@WhiteHouse Subjective. We're paying billions to other countries... that money goes somewhere.
This is objectively not a slush fund. Twitter feed of executive branch is posting falsehood to further a point.https://twitter.com/whitehouse/status/871088348122816514 …
-
-
-
Then it's a fund. Not a slush fund.
-
Again, subjective. Depends on whether you think the recipients deserve it or not.
-
That is still not the correct use of slush fund as a term.
-
It's somebody's slush fund. Just depends who. Third world dictators, most likely.
- 他1件の返信
新しい会話 -
-
-
There is something apropos about calling a global warming related fund a "slush fund" given what is happening at the poles.
- 会話の終了
新しい会話 -
-
-
The French Foreign Ministry annotated the White House's videohttps://twitter.com/francediplo_EN/status/870699642509512704 …
0:40 - 他2件の返信
新しい会話 -
-
-
.
@maggieNYT No Maggie , The Executive Branch is posting LIES! LIES! It's not hard to say or write. -
Lies. They are lying. Intentional misleading is to lie. They are lying. Use the word lie.
-
A falsehood is a lie that either can't be or isn't being proved that the speaker knows it is false.
-
I can guarantee he knows it isn't a slush fund. He has the full knowledge of the US government to draw from.
-
If an adult can't explain it to him with finger puppets and dolls then he honestly might not understand.
-
Oh, we all know he knows EXACTLY what a slush fund is...
-
Yes. He is a living slush fund.
会話の終了
新しい会話 -
読み込みに時間がかかっているようです。
Twitterの処理能力の限界を超えているか、一時的な不具合が発生しています。やりなおすか、Twitterステータスで詳細をご確認ください。