Biological explanation for Monkeybranching

[Billy&The CloneasaurusParticipant 388]

All men have seen the absolute lack of loyalty that women have for men. No matter how good you treated her, and how deep a bond you thought you had with her, they always walk away with a cold heart. I started to wonder why is this? It’s not enough to say AWALT, or women are disloyal…yes, this is definitely true, but what caused such a massive difference between men and women? I’m a big fan of Darwin, and evolution is an undeniable fact for anyone who cares to look at the evidence. I submit this:

Women monkeybranch solely because of their very short fertility window…the Wall, if you will. It would be a huge disadvantage to women if they remained heartbroken over a failed relationship, as they have precious little time before their eggs dry up as they slam head first into the Wall. So, nature crafted them to be utterly heartless in moving from one potential mate to another. Men, of course, age like a fine wine, so there is no biological penalty for being heartbroken. This is why men care much much more than women do. They can afford to.

No man should beat himself up over a woman he thought loved him, and then discarded him like he was nothing to her. It has NOTHING to do with the man. It’s biology. She’s spoiling rapidly, like a glass of milk left out in the hot sun. She can’t remain loyal…the biological cost is too high.

[GregB0Participant 377]

Agreed Billy, it’s genetic for them to seek their perspective of the most powerful, protective, resource rich mate. And then to Saddle that mate with enough spawn so that they, the female, remains relevant to the Male.

[pharmerParticipant 349]

I can see you put effort into this and its a nice bit of work but like so many bad female behaviours, cheating, shopoholic, psycho, sex witholding, passive agressive… (the endless list ) you can just say

BECAUSE WOMAN

Never fuck a crazy chick.

[GargamelParticipant]

Yes, it was always that way.

But feminism told them to be proud of their shittiness and removed all social graces.

The churches and religions of the world had installed a costume of rules and regulations to stabilize social life and created “the family” social system to enable multiplication of mankind.

And mankind “exploded” all over the world.

Feminism “liberated” women from these “systems” and beliefs.

Now these systems die off and the number of humans will be in a steady decline. Returning to the stone age.

Isn’t that what we see: Welfare queens sitting in their caves with 4 children from different men already like it was back then?

And the tribal chatter and gossip “from cave to cave” is now done by smartphone.

The family is dead because women are now returning to their real nature.

Men with such romantic belief systems must face it: GAME OVER.

:::::: Uncunting in progress: We are now low-level formatting the hard disk with the feminist virus on it ::::::

[BoarParticipant 3538]

Billy&The Cloneasaurus wrote:

No man should beat himself up over a woman he thought loved him, and then discarded him like he was nothing to he

That is what the courts are for.

Billy&The Cloneasaurus wrote:

It has NOTHING to do with the man. It’s biology the wallet.

I fixed that for you. And to be honest, anything that excuses whimyns behavior as biology, nature or social conditioning I find to be rather suspicious.

[YZF-R1Participant 3378]

Billy&The Cloneasaurus wrote:

She’s spoiling rapidly, like a glass of milk left out in the hot sun. She can’t remain loyal…the biological cost is too high.

I may use this in my sig. I believe in creation but I still give you a +1. It works in my frame of reference as well. Good job.

She’s spoiling rapidly, like a glass of milk left out in the hot sun. She can’t remain loyal…the biological cost is too high. - Billy & The Cloneasaurus

[Author]

Posts