Things I wish existed: apartment buildings with a “mandatory savings clause.” Add in whatever is needed to make it palatable, but fundamentally make people contribute to a savings account each month an amount equal to their rent (increase or decrease by factors required), and that savings account can’t be withdrawn from such that it would fall below amount per month * min(months stayed, 24) before the person retires or leaves the apartment building.

Why on earth would this be a good idea? Wealthy people may be assholes in many ways, but they aren’t going to be obviously dealing drugs in the corridors, they will be more considerate about loud music and parties, and they generally prefer being around other wealthy people for this and other reasons. Traditionally, we’ve kept poor people out of places by actually charging them money, but this results in low savings, insecurity, and much more being spent on wasteful housing than needs to be spent. This method allows for individuals to live cheaply without having to suffer the injury of dealing with low-income people

Notes

  1. formerbishie reblogged this from ranma-official and added:
    Yeah, I fucked up and should have checked OP’s tags. Sorry.
  2. raginrayguns said: i wonder if the X changes with the difficulty of eviction
  3. greenrd said: I don’t know where the idea that the EXISTENCE of expensive housing makes people homeless came from. It’s insufficient affordable housing that makes people homeless. This is due to a market failure that would be fixed by a land value tax, building massive amounts of public housing, or both. Moralising leftism sucks. It’s a bit like those people who tell you you’re evil if you eat meat (I used to be one of those people when I was young and naive).
  4. towerofglass reblogged this from leviathan-supersystem and added:
    “ Hey guys, I have this new Rational idea for making sure only the wealthy live under rooves. This is sure to keep us...
  5. philosoraptrix reblogged this from leviathan-supersystem
  6. shituationist said: how long are us non-leninists gonna have to answer for shit leninist one party regimes did
  7. shituationist said: “it’s wrong to discriminate on the basis of class” “uhm, what about gulags? checkmate, communists :^)”
  8. leviathan-supersystem reblogged this from greenrd and added:
    i feel it’s worth noting that i am not a supporter of gulags or even tankie-ish gulag jokes. nonetheless, even in...
  9. greenrd reblogged this from leviathan-supersystem and added:
    How evil is it compared to gulags?“Unfathomably evil” is a bit strong.This is basically a disguised presentation of...
  10. its-okae-carly-rae reblogged this from gunsanddopeparty2020 and added:
    This is a satire of urban homeownership and condos, isn’t it?
  11. razors-on-her-tongue said: wealthy people arent even considerate or quiet
  12. gunsanddopeparty2020 reblogged this from dataandphilosophy and added:
    bad post
  13. split-at-the-seems said: ‘satire’ and 'parody’ is bullshit - it’s that same testing the waters 'god can’t you take a joke’ nonsense that fascists have been using for years
  14. philippesaner reblogged this from canmom and added:
    Yeah, I’m not sure what point OP’s trying to make either.Personally I’m assuming the best, and treating the post as...
  15. canmom reblogged this from philippesaner and added:
    so fair cop that I didn’t check the OP’s tags and took it as a sincere post. (it’s a very deadpan discussion, and I was...
  16. phenoct reblogged this from alexanderrm
  17. jimrandomh reblogged this from dataandphilosophy and added:
    This would last for about three months before people realized they could use that savings account as collateral to...
  18. thewordywarlock reblogged this from transgirlnausicaa
  19. alexanderrm reblogged this from immanentizingeschatons and added:
    This sort of thing is already extremely normalized by society- literally the very existence of suburbs and the primary...
  20. dankcommunism reblogged this from decadent-trans-girl
  21. dronegoddess reblogged this from ranma-official and added:
    Oh. But that’s not obvious at all unless you look at the tags on the original post, which most people don’t do. And it’s...
  22. ranma-official reblogged this from formerbishie and added:
    It’s almost as if - almost as if - the OP is a parody and explicitly says “it’s a parody” in the tags.It comes at a zero...
  23. dataandphilosophy posted this