102
103

RuPauls comment on the events in Manchester, accompanied with a weird gif. (mobile.twitter.com)

jlw_01Sasha Velour が 投稿

全 89 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]kummerbund 164 ポイント165 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Hacked by Lucian.

[–]jlw_01Sasha Velour[S] 65 ポイント66 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Revolucian - Part 2: The Ruturn.

[–]kummerbund 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'd buy into a drag Trapped in the Closet version.

[–]superinamaxinaShea Couleé 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (0子コメント)

RuvoLucian.

[–]LilyMeSasha Velour 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Literally the first thought that popped into my head.

[–]imguralbumbot 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hi, I'm a bot for linking direct images of albums with only 1 image

https://i.imgur.com/KS7sjs4.gifv

Source | Why? | Creator | ignoreme | deletthis

[–]rifoistShea Couleé 43 ポイント44 ポイント  (17子コメント)

As if there aren't people who haven't spent their whole lives studying and understanding what motivates terrorists. Go read/research some shit Ru.

[–]eelsifyTrinity Taylor 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/why-hate-you-isis-reveal-8533563

[–]wish_boneEez tulle 35 ポイント36 ポイント  (0子コメント)

MOM?!..... Could you go fix your hair?

[–]brennanbocksSasha Velour 48 ポイント49 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Vaporwave Realness

[–]thedragdoctorAlexis Michelle 46 ポイント47 ポイント  (0子コメント)

is 'piane-ing' a verb now ???

[–]Mimi_Im_LastI will never be glamour 131 ポイント132 ポイント  (14子コメント)

There's fucking children dead and STILL this new age bullshit "objectivity" and "consciousness" barnum effect bollocks.

Normally it's mildly amusing, in this context it pisses me off. You did too much ketamine in the 90's Ru and you're a celebrity not a fucking muse. Gross.

[–]pidgehoettoValentina 96 ポイント97 ポイント  (12子コメント)

I still to this day cannot get over the story about her seeing some guys boat sinking and instead of calling the fucking emergency services like any sane person she sent "positive energy"

[–]CelraTrinity Taylor 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (2子コメント)

This actually happened?! I've never heard of this story until now mainly because I can't sit and listen to Ru and Michelle on a podcast.

I'd like to believe that Karma will handle Ru and someday Ru will be lost/car broken down in the middle of nowhere with no cell signal and someone will just drive by him by and send some "positive energy" and keep driving.

[–]cmgirty 17 ポイント18 ポイント  (0子コメント)

In case you don't wanna search.

"I remember once I had this place that overlooked the Hudson River, and I saw this guy on a sailboat and it had capsized and I went to the phone thinking, 'I've got to call someone.' But then I thought, 'What's the best thing I can do? You know what? I'm gonna pray for this person. I'm gonna send them loving energy.'"

[–]bidonicaTrinity Taylor 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's halfway through this interview: https://www.buzzfeed.com/patrickstrudwick/this-is-what-happens-when-you-interview-rupaul-and-he-throws?utm_term=.jjy55eZNy#.pj6QQ6lPn

[–]Mimi_Im_LastI will never be glamour 28 ポイント29 ポイント  (8子コメント)

See I won't lie, that to me is funny, using this tragedy to try and promote how removed she is from the "human condition", not cute. I'm gonna go watch old Ru before she turned into this piece of shit till I hate her less.

[–]JENHhhhBrand™ Ambassador 27 ポイント28 ポイント  (5子コメント)

This and her recent bitching about millennials made me angry, but also confused and a little concerned. Where is all of this coming from all of a sudden?

[–]bl_isaSasha Velour 32 ポイント33 ポイント  (1子コメント)

she's been on her millennial hatred, but the part I really don't get is who else does she think is subscribing to her flazeda New Ageism? She sure as hell acts like a millennial with the garbage "inspirational" quotes, oil pulling, food medicine, etc.

FYI, Ru, millennials are 20-30 year-olds gentrifying neighborhoods, drinking from mason jars, and doing yoga and reiki to cure chronic conditions. They're not fifteen year-olds on tumblr talking about pc culture. I think she's got her generations confused. Ru acts a millennial.

[–]genderfvckerMichelle's wig line 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

wow so dumb

[–]Zolome1977 6 ポイント7 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Its social media, what we are using right now. It allows us to instantly broadcast our thoughts across the globe. Most people don't stop to think how that message will be interpreted but just feel the need to share. Trolls on the other hand think very hard on what they are going to say to make sure people get their message.

[–]brendanrouthRETURNSmask4mask 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Trolls are in some ways the most responsible users of social media.

[–]awfuldaring 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's not recent. If you listen to the podcast, which goes back a while, at least 3 years, you can see Ru and Michelle discussing this kind of stuff. Mostly it's charming, occasionally it's cringy. They have evolved in the past three years, though. I don't think it's fair to criticize them as a whole as a piece of shit, just sometimes flawed like most humans are. They remind me of my parents' generation.

[–]thebestdaysofmyflermPeppermint 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Seriously? It's very harsh to call her a piece of shit because of one goofy tweet.

[–]Mimi_Im_LastI will never be glamour 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

You think that trivialising dead children is "goofy"? You are also a piece of shit.

[–]vmathematicallysexy 16 ポイント17 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Totally agree with you. I like it when people look beyond themselves and ask existential questions.

What I can't stand however is when people ask age old questions and post about it on social media with cheesy artwork to look like they're soooo deep. It's vapid "intellectual masturbation". Most people seem to get off just from asking the question, not from trying to actually think critically.

[–]captaincanuck89Fresh Tilapia 41 ポイント42 ポイント  (0子コメント)

But when will we talk about Squarespace?

[–]HefaesWelcome back, wennie lovers. 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Shet,... she was not inmune to the madness,... I thought Michelle was gonna be america's next drag queen nervous breakdown

[–]Vanilla____Gorilla 30 ポイント31 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thanks for that Ru, really helping

[–]mr_marky 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Jesus Ru...I get it, you're all about reaching higher plane of enlightenment (inbetween SquareSpace and Squatty Potty, natch) but sometimes "Thinking of those affected..." is plenty.

[–]vmathematicallysexy 79 ポイント80 ポイント  (24子コメント)

As a philosophy major, I've got a huge problem with her request to discuss human consciousness objectively.

I mean, technically speaking, human consciousness appears to be a convergent property of neural activity in the brain (the brain is the actual object). But we cognize human consciousness through our subjective experience of reality. So if I'm not mistaken, to discuss consciousness objectively would require the speaker to have knowledge of reality that is objective and not derived from experience/the senses.

Just saying Mama Ru if you're gonna dis millennials, don't be actin' a fool and tryna get all existential with a lil twitter logorrhea and an artsy gif. That rotating 3d head is just the same head reflected on itself with the vector normals flipped on one side. #calledoutbytheSTEMqueen

[–]NinaLevinTatianna 44 ポイント45 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I just saw Sasha girl!

[–]vmathematicallysexy 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Gender is a social construct, tear it apart!

[–]Zolome1977 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (5子コメント)

Don't sociopaths not see the head coming out of the inverse or is that some other experiment of concave?

[–]vmathematicallysexy 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (4子コメント)

No idea, sounds interesting though! I play around with 3D modeling and 3D printing a lot and I've made really odd models before that disappear at certain angles and turn inside out at other angles. Shit is trippy as all hell

[–]Zolome1977 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (3子コメント)

I found it, I was thinking of this https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wired.com/2009/04/schizoillusion/amp/

[–]TehKita 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (2子コメント)

Friend I was super nervous for a minute, I've seen this illusion before at a museum and I def saw the face as concave (my brain didn't 'fix it') but it was stationary and not moving... The movement must be important to this test, though... Super interesting!

[–]Zolome1977 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I found it interesting but I wouldn't worry to much about it, meaning anything to you personally. Unless a doctor says you are, news on the internet should be taken with a grain of salt.

[–]doctorhotpantsValentina 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, I had to concentrate in order to see the illusion -- I just kept seeing a concave face for a few rotations. I'm bad at seeing optical illusions, though, and always have been. Those unfocus your eyes and see the picture in the static posters were the bane of my existence as a kid. Clearly, I must be schizophrenic, even though I exhibit no other symptoms.

[–]bl_isaSasha Velour 18 ポイント19 ポイント  (9子コメント)

I'm a philosophy minor, and agreed! New Ageism presumes to be so deep but is so anti-intellectual. I was into it in high school until I got to college and started actually, you know, reading stuff. Like you said, we have no knowledge of a reality that is objective. We can't even prove that objective reality exists.

Stupid deferments to objective/subjective experiences signal to me that someone's going to start talking in some sort of shallow-deep New Age bs. Actual discussions on the notions of objectivity/subjectivity culturally, philosophically, and in an embodied sense, are a lot more interesting.

[–]thebestdaysofmyflermPeppermint 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Like you said, we have no knowledge of a reality that is objective. We can't even prove that objective reality exists.

But then is Ru wanting to talk about consciousness objectively any worse than wanting to talk about anything objectively?

[–]bl_isaSasha Velour 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

no it's not, you're right. No one can ever claim objectivity. In fact, the search for something that is objective is, well, one of the central tenants of religion.

[–]noey101Nina Bo'nina Brown 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (6子コメント)

This is all real interesting, are there any reads you'd recommed for someone who doesn't really study philosophy? Beginners level I'd love to read more about it /u/vmathematicallysexy same question, thank you!

[–]bl_isaSasha Velour 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (2子コメント)

tbh I'm a sucker for the Platonic dialogues. I think they're accessible to beginners, too, because they're written as conversations. The language is definitely tricky for beginners, but most everything you'd ask is asked within the dialogue. Also love Daoist philosophy.

Personally, I didn't major in philosophy because I think it is largely inaccessible. I definitely enjoy it, but the field is so overwrought with old white dudes who like to sit around and think they're smarter/more intellectual/more "objective" than everyone else. There are a lot of ways to get into philosophy without having to read dense texts...movies, books, attending a religious service (embodied philosophy), even children's books (The Little Prince!) are filled with philosophy.

[–]vmathematicallysexy 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

This is the T. Philosophy is FILLED with douchebags and it makes me really sad.

Philosophy is for everyone though. Just sit down, relax, and pick a question to think about. It's really fun to do once you learn to ask the right questions, because most things in life that seem trivial actually end up being infinitely complex and you only end up at half-baked answers at best. But that's the fun of it. Not only are we animals that hardly understand reality, we think we do and we pretend we do and we try desperately to figure it all out. And nature is just like hoe no she betta don't and thus here I am now typing about philosophy on the RPDR subreddit while I'm sitting on the toilet.

[–]vmathematicallysexy 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sry bout the nonsequitor ending to that post. I just wanted to wrap things up so I could get back to smoking dis bowl

[–]BellatrixaCalliopeTrinity Taylor 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sophie's World was what personally got me into Philosophy. I know you were asking other people, but this book really was great at introducing various philosophical concepts to me when I was at high school, a couple of years after it was published. It's not specifically geared at kids/teens, but the book's easy to digest without being patronising. It'll give you some insights into various philosophers that might encourage you to read more about a person/idea. Hope that helps!

[–]vmathematicallysexy 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (1子コメント)

That is so badass you're interested in reading about this stuff!!

/u/noey101 what reading level are you? If you're at college/academic reading level, I suggest checking out any of David Hume's work. He was one of the greatest skeptics in history and his writings on existence of the self are both mind-blowing and frustrating as hell to read. Youll see what I mean haha. If you're brave, read on every of his books. Otherwise there's tons of excerpts online that are still fairly easy to read. I personally really enjoy really dense writing (probably why I'm a philosophy+theoretical math major lmao)

I think the riggory of Hume's skepticism is really useful in today's crazy sociopolitical era. Helps you ask the right questions to filter out the bullshit. I.e.-

Me: gender is a construct, tear it apart Person: that's stupid, there are only two genders Me: How do you know that there are two genders? Person: it's always been that way Me: So because things were a certain way at one point, they should never evolve or change? Person: shit

That's a super contrived example but ya haha I fucking love philosophy. Most people think it's useless but it's the basis for the sciences: it's the study of rigorous thinking and reasoning.

[–]noey101Nina Bo'nina Brown 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thank you all very much!! /u/bl_isa /u/bellatrixacalliope I'll check everything 💕 #BrainyQueens

[–]RambunctiousGayShea Couleé 3 ポイント4 ポイント  (1子コメント)

Come through R.M Hare! Oh-no-she-betta-Descartes

[–]vmathematicallysexy 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

YOU 👏🏼 ARE👏🏼 AMAZING!

[–]Fishy-or-ShadeNaysha's number one fan. 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (3子コメント)

Think she just meant we need to discuss about what motivates someone to intentionally do something so horrible, without bringing religion and race into this, because at the end of the day, terrorism in the UK has not only been from islamists.

You can't seriously dissect a tweet with what you learned in your phylosophy classes.

[–]vmathematicallysexy 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

A self-aware and intelligent person tends to have well supported opinions and consistent reasoning. People that don't think critically will usually have a mess of contradictory nonsense floating around their head.

I realize nothing I said sounded playful, but I actually think it's really entertainting to hold people to their own standards. It's like the philosophical version of reading a bitch haha.

[–]RambunctiousGayShea Couleé -1 ポイント0 ポイント  (1子コメント)

...Er, actually you can, and arguably you should. The different schools of philosophy cover every issue and topic going, and philosophy (literally the science of thought) teaches one to be a well-rounded, considered and above all EXPERIENCED thinker. Philosophy prepares you for everything, one uses it in every activity.

[–]vmathematicallysexy 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

^ upvoted for spilling all the T in china

[–]jlw_01Sasha Velour[S] 12 ポイント13 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Also this: https://mobile.twitter.com/rupaul/status/867349976120152064

[–]kingdom6656Shea Couleé 15 ポイント16 ポイント  (1子コメント)

I try to politely look past her perpetual self-serving psychobabble, but this is too much. This really isn't the time or the place to promote your inner saboteur theories or self-help techniques.

[–]CaribWhoJaymes Mansfield 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I mean, right there with you on the whole psychobabble thing, but she's kinda got a point. These types of things don't happen in a vacuum. It's not enough to simplify the issue and chuck it up to evil people. The truth is, most of us are capable of terrible things, and I think trying to understand the motivations behind such a terrible and senseless act can help us prevent it in the future.

[–]miloennitSasha Velour 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

What you see, isn't always the truth.

[–]MsLaxativeAlyssa Edwards 8 ポイント9 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I wonder what she searches to find these kinda gifs

[–]bripatrickAlways On Brand™ 10 ポイント11 ポイント  (0子コメント)

She knew the bomb was there, and started to reach for the phone to call it in but then realized she'd be serving the victims better by just sending them positive energy and thoughts.

[–]luke_okurrrreally queen? 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think she had a weird acid trip that morning

[–]blowhardV2 4 ポイント5 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is when Ru's drug use and time spent in Hollywood really shows.

[–]KMS1313Aja 5 ポイント6 ポイント  (0子コメント)

What

[–]chillaxiconNina Bo'nina Brown 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

What the fuck???

[–]BlankNothingNoDoerNina Bo'nina Brown 1 ポイント2 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Who determines whether or not the conversation is objective? I think that is the whole problem. There is no easy answer. There's not even a difficult one.

[–]ronniefase 2 ポイント3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

She is mother

[–]functionofsassAlexis Michelle 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ah, children, smh.

[–]hamis4Nina Bo'nina Brown 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

has rupaul been kidnapped

[–]autohypnosis 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (0子コメント)

Trinity looks good

[–]Fishy-or-ShadeNaysha's number one fan. 0 ポイント1 ポイント  (1子コメント)

How is this offensive? I believe it is much more valuable than a generic post.

[–]chrisrosendahl -4 ポイント-3 ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is intellect demonstrated on a high level (a fierce one)