g, that sudden compressing atoms of two solid metal pieces into a critical mass allowed one single neutron in between to fission one metal atom to start ... a sudden explosion FLASH ... spreading death and radiation. But it doesn't work in reality! It is all propaganda. The H-bomb was similarly invented in the 1950's.

Nuclear terrorism was finally invented 2010 by US president B. Obama also to scare.

Like all info about Japanese radiation at Fukushima 2017 ... to scare! Plenty nonsense! Visit Fukushima May 2017 ! It is quite safe.

Part 1

by Anders Björkman, M.Sc.

Home

About us

Services

Contact info

News

Order books

Assbook

La bombe atomique n'existe pas!

All information about exploding atomic bombs radiating people to death since August 1945 is clever propaganda invented by Franklin D. Roosevelt, (Harry S. Truman) and Joseph V. Stalin! It is a 72 years old example of Fake News to scare and spread fear - and end wars. Like this:

NYT just published ... Fake News! It does it regularly since then: here and here. WW2 in Japan ended quickly a little later! It is a fact. But that two atomic bombs exploded in big, nano-seconds FLASHES that radiated people to death was just propaganda! It never happened! It was just a ... show!

Imagine that we have lived in a world based on such lies about a-bombs since 1945! Of course everyone was happy WW2 was over September 1945 ... but a-bombs?

Google today - "how to start an a-bomb explosion?" - and you get no answers at all! Reason is that there is no way to make an a-bomb explode to release radiation. Most radiation is harmless anyway.

The Japanese do not understand much about radiation, e.g. that <1 µSv per hour normal background radiation is harmless!

14/30 April 2017 the situation at the Japan, Fukushima no. 1 nuclear power plant itself and in the surroundings was not far away from it. Isn't it good news? Media will not tell you!

30 April 2017 inland from the power plant the situation is similar ... and fairly safe, i.e. <1.9 µSv per hour:

To make the situation more scary Main Stream Media trumpet that North Korea has 2017 exploded a-bombs and is building missiles to drop them on Japan. But there is no evidence for anything! It is also just propaganda!

This web page explains all propaganda lies of atomic bombs and radiation since 1945 to make you fear them and to scare you (and about peaceful, nuclear power plants).

I pay anyone €1 million proving me wrong since many years!

According Wikipedia there are at least two (!) types of nuclear fission, i.e. splitting the nucleus of atoms to produce radiation or release energy:

The first, peaceful type was discovered by German physicist Otto Hahn, 1938, in a laboratory and it produces, after having been investigated and verifieed by scientists and media and developed by engineers for many years, pure energy in the shape of radiation heat at nuclear power plants of various types, where neutrons split/fission atoms of 80-100 tons of nuclear fuel (uranium oxide) under moderated/controlled conditions. The neutrons are either slowed down by water under high pressure or sucked up by special control rods, so no exponential reactions can develop inside the reactor. After a couple of years the fuel is used up (it has become other types of atoms) and you must fill up with fresh fuel. How the nucleus of the atom is split and becomes two other types of atoms is 2017 really not fully explained but one thing is clear - no solid mass is transformed into energy as per Einstein. Nuclear research is carefully controlled by particular interests. The radiation phenomena had been discovered 40 years earlier in radium that decays (fissions) producing ionizing radiation - gamma rays.

A second type of fission or radiation occurs in a nuclear power plant, e.g. Fukushima or Tjernobyl, when you lose control. The fuel then melts and ends up at the bottom of the combustion chamber (that doesn't melt) and after a while the fission - release of radiation - stops by itself. Then you can exaggerate what happened, scare people with radiation, deport people and harass people. But nobody died at Fukushima! The local yakusa (mafia) cleaned up the place. But media cannot report it. It is a scandal!

The third, very nasty, fake, military type of fission producing destruction was very quickly invented from scratch by an American clown under complete and military secrecy 1942/5, where any result was easy to fake using propaganda, as follows:

Until destruction is desired, the military fission is kept subcritical - in the case of a uranium bomb, it is achieved by keeping 61 kgs of pure uranium solid metal fuel in a number of separate pieces, each below the critical size. No destructive, military fission occurs at all! To produce destruction, the pieces of metal uranium are brought and compressed together rapidly - to become critical - when very fast neutrons (no moderation!) drive at almost speed of light, exponentially the instantaneous fission explosive FLASH of the nuclear weapon into the environment. It lasts some nanoseconds and vaporizes and kills by radiation innocent people that happen to be in the way. 

It cannot happen in reality! Imagine that - compressing two bits of solid metal together and they explode? Metal explodes! The third, nasty, military, destructive type fission was and is pure, fantasy pseudoscience. But if you didn't agree and follow (military) orders, you were simply shot as a traitor!

Not even the International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA, can 2017 explain how fission, explosive or not, works, how to start an a-bomb explosion or how to prevent overheating of a nuclear power plant when cooling fails. IAEA considers that regulating atomic energy safety is a national responsibility. My business, safety at sea, is an international responsibility handled by the International Maritime Organization, IMO.

IAEA:s ideas about SAFETY OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS: COMMISSIONING AND OPERATION therefore reads like satire.

 

"It was very easy to create the a-bompb hoax 1945. Very few people were required to take part in the conspiracy. The secret Manhattan project to build an a-bomb was a failure ... but was turned into a success! The sick FDR had just died. The Japanese were desperate to have peace and being hit by a new, secret weapon suited them fine to surrender ... and give up military wars for ever. Japan thus willingly played along then ... and today. The US military loved it too, of course. A new secret, fake weapon to play with and launder money with. Marvelous! And the communists at Moscow? It was quite easy to convince Stalin to be part of the conspiracy to secure his power. It is so simple to fool the public with pseudoscience".

Anders Björkman

 

"Like all the great religions of the past, The Nutwork presents a choice to us all: believe our stories or live in doubt. While their stories seem rather silly to us, they give feelings of security and purpose to others. These stories are the gospel of the religion of normality, if you will. You cannot be normal if you don't believe in this gospel. You cannot function in society like your friends and family if you don't believe in this gospel. You can't just stop believing in the gospel of normality, because doing so would mean you have to find different answers to all the questions the gospel answered before. The gospel covers a massive emptiness in people. I can understand why people refuse to question it".

The RideNeverEnds 

"In short, you can rest easier on this matter, because there is no chance we dropped any nuclear bombs on Japan. It simply didn't happen. Japan knows that, Russia knows that, and the only ones who don't know that are the citizens of the US, who have been propagandized into a state of mass idiocy. The whole nuclear scare wasn't used mainly to keep the Russians at bay (since the Russians also never had any nukes). It was used mainly to keep US citizens in a state just short of panic for 70 years and to keep military and Intelligence expenditures absurdly high".

Miles W. Mathis 

“A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.”

Samuel Clemens, aka “Mark Twain”

  

This article of fake a-bombs and unsafe nuclear power plants is in two parts and seven sections for easy reference.

1.1.1 Introduction to the a-bomb hoax 1942-2017 ... by a random engineer

1.1.2 Introduction to the a-bomb hoax 1942-2017 ... propaganda and pseudoscience

1.1.3 Introduction to the a-bomb hoax 1942-2017 ... Yokohama

1.1.4 Introduction to the a-bomb hoax 1942-2017 ... the hydrogen h-bomb

1.1.5 Introduction to the a-bomb hoax 1942-2017 ... Nuclear war games 2014

1.1.6 Introduction to the a-bomb hoax 1942-2017 ... Fake News a-bombs 2017

1.1.7 Introduction to the a-bomb hoax 1942-2017 ... Punishable by death 2017

1.2 The B61 Silver Bullet a-bomb of 1963 - to be upgraded 2015 by Obama

1.3 A-bomb with parachute retarder

1.4 Increased accuracy of US a-bombs after 50 years service by Obama

1.5 The B61 Silver Bullet bomb will vaporize the plane dropping it - does Obama know?

1.6 The US War on terror 2014 - lost by Obama

1.7 Manne Siegbahn, 1924 Nobel prize (physics) winner

1.8 How to be politically correct - support atomic a-bombs or h-bombs vaporizing children

2.1 A-bombs - just propaganda to scare you

2.2 The one million C heat and one thousand bar pressure blast wave with its positive and negative phases

2.3 Einstein

2.4 June 1942 work started on bomb to vaporize everything and three years later it was ready

2.5 A plane dropped the a-bomb 6 August 1945 - No parachute retarder

2.6 Napalm carpet bombing by terrorists

2.7 Klaus Fuchs

2.8 The Soviet a-bombs

2.9 Wismut AG

2.10 - 300 Stalin prizes

2.11 A-bomb radiation 1945 and similar things 2011 and 2017 - how dangerous is the radiation at Fukushima?

2.12 The French a-bombs ... and h-bombs 

2.13 The China a-bomb 1964

2.14 The US propaganda machine 2015 - Nuclear terrorism 2017

Part 2 explains why a-bombs do not work.

1.1.1 Introduction to the a-bomb hoax 1942-2017 ... by a random engineer

It is worth repeating:

American, European nuclear scientists and their clowns hanging on to the lie say since 6 August 1945 that atomic bombs work and media transmit the message. According Wikipedia (before it was modified August 2016) nuclear fission, i.e. radiation produces

1) energy (hot steam driving turbo alternators) at nuclear power plants under moderated/controlled conditions to produce electricity and

2) drives the instantaneous explosive destruction of a nuclear weapon that lasts some nanoseconds in a big FLASH (started by bringing two separate pieces of metal together and compressing the metal to double density to start superfast fission that then cannot be stopped) in the atmosphere.

But 2) is pure pseudoscience to scare you and a BIG LIE explained below and taught at universities.

Fission is only possible under moderated/controlled conditions. I wonder why Wikipedia cannot say so!

A peaceful nuclear power plant may contain 80-100 tons (!) of nuclear fuel metal oxide pellets inside steel pipes that slowly are converted to pure energy due to fission. Normally the pellets just release heat that is absorbed by water. It is also possible to melt the pellets and allow the melted oxide to heat water to become steam and electricity. If something goes wrong - lack of cooling (?) - the plant overheats, the fuel pipes and contents melt and ... fission stops ... like at Fukushima, 2011. Of course, experts tell you that something else happens - fusion (!) - and that dangerous radiation will destroy the world or just the Pacific Ocean but ... it is part if the propaganda show you are watching.

It has nothing in common with nuclear weapons that contain only 20-60 kilograms (!) of pure, solid metal as nuclear fuel that allegedly explode or is transformed into energy and radiation in a big, hot, sudden FLASH.

But if you don't agree that fission in nuclear power plants also drives the sudden, nasty explosion of nuclear fission in a big, hot FLASH with radiation after two metal pieces have been compressed to double density, you will not pass your nuclear engineering university examination!

It is very easy to manipulate public opinion in, e.g. Japan. 99% of the 120 million Japanese believe anything about a-bombs and Fukushima and that radiation will kill them.

President Barack Obama decided August 2016 to modernize the US FLASH useless nuclear weapons stationed in Germany! Obama approved the last phase of development for the atom-bomb model B61-12, the up-dated B61 Silver Bullet from 1963, which is to go into full-scale production from 2020. However it was a typical Obama lie! Like his nonsense 2010-2016 about nuclear terrorism described below!

I am happy to inform that the elimination of the human race, the animal and biological world populations in a thermonuclear war started by anybody is not possible. Below I explain in detail why. Please note I talk about thermonuclear war. Conventional wars - soldiers shooting and planes bombing - will always be started and executed - generally by the USA and allies - to wipe out poor people here and there to keep the economies going in USA, Europe, Russia, Japan and China, etc, etc.

Since 2010 854 000 people holding top-secret clearances of the US intelligence community haven't been able to name one terrorist group trying to obtain a nuclear weapon. Reason is that a-bombs do not work. All nuclear warheads are dummies! Nothing to be afraid of! It is just a BIG LIE! Only peaceful and safe nuclear power stations work.

But as American, European and Japanese (!) nuclear scientists incl. Nobel prize winners say since 1945 that atomic bombs work and media transmit this message all the time, it is difficult to realize that you have been fooled ... by a BIG, STUPID LIE!

How do I know this? Can I prove it?

Wasn't I afraid of a-bombs as a small boy in the 1950's? You bet I was. The authorities really scared my parents and me being vaporized by a-bombs or killed by the radiation! But it was all propaganda. All lies!

A Nobel prize winner, MS, (physics 1924) didn't recommend physics as a career for me 1964. Same person, a clever scientist, I learnt later, had 19 years earlier, i.e. 1945, been asked by the Swedish government to design and build a (fake) Swedish (!) a-bomb... and agreed ... subject to some conditions! I explain it below! Another friend of mine, WM, that I met 1999 assisted Stalin building the (fake) communist a-bomb 1948-1958 ... für den Frieden ... for Peace! I describe it also below. So a couple of years ago I found out through friends that I had been fooled about the 1940's built a-bombs since my early years.

The 1940's a-bombs were all US/USSR propaganda. Approved by the US president (FDR) and his friend Soviet dictator Stalin with provisions to keep it secret forever by making it illegal and punished by death to be a whistleblower.

Pure disinformation! Simple misinformation.

I conclude today it applies to all later versions of a-bombs, incl. the infamous B61 Silver Bullet from 1963 but still 2017 the mainstay of US military defenses described below and as mentioned above to be newly produced again. All bullshit, actually.

Fast neutrons, subatomic particles, just fly away at 20.000.000 m/s speed and disintegrate into other subatomic particles. For neutrons to produce fission in a nuclear power station, they must be moderated/controlled, i.e. slowed down 10.000 times to 2.000 m/s speed or less or be sucked up by special control rods. But as all was secret 1945 the responsible parties decided to fake it to keep FDR happy. Wikipedia still cannot make any sense out of it.

End May 2016 US president B. Obama visited Hiroshima as first US president and there was a great show to remember the alleged 135 000 dead or injured according media due to the two a-bombs dropped on Japan 1945, when much fewer, <10 000, were injured and killed due to US napalm, carpet, terrorist bombing burning down the towns of paper/wood huts. The a-bomb propaganda, created by US government and military occupying Japan 1945/52 and associated censorship, just continues to be spread to scare people.

6 August 2016 USA celebrated that two a-bombs had exploded on Japan 71 years ago by imploding or compressing metal atoms. According Pew Center 56% of Americans think it was justified to radiate out 66 000 civilians, mostly old people, women and children at Hiroshima at once with one a-bomb and 39 000 others at Nagasaki three days later with more casualties due to radiation later. The Americans don't know it was all normal war propaganda to allow Japan to surrender 16 August 1945 to avoid an American and/or Soviet military invasion! Better just to stop shooting and bombing and invite the Americans to take over Japan without a fight. All fire proof, concrete buildings at central Hiroshima close to 'ground zero' survived easily.

No a-bombs ever exploded in hot FLASHES of radiation over Hiroshima and Nagasaki! Tets Kimura describes the official propaganda mainly based on fake records planted in the Hiroshima a-bomb museum!

Much more interesting is that I am an a-bomb FLASH denier! A very nasty person!

I simply suggest that any nuclear scientist stating that a-bombs work and produce FLASHES is a fraud!

A-bombs with their hot FLASHES and invisible, deadly radiation are inventions to scare you.

Maybe the nuclear scientists are frauds because it is illegal to be an a-bomb denier and that we a-bomb deniers can be punished to death (!!) in the USA. Media do not react! It is normal for them to support laws that threaten people to be killed, if they do not agree with something. Media and their assistants haven't studied and reported the explanations below.

Google has nothing about a-bomb deniers.

Google has nothing about metal atoms compression.

Wikipedia has nothing about a-bomb deniers.

Wikipedia has nothing about metal atoms compression.

We a-bomb and metal atoms compression deniers do not exist!

Below I, a random engineer, describe why a-bombs do not work and that everything to the contrary is simple propaganda. There are four basic reasons, in my opinion, why a-bombs do not work:

1. Stalin, the Soviet dictator 1928-1953 and creator of Lyssenko and a great friend of US president F.D Roosevelt, was the inventor of pseudoscience, and is said to have built a Soviet a-bomb in Siberia in only four years 1945-1949 using

(a) stolen information of all (!) the US a-bomb research Manhattan/Los Alamos project and

(b) Uranium metal extracted from ore mined by Wismut AG of Saxony, East Germany using German slave labor 1945-1947 and minimally paid German mine workers and a friend of mine later under top secret conditions.

But Wismut AG was and still is just propaganda and no Uranium was ever extracted from the German ore. It was just a typical Stalin/Beria stunt, like the Soviet a-bomb itself. Stalin just copied/pasted the US a-bomb nonsense to impress the world proletariat. And USA and Germany played along to keep the free world scared. According German sources (2015) Wismut AG had 43 000 employees 1989 and had 1946-1991 produced 220.000 tons of Uranium until it was suddenly closed 1991, etc, etc. How you can produce 220.000 tons of pure Uranium from ore that only contains 0.02% Uranium oxide is just silly propaganda.

The Stalin a-bomb was 100% pseudoscience like the stolen info it was based on.

2. Manne Siegbahn, Swedish 1924 Nobel prize winner physics was 1945 asked by the Swedish social democratic government to become head of newly created military research FOA to develop a Swedish a-bomb. Manne agreed under the condition that all a-bomb info was first peer reviewed and then made public. The Swedish government decided not to appoint Manne that got US$ 1 million from the Rockefeller foundation to develop his cyclotron instead and to shut up. You do not lie about secret a-bombs! I knew Manne a little 1960-1965 and he didn't recommend physics as a career for me 1964; too much politics!

Manne Siegbahn didn't like pseudoscience!

3. The Islamic Republic of Iran has according US propaganda plans of to build an a-bomb since the 1970's. The Islamic Republic since kicking out the US marionette shah 1979 is governed by a president (dictator) elected by the Iranian members of the priesthood (imams) and by a parliament and prime minister elected by the people. The Iranian presidents are against the a-bomb and deny any designs to build one. However the USA maintains that the Islamic Republic is secretly building an a-bomb, which can be ready in two to 15 years, etc, etc. I explain more below.

The Islamic republic knows how to handle pseudoscience!

4. Mushroom clouds! An atomic explosion is allegedly only fission (see below) producing during nano-seconds clean, pure energy - a FLASH and radiation. It does not produce smoke or gases or anything else visible. An a-bomb cannot produce a dirty, hot gas mushroom cloud.

A-bomb mushroom clouds are pseudoscience!

If you want to see plenty fake pictures of mushroom clouds suggest you study Operation Plumbbob that was conducted at the Nevada Test Site (NTS) from May through October of 1957. It was the sixth test series at NTS and consisted of 29 tests. All 100% fake, though!

1.1.2 Introduction to the a-bomb hoax 1942-2017 ... propaganda and pseudoscience

53 countries and 4 observing organizations and their leaders of the 2014 Nuclear Security Summit headed by U.S. President B. "Bomb" Obama apparently still believe that two metals (!) highly enriched Uranium and/or Plutonium can be used to manufacture nuclear weapons. They should study this web page and learn about propaganda and pseudoscience. 

As of mid-2014 Mr. Hans M. Kristensen and Mr. Robert S. Norris estimate that there are approximately 16.300 nuclear weapons located at some 98 sites in 14 countries. Roughly 10.000 of these weapons are in military arsenals; the remaining weapons are retired and awaiting dismantlement. USA controls a substantial part of them:

As of early 2015, the authors estimate that the US defense Department maintains about 4,760 nuclear warheads. Of this number, they estimate that approximately 2,080 warheads are deployed while 2,680 warheads are in storage. In addition to the warheads in the defense Department stockpile, approximately 2,340 retired but still intact warheads are in storage under the custody of the Energy Department and awaiting dismantlement, for a total US inventory of roughly 7,100 warheads. Since New START entered into force in February 2011, the United States has reported cutting a total of 158 strategic warheads and 88 launchers. It has plans to make some further reductions by 2018. Over the next decade, it also plans to spend as much as $350 billion on modernizing and maintaining its nuclear forces. 

They should also study this web page. Imagine spending $350 billion on something that doesn't work. It is pseudoscience.

Listen!

According Wikipedia: 

"Fission chain reactions occur because of interactions between neutrons and fissile isotopes. The chain reaction requires both (A) the release of neutrons from fissile isotopes undergoing nuclear fission and (B) the subsequent absorption of some of these neutrons in fissile isotopes.

When an atom undergoes nuclear fission, a few neutrons (the exact number depends on several factors) are ejected from the reaction. These free neutrons will then interact with the surrounding medium (sic - i.e. other fissile isotopes), and, if more fissile fuel (sic - isotopes) is present, some may be absorbed and cause more fission. Thus, the cycle repeats to give a reaction that is self-sustaining.

Nuclear power plants operate by precisely controlling the rate at which nuclear reactions occur, and that control is maintained through the use of several redundant layers of safety measures. Moreover, the materials in a nuclear reactor core and the Uranium enrichment level make a nuclear explosion impossible, even if all safety measures failed.

On the other hand, nuclear weapons are specifically engineered to produce a reaction that is so fast and intense it cannot be controlled after it has started. When properly designed, this uncontrolled reaction can lead to an explosive energy release." 

Do you follow? There are two fission chain reactions; one precisely controlled and slow, i.e. moderated in a peaceful nuclear reactor of a power plant that can be started and stopped at will (discovered late 1930's) and one fast that cannot be controlled - after it has started by mechanically compressing (!) two solid pieces of billions of Uranium 235 metal atoms together with a little neutron in between that will split the metal atoms in nano-seconds producing more neutrons driving the explosion (secretly invented as propaganda during WWII) into a FLASH, radiation and a mushroom cloud.

Or is there only one reaction ... without mechanical compression ... doubling the density?

When one little uranium nucleus fissions into two daughter nuclei fragments, about 0.1 percent of the mass of the single uranium nucleus appears as the fission energy of ~200 MeV. For uranium-235 (total mean fission energy 202.5 MeV), typically ~169 MeV appears as the kinetic energy of the daughter nuclei, which fly apart at about 3% of the speed of light, due to Coulomb repulsion. Also, an average of 2.5 neutrons are emitted, with a mean kinetic energy per neutron of ~2 MeV (total of 4.8 MeV).

The fission reaction (of one little uranium nucleus) also releases ~7 MeV in prompt gamma ray photons. The latter figure means that a nuclear fission explosion (?) or criticality accident (??) emits about 3.5% of its energy as gamma rays, less than 2.5% of its energy as fast neutrons (total of both types of radiation ~ 6%), and the rest as kinetic energy of fission fragments (this appears almost immediately when the fragments impact surrounding matter, as simple heat). In an atomic bomb, this heat may serve to raise the temperature of the bomb core to 100 million Kelvin and cause secondary emission of soft X-rays, which convert some of this energy to ionizing radiation. However, in nuclear reactors, the fission fragment kinetic energy remains as low-temperature heat, which itself causes little or no ionization.

Source

No - there are two! One (fake) where the temperature becomes 100 million Kelvin (a-bomb), one (real) low-temperature heat (nuclear power station). Let's repeat!

Nuclear fission is a nuclear reaction in a nuclear reactor in which the nucleus of an atom is split into smaller parts (lighter nuclei) by a free, moderated (slow) neutron. A nuclear fission process produces, apart from radiation or heat, more free neutrons.

Nuclear fission therefore produces energy/heat for nuclear power stations. Nuclear power is possible because certain substances called nuclear fuels undergo fission, when struck by fission neutrons, and in turn emit free neutrons, when the nuclear fuel breaks apart. This makes possible a peaceful, self-sustaining, moderated (or precisely controlled - the neutrons are slowed down) nuclear chain reaction that radiates pure energy/heat at a controlled rate in a nuclear reactor. Nuclear fission in a nuclear power plant just radiates energy, heat, when the uranium atoms are split into smaller atoms. No smoke! The nuclear fuel only becomes other, lighter atoms/molecules and heat. By preventing the neutrons to reach the nuclear fuels you can stop the process. The total mass of the elements involved remain the same. Only forces keeping the elements together are released to produce energy.

But can an uncontrolled nuclear fission chain reaction - to release forces - drive the explosion of nuclear weapons as suggested by Wikpedia and others (even if the Wikipedia description is changed all the time)?

A very rapid (at 3% of the speed of light!!), uncontrolled, exponential rate of nuclear fission started by one little fast neutron of a critical mass of pure, enriched metal Uranium 235 or Plutonium being suddenly mechanically compressed (!) in a nuclear weapon, i.e. an atomic bomb - an a-bomb - ending with radiation in a FLASH - is physically not possible and a silly idea in my honest opinion.

It is only foolish propaganda created by a small number of some idiots 1942/5 and still in force 2017, e.g. here! There is no evidence that mechanical compression of two pieces of pure Uranium or Plutonium metal to double density assisted by a mysterious 'initiator' will suddenly allow one little neutron to start a fission chain reaction that cannot be controlled and that is finished in nano-seconds in a hot FLASH with a temperature of 100 000 000 K and plenty radiation.

The whole idea is really stupid. Mechanical compression of two pieces of uranium or plutonium metal with a neutron in between to release internal nuclear forces to produce an a-bomb explosion and a radiation FLASH. It will not work, because there is nothing to moderate the released, free neutrons. The free neutrons just fly away and break down into other particles within minutes. Non release of forces! No FLASH! No radiation!

The hoax is today promoted by, apart from the people mentioned above and by the people here, by journalist Eric Schlosser in his book Command and Control: Nuclear Weapons, the Damascus Accident, and the Illusion of Safety published in September 2013 and by US history professor Alex Wellerstein. The latter has actually understood (or must have understood) that a-bombs FLASHES and critical masses are just simple, silly, magic tricks or illusions to impress the audience of the show but will not really admit it and thus preach the opposite. Wellerstein can be reached at wellerstein@gmail.com . Wellerstein said 7 January 2015 that:

"I'm a firm believer in the idea that sometimes non-academic historians stumble onto interesting things and interesting questions (John Coster-Mullen is a great example of this), and I don't discriminate unless people show themselves to be going down truly untenable paths (like that small segment of the Internet who believes that all nuclear weapons are a hoax, which is just a truly silly "theory").³"

John Coster-Mullen is an American truck driver that has built his own a-bomb with parts bought on eBay! It evidently does not work.

Footnote ³ about "that small segment of the Internet who believes that all nuclear weapons are a hoax" is interesting:

"For those who are curious: The "all nukes are a hoax" theory seems to stem from a couple different sources.

The technical argument is that fast neutron chain reactions are impossible, because the fission cross-section of U-235 is small for fast neutrons. The cross-section is indeed small for high-energy neutrons, which is why reactors use a moderator to slow the neutrons down and increase the likelihood of their capture by the small amounts of U-235 in the nuclear fuel. What is weird is that the people making this argument don't seem to realize that this is exactly why you use 80-90% enriched material in a bomb - it is to overcome this low probability of fissioning by just putting a ridiculous number of targets in the area. It is also why there are tampers, neutron reflectors, and the like, and also why even a relatively sophisticated weapon like the Fat Man only fissioned something like 13-18% of its fissile material, and the Little Boy bomb only fissioned around 1% of its fissile material.

They also have weirdly interpreted the "Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not that different from the firebombing of Tokyo" argument (to a rather absurd conclusion, that it was just a firebombing, despite the fact that firebombing and atomic bombing have really different outcomes), believe that the photographs of the mushroom clouds are all faked (despite the fact that such a level of fakery was really quite beyond the technology of the 1940s - similar to the "Apollo moon hoax," it would have been easier to make an atomic bomb in the 1940s than to fake an atomic bomb convincingly on film, at least to the degree of documentation that we have on them from the time), and believe that every scientist in the entire world (except for the random engineer who came up with this dumb theory) is in on the secret and has reasons to propagate it indefinitely (and I am apparently in on the hoax as well, to my surprise). …"

It seems Wellerstein has studied this web page, which is the only one on the Internet that mentions in one go that

(A) nuclear fission is always slow and only possible with a moderator or some sort of control to slow down the free neutrons,

(B) Hiroshima/Nagasaki damages are typical Tokyo/Yokohama napalm firebombing damages and

(C) all atomic a-bomb explosion mushroom and FLASH photos are faked, and on another page suggests that

(D) Apollo 11 was a hoax.

Wellerstein thinks it was easier to build an a-bomb in secrecy than to produce the propaganda 1945 and later. Well, I ... the random engineer who came up with this dumb theory ... do not agree. Wellerstein thinks in e-mail to me 4 February 2015 that all info below is nonsense and a dumb theory by a crank (me)!

Well, I consider Wellerstein not serious. He is just a full-time US propagandist of correct political thinking and part of the gang(s...s). I feel sorry for him wasting his life on it and getting upset of my findings gathered as a hobby. 

When above news (sic) of an a-bomb was published by media August 6, 1945, the NYT newspaper and all other editors of America just followed orders from above and didn't verify, if the information was true. Clearly no NYT or media reporter was present at Hiroshima to verify anything incl. the 20 000 tons of TNT and the 'vaporized' steel tower of a test three weeks earlier.

The editors/media just copied/published what they were told, i.e. the propaganda. The readers clearly didn't suspect it was a hoax.

Of course nobody in the USA had on August 6, 1945 ever heard about an a-bomb, as it was all secret, but everyone was now informed one had been dropped on Japan killing 66 000 and injuring 69 000. OK! It served the yellow monkeys right, we were told. And then the US citizens were told that the bomb or missile was equal to 20,000 tons of TNT or 20 kilotons of TNT (Trinitrotoluene) exploding in a hot FLASH.

Evidently nobody in the USA had at that time ever heard about or seen a 20 kilotons of TNT (Trinitrotoluene) explosion FLASH or what it was, but now it was planted in the heads of the Americans and from then on all fake a-bomb explosions could be compared with strange kilotons of TNT (Trinitrotoluene) explosions. War was on. Most Americans thought it was good news. Even if it was a lie!

It was very easy to create the a-bompb hoax 1945. Very few people were required to take part in the conspiracy. The secret Manhattan project to build an a-bomb was a failure ... but could become a success! The sick FDR had just died. The Japanese were desperate to have peace and being hit by a new secret weapon suited them fine to surrender ... and give up military wars for ever. They thus willingly played along then ... and today. The US military loved it of course. A new secret weapon to play with. And the communists at Moscow? It was quite easy to convince Stalin to be part of the conspiracy.

Media must of course again - 71 years later - publish the old lie that it was a fantastic invention by very, very intelligent, western scientists and engineers that saved millions of lives, etc, etc, bla, bla.

Only this web site will tell you the truth about the really silly, foolish, nuclear a-bomb nonsense that you have been told about at school to fear and that is regularly repeated by media that was invented and put together by clever but crazy Americans assisted by other, badly paid, western physicists in only three years 1942/5 (the Manhattan project).

The idea was a secret, fear-based super weapon to be developed during WW2 with money supplied by the military to really scare people. Everything must of course be military secret. That's the key to success.

The bomb would never work (that is the secrecy!), but with propaganda of all kind, you could easily impress friends and foes and cash in on fake a-bomb development projects. Many politicians loved it!

The "a-bombs" were actually invented by science fiction writer H.G Wells already 1913 nearly 30 years before US president Roosevelt started the top-secret Manhattan Project. Wells' The World Set Free describes cities around the world being devastated by what he called "atomic bombs". Wells predicted not only the mushroom cloud we associate with a-bombs, but their lasting radiation as well.

"Few who adventured into these areas of destruction and survived attempted any repetition of their experiences. There are stories of puffs of luminous, radio-active vapour drifting sometimes scores of miles from the bomb centre and killing and scorching all they overtook."

The stupid public should never know that it was a hoax from the start. My family and little I became worried too and were fooled then.

After the fake but successful a-bombings of Japan (people clearly believed they had happened) the crazy but still law abiding physicists got serious and believed their own propaganda lies and started to teach them as truths at universities. Internal criticism was no longer possible. You had to believe or you were not part of the gang(sters). 

Killing and bombing poor, unarmed civilians were common practice during WW2 by terrorists on both sides but the allies were in the lead. Nobody cared. A typical US bomber run on a civilian, non-military Japanese town, and there were many, would be made at night, at low altitude and deliver a mixture of high explosive and incendiary bombs. The objective was to turn the closely-packed, wooden homes and buildings prevalent in Japanese cities into raging infernos and ultimately into the most destructive of all weapons - the fire storm. Tokyo on the night of 9-10 March 1945 is a typical example. A force of 334 B-29s was unleashed - each plane stripped of ammunition for its machine guns to allow it to carry more fire/napalm bombs. The lead attackers arrived over the city just after dark and were followed by a procession of death that lasted until dawn. The fires started by the initial raiders could be seen from 150 miles away. The results were devastating: almost 17 square miles of the city were reduced to ashes. Estimates of the number of defenseless civilians, mostly elderly, women and children killed range between 80.000 and 200.000. The young men were evidently not at home but served in the armed forces. The industry was located far away. The military value of the napalm bombing raids against Japanese towns was zero. And probably much fewer people were killed as you could run for shelter in a park or jump into a canal nearby.

General Crawford Sams, a medical doctor, one of the six men who ran Japan under MacArthur 1945-1952, believed at the time the a-bomb propaganda but indicated that the a-bombs themselves were not very effective. He didn't explain more. He was just ordered to exaggerate everything ... propaganda wise.

Crawford F. Sams was interviewed 1979 about Hiroshima, when he knew better:

"It’s all right to put out propaganda, but don’t believe your own propaganda. That’s what happens too often in this business. That’s why you had the hysteria about this radiation thing up here. ...

After each war, for political reasons, you’d try to find a deterrent to prevent the next war. After the First World War, it was gas warfare and people – you probably wouldn’t remember – but after that we even had motion pictures (the movies) about gassing New York City and so on till somebody figured out the air currents were such [that] you couldn’t hold a concentration of gas to gas New York City if the people stayed in the buildings and closed the windows. So that failed.

The next deterrent was air power, and so from the time of Billy Mitchell in 1925 to the Second World War, [the belief was that] if we ever had another war, air power would destroy civilization. Sound familiar? So, the theoretical production of air casualties, the catching of troops in defiles and their obliteration was the thesis in which we were all indoctrinated up until the beginning of the Second World War. ...

I mentioned deterrents against war. There was a letter brought over by this first group that came up to Japan from the Philippines with me, from the Manhattan Project, in which the President was looking for a new deterrent against a future war, because air power had failed. You know, “If you have another war, air power will destroy civilization,” and it failed because it hadn’t even brought Germany to its knees. A strategic bomb survey over there showed that military production had increased actually during our bombings. So the object of this instruction, called Letter of Instruction, was “You will play up the devastating effect of the atomic bomb.” All right? So I was the one who set the deadline this time. Anybody who had been in Hiroshima and died within six months, whether they got run over by a bicycle or whatnot, would be credited to the atomic bomb.

When the (Hiroshima) bomb went off, about 2 000 people out of 250 000 got killed - by blast, by thermal radiation, or by intense x-ray, gamma radiation. Then, what happened is like an earthquake. The blast knocked down houses, hibachis had turned over and started fires. When you have an earthquake or an atomic bomb, you start fires and then people are trapped in the buildings. And again, by endless interviews, "Where were you?" "Where was your great uncle?" "Where was grandma when this occurred?" We built up the evidence to show on a cookie-cutter basis that it took about thirty-six hours for about two-thirds of that town to burn.

You see, it wasn't "Bing" like the publicity here [said]: a bomb went off and a city disappeared. No such thing happened. That was the propaganda for deterrent. They're talking about after that, "One bomb and away goes Chicago," you know? All you've got to do is look in Life magazine and whatnot back in '45, '46, and so on. What I'm trying to do is to show how it's like "End the war with one B-17." Well, you have to keep your feet on the ground. As near as we could figure then, about 21 000 people died in36 hours as a result of being trapped and burned and so on. It's like those who died in the '23 earthquake [and subsequent] fire. Then, as I say, I set the six months' deadline for anybody who had been there, even though they went away and so on, to put a deadline on deaths from delayed radiation effects as far as it takes six months or so for deaths from (what do they call it?) delayed effects.

One of us - Norman Trenton(?), somebody - got a priest there to say he guessed 100 000 people died when the bomb went off. Well, you see, it didn't.. There never was 100 000 people who died."

Etc, etc.

Further down are photos/text from Hiroshima 'ground zero' autumn 1945 after the streets had been cleared of debris (Source: http://gigamaster.blogspot.fr/2012/11/infographics-nuclear-explosions.html). It is clear to me that there was no 'ground zero' and that no a-bomb exploded here and destroyed buildings, bridges, inhabitants and everything as suggested by US military authorities. It seems that all, one or two storeys wooden/paper buildings housing mostly poor people were simply burnt down by napalm carpet bombing (exactly like Tokyo March and Yokohama May 1945 - a city I know very well) leaving steel bridges and the external walls/roofs of all brick/concrete office buildings intact. And the trunks of trees!

1.1.3 Introduction to the a-bomb hoax 1942-2017 ... Yokohama

When I arrived at Yokohama May 1972 (!) I wondered about all still damaged, abandoned bank buildings and empty plots between Yamate and Yokohama stations and was told it was all burnt down by napalm May 1945 ... not to be talked about.

It is common knowledge that 1945 central Hiroshima and Nagasaki were 95% wooden/paper one storey houses with simple roofs for accommodation and simple stores/shops and only 5% concrete buildings, banks, insurance companies, trading companies offices, etc. And all had quite bad fire protection. The heavy industry and any military compounds were located outside the city centre.

Aerial view of urban central Hiroshima before fire bombing. Nothing of military value there. Just wood/paper shanty houses 

Major Alexander P. de Seversky, who 1945 inspected the bombed towns of Japan, testified:

In Hiroshima I was prepared for radically different sights. But, to my surprise, Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned-out cities in Japan.

There was a familiar pink blot, about two miles in diameter. It was dotted with charred trees and telephone poles. Only one of the cities twenty bridges was down. Hiroshima's clusters of modern buildings in the downtown section stood upright.

It was obvious that the blast could not have been so powerful as we had been led to believe. It was extensive blast rather than intensive.

I had heard of buildings instantly consumed by unprecedented heat. Yet here I saw the buildings structurally intact, and what is more, topped by undamaged flag poles, lightning rods, painted railings, air raid precaution signs and other comparatively fragile objects.

At the T-bridge, the aiming point for the atomic bomb, I looked for the "bald spot" where everything presumably had been vaporized in the twinkling of an eye. It wasn't there or anywhere else. I could find no traces of unusual phenomena.

What I did see was in substance a replica of Yokohama or Osaka, or the Tokyo suburbs - the familiar residue of an area of wood and brick houses razed by uncontrollable fire. Everywhere I saw the trunks of charred and leafless trees, burned and unburned chunks of wood. The fire had been intense enough to bend and twist steel girders and to melt glass until it ran like lava - just as in other Japanese cities.

The concrete buildings nearest to the centre of explosion, some only a few blocks from the heart of the atom blast, showed no structural damage. Even cornices, canopies and delicate exterior decorations were intact. Window glass was shattered, of course, but single-panel frames held firm; only window frames of two or more panels were bent and buckled. The blast impact therefore could not have been unusual.

Then I questioned a great many people who were inside such buildings when the bomb exploded. Their descriptions matched the scores of accounts I had heard from people caught in concrete buildings in areas hit by blockbusters. Hiroshima's ten-story press building, about three blocks from the centre of the explosion, was badly gutted by the fire following the explosion, but otherwise unhurt. The people caught in the building did not suffer any unusual effects.

Professor Alex Wellerstein disagrees with above in an email to me 4 February 2015 and suggests:

"The Hiroshima/Nagasaki damages are in fact not typical of napalm damages. They are phenomenologically distinct. There are evidences of high pressure and high thermal flux, to say nothing of induced radioactivity from neutrons, at the atomic bombing sites. Napalm does not produce these kinds of effects. The similarities between the two are mostly superficial -- firestorm, for example. But they have drastically different mortality rates (Hiroshima/Nagasaki were 2-4X more deadly per square mile than the Tokyo bombing, and the Tokyo bombing was itself considerably more deadly than any later firebombing, much less firebombings on cities of the size and makeup of Hiroshima and Nagasaki)."

But Wellerstein is probably born around 1980, i.e. 35 years after the events and influenced or brainwashed by US propaganda.

Aerial view of central Hiroshima where the alleged a-bomb is said to have exploded over Rijo Dori street at Kamiya-cho, Naka-ku in the middle producing a blast/heat wave according this propaganda film. The main streets were quickly cleaned of ash and soot after the fires and no bridges were damaged (as they were made of steel/concrete). The flat thin roofs of the concrete/brick office buildings are intact. Only the wood/paper shanty huts making up 95% of central Hiroshima have been burnt down ... by carpet napalm bombing. Where the fires stopped, intact housing could be found. Many people jumped into the river to survive the fires

Another view of central Hiroshima ground zero (taken from the top floor of the undamaged office building across the street - see photo above), where the alleged a-bomb is said to have exploded. Rijo Dori street at Kamiya-cho, Naka-ku, is in the background with several other undamaged office buildings. The building in the foreground (now an a-bomb memorial monument) was destroyed by standard explosives and fire

This is the old Bank of Japan building at Rijo Dori street at Kamiya-cho, Naka-ku, Oct. 2016. It is today an art gallery. It was built in the 1930's and survived the August 1945 bombing ... virtually undamaged. See below for more

Professor Wellerstein thinks the photo above shows typical a-bomb damages. Of course he is supported by Mr. Dwight D. Eisenhower, President of the United States of America and promoted by IAEA suggesting to the 470th Plenary Meeting of the United Nations General Assembly, Tuesday, 8 December 1953, 2:45 p.m. that:

"On 16 July 1945, the United States set off the world's biggest atomic explosion. Since that date in 1945, the United States of America has conducted forty-two test explosions. Atomic bombs are more than twenty-five times as powerful as the weapons with which the atomic age dawned, while hydrogen weapons are in the ranges of millions of tons of TNT equivalent."

Bla, bla! Actually, the whole speech is outrageous, very cruel, shameless, immoral, crazy, pure propaganda ... but nobody at the time objected. It is one reason why the magic lies are 2017 still promoted as politically correct TRUTHS.

1.1.4 Introduction to the a-bomb hoax 1942-2017 ... the hydrogen H-bomb

The hydrogen weapon - the thermonuclear, high temperature H-bomb - is just an a-bomb in a box full of hydrogen isotopes (hydrogen atoms - deuterium and tritium - carrying one and two extra neutrons) in the shape of bits of solid metal, hydrogen compounds, where the hydrogen atom is replaced by its isotope. It was invented by USA in the 1950's.

When an a-bomb explodes only 1.5 to 2% of the uranium or plutonium atoms fission, while neutrons fly away, we are told, and described below.

In an H-bomb an exploding a-bomb - a boosted fission primary - first heats up polystyrene foam (!) to 120 000 000 C plasma that liberates extra neutrons or X-rays that compress more fission fuel - a fusion secondary. Nuclear fusion then takes place in the high temperature cloud after the a-bomb has exploded:

"... nuclear fusion is a nuclear reaction in which two or more atomic nuclei come very close and then collide at a very high speed and join to form a new nucleus. The mass of this new nucleus is slightly less than the sum of its constituents, by an amount known as the "binding energy". This is because the compound nucleus is a lower-energy system (a "more favourable" system energetically) than the two parent nuclei. The binding energy is released as photons (energy). This is the energy that is given off by a fusion process. Fusion is the process that powers active or "main sequence" stars, or other high magnitude stars" ...

There are other designs/explanations - all fantasies!

Wikipedia and other experts confusingly suggest that the a-bomb does not blow apart the H-bomb but extra hydrogen isotopes first fission the uranium and plutonium atoms flying around and then, fusion of the hydrogen isotopes takes place at high temperatures - plasma - created by the a-bomb:

The presumable (sic - it is secret!) structure of an H-bomb is as follows: at its center is an atomic bomb; surrounding it is a layer of lithium deuteride (a compound of lithium and deuterium, the isotope of hydrogen with mass number 2); around it is a tamper, a thick outer layer, frequently of fissionable material, that holds the contents together in order to obtain a larger explosion.

Neutrons from the atomic explosion cause the lithium to fission into helium, tritium (the isotope of hydrogen with mass number 3), and energy. The atomic explosion also supplies the temperatures needed for the subsequent fusion of deuterium with tritium, and of tritium with tritium (50,000,000C and 400,000,000 C, respectively). Enough neutrons are produced in the fusion reactions to produce further fission in the core and to initiate fission in the tamper.

Imagine 400 000 000 C temperature. During some nano-seconds! You need high temperature for fusion! Why hydrogen isotopes fuse is not really clear, as usual. Only extra neutrons of the hydrogen atoms of the metal compound are released to fission the uranium or plutonium atoms of the a-bomb. But as every a-bomb does not work, all H-bombs likewise are clever, pseudoscientific propaganda.

The magic H-bomb is so strong, it cannot be dropped by a plane - the plane will be destroyed Kamikaze style at the explosion - so USA suggest it arrives by ICBMs - Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles - at a speed >7;000 m/s but ... it is the usual nonsense as described below and here.

9 July 1962 USA detonated an H-bomb in space over Johnston Island in the Pacific. The (fake) explosion took place 400 kilometers above the Johnston Island (atoll). That really was vacuum space! The burst had an explosive yield of 1.45 megatons - approximately a hundred times that of the (fake) Hiroshima bomb (around 13 kilotons), media said:

... a brilliant white flash erased the darkness like a photoflash. Then the entire sky turned light green for about a second. In several more seconds, a deep red aurora, several moon diameters in size, formed where the blast had been. A white plasma jet came slowly out of the top of the red aurora (over Johnston Island) and painted a white stripe across the sky from north to south in about one minute. A deep red aurora appeared over Samoa at the south end of the white plasma jet. This visual display lasted for perhaps ten minutes before slowly fading. There was no sound at all.

Cecil R. Coale, PhD

Remember that this occurred at 400 000 m altitude in vacuum space, when the missile with the bomb was returning after having been further away from Earth. Read this what people on ground just below the explosion saw:

"At zero time at Johnston, a white flash occurred, but as soon as one could remove his goggles, no intense light was present. A second after shot time a mottled red disc was observed directly overhead and covered the sky down to about 45 degrees from the zenith. Generally, the red mottled region was more intense on the eastern portions. Along the magnetic north-south line through the burst, a white-yellow streak extended and grew to the north from near zenith. The width of the white streaked region grew from a few degrees at a few seconds to about 5-10 degrees in 30 seconds. Growth of the auroral region to the north was by addition of new lines developing from west to east. The white-yellow auroral streamers receded upward from the horizon to the north and grew to the south and at about 2 minutes the white-yellow bands were still about 10 degrees wide and extended mainly from near zenith to the south. By about two minutes, the red disc region had completed disappearance in the west and was rapidly fading on the eastern portion of the overhead disc". Bla, bla, bla!

What a fireworks display! You can also watch it here. Watch the H-bomb lifting off at time 4.27 to 1 100 000 m top altitude (5.09) to start dropping down to explode at 400 000 m altitude and the explosion a little later ... seen from far away! They forgot to film it from Johnston! However ... it was just early Fake News! Just propaganda invented by the usual clowns and non-existing PhDs. No merchant ships in the vicinity observed anything unusual that night. The event (incl. the fusion) never took place. I pay anyone €1M to show I am wrong!

1.1.5 Introduction to the a-bomb hoax 1942-2017 ... Nuclear war games 2014

A recent March 24, 2014, example is: "Obama reportedly plays 'nuclear war game' with world leaders at summit". Obama - "Yes, our President is a con artist, and yes, nearly every reporter who writes about him participates in this set of lies, because of careerism, social financial reasons, or a simple lack of competence or imagination" - apparently loves a-bombs vaporizing children and invites people to play nuke games with him! Obama's mother was a WASP - White, Anglo Saxon Protestant - and Obama's father was an upper-class, light skinned Kenyan (East Africa) student, so Obama, brought up on Hawaii by his WASP grand-parents working for the CIA and sent to Harvard, is 0% Afro-American, i.e. originating from West African slaves brought to America 1600-1800 and never given a chance to learn to read and write!

[FOX NEWS CAPTION]: " President of European Union Council Herman Van Rompuy, Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper, France's President Francois Hollande, Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron, U.S. President Barack Obama, Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel, Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, China's President Xi Jinping (??? - actually the Italian Prime Minister) and EU Commission President Jose Manuel Barosso (L-R, clockwise) meet during the Nuclear Security Summit in The Hague on March 24, 2014.REUTERS/POOL"

Many people incl. the nine politicians/clowns playing nuke games in above stupid photo apparently believe a-bombs, created by evil magicians since 1942 or so, work and can be used by terrorists and the reason is that they are manipulated to believe so by equally mad a-bomb and terrorist supporters of USA, USSR (Russia), Great Britain and France backed up by mainstream media. Why the European Union, Canada, Germany, Italy and Japan participate in the Obama madness is easy to grasp. You have to be politically correct and corrupt. Angela Merkel apparently has a PhD in physics and should know better but then she was also an FDJ-member and learnt to lie and cheat as a young woman.

So:

I do now understand how any unintelligent, uncivilized human being 2017 can support a-bombs and nuclear war games.

Reason is that all a-bombs are just propaganda. They do not work. No a-bombs were ever dropped on Japan 1945. It was just propaganda. Like the French announcements that >500 French brave résistance fighter wiped out some Nazi-German regiments on the Glières plateau at Haute Savoie, April 1944. Actually the battle trained Nazis killed >150 French and lost 5 own soldiers April 26, 1944, and the French were totally defeated at Haute Savoie, etc. The final victors always write the history though - true or false - whatever happened.

An a-bomb (1945) consisted allegedly of only 61 kg of Uranium 235.

61 kg is the critical mass (the link is a laugh) - ridiculously or unscientifically defined as a small volume of about 3 liters of solid, heavy Uranium 235 metal rings - 52 kg if a sphere - that can be carried in a bag - see below. When the outer rings circle the inner rings and press against each other, their combined mass becomes critical and a single, free neutron can start splitting one atom, releasing energy and releasing more neutrons splitting more atoms at the speed of light causing an explosion of released energy. It is evidently a lie!.

The a-bomb was dropped from an airplane and, triggered by mechanical contact/compression in fast, vertical flight, was transformed into pure energy (no combustion at all - just nuclear fast fission - and Uranium 235 (Hiroshima) or Plutonium (Nagasaki) atoms splitting into smaller atoms while releasing energy and more free neutrons producing during some nano-seconds, because that is the time for 2% or 100% of the 61 kg of Uranium 235 atoms to fission and producing in the atmosphere air first a white FLASH (lasting several seconds of extremely bright light travelling at the speed of light 299.792.458 m/s blinding any viewers/the enemy but not producing any shadows on films of such events), then a deadly SHOCK WAVE full of radioactive particles/split atoms felt as a noisy air/blast pressure increase >1 000 bar moving at supersonic velocity say >100.000 m/s into the stationary atmosphere, ahead of a fireball (see below) of the released energy, that blows away the viewers/enemies and destroys everything but also shakes the ground like an earth quake with noise travelling at only 330 m/s in air, followed by a terrible FIREBALL with HEAT (very high temperature >1 000 000 K) expanding at say only 10.000 m/s velocity into the surrounding cold air vaporizing viewers/enemies, unless they were blown away by the initial shock wave, heating up the air, so it glows and the ground below that it melts and starting fires, with nasty RADIATION (invisible electromagnetic microwaves frying the body cells of the non-vaporized viewers/enemies still alive further away) and RADIOACTIVE PARTICLES i.e, the radioactive remains of the original Uranium of Plutonium mixing with the ground soil and dust that people can inhale and a little later a dirty, hot, full of various gases and the radioactive particles MUSHROOM CLOUD of different colors (black?) rising slowly up 20 000 meters from the vaporized Ground Zero that can be photographed (photo shopped/Technicolor) to frighten the viewers/enemies.

The cloud is full of thousands of tons of radioactive particles that are carried up miles above the earth. These radioactive particles then fall out of the mushroom cloud, or out of the dispersing cloud of particles blown by the winds thus becoming FALLOUT that gives off invisible, gamma ray radiation killing people still alive inhaling them, and finally, sometimes, a CRATER (a hole in the ground below the explosion, where you can bury the enemy).

That's all!

All pure energy becomes within nano-seconds FLASH light, then high pressure, noisy SHOCK WAVE and high temperature HEAT with invisible electromagnetic RADIATION in the shape of a FIREBALL. And later a dirty MUSHROOM CLOUD consisting of hot dirty smoke in cold, clean air that nobody understands what it is and where it comes from but full of RADIOACTIVE PARTICLES and FALLOUT. And sometimes a CRATER at Ground Zero. If you do not die at once by the flash, shock wave, heat, radiation and fireball, you will no doubt die by inhaling the fall out later. Unless you dropped below a table with a wet towel around your nose and mouth.

Nonsense of course.

There is no scientific, peer reviewed evidence that above can happen. All is military, national security top secrets approved by nuclear experts. However, uncontrolled fission of atoms just produces heat that boils or melts the surrounding that prevents further fission. Nuclear power plants have suffered it. Any a-bomb would just melt before exploding.

All films of alleged atomic bomb explosions I have seen do not always show the white FLASH. We only see a lot of smoke/dark hot air (?) formed and later a dirty MUSHROOM CLOUD slowly rising in the sky. Sometimes there is a CRATER. I have never seen a film or photo showing the vaporized results of the enormous high temperature HEAT. Only normal fire damages, if any at all. Or seen, heard the noise later or felt the results of the high pressure SHOCK WAVE at different speeds in air and ground. Just structural deformations due to fire and gravity forces. And I have never seen any plants, trees or animals damaged by evil electromagnetic RADIATION, only photos of burnt humans and animals. Actually most footage of a-bomb explosions are very low quality and appear 100% fake. The explosions seem to be simple, relatively slow destructions driven by chemical reactions occurring behind the shock wave front producing the dirty smoke mushroom cloud. Such a slow destruction cannot be the superfast release of pure energy lasting nano-seconds of an a-bomb.

That's why I conclude, apart from real, physical evidence, that the a-bomb is simply a hoax to keep us in fear.

Professor Wellerstein has another opinion (in email to me 4 February 2015) what happens, when an a-bomb explodes, e.g. in the middle of a desert where nothing can burn (Trinity), and produces a fireball and mushroom cloud and the footage of it:

"As for how to photograph a nuclear explosion, please just read some of the basic literature on fireball and cloud formation. It is not "pure energy" -- the energy that is released comes primarily from kinetic repulsion of fission fragments and secondary radiations. Much of this initial energy is absorbed into the atmosphere surrounding the fireball (which is the cause of the "double flash" phenomena, because it briefly renders it opaque to visible radiation). All matter at the centre of the fireball is converted into an intensely heated gas. This is the fireball that rises, eventually forming the familiar "mushroom" shape because of Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities as it passes through the atmosphere, its surface cooling and becoming more "cloud-like." As it meets resistance it begins to flatten. The heat of the initial fireball (which is a result of the explosive yield) determines both how fast it rises and how high it eventually rises, and the resistance it encounters along way (say, from the troposphere), causes it to flatten even more dramatically. What I find bizarre is that you clearly believe it is possible for TNT to do this sort of thing (which it can, on a smaller scale), but somehow you accord nuclear energy a magical, "pure energy" quality that would somehow make it exempt from this rather basic behavior."

Hm, the matter at the centre of the fireball can only be split uranium/plutonium atoms and neutrons and they cannot be converted into a gas. Then there is the energy/heat and it will, if it is released, heat up the air. But a fireball? What is burning? The air?

I have evidently never seen 15 000 tons of TNT explode in a FLASH, so I have no opinion about making photos of it. All comparisons of a-bombs with TNT explosions are just propaganda. Not pure energy? What happens inside a nuclear power plant unless it is pure energy? It is not magic. The uranium atoms of the yellow cake fuel rods become other, smaller atoms but there are no explosions; the uranium atoms just split into two by moderated neutrons. And please, the gas that is intensely heated by the matter - what remains of the 61 kg Uranium 235 - is simple air (79% N₂, 21% O₂ and some other gases). Air or water does not get dirty, when you heat it. In a power plant the medium is water getting warm without Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities, blah, blah.

If the a-bomb energy release takes place below water at limited depth below the surface in an enclosed atoll of limited depth, you would also expect a FLASH, release of heat and a shock wave. The light travels a little slower in water but should be seen. The heat would boil the water into steam and the shock wave applied to the water should create a circular tsunami wave pushing the water aside at high speed virtually emptying the atoll. But it was not seen at the Baker 24 July 1946 alleged underwater atomic 21.000 ton TNT equivalent bomb explosion. The alleged bomb was located at about 27 meter depth in the average 60 meter deep atoll. When the bomb exploded film show no FLASH but hot water or steam being pushed straight up like the stem of a mushroom. Mushroom! Popular but not realistic. You would expect that the energy released would heat up the water above boiling point and create steam being dissipated in all directions, e.g. straight up, straight down against the bottom and bounce up and to the sides pushing the sea water ahead of it creating a great wave emptying the atoll and making room for air to fill the void sucked in from above. The energy applied mechanically to the water itself as a shock wave would also produce a circular wave emptying the atoll, etc. Whatever was shown on the films cannot possibly be that of an underwater explosion. I suspect that the whole thing was simple propaganda, e.g. two films - one of the sea below and another of the sky above with a model bomb added - all glued together. A simple trick film!

Prove me wrong about two other hoaxes and earn €1M! I am serious.

The a-bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were thus just propaganda 1945 to end WW2 in Japan and impress the USSR. Fooled the world then as there was no free press around. Only censorship. To keep the hoax going two a-bomb museums were quickly built at Hiroshima and Nagasaki for school children to be fooled by. Another a-bomb museum is at Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA paid for by the US government that started the hoax and keeps it going.

Comments are always welcome at anders.bjorkman@wanadoo.fr.

1.1.6 Introduction to the a-bomb hoax 1942-2017 ... Fake News a-bombs 2017

Imagine all fake a-bombs being built by fake industries and the money laundered by the criminals involved since 1945. I got involved in this strange business not until 1994:

Tianjin mushroom cloud points to Swedish engineer Anders Björkman's detailed argument that no nuclear bombs have ever exploded or existed: (a) Mushroom cloud pics videos are chemical explosions, we're just Pavlov'd to think they're nuclear (b) Hiroshima & Nagasaki were typical chemical firestorm sites like Tokyo, Dresden, Hamburg; 'ground zero' brick concrete steel stayed up, even their flagpoles etc; radioactive junk could have been dropped with chemicals (c) most Japan houses were wood so burned (d) Media hides witnesses who saw multiple bombers, etc. Nuke bomb terror has earned trillions for the cabal since 1945, & since 1960s has been major tool of Israeli terror against Arabs & world, 1967 & 1973 wars, 'Samson option' etc. Mordechai Vanunu is possibly fake re Israel's nukes, he 'leaked' to MI5-MI6 London Times, maybe was on Israeli beach & only 'in prison' for photos, a faker like Snowden or Assange. We can also see why all 10 alleged 'nuclear bomb nations' played along in this scam:  1945 - USA chemically bombs Hiroshima & Nagasaki (like Tokyo, Dresden, Hamburg...), also dumping illness-inducing radioactive items. Media, & Japanese witnesses who saw plane fleets, told to shut up. Nuke story sold by adding chemical-blast 'mushroom clouds' in film & photos - USA HAS NUCLEAR BOMBS  1949 - Soviet Union accepts deal for Russian elites to get wealthy by playing along with Cold War & global nuclear terror - COMMIE RUSSIA HAS THE BOMB  1952 - UK Brits & London financial centre don't want to feel 2nd class as Anglo empire dominates world - UK HAS THE BOMB  1960 - France chafes not to be 2nd class to roast-beef-eating Brits, accepts deal to become nuclear if they pretend to be the ones giving Israel nuclear technology - FRANCE & DE GAULLE HAVE THE BOMB  1964 - China gets upgraded to major league to help justify escalating military spending - COMMIE CHINA HAS THE BOMB NOW TOO  1966 - Israel gets to join the club as per earlier deal with France, in time to terrorise & intimidate Arabs in 1967 & 1973 wars - JEWS HAVE THE BOMB & JEWS ARE READY TO SAMSON OPTION EVERYBODY, later confirmed by 'brave whistleblower' Vanunu to MI6 London Times  1974 - India takes deal to stop being so non-aligned & side more with big powers, insulting India's own heritage by calling their bomb programme 'Smiling Buddha' INDIA NOW HAS THE BOMB  1979 - South Africa's white apartheid government gets to play act in compensation for all their abuse in Western media, but agrees in advance to 'dismantle' any bombs before Mandela or any black government can find out the scam ... joins with Israel & Taiwan in bomb test WHITE RACIST SOUTH AFRICA HAS THE BOMB READY TO KILL BLACK PEOPLE showing ANYONE CAN GET A BOMB, but 'bombs' all taken apart & shipped away before Mandela takes over  1998 - Pakistan is central player in new Western anti-Muslim theme & revving up 'war on terror', and Pakistan finally gets to upgrade to par with old rival India PAKISTANI MUSLIMS HAVE THE BOMB & OSAMA OR TERRORISTS MIGHT GET AHOLD OF IT, plus Pakistan 'sells' bombs to Saudi Arabia for extra bonus  2006 - North Korea, always making deals for latest consumer products for ruling family & elite, gets to upgrade to nuclear club CRAZY NORTH KOREA HAS THE BOMB  Whether nuclear bombs are real or not, it sure has been 'good business'!

The political implications of the a-bomb being a hoax are really not enormous apart from being funny and comical and I cannot understand why media cannot report it. Except that it is forbidden by a US law!

It means only that the USA (presidents Roosevelt/Truman) successfully cheated the world at the end of WW2 with the USSR, UK, France, Israel China, India, Pakistan and North Korea joining in later. Just laugh about it.

The "treason" of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg was probably part of the US show and they were not executed but given new identities.

The Israeli whistleblower Vanunu is also part of the show by "exposing" Israel's nuclear arms program when no such program exists.

Israel stating that it is concerned about a possible Iranian nuclear bomb is also pure a-bomb showbiz, knowing that no such bomb has ever been and cannot be built.

The Cuban missile crisis of 1962 was also a total fake with both Khrushchev and Kennedy cynically aware that they were engaged in a bogus argument about non-existent a-bombs. They had however just a little earlier decided to start the fake space race with cosmos clown Gagarin 1961 flying around the Earth in less than 120 minutes!

Many people cannot believe how easy it is to fake the whole a-bomb story: just keep the details secret and keep you scared via media.

How a secret, non-working super weapon costing $ billions today is compatible with real democracy is beyond my understanding. Of course, the a-bomb was secretly invented during WW2 as a cheap trick by few, young, probably honest people that avoided military service at the front by making up scientific fantasy stories about the a-bomb as part of the propaganda war effort, but you would have expected that they afterwards would have told the truth = it was all a hoax. An a-bomb does not work.

But they couldn't.

1.1.7 Introduction to the a-bomb hoax 1942-2017 ... Punishable by death 2017

In the USA it is against the law to tell the Truth about the a-bomb and if you do, you shall be punished by death!

The significance of the a-bomb for military purposes is crystal clear according the US Atomic Energy Act of 1946 (Public Law 585, 79th Congress). Still in force 2017!

That really foolish piece of shit, i.e. the US Atomic Energy Act of 1946, e.g. Sec. 10. (b) Restrictions. (1), (and its revisions) charges the US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), and later the US Department of Energy (DoE), with regulating restricted data wherever it appears and wherever it comes from, i.e. control of information.

The term restricted data as used in the law means all data concerning the manufacture or utilization of nuclear weapons, the production of fissionable material or the use of fissionable material in the production of power, but shall not include any data which the Commission from time to time determines may be published without adversely affecting the common defense and security. Evidently the Commission has never published any relevant info about nuclear weapons for the common defense and security.

In plain language - censorship! The restricted data clauses of the US Atomic Energy Act specifies that all nuclear weapons-related information is to be considered classified unless explicitly declassified, and makes no distinction about whether said information was created in a laboratory by a government scientist or anywhere else in the world by private citizens. Thus nuclear weapons information or propaganda is born secret according to the US law. The US authorities and public don't have any choice in the matter 2017. Therefore all information that a-bombs are fake is effectively censored in the USA. It seems this web page has been overlooked by DoE ... and that I, with intent to injure the United States, am in breach with the law Sec. 10. (b) Restrictions. (2) and (3) (but only in the USA) and shall be punished by death! And you the readers are also at risk! You are reading classified information.  

It must be kept secret! And vague!

Though large quantities of vague data have been officially released, and larger quantities of vague data have been unofficially leaked by former bomb designers, most public descriptions of nuclear weapon design details rely to some degree on speculation, reverse engineering from known information, or comparison with similar fields of physics (inertial confinement fusion is the primary example). 

Source

It worked beautifully in Japan 1945-1953 as Japan was occupied by the USA applying strict, military censorship there, so it was illegal to question the a-bombings 1945. You were arrested, jailed and even executed, if you said the a-bombings of Japan were just propaganda and that there were no evidences they had taken place. When I lived in Japan 1972-1976 I was mystified by it. Of course, USA still had its military bases in Japan then (and 2017), so I understand that Japan shuts up about the lies from 1945 until 2017.

The hoax works today 71 years later by keeping plenty silly, unintelligent and opportunistic people occupied everywhere. It (the a-bomb) is a criminal threat. Terrorists may use them! What a crazy world. A-bombs have always only been used by terrorists. No healthy, sane, intelligent person can consider using an a-bomb.

The threats from nuclear ... weapons are real. The possibility that terrorists might acquire and use nuclear weapons is an urgent and potentially catastrophic challenge to global security.

and 

Understanding the Nuclear Weapons Threat - While it has been more than twenty years since the end of the Cold War, the existence of thousands of nuclear weapons continues to pose a serious global threat.

In order to finally remove this global threat and to eliminate the potentially catastrophic challenge to global security I explain below why nuclear weapons like a-bombs created by evil magicians and fools do not work and are fake. Isn't it good news?

Media are kindly requested to publish the scoop. Mainstream media will clearly not do it due to lack of space. But imagine if five US major TV Channels would explain 6 August 2017 that what happened 72 years earlier in Japan was just propaganda. I would be happy.

But the show goes on and on! Example:

According to data exchanged on October 1, 2014 by Moscow and Washington, Russia has 1,643 deployed strategic warheads, compared with 1,642 for the US. Marginal difference in numbers but Russian land-based strategic forces have an explosive yield that is an order of magnitude greater than anything in the US armory.

Moscow's primary deterrent weapon is the mighty SS-18, a single one of which can destroy an area the size of New York - the state, not just the city. To get an idea of the destructive power of the SS-18, just look at the nuclear weapon the US used to destroy the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. The Hiroshima bomb was a primitive 15 kiloton warhead and yet it wiped out a city of 70,000 in a few seconds. The SS-18 - code named Satan by NATO - carries 10 warheads, each having a yield of 750 to 1000 kiloton). Some of these missiles carry a single 20,000 kiloton warhead - that's 1333 times Hiroshima.

...

Russia has another trump card up its sleeve - its supersonic bomber fleet of Tupolev Tu-160s. These Mach 2 plus aircraft can take off from well-defended airbases located deep in the heart of Russia, fly over the North Pole, launch nuclear-tipped cruise missiles from safe standoff distances over the Atlantic, and return home to watch the destruction on CNN.

That's assuming CNN will be around. For, the Russian strategic bomber fleet can singlehandedly wipe out every major city in the US.

...

What terrible nonsense!

1.2 The B61 Silver Bullet a-bomb of 1963 - to be upgraded 2016 by Obama

I live in Europe (Southern France) and today, 2017, it seems USA, 54 years later, protect me with plenty atomic strategic and tactical B61 Silver Bullet a-bombs created 1963 with fixed tail fins just screwed to the bomb shell (see photos below) and according to www.nrdc.org/nuclear/euro/euro.pdf. It is evidently a lie. The B61 Silver Bullet a-bomb does not work and probably does not exist! And what a stupid name of a bomb. Silver bullet!

The B61 Silver Bullet bombs, if they exists, which I doubt, are stored in well-known places all over Europe, where they apparently can go off at any time ... even if they do not work.

 A U.S. Air Force safety review determined in 1997 that there was a risk of accidental nuclear explosion during service of B61 nuclear bombs in NATO’s protective aircraft shelters. (p.52 of above link)

Nobody in Europe reacted 1997! Imagine US/NATO a-bombs just exploding in store!

There were (September 2015) approximately 180 US B61 a-bombs deployed in Europe at six bases in five NATO countries: Belgium (Kleine Brogel AB), Germany (Buchel AB), Italy (Aviano AB and Ghedi AB), the Netherlands (Volkel AB), and Turkey (Incirlik AB). The security is still not very good.  Terrorists plan to steal them! But don't worry. The bombs do not work. Or exist.

The B61 Silver Bullet gravity bomb was created in 1963 and was built by the Los Alamos National Laboratory, LANL, Los Alamos, in New Mexico according US propaganda. What a lie! There have never existed any bomb manufacturing plants at Los Alamos.

Los Alamos is a boring town in the mountains 40 minutes by car from Santa Fe, capital of New Mexico, famous for being the place where enriched Uranium U235 was transported in and out of the local a-bomb factory close to schools and parks full of children. Los Alamos was founded January 1943 and had 10.000 inhabitants 1946 and 12.000 inhabitants 2010. The whole town/laboratory is just propaganda. LANL is famous for its ridiculous 1950's Godiva device and nuclear fission in a laboratory. The radiation source within the Godiva device was a fissile metallic mass (usually highly enriched Uranium U235), about 30 cm in diameter (volume 14 137 cm3 and mass 270 kg). This was located at the top of a two-meters-high metal tower. The burst of radiation was produced when a piston of fissile material was quickly inserted and extracted from a cavity within the larger fissile mass. During the time these two masses were combined, they formed a critical mass and a nuclear chain reaction was briefly sustained.   But LANL and Los Alamos weren't wiped out. Atomic B61 bomb production engineering began there in 1965, with full production beginning in 1968 following a series of creative development problems. No bombs or Godiva devices ever exploded at Los Alamos. Or anywhere. Total production of all versions of the B61 Silver Bullet a-bomb was approximately 3.155, of which approximately 1 925 remained in service as of 2002 according US propaganda. Where the other 1 230 bombs are is a MILITARY SECRET due to national security considerations. Maybe they have gone missing or were stolen by locals from Los Alamos? They are a strange lot up there at the end of the road. There exists no evidence that a B61 Silver Bullet a-bomb has ever been tested anywhere.

There are 180 B61 Silver Bullet a-bombs in Europe (file photo) - note the fixed tail fins just attached to the end! It will cost USD one billions to make them controllable for improved accuracy when dropping on the enemy in order to better protect Europe! No bomb works though! Imagine that! The bomb tail fins direct the bomb, while dropping from a warplane - a top secret system! See also below about the new tail fins.   An old B61-7 Silver Bullet a-bomb without tail fins being rolled around by some fat US soldiers (or actors?) at Amarillo, Texas, between other B61 a-bombs. The bomb weighs 320 kg incl. 61 kg of Uranium 235 (critical mass) compared to 4 400 kg incl. 61 kg of metal Uranium 235 (critical mass) rings of the Hiroshima bomb 1945   A B61 Mod 11 weighs 540 kg for unknown reasons. Any B61, with or without tail fins, doesn't work, though! Imagine that! Where the parachute retarder is located is unclear but probably below the tail fins aft. The B61 Mod 12 is available 2014. Only fools believe it works

 "The B61 is about to undergo a major overhaul that the Pentagon estimates will cost up to $10 billion or $25 million per bomb".

NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 

The U.S. intends to refurbish the remaining 400 B61 a-bombs under its Life Extension Program with the intention that the weapons should remain operational until at least 2025:

"According to newly published figures, the United States will (2013) set aside more than US$ 10 billion for a life extension program for the B61 Silver Bullet a-bombs and another USD one billion for adding controllable tail fins.

The plan to give new tail fins to nearly 200 B61 gravity bombs stored in Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Turkey would give them new mission and new capabilities. The bombs could be delivered by stealth F35 fighter-bombers."

Ms Madelyn R. Creedon, the US assistant secretary of atomic war for global strategic affairs (whatever that can be? - propaganda?) suggested October 30, 2013 that: 

"a key component of the life extension program is the replacement of an expensive parachute system with a newly designed tail assembly, which will increase the B61's accuracy. And with increased accuracy comes the ability to decrease the weapon's yield without reducing its capabilities".

NNSA is evidently busy with Madelyn's pet the B61 Silver Bullet a-bomb and other Life Extension Program (LEP):

NNSA completed important tests for the B61-12 Life Extension Program (LEP). The B61 is a gravity bomb associated with the Air Force long-range bomber and dual-capable fighter aircraft. In coordination with the Air Force, Vibration Fly Around/Instrumented Measurement Vehicle (VFA/IMV) tests of the B61-12 were conducted on F-15, F-16 and B-2 aircraft. In addition, the first full-scale wind tunnel test of the B61-12 was conducted. All of these engineering development tests were successful and provided critical data for use in the B61-12 LEP.

and

NNSA reached the halfway point in the production phase of the W76-1 warhead Life Extension Program (LEP) this fall. This achievement underscored NNSA’s commitment to meeting the U.S. Navy’s requirements for W76-1 production. The primary purpose of the W76-1 is to extend the original warhead service life from 20 to 60 years.

Life Extension Programs (LEP) are major parts of the a-bomb hoax. Imagine extending something's service life from 20 to 60 years. But if it were built 1965 shouldn't it be from 50 to 60 years? Of course not! The B61 Silver Bullet a-bomb does not exist. It is 100% propaganda.

1.5 The B61-12 Silver Bullet a-bomb will vaporize the plane dropping it - does Obama know?

If the B61 bomb is dropped by gravity from 50 meters altitude by a US war plane on the enemy target, it will hit ground with a vertical velocity of 31.34 m/s after only 3.19 seconds (ignoring friction/turbulence that slows down the bomb a little). There is no engine driving the B61. Only its momentum, when released from the plane, drives the bomb when it drops down by gravity.

If the plane + bomb have a horizontal velocity of 100 m/s, the plane will proceed 319 meters, while the bomb is dropping vertically 50 meters while also moving forward at same speed. US$ 1 billion controllable tail fins (+ US$ 10 billion general upgrade) may of course divert the B61 bomb accurately sideways (and downwards - not upwards because it will then collide with the plane) a little during the vertical drop but during a maximum 319 meters path. After that the a-bomb hits the ground at great velocity, say, 104.78 m/s at angle 17.4° … and maybe bounces upwards. If the a-bomb then explodes, when hitting ground, the plane + pilot above will evidently be vaporized like the children at Hiroshima, as the a-bomb fire ball and blast/heat wave extends >300 meters within 0.01 seconds! It should have been much better to fit the B61 with a rocket engine - like on, e.g. an AIM-54 Phoenix missile. 

It seems US Department of War and Ms. Madelyn R. Creedon are fucking up, again. Luckily the gravity a-bomb does not work, though, as described below. And there are no planes that can drop the 2017 model B61-12 atomic gravity bomb:

Initially the old NATO F-16A/B and Tornado PA-200 aircraft that currently serve in the nuclear strike mission will not be able to make use of the increased accuracy of the B61-12, according to U.S. Air Force officials. The reason is that the aircraft computers are not capable of "talking to" the new digital bomb. As a result, the guided tail kit on the B61-12 for Belgian, Dutch, German, Italian and Turkish F-16s and Tornados will initially be "locked" as a "dumb" bomb. Once these countries transition to the F-35 aircraft, however, the enhanced targeting capability will become operational also in these countries.

Others believe the B61-12 is fantastic. And very dangerous.

Of course there are plenty US intercontinental ballistic a-bomb missiles too controlled by drunken generals like Michael Carey. It is OK. They do not work either.

The US public evidently does not care about costs - US$ 11 billion for life extension and tail fins improvements for better accuracy of something built in the 1960's that doesn't work is of no concern to the US public. US$ 11 billion keeps a lot of idle US military busy though planning ... what ... terrorism ... controllable tail fins? It would cost only US$ 1 000:- to dismantle a B61 Silver Bullet and ship it back to USA but it seems US national security will suffer. But, blah, blah, blah:

"We've worked with CAPE to study how we meet the requirements for the B61 while ensuring that we're being responsible stewards of taxpayer dollars. We're currently doing the required engineering and design work on the B61 which will allow us to make key decisions that we can then use to inform a well researched and validated cost baseline. All of the information we've gathered, including the CAPE study, will help us check any final conclusions against a long list of variables so that we're certain we have a cost baseline that is as accurate as possible."

Josh McConaha, National Nuclear Security Administration (4 Nov. 2012)

Popular media has not caught on, at all! They love to promote created, non-working, non-existing a-bombs and national security and do not understand that they are fooled (or paid) by the military and mad Ms Madelyn R. Creedon. Madelyn does not like my 80 kg a-bomb carried in a bag!

As Paul Craig Roberts says:

"National security is where the executive branch hides its crimes against law, both domestic and international, its crimes against the Constitution, its crimes against innocent citizens both at home and abroad and its secret agendas that it knows that the American public would never support.

"National security" is the cloak that the executive branch uses to make certain that the US government is unaccountable.

Without accountable government there is no civil liberty and no democracy except for the sham voting that existed in the Soviet Union and now exists in the US."

1.6 The US war on terror 2014 - lost by Obama

USA was November 2013 having great problems with its war on terror! Forbes reported that one million US soldiers have been injured in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars at tremendous costs ... and little has been won. RT reported that the cost of keeping each US soldier and there are plenty in Afghanistan has risen from $1.3 million per soldier to $2.1 million per soldier ... and that the war is lost. Matthew J. Nasuti reports in the Kabul Press that it costs US taxpayers $50 million to kill one Taliban soldier. That means it will cost $1 billion to kill 20 Taliban fighters. Of course that cost is included in the cost of keeping US soldiers in Afghanistan. 2014 did not look bright. The US war in Afghanistan was lost 2014. And Obama didn't use his a-bombs ... because they never worked.

Please, study below, really good news about the US military atomic nuclear madelyness.  

1.7 Manne Siegbahn, 1924 Nobel Prize (physics) winner

Manne Siegbahn, 1924 Nobel Prize (physics) winner and close friend of my grandfather was 1945 asked to become head of the Swedish military research agency, FOA, to, i.a., develop a Swedish atomic bomb. Siegbahn suggested that, if all scientific research of FOA immediately became public and subject to independent peer review, he would consider the offer. The Swedish social democratic government did not like that at all. So Manne continued doing peaceful physics research with his cyclotron instead but didn't really recommend physics or working as a physicist as a career (mostly low paid teacher jobs). So I became a naval architect instead 1965-1969. Thanks, Manne, for your advice! Another Nobel Prize (physics) winner, Niels Bohr, was also a friend of my grandfather and stayed in his home in 1942 before being flown off to USA and the Manhattan project. I assume Siegbahn and Bohr met 1945 (at my grandfather's place?) and that Bohr confided that the a-bomb was just a lie. Bohr could never really explain how an atom fissioned ... even if it did.

Of course there are twirps suggesting something like:

7.4.6 Sweden

During the 50s and 60s Sweden developed considerable nuclear expertise - developing reactor technology and building nuclear power plants. Sweden seriously investigated nuclear weapons from the mid 1950s into the 1960s. A very substantial research effort into the fundamental technical issues of weapon design and manufacture was conducted. By the mid-1960s this effort had supplied sufficient knowledge to allow Sweden to begin immediate manufacture of fairly sophisticated fission weapons. Faced with this decision, Sweden decided not to pursue a weapon production program.

You wonder what silly fools write this nonsense. It apparently took USA three years and 500 000 workers to build a few a-bombs 1942-45 at enormous cost in secrecy and here little Sweden could 1965 do it with 500 workers at much less cost in a very short time. Sweden just found that fission weapons do not work. But it had to remain secret. If you leaked the good news you ... got serious problems. To be politically correct and NEUTRAL you cannot say that the SUPERPOWERS and little France play stupid games.

If anybody can find a public, Swedish or any country scientific, peer reviewed paper 1945-2017 that and/or how an a-bomb works, pls tell me. I have not found any. It is all secret!

You wonder what universities or institutes of technology teach young people to become a-bomb engineers. Any ideas? One answer is the Swedish Royal Institute of Technology, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm, Sweden and its F-department. I had the possibility to study there 1965 but found the department full of crazy fools wanting to become nuclear bomb and space ship designers. So I went to the S-department at Chalmers Institute of Technology, Chalmers Tekniska Högskola, Gothenburg studying naval architecture instead. Much more fun.

Imagine your job is design and manufacture a military bomb that - a single problem - can only kill old people and children and destroy their poor homes ... and you do it. Evidently you are mentally sick, unstable and crazy. Like William L. Laurence:

It is a thing of beauty to behold, this "gadget." In its design went millions of man-hours of what is without a doubt the most concentrated intellectual effort in history. Never before had so much brain-power been focused on a single problem.

William L. Laurence 1945 

If you wonder who Bill Laurence was, don't worry. He was just a journalist producing propaganda lies all his life. Typical media!

This also includes 2015 e.g. hysterical Physics Forums:

Physics Forums values quality, civil and productive scientific discussion. We welcome all who believe in these values except Anders Björkman. If anybody links to Anders Björkman's web page "The atomic bomb hoax 1945-2016"at Physics Forums, then that person is banned for life at Physics Forums that believes in working a-bombs and rules that the subject cannot be discussed at Physics Forums for obvious reasons! On the other hand the fake Higg's particle can be discussed at Physics Forums.

The People's Republic of China, PRC, has joined the above group of crazy, mad fools. The PRC submarine fleet is reportedly the world's second-largest, with about 70 vessels. About 10 are nuclear-powered, and four or more of those are nuclear powered ballistic submarines capable of launching missiles with atomic warheads. I am happy to report that none of the atomic warheads works. 

All military or civilian a-bomb supporters are twirps or contemptible persons in my opinion. Religion is said to make good people do evil things. To make intelligent people create stupid things, it takes a-bomb development, engineering and manufacture protected by military and national security ... and good salaries. All paid for by tax payers. One result is Albuquerque, NM, a dump in the New Mexico desert and capital of the useless a-bomb. 

1.8 How to be politically correct - support a-bombs or H-bombs vaporizing children

6 August 2016, the working a-bomb illusion was only 71 years old. What started as a simple propaganda gimmick to finish WW2 in Japan is still believed by billions of people 2017. Evidently there exist plenty a- or H-bombs. But none works. But to be politically correct anywhere you have to agree that the a-bomb works. So you can protest against it.

I am evidently not politically correct. I don't like to lie, cheat and be dishonest that you have to do to be politically correct.

Björkman's a-bomb

Only 1.5% of the 1.4% or 6x1024 or 600.000.000.000.000.000.000.000 U235 atoms thus actually fissioned or split releasing energy (equivalent to 15.000 ton of TNT exploding), when the bomb allegedly exploded and released pure energy (and not gas of burnt TNT). Read below of further details of the very, very heavy, US a-bomb with only 61 kg U235 inside and how it allegedly exploded 6 August 1945 and killed mostly civilians and children and destroyed little of military value. Every time an Uranium-235 (U235) atom fissions, there is a small FIREBALL. So when an a-bomb explodes there are 6x1024 FIREBALLS making one big FIREBALL. Admire also my total weight only 80 kg Björkman's a-bomb (left) that can be hidden in a bag to fool US Department of Homeland Security & Co. I describe it in detail below. You only need 61 kg of U235 to destroy Hiroshima and it is easily accomplished in the bag left. Will it work? Evidently not.

The above fantasy can be tested in a laboratory!

On 18 April 1952, due to a miscalculation, Jemima was assembled with too many disks; this caused an excursion of 1.5 x 10¹⁶ fissions ... 

Prof. Hellman of Stanford University also explains the above in a recent hand-out for his a-bomb design students but it is just more stupid nonsense to keep his bosses quiet. More nonsense is the neutron mirror! In order to reduce the number of free neutrons flying away missing the action we are told that latest a-bombs are fitted with a mirror (!) around the critical mass of Uranium or Plutonium that reflects the neutrons back into action. With such a neutron mirror you can also reduce the critical mass, it is suggested. But it is all nonsense.

Professor Wellerstein evidently suggests otherwise. It was because "you use 80-90% enriched material in a bomb" actually 100%, that it exploded without moderation. Forget all nonsense about critical mass etc. Any amount of enriched material will explode i.e. produce FIREBALLS exponentially during nano-seconds by fission without moderation. According Wellerstein in an e-mail to me 4 February 2015:

"There is adequate evidence (sic) that fast nuclear fission is possible in enriched materials. This has been subjected to experimental testing repeatedly, and there are even reactors that operate on the principle. I stand my notion that (your) theory is "dumb" -- the reasoning is reflective of a lack of understanding of the principle of fast fission nuclear chain reactions, to say the least the preposterous notion that all scientists in the world have either been complete dupes on this very elementary issue (all in tandem) or have been fools. The "conspiracy" is untenable on first principles alone -- Occam's razor goes against it. This is aside from the silliness of the notion that all evidence (millions of pages of reports and experiments from tens of thousands of independent investigators in dozens of countries) on the history and legacy of nuclear testing has been falsified."

All scientists in the world? Only a small handful military scientists design a-bombs in secrecy! Wellerstein carefully avoids referring to the dumb exponential chain reaction of a critical mass causing an atomic explosion during nano-seconds theory, and talks about fast nuclear fission in enriched materials, which is something completely different. There is no such thing as "fast fission nuclear chain reaction" or an exponential chain reaction causing an explosion. Evidently I do not suggest that all scientists in the world are dupes or fools and part of a conspiracy. Why would I do that? Lack of understanding? We all agree that slow nuclear fission is real. Only an exponential nuclear chain reaction/fission of a critical mass lasting nano-seconds set off by some mysterious means producing an explosion is fantasy, as Manne Siegbahn indicated to me in the 1960s. All full scale tests of nuclear explosions are faked. There is no way to set them off safely.

Fact remains that any nuclear chain reaction or fission must be moderated or controlled like in a peaceful nuclear power reactor to work, i.e. the neutrons must be slowed down. It is the simple reason why USA, its Department of War and Charles A. Willoughby created the exponential, chain-reaction atom of a critical mass splitting a-bomb explosion propaganda 1945 to impress friends and foes.

Other web articles by me about clever and funny US propaganda are:

(1) Why NASA space (Moon) travel 1969-2015 is not possible (it is just more US propaganda that asstronots can fly to the Moon) and

(2) Why skyscrapers (like WTC1&2 at NY 2001) do not collapse from top down (only terrorists believe so in New York City).

Imagine how many times we have been fooled by silly propaganda.  

Anybody taking photos of the ruins of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and suggesting, e.g. that the two a-bombs were fake was simply arrested and maybe executed because such suggestions disturbed public tranquility.

How was it possible? The CCD was run by United Stasi of America's general Charles A. Willoughby. If Charles had remained in Germany, where he was born 1892, he would probably have had the job of Joseph Goebbels. Charles apparently was a psychopath and as such suitable for US Army service. Or for Adolf Hitler? Anyway, the Japanese controlled by USA happily assisted Charles.

If you today 2017 still believe in being vaporized by an a-bomb explosion the 135 pages US Planning Guidance for Response to a Nuclear destruction (June 2010) is recommended reading. You will, e.g. learn (p 81):

"A nuclear destruction in a modern urban area would impact the medical system more than any disaster previously experienced by the nation. Large numbers of casualties with traumatic, thermal, and radiation injuries, in all possible combinations, will be seen ... The death toll will be high, but there are opportunities to save tens to hundreds of thousands of lives."

But do not worry too much. It is just a lie. And the link doesn't work any longer. And you will not find the document in the US EPA Radiation Protection Document Library May 2017.

2.2 The one million C heat and one thousand bar pressure blast wave with its positive and negative phases

According the paper Blast Loading and Blast Effects on Structures - An Overview, by T. Ngo, P. Mendis, A. Gupta & J. Ramsay, The University of Melbourne, Australia, 2007 we learn:

It is suggested by many 'experts' that a nuclear explosion, if it really can take place, generates pure energy and no hot gases of a chemical explosion producing black smoke but something else - invisible energy corresponding to 20 000 ton of TNT exploding - heating up 1 kg of new atomics and 60 kg of unsplit Uranium atomics and 4 360 kg of scrap metal making up the bomb ... and the surrounding air. No mushroom cloud will be produced by such an explosion high in the air ... if it can take place.

Nuclear destructions produced high above the ground do not create dirty mushroom clouds!  

US official propaganda has a slightly different description of the devastating blast wave:

 "The … (blast) wave travelled out in all directions from the explosion. The blast effects produced were uniform and essentially those of conventional large high-explosive (chemical) weapons though on a much larger scale. Thus, instead of localized effects such as the collapse of a roof truss or wall panel, entire buildings were crushed or distorted as units.

The blast pressure, as with high explosives, rose almost instantaneously (?sic?) to a peak, declined more slowly, and then fell below atmospheric pressure for a period about three times the period during which it was above atmospheric pressure. The positive period--that during which the pressure was greater than atmospheric--was of much greater peak pressure than the succeeding, or negative phase. Short though the positive phase was--probably only slightly longer than a second--it lasted longer than the positive phase of ordinary bombs. Thus the effect of the atomic bomb on buildings was usually that of a powerful push, which shoved buildings over or left them leaning, whereas high explosive (chemical) bombs strike sharply and much more briefly and tend to punch holes in walls. The duration was also long enough so that almost all building failures came during the positive phase. Comparatively few evidences were found of failures of members during the longer but less intense negative phase; window shutters blown outwards toward the explosion were very rare."

So the peak, side-on overpressure of an a-bomb blast may be one thousand bars and the blast wave travels ~100 meter in 0.016 seconds or 6.250 m/s at the beginning according photographic evidence (see below).

They all fail my simple Challenge.

2.4 June 1942 work started on the a-bomb to vaporize everything and three years later it was ready

US president Franklin D Roosevelt had allegedly ordered the atomic bombs to be designed (or created) and built by clever US scientists and engineers 1939, 1941 or 1942, it is not clear why and when, because it is a military secret 2017. 1939? Before the 2nd WW even started tipped off by a stupid, foolish letter by no other than Albert Einstein that an a-bomb would work? Can we believe that? No, not possible! US public (opinion) was against any war then and vaporizing women and children. And Einstein must have been smart enough to understand that chain reaction fission without moderation was impossible. But USA started early: the very secret Briggs Advisory Committee on Uranium created by Roosevelt had its first meeting on October 21, 1939, in Washington, D.C., only seven weeks after WWII started and discussed Making Uranium (fission) chain-reaction bombs. Imagine that! What Briggs & Co found out is not known.

June 1941? When Hitler attacked USSR and it looked like Hitler would conquer the world with US looking on? No. US public (opinion) was still against any war and vaporizing people. Better to negotiate with Hitler?

Or 1942 after Japan had stupidly attacked Pearl Harbor and Hitler had declared war on USA in December 1941? Self defense! Why not? Can Japan bomb Pearl Harbor, USA can vaporize Japan! Iraq had the a-bomb according US intelligence already 2000 but found nothing after destroying the country and the Islamic Republic of Iran is apparently struggling making an a-bomb since 20 years, while the USA did it in only three years 1942-1945. Fantastic! Fantasy.

According US propaganda 2013:

In 1939, the Nazis were rumored [sic] to be developing an atomic bomb. The United States initiated its own program under the Army Corps of Engineers in June 1942. America needed to build an atomic weapon before Germany or Japan did [which they never did]. General Leslie R. Groves, Deputy Chief of Construction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, was appointed to direct this top-secret project.

Suddenly $2 billion were available + plenty brains to vaporize and/or radiate the enemy! It was probably 1942 - Oak Ridge, Tennessee was allegedly built then to accommodate 75.000 poor persons that got a job in the arms industry. Nice propaganda! But most of the work was apparently done in bars on Manhattan, New York City, NY, USA. That's why it was called the Manhattan project. It was all propaganda like much info presented as news by the New York Times 2001. It was said that 500.000 persons in the USA were working to build the bomb! I think it was 500. The top secret project was thus run since June 1942 by young Lieutenant General Leslie Richard Groves, b. 1896, of US Army Corps of Engineers. He had no knowledge of nuclear physics and radiation or nuclear weapons engineering. He could build offices and fortresses. The whole a-bomb project would be run military style and be 100% secret. The civilian nuclear experts had to abide to military rules and regulations.

In late December 1944, Roosevelt and Groves met in the Oval Office along with Henry Stimson, the Secretary of War. According Groves (in his memoirs) Roosevelt, asked if the atomic bomb might be ready to use against Germany very soon. Groves explained that for a variety of reasons, the most important one being that their schedule (?) had pushed the bomb back to the summer of 1945, this would not be possible. There is very little written documentation about the development of the bomb June 1942 - June 1945. Communication seems to have been casual! How Groves December 1944 could know that Germany would be defeated in May 1945 is a mystery.

However, only three years and one month (!) after project start June 1942 (much much faster than the JFK order 1961 to, propaganda wise, put Americans on the Moon 1969, which took 8 years), after Hitler had shot himself April 1945, the Roosevelt two types of complete a-bombs were ready July 1945 to be used to vaporize Japan, we are told, at a cost of $2 billion (1945). Imagine spending $2 billions ... all secret! In three years and one month! But before using the bombs in Japan, one type was secretly tested in the USA with no media or public present:

March 27, 1943 - a Mr. Tolman wrote to Oppenheimer about using explosives to collapse a shell into a critical mass (to ignite the a-bomb).

September 1944 - a Mr. Robert Christy suggested the "Christy gadget", the use of a solid core that is raised to supercriticality solely by compressing the metal to twice normal density (to ignite the a-bomb)!

April 11, 1945 - Oppenheimer reported that Kistiakowsky had achieved optimal performance with implosion compression in sub-scale tests (to ignite the a-bomb).

April 27, 1945 - Tokyo Bay (only water of course!) was dropped as a target (!) (to demonstrate ignition of the bomb) because it had already been burned down (poor fish!). Imagine burning down a sea.

June 21, 1945 - The first implosion initiator (LOL) was ready. Imagine that. An implosion initiator! To compress metal to twice normal density (to ignite the a-bomb).

So in the end the experts agreed that sudden implosion (a process in which objects are destroyed by collapsing or being squeezed in on themselves) of Uranium/Plutonium metal atoms to twice normal density would initiate the a-bomb destructive radiation that would last a few nano-seconds without any testing. Of course with a fast, free neutron in between starting it! That little thing - a fast, free neutron - will start exponentially fissioning billions of compressed or imploded metal atoms releasing energy and more fast, free neutrons. An a-bomb explodes and radiates! But you cannot compress an atom or a solid piece of metal by implosion. It just bounces. And the fast neutrons in between just fly away. Carey Sublette also explains the a-bomb development history - all invented of course - to support the propaganda lies ... forgetting the radiation! The first a-bomb dropped in Japan caused a lot of damage apart from vaporizing and radiating innocent people and many children:  "The fire damage in Hiroshima (due to the a-bomb explosion) was much more complete; the centre of the city was hit and everything but the reinforced concrete buildings had virtually disappeared. A desert of clear-swept, charred remains, with only a few strong building frames left standing was a terrifying sight. ... In Hiroshima, 4,400 feet from X, multi-story brick buildings were completely demolished. ... Because the explosion was well up in the air, much of the damage resulted from a downward pressure. This pressure of course most largely affected flat roofs. Some telegraph and other poles immediately below the explosion remained upright while those at greater distances from the centre of damage, being more largely exposed to a horizontal thrust from the blast pressure waves, were overturned or tilted. Trees underneath the explosion remained upright but had their branches broken downward. " Source: THE atomic BOMBINGS OF HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI by The Manhattan Engineer District, June 29, 1946. The above is pure propaganda without any evidence at all of an atomic attack. Only fire damage? You are not informed that central Hiroshima was 1945 95% poor, shanty wood/paper houses easy to destroy by simple firebombs. Only the Gelbi Bank and the Bank of Japan concrete/brick buildings, of course fairly earthquake proof, at Rijo Dori street, Kamiya-cho, Naka-ku, Hiroshima city centre and similar with their flat roofs just below the alleged atomic explosion point were not damaged or vaporized at all on August 6, 1945, ... and open for business a few days later after the fires had been extinguished and the streets had been cleared. The BoJ building is still there 2017! Quite amazing how easy it is to fool people for more than 71 years with propaganda!

Map of Hiroshima city centre, target Aioi bridge and location of Bank of Japan office and location above where the alleged a-bomb is said to have exploded over Rijo Dori street at Kamiya-cho, Naka-ku. There are many similar stone/concrete/brick buildings in the surroundings that survived the napalm carpet fire bombings   Aerial view of central Hiroshima where the alleged a-bomb is said to have exploded over Rijo Dori street at Kamiya-cho, Naka-ku in the middle producing a blast/heat wave . The main streets were quickly cleaned of ash and soot after the fires and no bridges were damaged (as they were made of steel/concrete)

This is the old Bank of Japan building at Rijo Dori street at Kamiya-cho, Naka-ku, Oct. 2016. It is today an art gallery. It was built in the 1930's and survived the August 1945 bombing ... virtually undamaged ... and not radiated at all

2.5 A plane dropped the a-bomb 6 August 1945 - No parachute retarder

We are told that the Hiroshima a-bomb was released at 08.15 hours local time, from an altitude of 9 855 meters by some US terrorists in an alone airplane named Enola Gay. We are not told that Hiroshima had been fire bombed previously and was already seriously damaged. What was done on 6 August 1945 was just show. The town was already evacuated after previous destruction.

Evidently this type of military attack was not suitable against industrial targets or even military troops. It was designed only to kill civilians of all ages. It was pure terrorism as terrorists target innocent civilians.

Now one B-29 plane was converted to carry and drop only one a-bomb - alone - or Enola - of 4 400 kg with 61 critical mass kilograms Uranium 235 inside. But strangely enough 64 B-29s had attacked Imabari again (!) the night just before Hiroshima was destroyed. But Imabari was already destroyed then. Probably the 64 B-29s destroyed Hiroshima by carpet napalm bombings. The alone enola plane was just propaganda!

Imagine releasing one such heavy bomb in one go from a little plane. It had never been done before. Not even a test had been done. How it was done is described at around 36.50 in this propaganda video. Admire the cheap actors playing the bomb plane crew that never existed ... like the bomb. We are told that ... ... 57 seconds later (no parachute retarder used), at the predetermined altitude of 600 m, the 4 400 kg bomb exploded directly over Shima Surgical Clinic (and close to the Bank of Japan building) producing a FIREBALL full of radiation and in an instant killing 75 000 civilians; the original aiming point was the Aioi Bridge, but wind blew it a little off course, we are made to believe. The lonely bomb thus dropped 9 255 m in 57 seconds. Average vertical velocity of the bomb was thus 162.4 m/s. If start vertical velocity was 0 and final velocity was 324.7 m/s (almost the speed of sound), it accelerated vertically at rate 5.7 m/s or 0.58g. Air resistance apparently slowed down the bomb. Start horizontal velocity was same as the plane's speed, say 100 m/s, but was reduced due to air friction, while the plane continued forward. Say that bomb horizontal speed was reduced to 50 m/s after 57 seconds, then the average horizontal speed was 75 m/s and the bomb horizontal displacement during fall until explosion was 4 275 m , i.e. the distance away from the target when dropping the bomb. The plane turned away and continued 5 700 m at reduced altitude. Had the lonely bomb dropped another two seconds, it would have crashed against the ground … and been destroyed ... and would never explode. That it actually managed to explode at 600 m altitude, while travelling at 324.7 m/s vertical speed and horizontal speed say 50 m/s after 57 seconds fly time, is evidently just magic ... or propaganda.

Approximate 57 seconds Hiroshima bomb trajectory dropping down 9.255 meters while moving forward 4 275 meters

How to trigger a destruction at 328.5 m/s total speed at exactly the right time using 1945 technology is not clear, as it had never been done before or after. Try to Google for the answer. You'll find nothing. But 100's of propaganda websites suggest that it was just done.
Note that the alone Hiroshima bomb 1945 had fixed tail fins like the 200 B61 Silver Bullet atomic gravity bombs protecting me 2017.

If the plane made 360 km/h or 100 m/s speed, when dropping the bomb and continued straight on (it turned), the plane would be only 9-10 km above from the explosion, i.e. 16 times further away than the Bank of Japan building below the explosion. Imagine if the bomb had exploded a little earlier. The plane would have been wiped away.

Anyway, an area of no military value with radius ~2 000 meters was wiped out by the Hiroshima lonely bomb FIREBALL, according the propaganda. It is suggested a 200 meters diameter FIREBALL was created in 0.016 seconds driving the blast radiation wave in all directions. The blast radiation wave then hit ground and destroyed Hiroshima and killed 75 000 persons within a second ... we are supposed to believe.

But it is just propaganda. Part of the population had already evacuated the town as the war was already lost months ago. The town was also already fire damaged due to a previous napalm bomb attack.

Probably only 7 000 persons died in the napalm bombing raids, as most people could escape to surrounding mountains and via the rivers. They were just part of the US/Japan show! The B-29 pilots thought they were napalm bombing Imabari for the second time. It was very easy to change the records later as Japan was subject the severe censorship until 1952.

A second WMD bomb was allegedly dropped late morning on a suburb of Nagasaki a few days later killing more innocent children. It was just a repeat show of Hiroshima. Nagasaki was also already damaged by conventional bombings.

There are many strange, eye witness testimonies of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki a-bombings/radiations all suggesting a bright FIREBALL accompanied by a rush of heat followed by a huge pressure wave and the rumbling sound of an explosion lasting a second. Some unlucky people were then vaporized! How the others survived is not clear. They should have been vaporized. Actually all testimonies must have been just propaganda.

If you are being vaporized or radiated to death, you cannot give testimony, of course. There are many photos of persons having being vaporized or radiated. They are just dark patches on a brighter background and how the photographer knows that it was a vaporized person is hard to understand.

The damages to Hiroshima and Nagasaki were very similar to the fire napalm bomb damages to Yokohama 10 weeks earlier. Plenty of local air fields were nearby that apparently were not attacked:

The Command's last major raid of May was a daylight incendiary attack on Yokohama on 29 May conducted by 517 B-29s escorted by 101 P-51s. This force was intercepted by 150 A6M Zero fighters, sparking an intense air battle in which five B-29s were shot down and another 175 damaged. In return, the P-51 pilots claimed 26 "kills" and 23 "probables" for the loss of three fighters. The 454 B-29s that reached Yokohama struck the city's main business district and destroyed 6.9 square miles (18 km²) of buildings; over 1000 Japanese were killed.

Imagine what propaganda creators can invent. The port itself with quays, cranes, docks and warehouses were not damaged at all. When I arrived at Yokohama May 1972 some parts of the city looked as if they had been bombed yesterday.

Still many people including children fear and worry today 2017 a lot about that an a-bomb will be used again and kill, radiate or vaporize innocent people in an awful terror attack.

But there is nothing to worry about. No atomic terrorist bombs worked neither 1945, nor 2017. But terrorist napalm carpet bombing worked 1945!

2.6 Napalm carpet bombing by terrorists

"In the (spring and) summer of 1945, the U.S. Army Air Force carried out one of the most intense campaigns of city destruction in the history of the world. Sixty-eight cities in Japan were attacked and all of them were either partially or completely destroyed. An estimated 1.7 million people were made homeless, 300,000 were killed, and 750,000 were wounded. … The destruction caused by conventional (terrorist napalm carpet bombing) attacks was huge. Night after night, all summer long, (Japanese) cities would go up in smoke."

Source

As media did not report this the most intense campaigns of city destruction in the history of the world, nobody gave a damn. Hiroshima and Nagasaki had simply been destroyed by similar US conventional napalm, carpet, morning 1 to 5 a.m., terror bombing raids by <100 B-29 planes taking off from Iwo Jima and other islands piloted by very young and stupid American boys dropping 1 500 tons of Rocky Mountains Arsenal made napalm bombs like Tokyo, Yokohama (29 May 1945*), Nagoya and 60+ other Japanese cities in 1945 killing 100 000's of innocent civilians. The only purpose of the bombing campaigns was to kill innocent civilians, i.e. pure terrorism.

That it worked was just propaganda spread by various insiders to other insiders before and after the show. Like the Nagasaki bomb. Both Japanese towns were simply destroyed by a US, standard, napalm, carpet terror bombing by about 70 B-29 planes raid before single petrol bombs exploding and setting fire to a cloud of petrol mist above the towns looking like a FIREBALL ... that could be reported as an atomic bomb. The Japanese houses were generally simple wooden structures that burnt down quickly. Growing trees on the other hand didn't burn so easy. And walls of concrete and brick buildings remained intact. Solid bank buildings were not even damaged inside! The napalm bombs were made by the US Rocky Mountains Arsenal area of which that today is an ecological disaster that will cost US$ billions to clean up.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki bomb damaged areas were quickly cleaned up after all wood/paper had burnt August 1945. Roof tiles, metal piping and cables were collected and recycled. When the allies arrived September 1945 only a barren flat city landscape could be seen with the few concrete office buildings still standing.

US propaganda June 8, 2013, suggests, e.g.:

"Japanese intelligence was predicting that U.S. forces might not invade for months. Soviet forces, on the other hand, could be in Japan proper in as little as 10 days. The Soviet invasion made a decision on ending the war extremely time sensitive.

Source

Evidently Soviet forces had few ships in the Far East to invade Japan 1945. So Japan capitulated 16 August 1945 and only USA occupied Japan until 1952. USSR and others just looked on. US President Roosevelt appointed General D MacArthur to govern Japan singlehandedly who immediately created the Civil Censorship Detachment (CCD) within its Civil Information Section. CCD was secret. You could not even say that censorship existed. Media could only publish what MacArthur approved, e.g. that MacArthur was always right! Anybody in Japan taking photos of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and suggesting, e.g. that the two a-bombs were fake was simply arrested and maybe executed because such suggestions disturbed public tranquility. How was it possible? The CCD was run by a friend of MacArthur: United Stasi of America's general Charles A. Willoughby in pure Soviet style. If you didn't agree with Charles you were shot. Charles apparently was a psychopath clever to invent things and as such suitable for US (Nazi Germany, USSR ...) Army intelligence and counter-intelligence services.

The propaganda lies and methods enforced by Charles A. Willoughby in Japan 1945-1952 are still on, of course ... 2017. KILLING OUR OWN - The Disaster of America's Experience with atomic Radiation by Harvey Wasserman & Norman Solomon with Robert Alvarez & Eleanor Walters issued as a Delta Book 1982 is typical. We are told that in the 1950's young farm boys in small villages in remote areas of the USA saw a-bombs explode in the distance and were later contaminated and died.  

Richard Rhodes has, e.g., given the definitive story of man's most awesome discovery and invention. Told in rich human, political, and scientific detail, The Making of the atomic Bomb is a narrative tour de force and a document with literary power commensurate with its subject:  

Few great discoveries have evolved so swiftly-or have been so misunderstood. From the theoretical discussions of nuclear energy to the bright glare of Trinity, there was a span of hardly more than twenty-five years. What began as merely an interesting speculative problem in physics grew into the Manhattan Project, and then into the bomb, with frightening rapidity, while scientists known only to their peers - Szilard, Teller, Oppenheimer, Bohr, Meitner, Fermi, Lawrence, and von Neumann-stepped from their ivory towers into the limelight.

But Wasserman, Solomon and Rhodes are just copying and pasting silly propaganda. An atomic WMD did not work 1945 or 1953 and doesn't work today. Isn't it good news? The US propaganda worked very well 1945 as the Japanese military government at the time was part of the deal. The Japanese happily played along and announced that two a-bombs had hit Japan ... and that Japan must surrender. And the USSR would not occupy Japan. Everybody was very happy. Of course millions of Japanese were almost starved to death during the US military occupation 1945-1952 of Japan in order not to make trouble. American secret censorship made the rest. Historians were fooled. It works 2017.

Except Klaus Fuchs, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg and some others.

Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were convicted of conspiracy to commit espionage during a time of war and to the passing of information about the a-bomb (that it didn't work!) to the Soviet Union and allegedly executed 1953, actually murdered. Or, better, were given new identities to carry on their happy lives out of the limelight?

2.7 Klaus Fuchs

2.8 The Soviet a-bombs

4 to 11 February 1945 Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin met at Yalta, USSR, to discuss how to divide the world after the defeats of Nazi-Germany and Japan. Roosevelt/Churchill indicated that they had a little surprise for Stalin. And the days/night 14/16 February central Dresden (Altstadt and Neustadt), Germany, a town of no military or industrial value was completely destroyed or burnt down by US/UK carpet napalm terror bombing raids. The only purpose was to show Stalin what happens to countries that do not respect agreements made. The Red Army arrived at Dresden early May 1945 and could see the result of UK and US governments' terrorism. There was more military industry at little Freiberg 35 kms west than at 15 times bigger Dresden but Freiberg was never bombed. My house there is still standing (and sold).

The US (fake) first atomic test bomb exploded in New Mexico 16 July 1945, we are told, and president Truman was informed, we are told, who indicated to USSR dictator Stalin 24 July 1945 at Potsdam, Germany, that USA had a new weapon.

Two days later 26 July 1945 US, UK and US puppet CKS/China but not USSR agreed and published a Proclamation Defining Terms for Japanese Surrender (the Potsdam proclamation) to the effect that

"Japan shall be given an opportunity to end this war ... for Japan to decide whether she will continue to be controlled by those self-willed militaristic advisers whose unintelligent calculations have brought the Empire of Japan to the threshold of annihilation, or whether she will follow the path of reason ... we insist that a new order of peace, security and justice will be impossible until irresponsible militarism is driven from the world .... Freedom of speech, of religion, and of thought, as well as respect for the fundamental human rights shall be established ... Japanese participation in world trade relations shall be permitted ... The occupying forces of the Allies shall be withdrawn from Japan as soon as these objectives have been accomplished ... We call upon the government of Japan to proclaim now the unconditional surrender of all Japanese armed forces, and to provide proper and adequate assurances of their good faith in such action. The alternative for Japan is prompt and utter destruction."

The alternative for Japan was not the a-bomb! It was secret. But USA didn't await any response from Japan to this proclamation. Three weeks later the fake a-bombs were brought into action. Why not? USA had invested a lot in this nonsense.

Klaus Fuchs had already 1 July 1945 told his USSR spy masters about the US test of the (fake) bomb so Stalin and/or his deputy Beria was in the picture. Two more (fake) US a-bombs destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan 6 and 9 August. In reality it was the same B-29s piloted by young, stupid American boys 18-19 years old not having a clue where they were that had destroyed Dresden a night in February that now destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki during two nights in August 1945 with their napalm bombs (and 60+ other Japanese cities). The atomic bomb 20 000 000 kg TNT FLASH, bla, bla, early morning was just propaganda.

Back in Moscow Stalin or Beria created 20 August 1945 a secret committee to produce a Soviet 'atomic' bomb, fake of course, as quickly as possible. The committee consisted of three communist gangsters, Malenkov, Voznessenski and Zaveniaguine and three corrupt scientists, Kurtchatov, Joffé and Kapitsa. Kapitsa had already 11 October 1941 written an article in Pravda about how to build an a-bomb that could wipe out a city, so it was no news. The committee also got, 11 October 1945, a full set of plans of the US (fake) bomb provided by Fuchs so it was just to copy and paste and … voilà - the USSR would have its (fake) bomb at little cost.

However, USSR had no (fake) Uranium ore or metal to produce the (fake) bomb. To produce a fake a-bomb you need enriched, fake Uranium metal to make the hoax more realistic. And the Uranium could anyway be used in peaceful, soviet, nuclear power plants. But where could Stalin get his Uranium?

2.9 Wismut AG

A quick study revealed that Saxony/Erzgebirge in the by the USSR occupied part of Germany had plenty of old, abandoned silver mines full of Uranium oxide (pitchblende). USSR secret service (NKVD/KGB) thus created (late 1945 or 1947) a German limited company, Wismut AG, to pursue mining Uranium in Saxony.

2.10 - 300 Stalin prizes

On 29 September 1949 about 300 USSR engineers and scientists received the Stalin Prize of 1st or 2nd order for the achievement to put a Soviet (fake) a-bomb together and blow it up. Imagine that the USSR managed to build in all secrecy (or copy paste together using Fuchs' fake plans) a (fake) a-bomb from scratch in only four years. USA thought it would take the USSR 20 years. All fake of course.

To scare him 1st November 1952 United States exploded its first hydrogen bomb - the H-bomb - triggered by a small (fake) a-bomb. It was 100 times stronger than the a-bomb but of course 100% fake.

Stalin didn't like it and died late 5 March 1953 murdered, shot, poisoned, sick or just faded away. Nobody knows how he died. Another mystery. One version is that Stalin was drinking, singing and dancing with his closest buddies, incl. Beria, Saturday 28 February at his datja and went to bed at 3 am 1 March and slept all Sunday. Monday 2 March Stalin was found unconscious but alive in his bed. Doctors were called but could do nothing for several days. Now and then Stalin was conscious and could eat some soup, drink some tea but couldn't speak. And then he died 5 March, still at his datja, with plenty people, doctors and nurses looking on. Medical care in the USSR was not on top!

But 1st August 1953 the USSR tested its first hydrogen bomb, too, triggered by a small a-bomb, media reported. It was 10 times stronger than the US bomb! It was of course also fake - invented by Beria (?), who at the time was in jail since 25 June - but western media said it was true. Beria was shot 23 December 1953 unless he had been murdered earlier. The cold war was heating up. But the show had to go on!

On 09:53 hours on September 14, 1954. somewhere in the USSR the above took place! Or not? To me the whole thing looks fake. Like everything nuclear weapons west/east or whatever.  Anyway, there was no radiation!

The US government propaganda by which the American people were terrorized began with the dire threat of nuclear annihilation. School children went through daily drills of falling to the floor in terror of the atomic bomb which would destroy their school. Their parents built backyard "bomb shelters" stocked with food and water. Because "scientific studies" showed that the radiation peril would last for at least five hundred years, the survivors apparently expected to spend that much time in their shelters. After years of exposure to the imminent threat of being vaporized in an atomic blast, Americans however began to ignore the threat; many of them bulldozed their bomb shelters into swimming pools. The years of being terrorized by the atomic threat had a very destructive effect on morality. If USA were to be vaporized at any time, it seemed worthwhile to seize the moment, to take pleasure, money and any other rewards while they were available and simply have fun. To stop this nonsense the US government invented new threats of all kind to scare the US citizens; war in Vietnam, etc, etc.

25 years later the USSR invaded Afghanistan December 1979 to help the local population make a revolution so that all children could go to school and that all people had access to medical assistance or whatever: they were the cover-ups of the 1979 Soviet aggression. Civil war broke out. February 1989 the USSR was defeated and left after having lost at least 14 000 dead, 53 000 physically injured and a couple of 100 000's mentally destroyed USSR soldiers - a majority of them 17-21 years old children - and civilians.

USSR never used its a-bomb toys at Afghanistan as they never existed and the USSR itself ceased to exist 1991.

The USSR/Stalin/Beria a-bombs were just fake for 42 years. Like the US ones!

But the world believed that the USSR had the a-bombs ready to drop them anywhere thanks to Western media. Modern Russia is keeping up the illusion. Doesn't cost them much ... but why not state today it was a hoax? Aha, Russia is still an a-bomb power!

2.11 A-bomb radiation 1945 and similar things 2011 and 2017 - how dangerous is the radiation at Fukushima?

11 March 2011 the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster took place. A few hours earlier there was the Tohoku very strong earthquake with its epicenter far away out at sea that produced a tsunami that later flooded the coastal area and killed ~15 000 persons and caused big physical damages and complete power failures. There were no earthquake damages anywhere on shore. The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant was however stopped due to the earthquake and before the tsunami hit the coast, i.e. control rods were lowered that absorbed the free neutrons stopping the fission and the moderating medium - water - was being cooled down by electric pumps circulating water.

The tsunami unfortunately destroyed not only the normal but also the local, in-house emergency electric power system of the Fukushima Daiichi plant (the emergency generators were located in the basement that actually was flooded first!), so the cooling pumps didn't work and some reactors overheated, when cooling failed, the moderating water started to boil, the nuclear fuel melted (!) and collected at the bottom of the combustion chamber and radioactive gasses (?) incl. hydrogen (!) leaked into the environment through safety valves and exploded (the roofs were blown off) ... we were told ... by experts ... and people could get killed by radiation (gamma rays) and radioactive fall-out poisoning! The radioactive leakages didn't occur until 3-6 days after the tsunami hit.

Eleven reactors at four nuclear power plants in the region were operating at the time and all shut down automatically when the quake hit. Subsequent inspection showed no significant damage to any from the earthquake. The operating units which shut down were Tokyo Electric Power Company's (Tepco) Fukushima Daiichi 1, 2, 3, and Fukushima Daini 1, 2, 3, 4, Tohoku's Onagawa 1, 2, 3, and Japco's Tokai, total 9377 MWe net. Fukushima Daiichi units 4, 5 & 6 were not operating at the time, but were affected. The main problem initially centred on Fukushima Daiichi units 1-3. Unit 4 became a problem on day five.

The reactors proved robust seismically, but vulnerable to the tsunami. Power, from grid or backup generators, was available to run the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) system cooling pumps at eight of the eleven units, and despite some problems they achieved 'cold shutdown' within about four days. The other three, at Fukushima Daiichi, lost power at 3.42 pm, almost an hour after the quake, when the entire site was flooded by the 15-metre tsunami. This disabled 12 of 13 back-up generators on site and also the heat exchangers for dumping reactor waste heat and decay heat to the sea. The three units lost the ability to maintain proper reactor cooling and water circulation functions. Electrical switchgear was also disabled. Thereafter, many weeks of focused work centred on restoring heat removal from the reactors and coping with overheated spent fuel ponds. This was undertaken by hundreds of Tepco employees as well as some contractors, supported by firefighting and military personnel. Some of the Tepco staff had lost homes, and even families, in the tsunami, and were initially living in temporary accommodation under great difficulties and privation, with some personal risk. A hardened emergency response centre on site was unable to be used in grappling with the situation, due to radioactive contamination.

Three Tepco employees at the Daiichi and Daini plants were killed directly by the earthquake and tsunami, but there have been no fatalities from the nuclear accident. 

The impressive hydrogen explosions that 2011 blew out the top of the walls and the roofs of the buildings housing units 1, 2, and 3 (and also 4?), allegedly releasing massive amounts of radiation, should be better clarified 2017. From where did the hydrogen originate, when cooling failed? Was it interaction of the fuel rods very hot zirconium cladding with steam? Does oxidation of the zirconium cladding at high temperatures in the presence of steam really produce hydrogen exothermically? Zirconium is extremely resistant to heat and corrosion. Was it a design fault? A significant problem in tracking radioactive release was then that 23 out of the 24 radiation monitoring stations on the plant site were disabled by the tsunami. The plant was virtually intact but 23 out of the 24 radiation monitoring stations failed. Why was that?

There were no fires anywhere. And let's face it. The roofs were just there to protect against rain and couldn't stop the radiation. With no roofs the gasses + radiation would just blow away.

Otherwise the Fukushima Daiichi (#1) nuclear power plant was intact.

There are many different, sloppy reports of the incident:

IAEA:

"Despite the efforts of the operators at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant to maintain control, the reactor cores in Units 1-3 overheated, the nuclear fuel melted and the three containment vessels were breached. Hydrogen was released from the reactor pressure vessels, leading to explosions inside the reactor buildings in Units 1, 3 and 4 that damaged structures and equipment and injured personnel. Radionuclides were released from the plant to the atmosphere and were deposited on land and on the ocean. There were also direct releases into the sea."

Wikipedia:

"The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster was an energy accident at the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant in Fukushima, initiated primarily by the tsunami following the Tohoku earthquake on 11 March 2011. Immediately after the earthquake, the active reactors automatically shut down their sustained fission reactions. However, the tsunami disabled the emergency generators that would have provided power to control and operate the pumps necessary to cool the reactors. The insufficient cooling led to three nuclear meltdowns, hydrogen-air chemical explosions, and the release of radioactive material in Units 1, 2 and 3 from 12 March to 15 March. Loss of cooling also caused the pool for storing spent fuel from Reactor 4 to overheat on 15 March due to the decay heat from the fuel rods.

WNA:

"Following a major earthquake, a 15-metre tsunami disabled the power supply and cooling of three Fukushima Daiichi reactors, causing a nuclear accident on 11 March 2011. All three cores largely melted in the first three days. … After two weeks, the three reactors (units 1-3) were stable with water addition and by July they were being cooled with recycled water from the new treatment plant. Official 'cold shutdown condition' was announced in mid-December. …There have been no deaths or cases of radiation sickness from the nuclear accident, but over 100,000 people were evacuated from their homes to ensure this. Government nervousness delays the return of many."

So we have been told about a meltdown (!!!) of the interior of the power plant. And government nervousness??

But six years later the interior is ... intact!!! But ...

And a Sasori robot was swimming (or walking?) around down there among the Sieverts ... February 2017! Sorry, it got stuck ... .

What a stupid joke! Is this serious? Is this real? 

It seems rain and snow cleans up most of Fukushima better than humans! What a surprise. 

How was it possible, that when the emergency electric power system didn't work, you could not cool down the moderating water and stop the plant? All other nuclear power plants in the vicinity were safely closed down due to the tsunami/earthquake.

Stopping the plant was standard operation for maintenance overhauls and refueling and had been done numerous times in the past.

Had a third power system been provided (on the roof?) or, if cooling could be done by gravity or by engine driven pumps, the shut down and cooling down of the plant could easily have been done as planned and the nuclear disaster avoided.

The water cooling requirements are fairly big when running at full output - about than 7.500 m³/hour for a reactor that will warm up a few degrees - but the head is small so little power is required. And much less cooling water is required in an emergency, when the unit is switched off, when higher temperatures may be allowed, and just needs to be kept cool due to natural fission. And explosive, hydrogen gasses? They should have been collected and simply been burnt off.

But the nuclear power plant experts! Who are they? All of them are supporters of the Hiroshima/Nagasaki 1945 a-bomb hoaxes. Can we trust them? They knew that plenty money can be made to scare people of ... radiation.

Due to this invented radiation dangers there was panic; people were told to leave the area and that they could not return ... forever.

The Japan Self Defense Force moved in and forcibly evacuated people forgetting it was not its job. Part of the panic and show was to temporarily close all, 50+ Japanese nuclear power plants that were running safely unaffected by any earthquakes.

You should really wonder why.

Thus - milliSieverts may be dangerous. But microSiverts and Low Dose Radiation and the Linear No-Threshold hypothesis, LNT, that Leaves No Trace, LNT? I assume James Muckerheide knows what he is talking about.

It seems also April 2016 that nobody died or has died later in Japan from radiation of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. People have died of stress and similar - being frightened or chased away from their homes by the JSDF - but radiation? The only ones getting rich were the local yakusas* that took over the alleged "cleaning up" of the areas around the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station that were sealed off at once. Reason may be that radiation hardly exceeded 3 µSv/h in most of Fukushima prefecture April 2011 and that April 2016 the situation was greatly improved.

Media were told by corrupt politicians supported by criminal, nuclear experts to exaggerate the damages to the nuclear power plant and dangers and effects of radiation and radioactive pollution and the yakusas* could hire poor, uneducated Japanese to be dressed up in white boiler suits to "clean up" the radioactivity and eliminate the radiation.

If you ask for details about the "cleaning up", you will not get any. Except that the nuclear a-bomb radiation show goes on, even if no nuclear bombs went off at Fukushima, Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

There were and are of course many political reasons to exaggerate the damages and to keep the Japanese population scared about anything nuclear and plenty corrupt Japanese politicians and civil servants were and are assisting the 71 years old a-bomb hoax and now the new, 2011 Fukushima show. But it didn't last! 29 March 2016 42 Japanese nuclear reactors are operable and potentially able to restart, and 24 of these are in the process of restart approvals. The first two restarted in August and October 2015. Evidently there was no need to stop them at all March 2011.

42 peaceful and safe Japanese nuclear reactors can provide 27% of the electrical demand and hopefully they will be up and running soon again. They should on the other hand close the nuclear museums at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They are just full of lies and nonsense about imaginary a-bombs that never exploded.

(*Yakusas are Japanese gangster cartels more powerful than any Italian or US mafia that run parts of Japan society since it was opened up to foreigners around 1860) 

There are other inhabited radioactive locations in the world, e.g. Ramsar's Talesh Mahalleh district in Iran is the most radioactive inhabited area known on Earth, due to nearby hot springs and building materials originating from them. A combined population of 2.000 residents from this district and other high radiation neighborhoods receive an average radiation dose of 10 mGy per year, ten times more than the ICRP recommended limit for exposure to the public from artificial sources. Record levels were found in a house where the effective radiation dose due to external radiation was 131 mSv/a, and the committed dose from radon was 72 mSv/a. This unique case is over 80 times higher than the world average background radiation.

The ICRP has investigated the Fukushima 2011 incident and concluded, e.g.:

There are great difficulties to communicate radiological information to non-experts and the public at large using the ICRP system and its quantities. ...

An important confusion has been triggered by the fact that the quantities equivalent dose (to an organ or tissue) and effective dose have a common unit, the sievert. ...

There have been some difficulties for transiting from the emergency exposure situation created by the accident to the existing exposure situation that will remain in the long term. A main difficulty seems to be how to define and decide when the emergency exposure situation is terminated and the existing exposure situation starts. ...

Etc, etc. Big confusion. Easy to fool people! An emergency exposure is of very short duration during the emergency, an existing exposure takes place today.

So what is the existing exposure today at Fukushima? The answer is below. But first let's review the strange units used:

Gray: The IS unit for the energy absorbed from ionizing radiation, equal to one joule per kilogram. An absorbed dose of one gray is equal to the absorption of one joule of radiation energy by one kilogram of matter. The gray is the correct unit to use when you wish to monitor energy absorbed per unit mass. 

Sievert: The IS unit for the amount of ionizing radiation required to produce the same biological effect as one rad of high-penetration x-rays, equivalent to a gray for x-rays. It measures the radioactive dose equivalent. One sievert is equal to one gray multiplied by a relative biological effective factor, Q, and a factor that takes into account the distribution of the radiation energy, N. The sievert is the correct unit to use when you wish to monitor the biological danger of radiation.

Do you follow? I do not understand anything! A geiger meter normaly tells you the dose per hour, e.g. µSv/h . But the experts use also doses per day or year. But if the radiotion varies with time, how can you calculate a dose over a year. It seems that finally the experts use µSv/h as measurement and that 1 µSv/h is not dangerous ... over a year!

Let's sum up!

1 gray (Gy) = 100 rad

1 rad = 10 milligray (mGy)

1 sievert (Sv) = 1.000 millisieverts (mSv) = 1.000.000 microsieverts (µSv)

1 sievert = 100 rem

1 becquerel (Bq) = 1 count per second (cps)

1 Bq/cm³ = 1 µSv/h . Why would anyone invent this strange equivalency and put it in a report?

1 curie = 37,000,000,000 becquerel = 37 Gigabecquerels (GBq)

For x-rays and gamma rays, 1 rad = 1 rem = 10 mSv

Millirem, mrem, is the US unit for effective dose. Americans receive 620 mrem/year.

For neutrons, 1 rad = 5 to 20 rem (depending on energy level) = 50-200 mSv

For alpha radiation (helium-4 nuclei), 1 rad = 20 rem = 200 mSv

Etc, etc.

I do not understand anything. Here we are 2017 and the scientific and medical world expertize has no unfied descriptions of (1) radiation, (2) biological danger effects of radiation on human life or anything ... except that radiation is dangerous.

The World Health Organization has investigated the radiation exposures of Fukushima:  

The present results suggest that the increases in the incidence of human disease attributable to the additional radiation exposure from the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident are likely to remain below detectable levels. ... 

To date, the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident has not resulted in acute radiation effects among workers. None of the seven reported deaths among workers is attributable to radiation exposure.

Etc, etc. 

The World Nuclear Association has also studied the radiation exposure at Fukushima:

Maybe the radiation is really >10 µSv per hour in some locations that adds up to 87 600 µSv per year or 87.6 mSv per year, which is much above the 20 mSv/year to worry about. There is plenty info about the short term emergency exposure March 2011 though that scared the population to flee. The answer probably is that the existing radiation exposure at Fukushima (apart from very close to the nuclear power plant) six years later is less than that of Ramsar's Talesh Mahalleh district in Iran today.

On the other hand, 14 April 2017 just outside the damaged nuclear power plant itself, radiation doses were <2 µSv per hour:

 It seems safe to visit Fukushima today!

2.12 The French a-bombs ... and H-bombs

But didn't France governed by our famous Général explode a-bombs 1960 and 1966, you may ask? Oui, the Général produced his first a-bomb-show February 13, 1960, in the middle of desert Sahara and 60 persons flown in witnessed it. It was followed by 16 more Sahara desert explosions, three of which also in the air. Of course, the visitors were all asked to turn around and close their eyes, when the bombs exploded (to protect their eyes) ... and were later shown photos/films of what they were supposed to have seen - a FIREBALL. They were of course impressed. Same July 2, 1966, at Mururoa, a deserted island in the middle of the Pacific with the Général as host. Only (not) seen by some flown in witnesses being asked to turn around, close their eyes, etc, etc. It was the first off 193 explosions at Mururoa of which 43 were in the air producing FIREBALLS. On 24 August 1968 the Général exploded his first H-bomb (hydrogen, thermonuclear fusion bomb ignited by an a-bomb that didn't blow the H-bomb apart doing it) at Mururoa.

The witnesses evidently had no reason to doubt what the Général told them.

All French witnesses were proud and certain to contribute to the greatness (grandeur) of France. But the Général simply fooled them. The 1960's French propaganda was not very clever. A big, impressive balloon is used to carry the various bombs in the Pacific (they must be heavy!) that allegedly explode at 600 meter altitude and the shows are filmed from very far away. All viewers are standing up in the open but are asked to turn around, when the bombs go off. In one case the FIREBALL allegedly heats up the water 600 meter below to boiling point and boiling water/vapor emerges, blah, blah, but there is no tsunami or shock wave. The films are cut to insert pictures of happy, invited Frenchmen. All FIREBALLS are simple trick film. Fooled plenty people then.

Fake photo of imaginary a-bomb explosion in the South Pacific

The French have much better ideas than a-bombs and ICBMs to protect themselves that is still working today. French nuclear submarines with short range conventional missiles are always stationed close to the allies' and enemies' shores and they can wipe out the allies' and enemies' headquarters in short time. Keep it simple.

But US invests a lot in the hoax 2015.

Imagine, e.g., all nonsense about the LGM-118 Peacekeeper:  

The LGM-118A Peacekeeper, also known as the MX missile (for Missile-eXperimental), was a land-based ICBM deployed by the United States starting in 1986. The Peacekeeper was a MIRV missile; it could carry up to 10 re-entry vehicles, each armed with a 300-kiloton W87 warhead/MK-21 RVs. A total of 50 missiles were deployed after a long and troubled development period.

As nuclear weapons do not work, imagine all money wasted (actually stolen by US Pentagon insiders) with the LGM-118 Peacekeeper. And ICBMs do not work either. They burn up at re-entry.

All atomic or nuclear bomb information is silly propaganda! Like the NASA human space travel project. To produce all the nonsense a lot of Americans are kept busy since 1945 and it has become a family business. The children, grand children and great grand children of the original propagandists keep the fire burning 2017. It is a boring job ... doing nothing ... resulting in drugs and alcohol abuse. But it is paid for by the government and it is protected by security and media will never look into it.

According Isao Hashimoto 2 053 atomic Uranium or plutonium bombs or trigger devices for hydrogen bombs have exploded in the period 1945-1998. I am happy to inform it is also all propaganda! Not one a-bomb has exploded, ever!

However, there is a new, big problem today 2017:

Nuclear terrorism!

You must have heard about it. Terrible stuff!

1 April 2016 B. Obama said:  

"... the danger of a terrorist group obtaining and using a nuclear weapon is one of the greatest threats to global security."  

The POTUS was just repeating old nonsense about a-bombs to scare at the 2016 Nuclear Scare hm Security Summit at Washington, DC, where about 50 really silly representatives of countries and some organizations met one evening for dinner and the next day (1 April) for a group photo:

Then they had lunch ... and a little chit-chat ... and went home again. Media hardly reported the meaningless encounter. What terrorist group is obtaining a nuclear weapon today? Any ideas? Let's look back!

The Nuclear Security Summit (NSS) is a bi-annual world summit, aimed at preventing nuclear terrorism around the globe.

A terrorist is a (sick) anonymous person murdering innocent civilians to scare other innocent civilians that cannot do much about it anyway. The terrorist is today normally immediately killed by local police after the murders, so it is risky business. Recent crazy examples here in France: (1) Terrorists attack a satiric magazine editorial office and kill editors and cartoonists but were hunted down and killed by police, (2) Terrorists attack Paris restaurants and music hall full of people having dinner or listening to music shooting them down but are killed in return by police. (3) A terrorist rents a heavy, slow truck and drives it into crowds of people watching fireworks at Nice killing 84 but is killed by police. (4) Terrorists interrupt morning mass/prayers in a remote village in Normandy, take a few people hostage and cut the throat of the priest but are killed by police. It is little you can do about such crazy terrorism.

Nuclear terrorism on the other hand refers to an act of terrorism in which a person or persons belonging to a terrorist organization detonates a nuclear device. But as it is not possible to detonate an a-bomb or similar nuclear device, nuclear terrorism doesn't really exist. It is an invention/propaganda to scare us! Invention? By whom?

The first Nuclear Security Summit was held at Washington DC, April 12-13, 2010, with world leaders from 47 countries incl. Turkey (Erdogan!) and three international organizations participating hosted by Obama! No terrorists that were obtaining nuclear weapons were named!

The second Nuclear Security Summit was held at Seoul, South Korea, March 26-27, 2012, with 58 world leaders from 53 states incl. Turkey (Erdogan again!) and four international organizations, including the United Nations, International Atomic Energy Agency, the European Union and INTERPOL, participated. Again no terrorists that were obtaining nuclear weapons were named!

The third Nuclear Security Summit was held at The Hague, the Netherlands, March 24 and 25, 2014, again with 58 world leaders (5 of which from observing international organizations) incl. Turkey (A. Gül - Erdogan was on vacation), some 5 000 (!) delegates and some 3 000 (!!) journalists. Imagine that - 5 000 delegates and 3 000 journalists - assembled during two days and nobody could name one terrorist that was obtaining nuclear weapons. After four years no world leaders could still identify any terrorist that was obtaining nuclear weapons. And not one of 3 000 journalists asked them! What is the purpose of media?

And at the fourth Nuclear Security Summit the few attending journalists were asked by the POTUS to leave the room and not ask any questions or report anything. ROTFL! No delegates of any kind were seen! But Recep Tayyip Erdogan, President of Turkey was there ... as he was 2010! And according Obama:

"... the danger of a terrorist group obtaining and using a nuclear weapon is one of the greatest threats to global security."  

But since 2010 Obama and 16 separate US government agencies that work to conduct intelligence activities considered necessary for the US national security haven't been able to name or identify any such terrorist group. The Washington Post reported in 2010 that there were 1 271 government organizations and 1 931 private companies in 10 000 locations in the United States that are working on counterterrorism, homeland security and intelligence, and that the intelligence community as a whole includes 854 000 people holding top-secret clearances. But none has been able to name a terrorist group trying to obtain a nuclear weapon.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, President of Turkey, is according media supporting the terrorist group ISIS, Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, just south of the border and Turkey, a member of NATO, stores plenty US a-bombs ... and nobody cares. Reason is that all a-bombs, incl. the US ones in Turkey, are dummies.

In my clear, healthy mind a-bombs and nuclear terrorists simply do not exist. Only sick military minds and sick world leaders of all kind (Turkey?) think otherwise and waste their times at semi-annual, nonsensical Nuclear Security Summits. Media are part of the show ... and are paid for it.

Go to Part 2 - Why a-bombs do not work

Heiwa Co home page