Operation Destroy Milo
In case you didn't realize that the concerted effort to take down Milo was a designated media hit that is aimed to divide and conquer Republicans. From /pol/ yesterday. Note the timestamp.
I have to say that I'm very pleased with both the Dread Ilk and the Castalia House authors. Very few of the former, and absolutely none of the latter, were foolish enough to be taken in by it, and more than a few contacted me to let me know of their support for Milo.
FYI the MSM has a huge fucking media onslaught that is set to go live Monday to scorch earth Milo and destroy him via the pedophile label.They are particularly frightened of the Alt-Right, of course, because only the Alt-Right has the courage to actually attack them instead of cowering dutifully before them like cucks or going gracefully down to noble defeat like conservatives.
I'm part of a mailing list (not giving my real name or the name of the list for the sake of protecting my ass from retaliation) but they have been sitting on the story for a while, because they thought Milo was small fries and wanted to wait until he got big enough a thread to go nuclear on.
The journalists are pissed the fuck off Maher put him on the air and more so, pissed off his book deal had not been revoked (and some are pissed that Milo got a book deal from the same publisher who dropped Zoe Quinn's book, along with a larger signing bonus than most of the publisher's social justice authors).
There are also those who want to hurt him simply as a proxy to hurt Steve Bannon/Breitbart. since their attempts to attack Bannon have largely failed. Not to mention people on the left being pissed off that most people sided with Milo over the rioters. Rioters, that were paid for by Soros through a variety of fronts and laundered through companies that can't be traced back to him.
Expect a steady drumbeat of "Milo is a pedophile" and "Milo must be dropped from CPAC". The later is especially important, in terms of the divide and conquer long game the press is playing: the press wants a civil war with the McCain/Graham wing of the GOP and the Trump/Ryan wing so as to weaken the Republicans in 2018. The overall plan is to make the Republicans fear social shaming from the media and the left more than they do their actual constituents who love Trump, in hopes of regaining the House and enough Senate seats to pull off an impeachment of Trump.
It matters in so far as it's an attempt to go after anyone connected with the alt-right silenced and destroyed publicly.Keep that in mind if you feel inclined to wax indignant and turn your back in huffy righteousness on Milo, Gavin, Steve, Laura, Ann, or Anthony. Or, eventually, Mike Cernovich, Stefan Molyneux, and me. You are being played by the Left. You are, quite literally, serving their interests.
Case in point, there are a couple of journalists sitting on some nasty shit Gavin McInnes did when he was with Vice. Stuff Shane Smith personally helped said reporters gather (since Shane hates Gavin and would gladly backstab in a heart beat).
Also know they have been soliciting shit on Steve Crowder, Laura Southern, Ann Coulter, along with trying to get their grubby hands on as much anti-PC footage and audio they can gather to take down Anthony Cumia, since Cumia keeps surviving every hit they try on him. They are going the long view angle.
The right are at a crossroads in that a younger generation has risen and going conservative, which kills their plan for a never-ending wave of kids being born and each generation being SJW types.
The media in particular, has started to notice as well that after years of ignoring the internet, that the libertarian wing of the GOP have started colonizing their own segment of the internet that grows stronger every day. They blame Bannon for this; Bannon was the one who saw the need (one that Breitbart himself ignored) that you need to make conservativism sexy and young; Fox News may have served a purpose, but it's too tied to older folks and more so, bound to the old axis of religious right/big business, that Trump's election and the youthquake shattered with Trump's ascension.
Milo, Southern, McInnes, Crowder, Compound Media are basically the right's version of MSNBC/Vice/Daily Show/Colbert Report. I'd also toss in Alex Jones, but Jones is considered a whole other beast in than the others in a lot of ways, by my fellow journalists so I'm leaving him out.
Them being on the internet also puts them beyond the traditional media's reach to silence them. And they are bringing in the young conservatives and converting jaded, pissed off liberals to the right.
They want them dead, now while they are still on the brink of mainstream acceptance, because the left is TERRIFIED of the right having their own version of John Stewart/Stephen Colbert/Samantha Bee/John Oliver types and the mainstream media definitely wants to kneecap the right claiming any significant internet territory to rival the left's control over most of the internet.
I have to say that I'm very pleased with both the Dread Ilk and the Castalia House authors. Very few of the former, and absolutely none of the latter, were foolish enough to be taken in by it, and more than a few contacted me to let me know of their support for Milo.
Labels: cuckservative, media, SJW
190 Comments:
Just assume everything you say is being recorded and may be used later to hurt you
It was obvious after the quick announcement of the S&S book deal cancellation that this was a planned takedown. Milo's flaws notwithstanding, I like him, and I'd happily fight alongside even someone I dislike against the globalist media.
The left thinks this is a juicy news cycle, but this hit won't do a damn thing in the end. Meanwhile, any moves the right makes in the next few days will go completely unnoticed and unchallenged. An opportunity in disguise if I ever saw one.
So Castalia House will move into the big leagues of publishing, passing Simon and Schuster. These people are nuts. Milo has non-alt right people wanting to read him, so the MSM hands him and his prospective readers off to Vox Day.
The old media are only here to tell the old folks that everything's OK and get a few more nickels out of them.
Yes, it was/is a coordinated attack. But I think the allegations are true. Sadly. Mr. Yiannopoulos was always a scandal waiting to happen. Sex with drug dealers? Talking about using hard drugs? Talking about paying good money for choking? I am frankly amused by the incompetence of the media unable to fly over to England and looking for a big fat closet full of skeletons.
Mayby this scandal is fake news. But there is always someone somewhere willing to talk. And they will find him.
All of these attacks on 'victim' groups will only further negate the phenomenon of identity politics.
Now we just need some faux Muslim dissenters who are central to the movement.
The current liberal agenda is to divide and conquer, if only we could surface the facts to demonstrate just that.
I think that, during Milo's press conference, he should thank his attackers.
Thank his attackers, for giving him the motivation to see a therapist to start the healing process from his abuse as a child. Thank them for bringing attention to the victims of pedophilia. Thank the media for joining Trump in the fight against pedophiles.
The therapist, of course, will be of the kind that Molyneux would approve of.
Skeletons are only an issue if you try to hide them. Milo has never pretended to be anything other than what he is.
@5 So are you a concern troll or an idiot?
It doesn't matter that Milo has weaknesses or things about him we don't like (or even that disgust us). He's on our side - even if he isn't alt right, he does more for us than 10,000 weak-stomached no-balls cucks that go running for cover any time the lugenpresse comes out with fresh bullshit to sling at someone on the right.
HE IS OUR ALLY - WARTS AND ALL. YOU PROTECT YOUR ALLIES, YOU DO NOT DISCARD THEM. WE ARE NOT CUCKS, WE DON'T GIVE A SHIT WHAT THE MEDIA OR THE CUCKS THINK.
I don't like a lot about Milo, but Milo is useful and an ally. We can bitch about his disgusting homosexuality AFTER we've saved Western Civilization.
This all seems like a lose-lose proposition for the Left. Here's how this could end:
1. Milo's position among the alt-lite is strengthened and he gains a new contingent of rabid fans
2. Milo gets taken down, but in the process the Left has to affirm its hatred for pedophilia AND have a light shone on the fact that pederasty plays a huge part in the developing of homosexual identity. If PizzaGate gets blown open right after this and several high-level leftists and Cuckservatives are taken down, the Left can't use normalization tactics to defend the pedos, since it just spent tons of digital ink decrying man-boy lovin'...
Is this the best Timeline to be in or what?
@5 Sex with drug dealers? Talking about using hard drugs? Talking about paying good money for choking?
Wow, those sound like excerpts from Dreams From My Father.
Gavin, Steve, Laura, Ann and Anthony wish they could get the furor that Milo got recently. Gavin threw actual punches, and Laura suffered them: still, a sub-head for Milo antics.
If you hitch your wagon to a gay mule, don't be surprised when you end up in San Francisco. If that's where gay mules naturally migrate. Honestly, I don't know.
But on my Why Should I Give A Shit Scale, two Yankees, three Canadians and a British fag don't even register.
Also, if you are on any kind of social media where members of the public can see - any time you post about Milo, make sure you compare to Lena Dunham. Explain they are trying to railroad Milo for something he allegedly SAID, whereas they had no problem excusing Lena Dunham for ACTUALLY ABUSING HER SISTER.
If anyone has a doubt of the global coordination and ownership of the propaganda legacy media, here in Spain in the most popular news website, this is a stand out article.
Keep in mind here Milo is a completely unknown for common people.
http://internacional.elpais.com/internacional/2017/02/21/estados_unidos/1487637119_429406.html
"Milo Yiannopoulos, the breitbart star, radical media supporting Trump, defends pederasty.
Those taking flak are confirmed over the target. Bombs away!
The Left has the mind of a crazy woman, IMO this will blow up in their faces.
#IStandWithMilo
That is all. . .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdNn5TZu6R8
PUSH!
They didn't stop gamergate
They didn't stop Trump
They aint stopping the dangerous faggot.
Alice De Goon wrote:Is this the best Timeline to be in or what?
It is very hard because of all the awful things. But in this timeline we're dealing with it.
And MILO is going to come up top with the haters having just elevated his profile and enhanced his anti-pedo quest.
[insert gay joke about tops]
I dont support Milo, but flinging mud at Milo wont work, as all his college tours & lectures are free ... he has no income stream from the mainstream
Also Milo made a mistake by releasing a lengthy retraction, he should've just said he meant 16 year old teens
They tried all this shit with plenty of comedianes, Anne Coulter, MRA's, & Trump ... Trump is now president
Flinging mud doesnt work, except get you banned from liberal campus's, Anne Coulter doesnt give a shit, her book sales are through the roof
I'm not a fan of Milo, but this is obviously a media hit job.
The New right may be divided in that a lot of us don't care about that shit. We grew up in the nineties listening to Marylin Manson and watching early adult swim. I couldn't give a toss if some fag wants to get his rocks off with a loaded gun held to his temple. His opinions on paedephilia should be taken as the unfiltered thoughts of someone on the receiving end of abuse. I can't say much about it but he can and that's useful.
The number of concern trolls who showed up yesterday was insane. These names have never showed up before. Of course, the sheer number was a clear tip-off, kind of like in the Last Samurai when there were 75 ninja when 1 would have been more effective.
Then suddenly all these obvious pearl-clutchers show up to condemn Milo.
These guys were obviously paid trolls, however there are still some "Debutante Dad" type rightists out there who recoil at the slightest bit of dirt and grit. Fortunately they're most easily identifiable due to Trump.
Once again, it pays to check here first before saying or doing anything.
If Milo were to actually come out and support pedophilia then I would not be able to support him, media hit job or not.
But that's not what happened. I watched the video. I read the transcript. And he did nothing of the sort.
In fact, he explicitly stated the opposite. He said British AOC laws were 'probably right' (as in, should not be set lower) and repeatedly stated that his words were not to be interpreted as support for pedophilia.
All of this is just another example of a fake news hit job. And all it does, for me any way, is to increase my spite for the media. At this point if CNN announced the sky was blue and water was wet I would be forced to reevaluate my beliefs on the subjects.
If it wasn't for the fallout Milo is forced to endure I wouldn't give another thought to any of it. I hope he comes out stronger for all of this, and a more powerful voice against the left.
And Vox: count me as another pre-order if Castalia House can get his book.
He's been out there confronting the rabid left. He's an enigma to them, and therefore dangerous to their personal philosophy, let alone their agenda of sucking everyone into their hive-mind.
I'm with Milo.
Milo's support seems strong on his FB, his followers all seem to recognize what's going on. Surprised Zuckerberg didn't pull his account.
Yesterday's attack also made clear that:
-Alt Right twitter can virtue signal with the best of 'em. Mention the the word 'pedophile', however erroneously applied, and all critical thinking goes out the window.
- R Spencer & H Wallace's whole mission is to take down Alt Lite. I tried to give them a chance & support but no more. The shortsightedness, jealousy & opportunism is too much to take.
This attack on Milo, while I predicted it for a while, still makes me angry as hell.
The fact that they want to go after other popular figures on the Right (especially Gavin McInnes, who might be a bit too civic nationalist for our tastes, but is nonetheless awesome) is even more predictable, and makes me angrier still.
But what I hadn't predicted, and makes me the angriest, are fucking worthless, disloyal traitors on the "Right" who are either gloating or jizzing their panties over what happened to Milo.
In some cases, people like Mark Dice who have had zero interaction with Milo, but are simply happy that a potential competitor (that's how they see fellow right-wing figures) is being heavily attacked.
These traitorous scumbags sicken me the worst. They deserve the same treatment as an other SJW or globalist enemy.
In years ahead, we're going to look back on this as the moment that defined a movement. Just as counterculture 1.0 looks back at Ken Kesey and the Merry Pranksters, LSD, Jack Kerouac, Allen Ginsberg, the so called Beat Generation, etc. for their origins, counterculture 2.0 is going to look back at Milo, Mike C., VD, Roosh, CH, and too many others to mention as the harbingers of a profound cultural, social and political awakening and shift. It's the beginning of the end for the conservative media, academia and cultural elite (and by conservative I mean leftist), who only want to crush Milo because they are, as was the case with an earlier generation, horrified by a cultural shift, and terrified of losing their grip on power in all its forms. If the alt-right wasn't important, the NYT today would have a puff piece on Milo, profiling as in as an interesting but harmless Conservative. That they're trying instead to wipe him from our minds should tell you how frightened they are. And just as I can recall arguing with a teacher telling me that nobody will remember the Beatles six months after their break up, we should all consider that reports of Milo's death are greatly exaggerated. Twitter stubbed its toe when it banned Milo; but Simon & Schuster have opened an artery by reneging on their deal.
2017 is going to be counterculture 2.0's version of 1.0's summer of love. Let's hope we don't have to confront a 2.0 version of the Kent State shooting, but it would be prudent to prepare for anything.
#IStandWithMilo
I await Milo's triumphant return. Slimeon and Shyster's back-stabbing will only dissuade controversial authors from publishing with them, and accelerate the downfall of mainstream publishing.
What's the best tactic to deal with this? I'm not sure about best course of action.
Ignore?
Attack the media for proclaiming p*zz*gate as conspiracy lies to innocent people despite a lot of suspicious signs of child abuse ring,but making public trial for a controversial words of a former victim?
Milo gave them some ammo in this case,like Spencer in Hail Gate. That's undeniable.
@11 - that or a new Common Core book for first grade sex ed.
Vox Popoli comment section becoming more ban-happy: is it self-defense, or is it marketing?
@23
- R Spencer & H Wallace's whole mission is to take down Alt Lite. I tried to give them a chance & support but no more. The shortsightedness, jealousy & opportunism is too much to take.
Those three shortcomings were clear for a long time.
Still, while I'm not surprised by Wallace's condemnation, I thought Spencer was smarter and better than this.
I don't like Spencer, especially since his ideas are just a watered-down, less educated version of what he got from former mentors Jared Taylor and Paul Gottfried, I thought he was no fool, and staunchly defended and supported him during both the Roman salute and him being sucker-punched.
He, on the other hand, can't bring himself to defend himself an important ally, even if they're not friendly.
What a fucking embarrassment.
Spencer can't fight.
Spencer has zero tactical awareness.
Spencer gets played like a fiddle by the opposition media.
Spencer's "ideas" are an inferior version of what smarter, better men have written.
Worst of all, Spencer can't even show basic loyalty to his side. He is only too happy if a right-wing voice falls so long as it advances him.
Hilarious that the same retards who complain about Milo being too flawed of a leader then flock to this incompetent, traitorous charlatan. It's like condemning a petty thief while backing a serial rapist.
Aside from a nice smile, what a sad, sad representative for the Alt-White. Perhaps a bit better than Mike Enoch of TRS, but not by much.
Mark Dice? That's a let-down.
All that matters really is whether they are moving the ball closer in the right direction. Sad that some can't see that.
More to the point, does Milo have to give his advance back if he moves to another publisher? If so, how much of his $250K disappeared between then and now?
Did Milo read his S&S contract? What's his exposure?
But by all means, let's encourage him to move to another publisher.
Three Canadians, two Yankees, one British gay and an American Indian in Italy telling me what's what, that's what makes America.
I know the auto-ban scripts cut all of this, but in the vain hope that somebody of any sense reads this, NAME ONE PERSON HERE INVESTED IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF AMERICA.
What did people think would happen when a walking Jewish stereotype became a poster boy for the right? Nothing suspicious there, right? Do all these Jews pretending to be white nationalist leaders ring a bell?
Even if Milo was genuine, that's an incredibly weak link to have in a movement. Remember the words of Jesus.
Best response to attacks on Milo?
We. Don't. Care.
There won't be any triumphant return. For better or for worse, much of alt right turned their backs on him. I'd say for better, as he was always an embarrassment and pedophilia was a final drop, one many couldn't accept given that we were dealing with left's attempts at normalization and promotion of pedophilia for so long now.
What we are going to see now, is if those who claimed that he was in this for the money and attention only were right or not. If he was to switch side, next few month would be a time for him to do so. It would be hilarious if they end up embracing him...
@27 Judo it.
If Milo's rhetoric is evidence gay men should stay away from teen boys, what does that say about gay adoption/boy scout leaders?
This is a war. There will be battles.
The Enemy will not just roll over and die. Yes, some of his supporters are fragile and will shrivel before us readily. The Enemy will not cower but will come at us sideways and in the most damaging way, from it's perspective, possible.
They currently use an outdated model of their opposition to predict our responses. Let's not don our hair shirts and fall into the mistake of making their outdated model once again accurate. That's for the cucks.
@20
Exactly. I was away from the computer for all of two hours yesterday and the first Milo post, which hadn't even been up when last I checked in, had blown up to 150+ comments.
And it wasn't even an election day...
The Spidey Sense was tingling before I even opened comments and read them. Immediately obvious what was happening.
And I must say that I was somewhat disgusted and disappointed by the cucking about I saw here. I can only hope that the trolls had entered names of some previously esteemed commenters and that it was not truly them.
People here should know better. They know how anti-pedophile everyone here is, they know about Marion Zimmer Bradley and Samuel Delany and the writers/allies who have exposed their kindght here on this very blog and its affiliates.
They knew the very word itself and alone would override judgement.
Milo is a victim of sexual predators and an anti-pedophile.
#I Stand With Milo
And I'll purchase his book wherever it gets published, though I hope it gets published with Castalia. I've bought one of everything they publish on principle alone because I hate SJWs, Cucks and everythey stand for (or in the case of Cucks, don't stand for...) in every industry where they are found.
I'll buy anything that pisses them off and gives money to their enemies. Why? Because Fuck You, that's why, SJWs and Cucks. Fuck you.
And because John C. Wright is just awesome. And David the Good is compulsively readable. And because The Stars Came Back is fantastic...
#I Stand With Milo
Hard to take Milo down without serious evidence, and by evidence I mean recordings of the fact itself of from Milo accepting it in some recorded conversation (but that case Milo should go down for good).
Testimonies or some guys saying "I was raped by Milo" can be bought and prove nothing.
The matter is that the label "fake news" sticks, and only people who are already convinced are gonna believe such accusation without real evidence. And there's no real evidence for a very simple reason. If there was, it would have been already released by now.
No, Milo is far from being in danger. A couple of years ago, it would have been different. Now, unproved accusations are not gonna be taken seriously.
There won't be any triumphant return. For better or for worse, much of alt right turned their backs on him.
They declared war on him months ago. They're totally irrelevant now. There is a very good reason the media is attacking Milo and not them. Milo matters. They don't.
Alice is right. The MSM may well succeed in taking down Milo, but they've had to do so by giving lots of publicity to a homosexual defending (so they say) pedophilia. They had to spend a lot of capital to do this.
Not that it needs being said, but I stand with Vox, and I stand with Milo.
In some ways, the book deal cancellation had to have been anticipated to some degree, as he did try to dissuade them of proceeding. I have a hard time imagine Milo even willing to consider another publishing offer by another media conglomerate, even if one were extended. It seems to me that the more strategic move is to publish with Castalia House rather than self-publish or go with another publisher, or (unlikely) shred.
The press release for the book could be written in SJW blood. Imagine the special offer tie-ins!
A strong America is in the interest of anyone favoring western civ. Do be taller next time.
Bravo. Milo is just a step on the way to the real targets-Breitbart and Bannon. Hold the line.
There is nothing worse than capitulating to a leftist demand that some right-winger enforce a morality the leftist does not even believe in to begin with. Even worse if said demand is built on lies.
No right-winger should be glad that Milo is taken down. He's the patriotic gay commando wreaking havoc behind enemy lines.
And throw in Roman Polanski for good measure.
@31
What did people think would happen when a walking Jewish stereotype became a poster boy for the right? Nothing suspicious there, right? Do all these Jews pretending to be white nationalist leaders ring a bell?
Milo has always rejected the "white nationalist" label, you shameless fucking liar. The only one pretending here is you.
Also, since when is a flamboyantly homosexual, half-Greek, half-Jewish CATHOLIC from Britain a "walking Jewish stereotype"? That's even funnier than calling Vox a "walking American Indian stereotype".
At least drive-by, lying idiots provide us with some unintentional humor on occasion.
Does Milo keep the money from the advance?
The damage is already done, there ain't no fixing it now. His momentum has been stopped and those in the mainstream who value their reputation will have nothing to do with him. This and similar blogs may continue to support him, but that is the maximal extent of his power from now on.
@33 - what part of "he does not endorse pedophilia" did you fail to grasp?
Unless I've misunderstood you and you were referring to the media lie. But from the context it sounds like you believe the lie.
#38 - yep. The left is willing to burn down UC Berkley to stop him from speaking. About the only other person who can draw that kind of anger from the left is Trump himself. That speaks to his influence and his power.
There is nothing worse than capitulating to a leftist demand that some right-winger enforce a morality the leftist does not even believe in to begin with. Even worse if said demand is built on lies.
No right-winger should be glad that Milo is taken down. He's the patriotic gay commando wreaking havoc behind enemy lines.
@47
Such Words of Wisdom. Wow. Just...wow. Now, take that, turn it sideways and shove it up the old poop chute.
Why don't you bless us with some more cucked up cuckiness, you milquetoast Cuck?
Go. Sell. Your. Concern. Somewhere. Else. You. Cuck.
#I Stand With Milo
The goblin-like Ilk stood watch on the outer perimeter. His black armor and jagged long spear gleaming in the moonlight. Drool dripped from his fangs and his eyes seemed unfocused. Perhaps the Ilk was recovering from a head injury? No matter Ilk healed quickly; all the better to take additional abuse. Tacked to the front his armor was a bright yellow sticky-note. It read "I DON'T CARE." Below that was a second note this time in pink. "AND YOU DON'T CARE EITHER." The Ilk stood silently just one of countless multitudes serving The Supreme Dark Lord.
I'm with Milo.
I'm also one of the female "Shy Trump Voters" who worked stealth to cause people to ask questions during the campaign. Pointing out the inconsistencies, lies, and flat-out graft of Hillary Clinton brought me great joy. The early morning of November 9 felt like 'Emancipation Day" as I finally felt released from the evil 'slavery' of the past eight years.
This manufactured outrage over Milo is simply laughable. And believe me, I'm going to talk more about it on my own channels.
The idea that the left is trying to claim the moral high ground on this is breathtakingly stupid. Obviously, the journalists and the left are forgetting their contribution to Bill Clinton's sexual scandals. (The whole parsing of "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is.")
In 1998, during Bill Clinton's denial of his antics in the Oval Office, the American public was given quite a show of moral relativism. What did it matter? And besides, it was just sex. Whatever goes on behind closed doors is none of our business.
So here's a newsflash for the journalists and the left: You made this sordid bed with your obfuscating and non-stop mind-f**ks. Now you get to lie in it. I don't care. You made sure I didn't care 19 years ago. I sure as hell am not going to care now simply because you're having a hissy fit over a gay man talking about when he lost his virginity (and the fact he's not on your team).
As far as I'm concerned, the moral decay of our culture was aided and abetted by the MSM and especially the left. You don't get to now act like the offended preacher's wife who shakes her head while clutching her pearls. Not after what you did during Bill Clinton's years in office and especially not after what you did for Hillary's campaign.
Although the non-stop witch-hunting is getting frustrating, it also is secretly filling me with satisfaction. Why? Because the more these weak sisters whine and complain, the more I know we're hitting them right where it hurts.
And nothing hurts more to them than losing.
So I say rally the troops, boys. Circle the wagons. Do not for one moment forget the larger issue at hand, which is we're in a war. And during a war, we never leave a man behind.
#WAR
"Just as counterculture 1.0 looks back at Ken Kesey and the Merry Pranksters, LSD, Jack Kerouac, Allen Ginsberg, the so called Beat Generation, etc. for their origins"
The alt-right still does not have somebody with the stature and staying power of Kerouac (sorry if you hate him, there it is) or Ginsberg (who I mostly don't like at all, but he did manage to make himself a household name. Lenny Bruce to my mind wasn't funny at all, and his work is largely forgotten, but he did manage to blow a big whole in the hull at the time. Milo is fascinating and charismatic, which of course is why they're trying to destroy him, but the alt-right still needs to cultivate much bigger cultural fish, and put young people behind them in numbers. The humorous, I-don't-care attitude of the alt-right is very winning, there need to be more PJ O'Rourkes in development.
Also, music is a problem but also not a problem. I usually argue that the internet is the new rock and roll, but the infuriating dominance of hip hop is something that's very difficult to figure out how to counter. It takes a long time to nurture, from Grandmaster Flash to Jay-Z is what? Like thirty years. From Chuck Berry to Abbey Road is 15 years. It takes a while because it has to be organic. Maybe it's more in motion than I think, and if I'm right and the internet is the new rock and roll then it has been in motion for quite some time.
But as the solid observation goes, politics is downstream from culture. Act and work accordingly.
The attack on Milo can be made useful in the same way the arrest of Lenny Bruce was made useful or the notoriety of Ginsberg and Kerouac were useful. It makes him a rebel taking his lumps, if he can figure out how to play it right. (I'm no media spin genius, but the key seems, as others have suggested, to be the two-pronged counterattack, of a) I'm the one who actually suffered as a boy, even though I didn't think so at the time and b) I'm the one who's actually actively done something about the problem.
Milo seems to always land on his feet, so my money's on him to turn this around in some weird brilliant way that is unexpected.
The other trick is to find a way to play this as a coordinated media hit motivated out of spite and hatred and other base motives, without it being seen as whining.
Something great would be an alt-right version of Easy Rider or Five Easy Pieces. The old left narrative was evil intolerant crew-cut types being mean to the righteous but put-upon hippies. Now of course the roles are reversed, and the now-powerful self-righteous hippies are the ones playing Darth Vader, and the crew-cut types are Luke. But the left and the (((left))) fight like the devil to maintain their perceived status as the perpetual put-upon underdogs. It's bullshit of course, but they have the megaphone, so people who still haven't put the sunglasses on still can't see it.
Milo's days of being able to swim in the MSM sea may well be over, but he's not totally finished.
However, his ability to "go behind enemy lines," which was his special gift, may now be limited. As such, he won't be nearly as effective. We already have lots of good alt right writers in our own sphere, so he won't stand out as much if limited to the that side of things.
If the alt right can continue to grow its own media to replace the MSM, then maybe he could make a sort of comeback. But there's still a ways to go and it's a bit of a slog. Not nearly as fun as what he's been currently doing.
Like the old saw about the Velvet Underground, They didn't sell many records in their day, but everyone who heard it went out and started a band.
@10. Alice De Goon
How quaint, you still expect the left to be consistent. "Alice ... sometimes [they've] believed as many as six [contradictory] things before breakfast." ;)
Being of the left requires cognitive dissonance. It is built on claiming to believe an external narrative despite the evidence of your own humanity. The ability to adapt to the changing narrative on a dime is built in since they know it is false, any other lie can take it's place.
"We've always been at war with Eastasia."
A war between traditional left wing media ie the MSM and the new emerging right media just means that The MSM are more frightened and weaker than they have revealed.
This take down attempt at Milo is a farce. They are doing their rote denunciation and tired Alinsky tactics that have seen them increasingly marginalized and the subsequent rise of right wing media.
The only thing the MSm does is slander, obfuscate and lie by omission. As long as we stand by Milo and the others they will eventually attack they will undoubtably fail again.
This is all they know. They have no morals yet appeal to our morality. They have no honor but appeal to our honor. They have no decency, courtesy, kindness or reason yet demand we respond in the name of these virtues. All the while they laugh and ridicule us for taking the bait and ensuring their victory over us.
Milo isnt perfect. none of us are. He is however a warrior in the fight against the Behemoth that is the lugenspresse. A strong and irreplaceable fighter for the cause.
Most of us have no impact on a large scale. We dont give voice to our beliefs and fight for Western Civilization on large platforms or take the fight directly to the left. The best we can do is support those who do. Theres no shame or dishonor in being an anonymous commenter on this or other sites, we are the multitudes who stand against the rot within our culture and society. The greatest contribution we can make is to stand with those who fight in the forefront. To be the hand upon their back, the voice giving thanks and encouragement when it seems the whole is their enemy.
I stand with Milo.
Bill Maher & CPAC were the moments. You had the radical black leftists like Deray, who would have never got this mainstream even in the 1960s, bashing him, then you had the neocons on the other side the Kristol's/Shapiro's who would organise to bash him on the Right.
Basically the same folks from the 1960s are on both sides of politics now. Sons of bitches.
Maj wrote:The damage is already done, there ain't no fixing it now. His momentum has been stopped and those in the mainstream who value their reputation will have nothing to do with him. This and similar blogs may continue to support him, but that is the maximal extent of his power from now on.
And why would anyone care what you think? You've already demonstrated a complete lack of integrity.
Shouldn't Milo deserve the chance to clarify his remarks and defend himself?
The left is quite quick to put people in little square boxes with labels, why should we do the same?
This is a hit piece, PewDiePie, Milo... who's next Molineaux? I think the core basis on the attacks are economical, these people reflect a new reality of the cultural war the left can't barely scratch, eliminating the online opposition helps them conquer the minds of the young.
And the minds of the young are the minds of tomorrow's cash cows.
@12. FUCK GOOGLE
I refer you to my above answer: leftists do not care about hypocrisy or double standards, if they did they wouldn't be leftists
In the end this is 4th gen information warfare. The perception and framing is all that matters. It is a war for legitimacy. This situation looks terrible and could create a domino effect of scandals. For the so called New Right it could delegitimize beyond approach.
The Alt-White and some on the Alt-West uses this to our advantage to take a share of the Mr. Yiannapoulos base. (sorry not sorry)
In the end and let’s be honest Mr. Yiannopoulos is a gay, neoconisch, Zionist Jew.
He advanced our agenda greatly, I give him that but he is beyond using point and I have no problem to throw him away.
Maybe the 60s counterculture is the wrong model, maybe it's more like the punk movement with its NYC/London axis (HINT: don't use that axis, make a new one like Cobain did, but do exploit that one). A physicl axis, viz. a city that's become a hip ground zero for the alt-right, would be useful though, it's good optics.
Recall Johnny Rotten: "They wanted us to be FUN! (snorts in contempt) Like the BEATLES!"
Kim Gordon (Sonic Youth): "The real secret to rock and roll is, people are willing to pay money to watch other people believe in themselves."
Go and do likewise.
Snidely Whiplash wrote:And why would anyone care what you think? You've already demonstrated a complete lack of integrity.
You still failed to provide any actual argument as to what we have to gain from extending of support of this guy. And no, snarky quips and memes don't count.
The Alt-White and some on the Alt-West uses this to our advantage to take a share of the Mr. Yiannapoulos base. (sorry not sorry)
Which is why I will have nothing to do with you. You're disloyal, unreliable, and therefore totally useless as allies.
This whole incidence shows the desperation of the Left. They are being forced to invent scandals out of whole cloth to fight a generation of the right that actually knows how to win. Sure its disappointing to see supposed allies running to put a knife in his back, but at least we know who can be trusted in a fight.
I believe Milo will recover, I've see a lot of commentators on the Milo news stories clearly seeing through the narrative. If nothing else the Left has pushed back their evil normalize pedophilia campaign by years. #IstandwithMilo
You still failed to provide any actual argument as to what we have to gain from extending of support of this guy.
We're not arguing with you. We're not trying to persuade you. We know you don't support him. We know you're allied to the Left in attacking him. You've been "at war" with him for months now.
Alt-philosophy wrote:
The Alt-White and some on the Alt-West uses this to our advantage to take a share of the Mr. Yiannapoulos base. (sorry not sorry)
And.... AltRetard shows up.
The raw numbers of comments on this blog over the last several posts is quite revealing and insightful. It is time to show the concern trolls on the payroll that we cannot be worn down or divided.
So what are the rules here? Can we talk about Jews or not? Is it support the gay Jew or fuck off? Please tell me now so I know not to waste any more time.
Remember Obama is all about looking cool & fashionable to the youth, and he needs the white youth, if the Alt-Right continues to attract them, they must have their most forefront personalities dismantled.
Marxists don't look at Milo & Baked Alaska and go, oh they don't get along anymore. They are all aligned and equally despised. If they can make them fight each other all the more better. The problem for the Obamabots of the Left is that they work together to further Trump's Youth agenda. Which is working. They are losing. They'll seek out traitors on the right to do work for them.
So what are the rules here? Can we talk about Jews or not? Is it support the gay Jew or fuck off? Please tell me now so I know not to waste any more time.
Just leave and stop wasting time. You don't need to know the rules. We neither want nor need you.
Alex Jones is sort of like a gateway drug for alternative media. He's where many people start off and are introduced to other alternative news sites and personalities. He's very entertaining and provacative, and that's what initially attracts people to Infowars. It's my opinion that the man is a comic genius, George Carlin, Andy Kaufman and Chris Farley all mixed into own persona.
Not the first time I've heard that!
Thank you for the quick reply. There's another post of mine still here, just to be helpful.
Maj wrote:The damage is already done, there ain't no fixing it now. His momentum has been stopped and those in the mainstream who value their reputation will have nothing to do with him. This and similar blogs may continue to support him, but that is the maximal extent of his power from now on.
It appears we have a Kelpie among our mists. Please tell us more about how hope is futile and how we will never win.
Maj wrote:but that is the maximal extent of his power from now on.
Which is an order of magnitude beyond the combined power of all those that oppose him. When will you accept the total and utter irrelevance of you, your kind and all that you claim to stand for @Maj? Your time is over.
This is almost as funny as when the WSJ hacks (circulation 2.3 million and falling) knocked on PewDiePie's door (circulation 53.6 million and raising) to offer him a "platform" to defend himself against their libel.
He rightly laughed in their faces as we do to you @Maj.
(I hope you are on the Soros payroll because if you really believe this shit you are going to be in a lot of trouble when reality smashes you in the face.)
"Just assume everything you say is being recorded and may be used later to hurt you"
You don't stop this by never saying anything. There's a very old quote about "Give me seven words spoken by an honest man and I will find something in them to hang him"
This only stops when we stop turning on our own because they've been attacked by our enemies.
In other words, impolitic words are not the issue. Loyalty and self discipline are the issues.
@Maj you still can't unsuck that Soros.
Pizzagate isn't going away just because you fantasize about it.
Joe Rogan may be in their sights too. His Alex Jones podcast was so big. It was talked about by people here in Oz that hardly follow politics, it was just cool. Alex Jones gets hipper by the day, who knew. Joe Rogan may be able to say, oh I have nothing to do with any of that, but Marxists would beg to differ.
@83
Amen, brother. Pass the ammunition.
Concern Trolls and alt-retard? Is this the best they can muster?
Is this the best they can muster?
No, they can also withdraw the use of their platforms. Which, of course, is why I always say that we should concentrate on building our own, not elevating our profiles on theirs.
Je suis Milo
Milo's press conference should take a page from Roosh and go even further. Show the lie, attack the would be attackers, ridicule them for covering up pizzagate, etc.
Milo may not have sought it, but he is in a position now to take this battle with the left to another level and from what I've seen of him, he's got the chops to do it. The press have avoided him because he makes look and feel foolish, but now they are closing in because they think there is blood in the water. They are a bunch of guppies deciding to attack a barracuda.
He's a sinner as he readily admits, but Lord have mercy on him, bless him and keep him, because he fights the good fight today and all decent people should support his fight where they can.
I am questioning who is running the main-page at drudge right now. They are helping the hacks build momentum and pressure on Breitbart to fire Milo. I don't mind the stories being there but top page spread for more than a day with multiple negative stories and a tiny headline to cover Milo's defense. I suspect that a rival of Milo's has been doing the editing these past two days.
Dear Trolls, your snark belies that you were sent here bebcause your masters are terrified. They are beginning to lose. You support those in the throes of losing.
You support losers. Play coy all you like.
All your base are belong to us.
VD wrote:Is this the best they can muster?
No, they can also withdraw the use of their platforms. Which, of course, is why I always say that we should concentrate on building our own, not elevating our profiles on theirs.
Indeed, burn unit donation incoming. A bit embarrassed to admit I held off till now.
Just for some context, especially for you anti-Milo commenters, this is what these same people who are ganging up on Milo right now have been advocating in the past:
http://www.socialmatter.net/2016/09/07/weimerica-weekly-episode-40-pedophiles-just-like-us/
One was best friend of Pence?...http://www.theeventchronicle.com/cabal-exposed/former-cia-officer-flynn-fired-high-level-dc-pedophile-list/#
The press conference should play to Milo's strengths nicely. I
Admittedly they have some idea what to expect from Milo, Roosh took them by surprise. But the ones that show up for the presser are nowhere near to Milo's league.
Hopefully he's given them a few hints that this will be the official "apology". So they will already be in Victory Parade mode
Must be three months ago that I told a friend that Milo was particularly dangerous to the left. Why? Because he makes being on the right look fabulous, darling!
He makes being right look fabulous and fun and by contrast makes SJWs and the left look like the pinch-faced scolds they really are - but worse, he makes them look unfashionable.
Milo is one answer to the problem of single women vote. If he can make us look fab rather than fuddy-duddy, even the deepest bunker will offer no respite from the thunderous sound of young female feet stampeding right.
(And now back to read the comments)
What an opportunity if Milo had pizzagate names and evidence for his press conference.
@Myth: "Even if Milo was genuine..."
So you think Milo is really a black-hating straight man who's just going that extra mile to prove his con, then?
"If you were a real Christian you'd support all migrants...."
These cucks will always get duped into the frame of the enemy. They don't have a sense of what is at stake and what the goal is.
Who is more dangerous for those of us who have children? Milo? Or the friends and associates of Jeffrey Epstein? The answer is obvious now but it will be unavoidable very soon I pray.
I'm convinced that 9 out of 10 of these critics are leftist shills pretending to care about Milo's sexuality.
"I can't spare this man. He fights."
That should be enough to shut down these pearl-clutching cucks.
I understand your loyalty and I admire that you are steadfast in your defense of an ally, but you made a poor choice.
Milo was never part of the Alt Right, never a conservative- he was a self aggrandizing attention whore who used the popular mood shift as a means of garnering that attention in a way that would not have been possible had he come at it from the already identity saturated Left.
He brags about his sexual escapades, especially his race mixing ones. He deliberately amps up his preposterous queen act to the point of becoming a cartoon.
Now #milogate
Fabulous.
Ingot9455 wrote:What an opportunity if Milo had pizzagate names and evidence for his press conference.
Not going to happen, unfortunately. In his facebook video where he talked about the pedos he did help bust, he explained what a detailed and arduous process it is to do properly.
... (and some are pissed that Milo got a book deal from the same publisher who dropped Zoe Quinn's book, along with a larger signing bonus than most of the publisher's social justice authors).
Yeah, I think that was what really got the ball rolling here.
The "Major Book Deal" is the all and the everything to the SJW Journolisters. It is their Tower of Power. It is the their ultimate status symbol. It is what they dream about being able to tell their friends about when they are "at lunch." The Major Book Deal is the summit of Olympus for them.
AND IT WAS GIVEN TO MILO!!!!! HOW DARE THEY!?!?!
I don't believe a word liars say. The MSM is a collection of liars who are not to be trusted. I assume anything they say about Milo is a lie, and I won't believe it.
Crap, and I finally broke down and pre-ordered Milo's book yesterday.
I have never taken much is any notice of Milo but he is British and in Britain sex between males of sixteen and upwards is legal. From my own miserable experiences as a fourteen and fifteen year old it is also the case that Homosexually inclined men draw no (artificial) distinction between those who are over the age of sixteen and those under that age.
I understand your loyalty and I admire that you are steadfast in your defense of an ally, but you made a poor choice.
No, I most certainly did not.
Milo was never part of the Alt Right, never a conservative
He never claimed to be. And I was never a conservative either.
Joe Rogan is friends with Alex Jones and has been more and more showing his true anti-atheist, anti-Catholic, Jesse-Ventura-sans-SEAL-experience colors.
Rogan's no friend of the left. And it doesn't surprise me he's in their sights now too.
Alt-philosophy wrote:Yes, it was/is a coordinated attack. But I think the allegations are true. Sadly. Mr. Yiannopoulos was always a scandal waiting to happen. Sex with drug dealers? Talking about using hard drugs? Talking about paying good money for choking? I am frankly amused by the incompetence of the media unable to fly over to England and looking for a big fat closet full of skeletons.
Mayby this scandal is fake news. But there is always someone somewhere willing to talk. And they will find him.
Concern troll is concerned.
So just what number of Journo-list of unethical and coordinated leftist media mailing lists are we on now?
"Oh you found us out. Drat! We promise we won't collude any more. Pinky square."
Sam, the only possible action is the same action when ambushed in combat.
Assault through the ambush. Attack!
Rho, your ignorance is embarrassing. Vox's ancestors fought at Valley Forge. Lauren Southern is a direct descendant of the same types who wrote about the rights of Englishmen. McInnes...his grandfather no doubt endured some oppression. Are they really telling you what it means to be an American, or telling you to resist tyranny? Would you have refused the Marquis De LA Fayette, or Major Steuben?
Grow up.
Maj wrote:You still failed to provide any actual argument as to what we have to gain from extending of support of this guy. And no, snarky quips and memes don't count.
Does anyone know this guy? Why should he think he's entitled to an "argument"?
Go away, troll. You were here yesterday too. Take your paid for defeatist attitude out of here.
There's nothing inevitable about Milo being "scandalous". The word hardly has any meaning but certainly not on the Left.
But betrayal by the Old Right / Cuckservative axis was absolutely baked into the cake a long time ago. It became unavoidable when the Cucks decided the opinions of their enemies meant more to them than the survival of their friends.
@47 You thought Hillary was gon win too, dinja? Loyalty to a cuck is anathema. Loyalty to a troll is just letters.
It amuses me that Richard Spencer thinks he can profit from Milo being destroyed while the 1488 memelord brigade is already sharpening their knives to destroy him at the earliest opportunity too.
@100 - Milo was never part of the Alt Right, never a conservative- he was a self aggrandizing attention whore who used the popular mood shift as a means of garnering that attention in a way that would not have been possible had he come at it from the already identity saturated Left.
And yet he has done more to conserve America and the west then 10,000 of you. And he has done so at great personal risk. The left literally wants to kill him.
I love how "principled" and "moral" conservatives are quick to forget the commandment "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor." Milo did not do the thing he is accused of. So what does the "concerned" right do?
Help the left by repeating the lie ad nauseum.
I do find it curious that there's been NO mention of any of this on Breitbart over the last 24 hours, though.
If they can't stand by Milo, then I'll have to seriously reevaluate my own loyalty to Breitbart. I could understand them (briefly) standing by Michelle Fields, since at least she was one of their own (of sorts) at the time, until it became obvious very shortly thereafter that she was a snake in the grass.
But if they can't stand by Milo during an overt smear job, then I can find news elsewhere.
Silly But True wrote:Rogan's no friend of the left.
He's convinced he knows better than everyone else and sees gubbmint intervention as the cure for everything - he might not agree with the current incumbents but he definitely sees himself as some future benevolent dictator of everything in the name of the greater good.
I look forward to his "Barry Lyndon" moment.
Gaiseric wrote:I do find it curious that there's been NO mention of any of this on Breitbart over the last 24 hours, though.
If they can't stand by Milo, then I'll have to seriously reevaluate my own loyalty to Breitbart. I could understand them (briefly) standing by Michelle Fields, since at least she was one of their own (of sorts) at the time, until it became obvious very shortly thereafter that she was a snake in the grass.
But if they can't stand by Milo during an overt smear job, then I can find news elsewhere.
This. If you can't stand by your allies in the worst of times, then posturing in the best of times is less than worthless.
My main takeaway from all of this is how easy it is to divide the alt-left and alt-right into waring, virtue signaling factions.
Milo needs Myrmidons.
> What's the best tactic to deal with this?
They're lies. Say they are. Call those repeating them liars.
> The damage is already done, there ain't no fixing it now.
Still here? Why aren't you seeking help for your spousal and child abuse problems?
> You still failed to provide any actual argument
We don't provide arguments to those who are accused of beating their wife and kids.
> Does anyone know this guy?
Of course not. He just showed up on the Milo threads, and he'll disappear just as quickly.
My main takeaway from all of this is how easy it is to divide the alt-left and alt-right into waring, virtue signaling factions.
Sure, when you count the plethora of Soros trolls as Alt-Right, it may appear that way. Anyone who's actually been here for any length of time and still feels the need to virtue signal or cares in any way about being liked is not a significant factor in the movement anyway.
How about you count how many of us stand with Milo instead?
@Myth
"Even if Milo was genuine, that's an incredibly weak link to have in a movement. Remember the words of Jesus."
Which words are those? The ones about the Roman centurion and his "boy"? "I have not found such faith, not even in Judea."
Regarding the @ReaganBattalion account that broke the video:
I trolled that account several times during the campaign. It was one older, probably genuine but severely cucked Never Trump guy. He was ridiculously easy to beat both rhetorically & with hard facts. The easy wins were kind of addicting tbh. IQ 90-100 max.
The tweets coming from that account are definitely not the same person. Definitely not.
Fwiw
@Rabbit,
I can at least respect his martial arts credentials are legit as his aspirations to entertainment. He's living his dream; the success of his podcast at 16m viewers is his own doing.
But there's always a risk pulling back the veil on his own politics rather than just serving up deer vaginas may be his own undoing.
As long as my allies are targeting the enemy, I will be giving them cover fire. Never going to shoot one of my allies in the back.
My New Purple Shoes
It's amazing how quickly people are starting to realize how (((They))) live.
"If you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas". There is a reason that the wiser elements of the Alt-Right made sure to distance themselves from Milo.
Predatory interest in jailbait is common among homosexual males, something our society knew as recently as the 1950s.
> "If you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas".
And the fleas are out in force today. Have you stopped beating your wife yet?
I'm pretty convinced that the Simon & Schuster deal was given simply in order to take it away at an opportune time. Likewise with the CPAC invite.
The Mark Dice condemnation is rather disappointing. But I think Mark has always rejected him for his homosexuality.
Richard Spencer I just don't get. Something doesn't sit right about him. Its not anything about what he actually has to say (not that I agree with everything the man says), but its more the manner in which he says it and the way he presents himself. Its as if he is purposefully embracing the aesthetics of Nazism, sprinkling such things into the mix unnecessarily. His manner of dress, his hair, the way he speaks in public...he invites this upon himself, willingly. Like he wants to be the boogie man for the left to trot out in the media. The vibe I get form him is that he either enjoys the hatred he inspires and receives, or that he is some sort of plant. Either way theres just something not right about him, and I think he is far more of a liability than an asset. So if its between him and Milo, I'll happily go with Milo.
OGRE wrote:The Mark Dice condemnation is rather disappointing. But I think Mark has always rejected him for his homosexuality.
A lot of folks have always rejected him for his homosexuality, or for his Jewishness, or even for his flamboyance and refusal to fully embrace the alt-right label.
Not everyone condemning Milo now is a troll or paid shill. Some of them have simply been purity spergs all along.
> Some of them have simply been purity spergs all along.
Sure, but they're not the ones showing up here.
Anyone who can't see the tactical advantage of having a race mixing jew faggot throwing bombs into the leftist narrative is retarded. He is nearly bulletproof, by the lefts own standards, even if he wasn't incredibly talented and intelligent, which he is.
This attempt at alinskian isolate-and-swarm shows how worried they are.
As with Richard Spencer and Mike Enoch, Milo did nothing wrong. D&C shills please go.
Do these trolls and their paymasters really think they're effective? "I was going to support Milo, but then I read a comment from some random asshole, whose name I've never seen in the 3+ years I've been reading Vox's blog so sorry Milo it's under the bus you go!" Is that what they think will happen?
130 Gaiseric
"purity spergs"....so similar to the #NeverTrump Traitors. Don't want them in my foxhole.
Who didn't see this coming?
For a group of people who pride themselves on their high IQ's, you folks have some very serious blind spots.
In any event, Milo was never influential enough to warrant this much attention from either his friends or his foes.
He's a Barnum and Bailey freak show.
@Myth
We support people who support our goals, and fight peoplw who oppose our goals. Take your sexual identity politics and shove them up your ass (even though I suspect that yi'd secretly enjoy it).
What parts of allies and enemies do you not understand?
It was obvious after the quick announcement of the S&S book deal cancellation that this was a planned takedown.
Yep, that made it clear as day. Since when are mainstream publishers sticklers for the age of consent, especially as regards homosexuals? They should have at least waited a couple days, made it look like they were hesitant but eventually caved in to consumer pressure. They made it obvious that they were alerted in advance and ready to dump him on a schedule.
Right on cue, Casey.
> In any event, Milo was never influential enough to warrant this much attention from either his friends or his foes
Then why is it so important to the left to destroy him? Go ahead, keep repeating the lies. I'm sure they must be convincing someone, somewhere, right?
Leftists are idiots. It would have been to their advantage to allow Milo to continue alienating young men from the Trump movement with his clownish, over the top, homosexual displays.
This is the real Maj - long-time reader and occasional commenter. Also, the guy who was getting into it a bit yesterday re Milo. But The "Maj" who has been posting in this comment thread is stealing my identity. Not cool, man! (Though not a bad immitation).
The MSM may well succeed in taking down Milo, but they've had to do so by giving lots of publicity to a homosexual defending (so they say) pedophilia.
Exactly. The more they drag Milo's personal life out into the open, the more they'll be shining a light on what is normal for homosexuals, something they've spent the last several decades trying to hide. If even Milo -- a charming, intelligent guy whom even conservative women want to adopt and take home as a pet -- was immersed in a lifestyle where it's the norm for young boys to be groomed by older men and this results in a lot of moral confusion and the inability even to blame one's own abusers, what does that say about homosexuality in general? What does it say about the media/entertainment industry that certainly knows the ugly truth, but has been presenting it as perfectly healthy?
They could be reaping a whirlwind here.
I kinda regret not picking up those job offers that were being handed out at pride fest, I might have been getting the leftist talking points to troll ahead of everyone.
Mayby this scandal is fake news. But there is always someone somewhere willing to talk. And they will find him.
Yet when the Louisiana gravedigger came forward saying Crooked Eye Clinton raped him lamestream all ignored. It wouldn't cost much to get some homeless tranny to say bad things about you.
. Thank the media for joining Trump in the fight against pedophiles.
Oh please I am surprised they didn't start a petition to pardon Roman Polansky
And MILO is going to come up top...[insert gay joke about tops]
The problem is MILO is a bottom. I don't know any tops that were raped as kids.
what does that say about gay adoption/boy scout leaders?
There should never have been gay scout leaders because almost no gays are willing to camp at a place without showers. As far as adoption boys adopted by lesbians are worse off. Its kind of like the fight for gays to donate blood, the only ones I ever heard about giving blood where gays selling blood that shouldn't have & ones that said they purposely tried to infect the blood supply so STR8s would create a cure.
The goblin-like Ilk stood watch on the outer perimeter. His black armor and jagged long spear gleaming in the moonlight.
Did Vox make Meerfin the gay goblin before or after meeting MILO?
So what are the rules here? Can we talk about Jews or not? Is it support the gay Jew or fuck off?
There are several JUUUUUICE articles a week as a release valve
One was best friend of Pence?..cabal-exposed/former-cia-officer-flynn-fired-high-level-dc-pedophile-lis
I expect pizzagate to take out 3/4 of democrats & 1/3 of republican law makers. Remember the Clintons went to TRUMPs wedding.
a race mixing jew faggot throwing bombs into the leftist narrative is retarded. He is nearly bulletproof, by the lefts own standards
People criticized David French for using a black as a shield but Milo deploys 8 shields.
Maj: " Hello you fighting orphans in the Pacific. How’s tricks? "
Vox is correct. It is a virtual "reichstag." Already banned from Twitter, book canceled, and uninvited to speak. Soon, banned from Facebook and erased from Wikipedia. Push him out of Google search and ban him on YouTube. What college will allow "that pedophile guy?"
Without new platforms and online exposure, people will be digitally erased and that is what Cernovich calls "silenced." Can't read the books if we burned them all.
Once the platforms are established and mainstream, they would have to block entire portions of the net to silence dissent. I am sure it can be done here as in China.
So yeah, I support Milo's right to speak and be heard. I laugh at every CH article and was pissed about his warning. Enough of this shit.
Thanks Vox, you were made for these times.
@9
" HE IS OUR ALLY - WARTS AND ALL. YOU PROTECT YOUR ALLIES, YOU DO NOT DISCARD THEM. "
Amen, brother!
Spoken like a gentleman.
And when I say gentlemen I do not mean a sissy with nice manners.
I mean a man who put on 40 pounds of mail and killed Vikings or Muslims in grisly close combat, to protect Christian civilization from the loathsome savages.
Now, the Savages are the Press, the RINOs, the globalists, the Deep State.
Vox is correct. It is a virtual "reichstag." Already banned from Twitter, book canceled, and uninvited to speak. Soon, banned from Facebook and erased from Wikipedia. Push him out of Google search and ban him on YouTube. What college will allow "that pedophile guy?"
Without new platforms and online exposure, people will be digitally erased and that is what Cernovich calls "silenced." Can't read the books if we burned them all.
Once the platforms are established and mainstream, they would have to block entire portions of the net to silence dissent. I am sure it can be done here as in China.
So yeah, I support Milo's right to speak and be heard. I laugh at every CH article and was pissed about his warning. Enough of this shit.
Thanks Vox, you were made for these times.
This comment has been removed by the author.
@141 Maj
This is the real Maj - long-time reader and occasional commenter.
Hello fellow alt-Right person, you read Vox long time now? First time caller, yes, very Concerned about this?
Is it a lot of work to stay up so late last night to be busy with the many postings and then also today being also very, very busy with many more of the postings? Is it not a tiring way to get money?
Also remember the James Dixon question of have you stopped beating your wife yet, yes, when do you answer that question? Should we ask it of you in Hindi instead?
Please to be thinking of answers now. We are busy.
Breitbart is down. WTF? "Not Found."
(11:39 EST, 2/21/17)
We. Don't. Care.
No one is watching or paying attention to their dying narrative. Not one person that truly supported Milo is going to be swayed by this. They are going all in with everything they have and are losing. Milo will prevail as did the God Emperor they are impotent.
Vox I am sure you have already passed it on but Milo should review the Roosh new conference then magnify it in his own fabulous way.
Aaaand, Breitbart is back up... Odd.
I wonder if it's under attack.
They are failing and Milo will win as the God Emperor is winning. The gatekeepers are impotent and can't adjust their tactics, canceling a book won't stop it.
CPAC canceling hurts them more than Milo. If Milo was smart he would give he his speech on his own platform at the same time as CPAC, bring in the Alt-right as guests. It would dominate the new cycle. No one under 60 gives a shit about CPAC or any of this. Milo isn't going away, he is going to get stronger.
well, if you want to throw away every teenage boy with a cell-phone, then, by all means, throw away Milo.
I've two sons: they watched Milo for a year on youtube before even letting us know about him.
He's not sneaking around with his appetites, unlike, say, any pedophile. He's very open about both his sins, and his faith. That's attractive. It's one thing my kids like- he's not perfect in his faith.
These are two jocky, smart boys. They've got acres of friends who watch Milo as well.
You want to lose the culture war for the next few decades? Then throw Milo under the bus.
Don't abandon your warriors when they're attacked. Double down. It's time for Trump and everyone else to begin taking the bad guys out. They think they're protected and can do anything they want. If we don't start knocking them off one at a time, they'll never quit this shit.
Stick with MILO.
@153: Agreed. Long before I started talking to my boys about Milo, for instance, they'd already heard of him. In fact, I think how it happened was I mentioned his tagline of feminism is cancer (after laughing while walking down the street and seeing some guy wearing a shirt that said that, his arm possessively around a very willing hot chick), and my son immediately knew where it came from.
Milo's been doing good work. Which the powers that be have finally figured out and decided to be afraid of.
I stand by Milo. All these trolls, and Gamma spergs have no effect. This is a Life or Death effort to destroy Milo. A desperate stench of fear is in the air.
Maj wrote:
You still failed to provide any actual argument as to what we have to gain from extending of support of this guy. And no, snarky quips and memes don't count.
And you've still failed to provide ny argument as to what we have to gain from turning on/abandoning/surrendering Milo.
Look, fuckwit, the pseudo-dialectic doesn't fly here.
BTW, have you stopped raping children yet, Nazi-boy??
2 facts to be emphasized:
(1) Milo was a victim - exploited by an older man when Milo was 13 years old.
(2) Milo IS anti-pedophile and has the evidence to prove it 3 published takedowns of pedophiles NAMED by him.
I'm keeping Milo in my prayers. As terrible and evil as the onslaught against him is, the stakes of the game are far higher than book contracts and conference keynotes. Milo has obviously been through very dark experiences. It really is spectacular how much good he has been able to do in spite of the obvious pain and turmoil he has lived with. For the sake of his soul I hope this is a turning point for him. He doesn't deserve the lies and attacks. Older men who lead younger men into homosexuality however are demonic as far as I'm concerned. His defense of this activity was wrongheaded, especially in a public forum. #RosaryforMilo
Damn right to stand by Milo, Lauren, Gavin, Cernovich, and the rest.
The Left has not learned that the tactics that work against the cucks don't work against, well, us.
Also, what shaming tactics would work against Gavin McInnes, who has openly discussed his drug use and sexual history all over the place? Or Cernovich? Or anyone?
I freely admit my past and am not ashamed. I'm a dude and was once 16-26. Guys do a lot of funky stuff.
So, the takeaway here is that the Left can be shamed. They're hiding some big time stuff. I think someone on the other Milo thread discussed how this might be related to the Pizzagate stuff.
I also think, and Sargon raised this point with Pewdiepie and the media attacks, that the MSM is dying its long and horrible death. We're going to see some awful rattlings and bites as they attack the alternative and independent media as we are winning.
Don't forget fellows, that their idiot attacks are evidence that we are winning.
BTW, I have noted increasing signs of convergence at Amazon in general and CreateSpace in particular. The first wave is usually marked by a massive increase in the level of incompetence - almost to government levels. This is often an indication of hiring masses of dindus and assorted colonizers who cannot even function very well in English - often outsourcing the support to third-world shitholes of one kind or another. Next wave will be purging anything that's not PC. Jeff Bezos is clearly one of one of the enemy, as can be seen by his Carlos Slim-like behavior in propping up the Washington Post fake news zombie.
Richard Spencer I just don't get. Something doesn't sit right about him.
He's a narcissistic Nietzschean atheist with totalitarian tendencies. Of course he doesn't sit well with a lot of folks here.
Just like Milo is a race mixing jewish faggot, and of course doesn't sit well with a lot of people on the real right.
They are both helping our side, fuck the D&C. If you don't like someone who is helping your side, ignore them.
FUCKING SHOOT AT THE LEFT.
This is basic alinskian tactics and no one should fall for it.
I could tell that this was all fake when Milo gets spun, but no one cares when Richard Dawkins says that teachers touching kids is no big deal. ( Hat tip.)
The left just wants to attack Milo here, not ferret out pedophilia.
While the Left deftly picked a strategy and target that will show a split the GOP and Right, what the Left doesn't realize is that because of the rampant hypocrisy on the young age sex topic, they are actually splitting off the Cucks from the rest of us. The Cucks are self-identifying on this one-- those that shoot at Milo, but haven't at the many many worse similar targets on the Left.
Milo is currently being trashed by Breitbart
Please go post some comments about him in their comments section, it's important that Breitbart editors know we stand behind him !
My thought on the Milo Event: For the Left, it's never about the foreground issue; it's always and only ---always and only-- about taking down your enemy. And, if possible, getting your enemies to take down one another.
Progressive propaganda sheet Salon had already published TWO articles exploring the possibilities of pedophilia. Now their site has erased them. Lena Dunham, loathsome virago of the Progs, publicly admits to pedophilia as a younger person. No outcry.
The supposed issue at hand is never the real issue. Read Alinsky.
@165
Nope. Nobody is going to gang up on one of biggest alt right news sites.
If whatever you wrote in the comments is worthwhile, people will be supporting it. If you are just cheerleading for Milo, you will get what you deserve.
Breitbart isn't alt-right. It's just closer to it than Fox news is.
@162
"real right"
What the Alt-West (the actual Alt-Right) has learned over the past 48 hours, is that the Alt-White is no different from the Left. We could stomach if the alt-white sat back and didn't defend Milo. Which is still stupid considering what he does for the Right, but understandable considering his degeneracy. We get it, hes a race-mixing, jewish, faggot. But they didn't do that. They gloated and celebrated with the Left who concocted this garbage story. Then, Stormfags took it upon themselves to crash Cernovich's stream on RightSide. This, coupled with Spencer's tweets about Milo is enough. The Alt-Right doesn't need the Alt-White.
14/88 is not the future of the West.
NatSoc is not the future of the West.
The future of the West does not rest on the JQ.
The alt-white are worse than cucks, because they were actually a part of the alliance against the Left. Clearly, the alt-white is tired of that alliance. Their betrayal of Milo is not going to grow their platform which is not growing. That's why the Left doesn't give a shit about them. They give a shit and will hammer the alt-west which is actually changing things.
So no, I'm not going to keep my guns pointed Leftwards while we are being shot in the back.
@58 This is true. I was thinking this would help convince the normies and the fencesitters that the Left isn't quite right in the head.
So, VD,
Are we allowed to call them alt-retards again?
If he got the advance, oh well.
Jeffery Epstein, Mossad?
Yep
Oh wow. Much bigger than I thought it was. Thanks for putting it up. Still have Milo's back and everyone else mentioned who's on the list.
Nobody is going to gang up on one of biggest alt right news sites.
And most irrelevant. You declared war on Milo and lost.
If only Milo had been a Liberal, all would have been well. George Takei is allowed to molest boys with impunity. Milo is forbidden to be a victim, or to cope with his having been victimized with acceptance, because he is a Conservative. The rules are different for Conservatives, apparently.
https://heatst.com/culture-wars/george-takei-spoke-glowingly-about-being-molested-as-young-teen-by-older-man/
in my home state of massachusetts, the right wing radio hosts were all over senator warren for using fake minority satus (3% Cherokee and looks more anglo than the queen of England ).They should have praised her for undermining the unjust and discriminatory affirmative action law, which would undermine the oppositions position. Likewise we should compile facts about homosexuality and it nexus to serial killers, and it disproportionate tendency towards pedo behavior all the while pointing out how Milo was in fact the victim of these horable faggots.( its true is it not.) Aikido my freinds.
If we are going to condemn Milo for being a paedophile, can we at least be consistent and also condemn the so-called "prophet" of Islam, Mohammed, because he was also a paedophile according to the official Muslim sources?
Will Milo's book be published by Castalia House?
Will Milo's book be published by Castalia House?
Post a Comment
Rules of the blog
Please do not comment as "Anonymous". Comments by "Anonymous" will be spammed.